Properties of Convergent Series | Free Calculus 2 Lesson (4 College Credits) | UPI Study

UPI Study › Courses › Calculus 2 › Free lessons › Lesson 6.5 Free lesson

Properties of Convergent Series

Calculus 2 · Chapter 6: Sequences & Introduction to SeriesSection 6.5 · lesson 31 of 5410 min · free

← Telescoping SeriesNext lesson: The Integral Test and p-Series →

Earn 4 college credits for Calculus 2Recommended for credit by NCCRS · Math 265 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access

In this lesson

The algebra of infinite sums - and its limits.

  • Factor constants out and add series term by term
  • See why the converse of linearity fails
  • Know that finitely many terms never affect convergence
  • Avoid applying linearity to divergent series

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,575 words). Read along, or search it.

MAT-265 - Calculus 2 · Section 6.5

Properties of Convergent Series

You now know how to sum two families of series exactly. Geometric, and telescoping. But most series you'll meet are neither. So before we start building convergence tests, it's worth establishing the algebra of infinite sums. What operations are you allowed to perform on a series? And which ones preserve convergence? The answers are mostly what you'd expect. But there are two places where intuition fails badly. And those two places are where students lose the most marks.

Linearity

Constants Factor Out, Series Add

The first property is linearity. If the sum of a n converges to A, and the sum of b n converges to B, and c is any constant, then two rules hold. First. The sum of c times a n equals c times the sum of a n. Constants factor out. Second. The sum of a n plus or minus b n equals A plus or minus B. Series add term by term. Both follow directly from the corresponding limit laws, applied to the partial sums. Which makes sense — a series' sum is by definition the limit of its partial sums, so anything true of limits transfers. Let's use them. Evaluate the sum of three times one half to the n, plus five times one third to the n, starting at n equals zero. By linearity, split the combined series into two separate geometric series and add their sums. The first has a equals three and r equals one half. So it sums to three over one half. Six. The second has a equals five and r equals one third. So it sums to five over two thirds. Fifteen halves. Add them. Six plus fifteen halves is twenty-seven halves. Second example. Evaluate the sum of seven over two to the n, starting at n equals one. Factor the constant seven out, leaving a geometric series. That remaining series starts at n equals one. So its first actual term is one half, and r is one half. Seven times one half over one half. Seven times one. Seven.

A Caution

Linearity Runs One Way Only

Now here's the first place intuition fails. Linearity runs in one direction only. If both series converge, their term-by-term sum converges. That direction is guaranteed. But the reverse is not. If the sum of a n plus b n converges, it does not follow that the individual series converge. Here's a clean counterexample. Let a n be one, and b n be minus one, for every n. Each of those series diverges — one grows without bound, the other falls without bound. Yet their term-by-term sum is the sum of zero. Which converges, to zero. So the linearity theorem requires the individual series to converge before the rules may be applied. There is one useful consequence worth stating on its own. If the sum of a n converges, and the sum of b n diverges, then the sum of a n plus b n diverges. The reason is a short proof by contradiction. If that combined sum converged, then subtracting the convergent sum of a n — using linearity — would force the sum of b n to converge. Contradicting the fact that it diverges. So a convergent series can never rescue a divergent one.

The Tail Is What Matters

Finitely Many Terms Never Affect Convergence

The second major property concerns what happens when a series is altered at the front. And the result is one of the most useful facts in the chapter. Changing, inserting, or deleting any finite number of terms cannot change whether a series converges. Though it generally does change the sum. Formally: for any positive integer M, the series and its tail starting at M plus one either both converge, or both diverge. Let's see why, because the reasoning is simple and clarifying. Split off the first M terms. That writes the full series as a finite sum, plus its tail. The bracketed piece — a one through a M — is just a fixed number. Call it P. Now, adding a constant P to the tail cannot change whether the tail's partial sums approach a limit. It merely shifts that limit by P. So the full series converges exactly when its tail does. And the two sums differ by P. And because M can be any finite number, no finite collection of terms ever determines convergence. Only the infinitely long tail does. This explains a convenience we've already been using informally. When testing a series for convergence, the starting index does not matter. And any finite number of troublesome early terms can simply be ignored. Convergence is a property of the tail behavior of a series. How its terms behave far out, as n goes to infinity.

Worked Examples 3 and 4

Same Convergence, Different Sum

Two examples to make the distinction sharp. The geometric series sum of one half to the n, from n equals zero, converges to two. What happens to convergence, and to the sum, if the first two terms are removed? Removing one and one half leaves the tail starting at n equals two. That's one quarter plus one eighth, and so on. This tail still converges — it's itself geometric, with a equal to one quarter and r equal to one half. Its sum is one quarter over one half. One half. So convergence is preserved. But the sum dropped from two to one half. Precisely because the removed terms, one plus one half, equal three halves. And two minus three halves is one half. The removal changed the value, but not the fact of convergence. Second example. The harmonic series diverges. Does prepending the terms one hundred plus fifty, or deleting the first thousand terms, change that? No. Adding two finite terms at the front, or deleting the first thousand, alters only a finite portion. The infinitely long tail behaves exactly as before, and still diverges. So the modified series diverges too. No finite change can convert a divergent series into a convergent one. Or the other way round. The table summarizes it. Multiply every term by c: convergence preserved, sum multiplied by c. Add two convergent series term by term: preserved, sums add. Remove finitely many terms: preserved, sum changes by the removed amount. Add finitely many terms: preserved, sum changes by the added amount. In every row, convergence is preserved. Only the value moves.

Together

Split, Sum, and Adjust the Index

The real power of these properties appears when they're combined. A complicated-looking series can often be broken into pieces, each recognized as a known convergent series, then reassembled by linearity. With any awkward leading terms split off separately. Let's do one that uses both properties. Evaluate the sum of one half to the n, plus one quarter to the n, starting at n equals zero. Then find the same sum starting at n equals one. By linearity, the first sum splits into two geometric series, each with first term one. One over one minus one half, plus one over one minus one quarter. That's two, plus four thirds. Ten thirds. For the second sum, which starts at n equals one, simply remove the n equals zero term. That term is one half to the zero, plus one quarter to the zero. One plus one. Two. By the finitely-many-terms property, the series still converges. And its sum is the full sum minus the removed term. Ten thirds minus two. Which is ten thirds minus six thirds. Four thirds. Both properties were used. Linearity to split and sum. And the finite-term rule to adjust the starting index. Now here's something to think about. The finitely-many-terms principle says convergence depends only on the tail, not on any finite front portion. Yet the principle draws a sharp line at the word finite. Why does the argument — the removed terms sum to a single fixed number P — break down completely if you try to remove infinitely many terms? What exactly goes wrong with the reasoning in that case?

Key Takeaways

The Pitfall, and What to Carry Forward

The most consequential error in this section is invoking linearity when one or both series diverge. The linearity theorem has an explicit hypothesis. Both series must converge. And the rules are simply false without it. A tempting but invalid move is to split a divergent series into two pieces, evaluate each as if convergent, and combine. For instance, you cannot write the sum of one minus one, as the sum of one, minus the sum of one — and conclude the answer is infinity minus infinity equals zero. The two pieces diverge, so the subtraction is meaningless. Even though the original sum of zero does converge to zero. The safeguard is to confirm convergence of each individual series first. And only then apply linearity. A related slip is assuming that because a combined series converges, its parts must. That's the converse we warned about earlier. When in doubt, establish convergence of the building blocks before manipulating them. Five takeaways. Convergent series are linear. Constants factor out, and convergent series add term by term. Linearity requires the individual series to converge first. The converse fails — a convergent combined series need not have convergent parts. A convergent plus a divergent series always diverges, since a convergent series cannot rescue a divergent one. Adding or removing finitely many terms never changes convergence, because the removed portion is a single fixed number. Only the infinite tail matters. And removing or adding terms does change the sum of a convergent series — by exactly the amount removed or added. That closes Chapter Six. Next up is Chapter Seven — Convergence Tests for Series, beginning with the Integral Test and p-series.

About Calculus 2 at UPI Study

Calculus 2 (Math 265) is a self-paced online course of 54 video lessons in 10 chapters, from integration techniques to series, parametric curves and vectors. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 4 semester credits.

Every lesson video and transcript is free on pages like this one. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Why take it here

Why students take Calculus 2 with UPI Study

Open the door to higher mathCalculus 2 is the gateway to Calculus 3, differential equations, statistics and most engineering, physics, economics and computer-science degrees. Completing it now lets you qualify for those courses at your university.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 4 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Calculus 2 carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Properties of Convergent Series

What are the linearity properties of convergent series?
If \sum a_n = A and \sum b_n = B both converge and c is a constant, then \sum c\,a_n = cA and \sum (a_n \pm b_n) = A \pm B. Constants factor out, and convergent series add or subtract term by term. Both rules follow from the limit laws applied to partial sums, since a series' sum is defined as the limit of its partial sums.
How do you evaluate a sum of two geometric series using linearity?
Split the combined series into separate convergent series, sum each one, and add the results. For example, \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \left(3(\tfrac{1}{2})^n + 5(\tfrac{1}{3})^n\right) splits into two geometric series. The first sums to \frac{3}{1-1/2} = 6 and the second to \frac{5}{1-1/3} = \frac{15}{2}. The total is 6 + \frac{15}{2} = \frac{27}{2}.
Does removing the first few terms of a series change whether it converges?
No. Adding, deleting, or changing finitely many terms never changes convergence, though it usually changes the sum. For example, \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (\tfrac{1}{2})^n = 2. Removing the first two terms, 1 and \tfrac{1}{2}, leaves a tail that still converges, but to 2 - \tfrac{3}{2} = \tfrac{1}{2}. The finite front portion is just a fixed number, so convergence depends only on the infinite tail.
If the sum of two series converges, do the individual series have to converge?
No. The converse of linearity fails. If a_n = 1 and b_n = -1, both \sum a_n and \sum b_n diverge, yet \sum (a_n + b_n) = \sum 0 = 0 converges. Likewise, you cannot split a series into divergent pieces and compute \infty - \infty. Always confirm that each individual series converges before applying linearity. Also note that a convergent series plus a divergent series always diverges.

About the Calculus 2 course

How many college credits is Calculus 2?
Calculus 2 (Math 265) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 4 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Calculus 2 cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 54 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Calculus 2 take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 54 lessons total about 9 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 4 credits in Calculus 2.

54 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Calculus 2
4 credits · NCCRS
Enroll →