UPI Study › Courses › Ethics in Technology › Free lessons › Lesson 15.1 Free with a free account
How to Approach Difficult Choices When Technology Creates Competing Interests
Ethics in Technology · Chapter 15: Doing the Right Thing: Ethics, Media Responsibility, and Digital CitizenshipSection 15.1 · lesson 100 of 11613 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Ethics in Technology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Ethics in Technology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Developing Independent Moral Judgment in Professional and Business Environments →← The Broader Relationship Between Scientific Progress, Innovation, and Human SocietyNext lesson: Developing Independent Moral Judgment in Professional and Business Environments →
In this lesson
A practical model for decisions involving competing interests.
- Explain competing interests in technology decisions
- Describe the five major ethical frameworks
- Explain a practical ethical decision model
- Apply the lenses and model to a technology dilemma
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,729 words). Read along, or search it.
Doing the Right Thing: Ethics, Media Responsibility, and Digital Citizenship
Ethical Frameworks and Difficult Choices
Technology creates difficult choices when a benefit for one group costs another group something valuable. The question may concern privacy, autonomy, or trust, rather than whether a device can perform a task. Five ethical frameworks supply different reasons for judging an action. A practical process runs from identifying the dilemma through reflecting afterward. First, explain why technology decisions create competing interests among people. Second, describe utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, rights-based ethics, and justice-based ethics. Third, explain the practical ethical decision-making model. Fourth, apply the lenses and model to a real technology dilemma. The running example concerns selling anonymized user location data, where revenue and user control compete. Do not expect a framework to make every competing interest disappear from the choice. The aim is careful reasoning, followed by a decision you can explain and defend.
Competing Interests
A Technical Capability Does Not Settle the Choice
More data collection raises questions beyond storage or software. Its possible benefit can compete with users' interests in privacy, autonomy, and trust. An experimental hospital diagnostic algorithm also affects different people's interests. A school deciding whether to monitor student devices faces a similar kind of tension. The technology enables an action. It does not decide whose interests should receive priority. The reading calls these ethical dilemmas, because no option satisfies everyone. That definition directs attention to affected people, beyond technical performance. Start by naming both the hoped-for benefit and what another group could lose. If the choice benefits one group, ask whether the cost is being carried by another. Good reasoning does not require a perfect answer removing every tension. It requires examining the competing interests, and explaining why the eventual choice is defensible.
Five Frameworks
Each Lens Asks a Different Core Question
The five frameworks provide different lenses, rather than five automatic answers. Utilitarianism asks which option produces the greatest overall benefit, across everyone affected by the choice. Its focus is total good and harm, beyond one stakeholder's gain. Deontology asks whether the action follows a rule or duty that should always be honored. Its focus is obligation, regardless of the outcome that following the rule produces. Virtue ethics asks what a person of good character would do in this situation. It considers character and habits the action reflects, or builds. Rights-based ethics asks whether the action respects or violates fundamental entitlements, such as privacy or consent. Justice-based ethics asks whether the action is fair, including the distribution of benefits and burdens. Different conclusions reveal concerns that a single lens might miss. Examine those concerns together. Disagreement does not make the frameworks defective.
Outcomes and Duties
Compare the Consequences With the Obligation
Utilitarianism and deontology use different bases for judging an action. A utilitarian approach considers the total balance of benefit and harm, across all the people affected. The organization's benefit is only part of the outcome to consider. Also consider costs to others, and the possibility of real harm. A deontological approach begins with a different question: does the action honor a rule or duty? That duty is not judged solely by an attractive outcome. A favorable consequence alone does not answer the deontological question. The source presents the distinction as overall benefit, compared with an obligation that should be honored. Explain the difference, rather than merely repeating the framework names. First name the consequence being considered. Then name the obligation that might constrain the choice. Distinct reasons clarify disagreement, and support an explanation of your decision.
Character, Rights, Justice
Keep Three Additional Questions Distinct
Three other lenses direct attention to character, fundamental rights, and the fairness of the distribution. Virtue ethics asks what the action says about the person choosing. It also considers habits that the action reflects, or develops. Rights-based ethics asks whether someone's fundamental entitlements are being respected, rather than traded away without consideration. The reading emphasizes privacy and consent, especially for personal data. Justice-based ethics asks who receives the benefits, and who carries the burdens of the action. Fairness concerns the distribution, rather than only the total benefit. These lenses overlap, but their questions are not interchangeable. A choice might respect individual rights, yet still raise fairness concerns about who bears resulting costs. A favorable total outcome might still violate a fundamental right. Additional questions deepen reasoning. One favorable answer does not settle everything.
Figure 15.1.1
Work Through the Dilemma in 6 Steps
The source's figure turns ethical reflection into a six-step process. First, identify the dilemma. Name the decision, and explain why it involves competing interests. Second, gather the facts. Learn what is actually known, before judging the situation. Third, identify stakeholders. List everyone affected, and what each person or group has at stake. Fourth, apply ethical lenses. Reason through the choice using several frameworks, rather than only one. Fifth, decide and justify. Choose a course of action, and be able to explain the reasoning. Sixth, reflect afterward. Revisit the decision once the outcomes are known, so you can learn from it. The order matters because conclusions should follow facts, and the decision should follow the ethical analysis. Frameworks supply questions. The process organizes when, and how, to use them. Explanation and learning belong to the task, beyond the initial choice. The repeatable process guides the next dilemma, without assuming identical circumstances.
Before the Judgment
Identify the Dilemma, Facts and Stakeholders
The first three steps establish the decision, facts, and affected interests. Identify the dilemma more precisely than calling it a difficult issue. Name the actual choice, then explain the competing interests that make the choice difficult. Gathering facts means learning what is actually known, before deciding whether an action is acceptable. Judging too early lets assumptions, rather than reality, shape the conclusion. Confident analysis can still address a situation that misrepresents the facts. Identifying stakeholders means listing every affected person or group, together with what is at stake. Stakeholders extend beyond the person with formal authority to decide. The criterion is being affected, with interests that deserve consideration. These steps prepare the ethical analysis. They do not yet settle which course of action to choose. Under pressure, preserve the fact-gathering step; skipping it can distort every judgment that follows.
Finish and Learn
Apply Lenses, Decide and Reflect
The final three steps move from ethical analysis, to a justified choice, and then to learning. Apply several lenses to the facts and interests, beyond one familiar framework. Ask about overall benefit, duties, character, rights, and fairness, while keeping their questions distinct. Deciding means choosing an action, even while competing interests remain. Justifying explains the reasoning, so the choice can withstand later questioning. The process requires reasons, beyond declaring that the decision feels right. Reflection comes afterward, once outcomes are known and can be compared with what was expected. This turns one decision into a lesson for approaching the next. Pressure makes gathering facts and reflecting afterward easy to skip. One protects the initial judgment from assumptions. The other tests expectations against the eventual result. Both belong to the decision process, rather than being optional additions.
Location-Data Dilemma
Revenue Competes With Control Over Data
Consider the source's example: a company is deciding whether to sell anonymized user location data to advertisers. Name the specific conflict, beyond treating the sale as a technical transaction. The company has an interest in revenue. Users have an interest in controlling how their data is used. Gathering facts includes learning exactly how anonymized the proposed data really is, before judging its use. The anonymized label alone cannot supply the required factual assessment. Understand the actual risk of linking the data back to individuals. Stakeholders include the users, the advertisers, and the company itself, even though their interests point differently. Naming only the company misses users' affected control or privacy. Naming only users omits other interests that make this a dilemma. Establish the situation carefully, before evaluating it through ethical lenses. Now the company can reason about the actual choice, rather than assuming the label settles the problem.
Apply the Lenses
The Same Sale Raises Different Questions
A utilitarian lens weighs the revenue and services the sale enables, against any real risk of user harm. That harm could arise if the data is later linked back to individual users. A rights-based lens asks whether users meaningfully consented to this specific use of their location data. Ask about meaningful, specific consent. Different agreements are not necessarily equivalent. A justice-based lens asks who bears privacy risk, and whether that burden falls disproportionately on some users. The reading emphasizes users with the least ability to understand, or opt out of, the proposed use. Focusing only on total revenue and benefit could miss this fairness concern. The example leaves the sale decision open, emphasizing the reasoning process. After reasoning through the considerations, choose and explain the decision. Then reflect on the outcome, rather than assuming justification is enough. Multiple lenses reveal different considerations; a single label cannot replace reasoning.
Key Terms and Takeaways
Use a Precise Vocabulary for the Reasoning
Five key terms help you explain the lesson precisely. An ethical dilemma involves competing interests, where no available option satisfies everyone involved in the situation. Utilitarianism judges an action by whether it produces the greatest overall benefit, across the affected interests. Deontology judges whether the action follows a rule or duty, regardless of the outcome it produces. Virtue ethics judges an action by what it reflects about a person's character, rather than only its consequences. A stakeholder is any affected person or group, whose interests should be considered when reasoning through the decision. Rights-based and justice-based ethics remain essential, beyond the five listed terms. The first asks about fundamental entitlements. The second asks about fair distribution of benefits and burdens. The takeaways connect lenses and process, from naming the dilemma through reflection. Gather facts before judging, apply several lenses, and explain the choice rather than merely asserting it. Return to the result, using the decision to improve the next one.
Review the Reasoning
Answer the 5 Review Questions With Reasons
The first review question asks why these are ethical dilemmas, rather than only difficult technical problems. Explain the competing interests: one group's benefit can cost another group something valuable, including privacy or trust. The second asks how utilitarian and deontological reasoning differ: overall benefit, compared with honoring rules or duties. The third asks why multiple frameworks help, since one acceptable answer can still raise another important concern. For example, a favorable total outcome does not remove a question about individual rights or fairness. The fourth asks why facts must come before judgment, because assumptions can misrepresent the real dilemma. Explain how inaccurate information can produce decisions that miss the actual situation. The fifth asks what justice examines in the location-data sale: the distribution of privacy risk. Emphasize users with the least ability to understand the decision, or to opt out of its consequences. Explain the reasons behind the terms, beyond naming an ethical framework. Carry the complete process into practice: identify, gather, consider stakeholders, apply lenses, justify, and reflect.
About Ethics in Technology at UPI Study
Ethics in Technology (Computer Science 195) is a self-paced online course of 116 video lessons in 15 chapters, from cybersecurity basics, privacy and surveillance to big data, hacking, malware, network defense, intellectual property, cybercrime, encryption, emerging technology and digital citizenship. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Computer Science courses
Compare: Cybersecurity vs Ethics in Technology · Which ethics course?
Why take it here
Why students take Ethics in Technology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Ethics in Technology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About How to Approach Difficult Choices When Technology Creates Competing Interests
What are the five main ethical frameworks used to judge technology decisions?
What is the difference between utilitarianism and deontology?
What are the steps of an ethical decision-making model?
Is it ethical for a company to sell anonymized location data?
About the Ethics in Technology course
How many college credits is Ethics in Technology?
How much does Ethics in Technology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Ethics in Technology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Ethics in Technology.
116 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →