UPI Study › Courses › Introduction to Artificial Intelligence › Free lessons › Lesson 9.7 Free with a free account
The Evolving Workplace: AI's Influence on Jobs and Skills
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence · Chapter 9: AI Applications, Ethics, and the FutureSection 9.7 · lesson 68 of 6912 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Introduction to Artificial Intelligence.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Introduction to Artificial Intelligence
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: AI's Broader Impact on Society, Policy, and Global Governance →← How AI Reshapes Economies and MarketsNext lesson: AI's Broader Impact on Society, Policy, and Global Governance →
In this lesson
How AI changes tasks, skills, hiring and monitoring in the workplace.
- Explain why jobs change task by task, using substitution, complementarity, demand growth and new tasks
- Calculate the share of a job's time an AI tool could free, weighting each task by its time
- Compare patterns of human-AI collaboration and the risks of automation bias and deskilling
- Describe good practice for using AI in hiring and workplace monitoring
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,551 words). Read along, or search it.
Opening Question
Will the Claims Tool Take Jordan's Job
Jordan processes insurance claims. This month, the company brought in an AI tool, and a rumor spread that it can do a third of Jordan's job. Will Jordan lose the job? Headlines ask a yes-or-no question: will AI take my job? A more useful question is which tasks in the job are changing, and what people and organizations can do about it.
Jobs as Bundles
Technology Reaches Tasks Before Jobs
Technology has changed work before. Looms changed weaving, typewriters changed offices, spreadsheets changed accounting. Each time, some tasks disappeared, some jobs changed shape, and new roles appeared. That's because a job is a bundle of tasks. A bank teller once counted cash, checked identity, answered questions, and helped customers choose products. Technology usually reaches single tasks first, and a whole job only later, if at all. That's why one tool can wipe out one role, reshape another, and leave a third untouched.
Key Terms
Automation, Augmentation, Displacement and Creation
Four terms. Automation: a machine performs a task a person used to do, like software filling in forms from scanned documents. Augmentation: a tool helps a person do a task better or faster, and the person stays in charge, like a writing assistant whose suggestions the author edits. Displacement: a worker loses a role because its tasks shrink or vanish, like a job that was mostly copying data. And job creation: new roles appear, like technicians who maintain machines, or people who check and improve AI output.
Four Forces
Substitution, Complementarity, Demand and New Tasks
When a new tool arrives, four forces act at once. Substitution: the machine takes over some tasks, so fewer human hours go to them. Complementarity: the remaining human tasks become more valuable. Demand growth: lower costs or better service raise demand, which can offset substitution. And new tasks: the technology opens work that didn't exist before. The result depends on which force wins.
Classic Case
ATMs and Bank Tellers
The bank teller is the classic case. Automated teller machines took over much of the cash handling. Yet for a long time, teller numbers didn't fall as many expected. Branches became cheaper to run, so banks opened more of them, and tellers shifted toward relationships and selling services. Later, as online and mobile banking spread, teller numbers did decline. So technology doesn't always create jobs, or always destroy them. It depends on costs, demand and redesign, and it changes over time.
Worked Example
How Much of Jordan's Time Is Freed
Back to Jordan. Jordan's time splits into four tasks. Data entry is 30 percent of it, and the tool can handle 80 percent of that: 24 percent of the job. Checking documents is 25 percent, and the tool handles half: 12.5 percent. Talking with customers, 25 percent, and handling unusual cases, 20 percent, it can't do at all. So 36.5 percent of the job's time is freed. What happens to that time isn't decided by the tool. The company could process more claims, keep fewer clerks, or move clerks toward customers and complex cases.
Task Grid
AI Ability Versus Judgment Needed
To think about any job this way, sort its tasks on two questions: how well can AI do it, and how much judgment or relationship does it need? Data entry: AI does it well, little judgment. Checking documents sits in between. Customer talks and unusual cases need judgment and relationships, so they stay with people. One caution. People once thought only routine tasks were exposed. But generative AI drafts text, writes code and summarizes documents, so that line has blurred. And exposure isn't loss. Whether it turns into change depends on cost, regulation, how fast organizations adopt, and whether demand grows.
Quick Check
A Paralegal's Freed Time
Quick check. A paralegal spends 40 percent of the time reviewing documents, 30 percent meeting clients, and 30 percent drafting. A tool can do 70 percent of the reviewing and half the drafting, but none of the meetings. What share of the job's time is freed? Pause, and work it out. Forty-three percent. Reviewing frees 40 times 0.7, which is 28 percent. Drafting frees 30 times a half, 15 percent. Together, 43. Sixty is the trap: it averages the tool's seventy and fifty percent, and forgets how much of the job each task takes.
Human-AI Collaboration
Human In, On or Out of the Loop
Often the real question is how people and AI share a task. AI tends to be strong at speed, consistency, patterns in huge data sets, and quick first drafts. People tend to be strong at judgment in unusual situations, empathy and trust, ethical reasoning and accountability, and understanding context. Sharing comes in patterns. Fully human. Human in the loop: AI suggests, a person decides. Human on the loop: AI decides, a person monitors and can step in. And out of the loop: fully automated.
Collaboration Risks
Rubber-Stamping, Deskilling and Blurred Blame
Collaboration has its own risks. Automation bias is trusting a machine's suggestion too readily, so reviewers approve without really checking. That's rubber-stamping. Deskilling: people stop practicing a skill the tool handles, then can't step in when it fails. And responsibility blurs: who answers for an AI-assisted mistake? Research on human-AI teams is mixed. Sometimes the pair beats either alone, and sometimes it does worse than the better of the two.
