UPI Study › Courses › Calculus 2 › Free lessons › Lesson 3.4 Free lesson
Integrals and Inverse Hyperbolic Functions
Calculus 2 · Chapter 3: Hyperbolic FunctionsSection 3.4 · lesson 15 of 5412 min · free
← Derivatives of Hyperbolic FunctionsNext lesson: Areas Between Curves →
In this lesson
Running every derivative backwards - and the catenary that started it.
- Read the six derivative rules backwards as antiderivatives
- Express each inverse hyperbolic function as a logarithm
- Use them to resolve \sqrt{x^{2}+a^{2}} and \sqrt{x^{2}-a^{2}} integrals
- Compute the length of a hanging cable in closed form
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,773 words). Read along, or search it.
MAT-265 - Calculus 2 · Section 3.4
Integrals and Inverse Hyperbolic Functions
A structural engineer designing a pedestrian bridge needs three things. The exact shape of the supporting cable. The length of material to order. And the tension at the anchor points. All three flow from a single function — the hyperbolic cosine — and from the calculus that surrounds it. Working out the cable's length, in particular, leads to an integral that no ordinary trig substitution resolves. But the inverse hyperbolic functions handle it cleanly. The previous section established the derivatives of all six hyperbolic functions. And every derivative formula, read backward, is an antiderivative formula. So the differentiation rules immediately hand over a whole family of integrals — for free.
Reversing the Rules
Every Derivative Formula Is an Antiderivative Formula
Let's collect them. Reversing each differentiation rule produces a basic integral. The integral of cosh x is sinh x plus C. The integral of sinh x is cosh x plus C. The integral of sech squared x is tanh x. The integral of csch squared x is minus coth x. The integral of sech x tanh x is minus sech x. And the integral of csch x coth x is minus csch x. These mirror the circular integration formulas with predictable sign differences. And they combine with substitution exactly as their circular cousins do. Let's do two quick ones. Evaluate the integral of x cosh of x squared. The inner function x squared suggests u equals x squared, so d u is two x d x — meaning x d x is one half d u. The integral becomes one half the integral of cosh u, which is one half sinh of x squared, plus C. Second. Evaluate the integral of tanh x. Rewrite tanh as sinh over cosh, and substitute u equals cosh x, so d u is sinh x d x. You get the integral of d u over u, which is log absolute u. So log of cosh x, plus C. And notice — no absolute value is needed here, because cosh x is positive for every x. Compare that to the circular result: the integral of tangent x is minus log absolute cosine x. Again, the hyperbolic version has the sign and the absolute value smoothed out.
The Inverses
Every One Is a Logarithm
Now the second family. The inverse hyperbolic functions. Sinh is one-to-one across its entire domain — it's strictly increasing — so it has an inverse defined for all real numbers. Cosh is not one-to-one. Being even, it fails the horizontal line test. So its inverse is defined only on the principal branch, x at least one, with output y at least zero. And tanh is one-to-one, with inverse defined on the open interval from minus one to one. Now here's a striking feature that sets these apart from inverse circular functions. Each one can be written explicitly as a logarithm. And that's no accident. The hyperbolic functions are built from exponentials — so their inverses are built from logarithms. Let's derive one. Start from x equals sinh y, which is one half of e to the y minus e to the minus y. Multiply through by two e to the y to clear the negative exponential. You get e to the two y, minus two x e to the y, minus one, equals zero. And that is a quadratic in e to the y. Apply the quadratic formula with w equals e to the y, and you get w equals x, plus or minus root x squared plus one. Now — which root? Since w is e to the y, it must be positive. And root x squared plus one is always bigger than the absolute value of x. So only the plus root is valid. Take the natural log, and you have it. Inverse sinh of x equals log of x plus root x squared plus one. For all real x. The same approach gives the other two formulas.
Figure 3.4.1
Graphs of the Principal Inverses
Look at the three graphs, because the domains tell the story. On the left, inverse sinh. Defined for all x, increasing smoothly through the origin. It's the mirror image of sinh across the line y equals x, and since sinh was defined everywhere and unbounded, its inverse is too. In the middle, inverse cosh. It exists only for x at least one, starting at the point one comma zero. That's because cosh has range one to infinity — so its inverse can only accept inputs from that range. On the right, inverse tanh. Defined on minus one to one, with vertical asymptotes at x equals plus and minus one. And notice the elegance there. Tanh had horizontal asymptotes at y equals plus and minus one. Its inverse has vertical asymptotes at x equals plus and minus one. Reflecting across y equals x turns one into the other.
The Payoff
Integrals the Radicals Would Not Give Up
Now the real payoff. Differentiating the logarithmic formulas — or using implicit differentiation on x equals sinh y — yields compact derivative rules. The derivative of inverse sinh x is one over root x squared plus one. The derivative of inverse cosh x is one over root x squared minus one, for x greater than one. And the derivative of inverse tanh x is one over one minus x squared, for absolute x less than one. Now read those backwards as integration formulas. The integral of d x over root x squared plus one is inverse sinh x. The integral of d x over root x squared minus one is inverse cosh x. And the integral of d x over one minus x squared is inverse tanh x. More general versions, obtained by substitution, handle a positive constant a. The integral of d x over root x squared plus a squared is inverse sinh of x over a. These resolve integrals whose radicands — root x squared plus a squared, and root x squared minus a squared — resist ordinary methods. Now here's something worth thinking about. Ordinary trig substitution can also evaluate the integral of d x over root x squared plus nine, using x equals three tangent theta. But that work is longer, and it ends in a logarithm anyway. So why do the inverse hyperbolic formulas feel so much cleaner here? Because root x squared plus a squared is the natural companion of the fundamental identity, rearranged as one plus sinh squared equals cosh squared. The radical and the identity were built for each other. So the substitution leaves no leftover trigonometric cleanup at all.
Worked Examples 3 and 4
Indefinite, Then Definite
Let's do one of each. Indefinite, then definite. Evaluate the integral of d x over root x squared plus nine. Here a squared is nine, so a is three. Apply the formula directly and you get inverse sinh of x over three, plus C. Using the logarithmic form instead, this equals log of x plus root x squared plus nine, plus a different constant. The two answers differ only by log three, which the constant absorbs. Either form is acceptable. Now the definite version. The integral from zero to four of the same thing. Using the antiderivative just found, evaluate inverse sinh of x over three, from zero to four. That's inverse sinh of four thirds, minus inverse sinh of zero. And here the logarithmic form earns its keep, because you need actual numbers. Inverse sinh of zero is log of zero plus root one, which is log one. Which is zero. Inverse sinh of four thirds is log of four thirds, plus root of sixteen ninths plus one. That inner root is root twenty-five ninths, which is five thirds. So you get log of four thirds plus five thirds. Which is log of nine thirds. Which is log three. The answer is log three. About one point zero nine eight six.
Application
The Catenary, and the Length of a Cable
Let's close with the curve that motivated this whole chapter. A perfectly flexible cable of uniform weight, suspended from two points and hanging freely, settles into a shape governed by a balance. Gravity pulling down. Tension along the cable. Solving the resulting differential equation produces the catenary. y equals a cosh of x over a. Here x is horizontal distance from the lowest point, and a is a positive constant set by the cable's weight per unit length and its horizontal tension. The lowest point sits at zero comma a, since cosh zero is one. A catenary is often mistaken for a parabola. Look at the picture — near the bottom they're genuinely similar. But the catenary rises more steeply toward the supports. And that distinction matters in engineering. A freely hanging cable is a catenary. But a cable supporting a uniformly distributed horizontal load — like a suspension bridge deck — is closer to a parabola. Now let's find the cable's length. And watch what happens. Arc length is the integral of root one plus y prime squared. Differentiate: y prime is a sinh of x over a, times one over a. Which is just sinh of x over a. So one plus y prime squared is one plus sinh squared of x over a. And here the fundamental identity collapses the radical beautifully. One plus sinh squared equals cosh squared. So the square root is simply cosh of x over a. Positive, because cosh always is. The messy arc-length integral has become the integral of a single cosh. Integrate, use the oddness of sinh, and the length is two a sinh of b over a. A closed-form answer an engineer can evaluate in one step, once a and the half-span b are known. That collapse — from a messy radical to a single cosh — is exactly why hyperbolic functions are the right language for this problem.
Key Takeaways
What to Carry Forward
Five things to carry forward. Every hyperbolic derivative, read backwards, is an antiderivative. The six basic integrals mirror the circular ones with predictable signs. The integral of tanh x is log of cosh x, with no absolute value — because cosh is always positive. Each inverse hyperbolic function is a logarithm. Inverse sinh is log of x plus root x squared plus one. Inverse cosh is log of x plus root x squared minus one, for x at least one. And inverse tanh is one half log of one plus x over one minus x. The inverses unlock integrals with root x squared plus a squared, and root x squared minus a squared, more cleanly than trig substitution — because the radical and the identity were made for each other. And a hanging cable is a cosh of x over a, with length two a sinh of b over a. The arc-length radical collapses to a single cosh. That closes Chapter Three. Next up is Chapter Four — Applications of Integration, beginning with areas between curves.
About Calculus 2 at UPI Study
Calculus 2 (Math 265) is a self-paced online course of 54 video lessons in 10 chapters, from integration techniques to series, parametric curves and vectors. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 4 semester credits.
Every lesson video and transcript is free on pages like this one. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Calculus 2 with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Calculus 2 carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Integrals and Inverse Hyperbolic Functions
How do you write inverse hyperbolic functions as logarithms?
How do you integrate 1 over the square root of x^2 + a^2?
What is the arc length of a hanging cable (catenary)?
What is the integral of tanh x, and does it need an absolute value?
About the Calculus 2 course
How many college credits is Calculus 2?
How much does Calculus 2 cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Calculus 2 take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 4 credits in Calculus 2.
54 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
4 credits · NCCRSEnroll →