Good Design
Dividing Tasks Deliberately
So divide tasks deliberately, show reasons and confidence, make overriding easy, keep skills in practice, and measure whether the combination really is better.
Valued Skills
Literacy, Durable Skills and Domain Knowledge
As tasks shift, so do the skills employers value. First, AI and data literacy: knowing what AI can and can't do, writing clear instructions, and checking outputs. Second, durable human skills: critical thinking, communication, collaboration, empathy, creativity and adaptability. Third, deep domain knowledge, to judge whether an AI's answer is sound. Upskilling deepens skills in your current role. Reskilling prepares you for a different one. Both are lifelong learning, through courses, on-the-job learning, apprenticeships and communities of practice. The barriers are real: time, cost, access, confidence, and whether employers support it.
Personal Plan
Five Steps to Stay Ready
A personal plan takes five steps. Map your tasks: list what you actually do in a week, and sort them on that grid. Try the tools on your own work, and always check the result. Strengthen durable skills. Set a learning routine, even a few hours a month. And keep evidence: save examples of your work, and record new skills and credentials.
AI in Hiring
Fast Screening, Learned Unfair Patterns
AI also enters hiring: targeting job ads, screening resumes, scoring assessments and video interviews, and ranking candidates. The benefits are real. It handles huge numbers of applications quickly, applies the same criteria to everyone, and answers routine questions at any hour. But a tool trained on past hiring decisions can learn their unfair patterns, even without seeing a protected characteristic, because other details act as stand-ins. Tools can also be invalid, scoring things that don't predict job performance. They can be opaque, inaccessible to people with disabilities, and collect sensitive voice and video data.
Good Hiring Practice
Validation, Audits and Human Review
Good practice: validate the tool, showing its scores relate to success in the job, not just to past choices. Check outcomes by group regularly. Keep a human review for borderline cases, with the power to overrule. Tell candidates when AI is used, and how to ask for another route. And hold vendors accountable: the employer stays responsible, even when someone else built the tool. Some places now require bias audits and notice to candidates.
Workplace Monitoring
Algorithmic Management and Its Trade-Offs
AI also appears after hiring. Systems log keystrokes and screens, analyze email, track location, and score productivity. Some even assign tasks, set schedules and issue warnings automatically. That's algorithmic management: software making decisions a manager once made. Each use has a benefit and a risk. Activity tracking can spot security problems, but measures typing, not value. Location tracking can warn about hazards, but can follow people after hours. Productivity scores can show who needs help, but invite gaming and stress. Automated scheduling matches staff to demand, but makes hours unpredictable.
Measures as Targets
Gaming the Metric
Monitoring has a recurring problem: when a measure becomes a target, people optimize the measure, not the goal. Score keystrokes per hour, and some people will type meaninglessly. Heavy monitoring can also cut trust and autonomy, and raise stress. Responsible use rests on purpose, a stated reason. Proportionality, no more intrusive than needed. Transparency. Human review and appeal. And worker voice in what's introduced.
Quick Check
Radiologists Approving Every Flag
Quick check. A hospital adds an AI tool that flags suspicious scans. A year later, an audit finds radiologists approve almost every flag without opening the image. Which risk is this? Pause, and decide. Automation bias. The reviewers trust the machine too readily, so review has become rubber-stamping. Deskilling is the tempting answer, and it may follow if this goes on. But right now, the radiologists can still read scans. They're simply not checking.
Back to Jordan
Tasks Change, Choices Remain
Back to Jordan. The tool frees about 36 percent of Jordan's time, not a whole job, and the rest needs judgment and relationships. What happens next depends on demand and on management's choices. Jordan's best move is to map the tasks, learn the tool, and grow the customer and complex-case work.
Key Takeaways
AI and Work in Summary
To sum up. Jobs are bundles of tasks. Substitution, complementarity, demand growth and new tasks act together, and the winner varies. Good collaboration divides tasks deliberately, keeps overriding easy, and guards against automation bias and deskilling. AI literacy, durable human skills and domain knowledge gain value, and lifelong learning keeps them current. And AI in hiring and monitoring needs validation, bias checks, transparency, human review, and care about what's being measured.
Think About It
Mapping the Tasks of a Job You Know
Here's something to think about. Pick a job you know well, and list its tasks for a typical week. Which tasks could AI handle well, which need judgment or relationships, and what would you do with the freed time?
About Introduction to Artificial Intelligence at UPI Study
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence (Computer Science 373) is a self-paced online course of 69 video lessons in 9 chapters, from intelligent agents and search to game strategy, neural networks, logic and reasoning, machine learning, language, robotics and AI ethics. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Computer Science courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: AI vs Current Trends in CS and IT
Why take it here
Why students take Introduction to Artificial Intelligence with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About The Evolving Workplace: AI's Influence on Jobs and Skills
What is the difference between automation and augmentation?
How do you estimate how much of a job AI could take over?
Did ATMs eliminate bank teller jobs?
What is automation bias in the workplace?
About the Introduction to Artificial Intelligence course
How many college credits is Introduction to Artificial Intelligence?
How much does Introduction to Artificial Intelligence cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Introduction to Artificial Intelligence take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Introduction to Artificial Intelligence.
69 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →