UPI Study › Courses › Ethics in Technology › Free lessons › Lesson 14.7 Free with a free account
Sensors, Telematics, and Autonomous Features Transforming How We Drive
Ethics in Technology · Chapter 14: Tomorrow's Technology: AI, Biotech, IoT, and the Connected FutureSection 14.7 · lesson 95 of 11615 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Ethics in Technology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Ethics in Technology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Connected Medical Devices That Monitor, Diagnose, and Treat Patients Remotely →← How Networks of Connected Devices Are Creating New Business Models and Revenue StreamsNext lesson: Connected Medical Devices That Monitor, Diagnose, and Treat Patients Remotely →
In this lesson
Telematics, driver assistance, six automation levels, V2X, and vehicle cybersecurity.
- Explain telematics and usage-based insurance pricing.
- Compare assistance features and the six SAE driving-automation levels.
- Describe connections that extend a vehicle’s information beyond its own sensors.
- Connect a larger attack surface with layered vehicle defenses.
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,847 words). Read along, or search it.
Tomorrow's Technology: AI, Biotech, IoT, and the Connected Future
Connected Vehicles and Driving Automation
Connected vehicles combine sensing, computation, communication, and assistance features that change how information supports driving. Telematics can report actual usage, helping an insurer consider behavior beyond broad demographic and historical factors. Driver assistance includes warnings, momentary interventions, and sustained support of particular parts of the driving task. These functions differ substantially, so the word assistance alone does not specify an automation level. The SAE scale distinguishes six levels, from human driving through systems that handle increasingly complete tasks. A major transition occurs when continuous human supervision changes to readiness for a required takeover. Vehicle-to-everything connections can supply information from outside the range of a vehicle’s own cameras. Other connection types support network services, electric-grid interaction, or devices used inside the vehicle. Each additional interface also creates cybersecurity questions. These matter especially when software can influence physical driving functions. We will connect the benefits with actual operating conditions, human roles, data uses, and layered defenses.
Telematics
Collect and Transmit Information about Vehicle Operation
Telematics combines telecommunications with onboard computing, allowing a vehicle to collect and transmit operational information. The device may be built into the vehicle. Another option connects through its diagnostic port. Speed, braking patterns, and acceleration can reveal aspects of how a particular vehicle is driven. Mileage records usage, while time-of-day information adds context about when trips occur. Location and vehicle-condition information can provide further context, depending on what the system measures. A wireless connection sends selected information to an insurer, fleet manager, manufacturer, or related service. Those recipients do not necessarily use the same information for the same purpose. An insurer might use driving measurements for pricing, while a fleet manager monitors operational patterns. Ask which measurements are collected, how they are interpreted, and who receives the resulting information. Useful visibility comes with responsibilities concerning the purpose, access, and treatment of vehicle data.
Usage-Based Insurance
Actual Driving Information Can Affect the Premium
Usage-based insurance incorporates measured driving behavior or vehicle usage into the calculation of an insurance premium. Traditional pricing can consider broad factors, including age, location, and an individual’s previous driving history. Telematics adds more specific information about the way that person’s vehicle is actually used. Imagine two drivers with similar demographic profiles, but noticeably different braking and speed patterns. Gentle braking and fewer late-night trips might support a lower premium under a particular program. Frequent hard braking or speeding might instead produce less favorable pricing under that insurer’s model. These are illustrative possibilities, rather than promises about every program or every recorded event. Traditional factors can remain relevant. The program’s measurement and pricing rules determine the result. Understanding participation requires considering both the information collected and its potential effect on the premium. The key change is individualized usage evidence, which supplements the broader information used in traditional pricing.
Driver Assistance
ADAS Features Help with Different Driving Tasks
Advanced driver assistance systems use sensors, cameras, radar, and software to support a human driver. Automatic emergency braking can apply a momentary braking intervention when the system detects an imminent collision. Lane-keeping assistance can provide steering support that helps bring a drifting vehicle toward its lane. Adaptive cruise control adjusts vehicle speed to help maintain a selected distance from traffic ahead. Blind-spot monitoring warns about another vehicle that may be difficult for the driver to see. These examples do not all perform the same control function. Some also provide no sustained driving automation. Warnings and momentary interventions differ from systems that continuously support steering or acceleration and braking. Assistance can therefore include limited automation, while still requiring the human to drive or supervise. At Levels zero through two, these features do not justify abandoning attention to the driving environment. Always distinguish the feature’s actual task, duration, and operating conditions before describing its capability.
SAE Levels 0–2
The Human Performs or Supervises the Driving Task
SAE driving-automation levels describe the role of a feature while that particular feature is engaged. Level zero leaves the driving task with the human, even when warnings or momentary interventions occur. A brief emergency-braking action therefore does not automatically make a feature Level one. Level one continuously supports either steering, or acceleration and braking, while the human supervises. The driver also performs the remaining parts of the driving task that the feature does not handle. Level two continuously supports both steering and acceleration and braking within its supported operating conditions. The human must still monitor the driving environment and supervise the system throughout its use. The important distinction is sustained task coverage. Simply moving a control does not settle the classification. A vehicle can contain several features, so classification refers to the engaged feature’s role. These categories explain task allocation; they are not a universal safety guarantee or complete liability determination.
SAE Levels 3–5
Driving Systems Take on More of the Task and Fallback
At Level three, the system performs and monitors the driving task within its specified operating conditions. The person must remain available to resume driving after a request, or an evident relevant malfunction. This readiness differs from the continuous environmental supervision required while a Level two feature operates. At Level four, the system handles driving and fallback. It does so within defined conditions or a service area. Human driving is not needed there, including to mitigate risk when the system reaches a problem. The operating limits are fundamental to Level four, rather than exceptions to an otherwise unrestricted capability. Level five covers all on-road conditions that a human driver could manage, without requiring human driving. That definition does not promise operation through physically impossible conditions that human drivers could not handle. The scale progressively changes the system’s task and fallback role, as well as its supported operating scope. Assess an actual feature against those definitions, rather than assuming a marketing name establishes its level.
The Level 2-to-3 Transition
Continuous Supervision Changes to Readiness for Fallback
The transition from Level two to Level three changes how human attention relates to the driving task. At Level two, the feature supports steering and speed. The human continuously monitors the road. The driver supervises the feature and remains responsible for carrying out the required human driving role. At Level three, the system itself performs and monitors the task within its supported conditions. The person instead remains ready to resume when a request or evident relevant malfunction requires action. This distinction raises an important practical question about returning attention to a changing road situation. A person must recognize the need to act, understand the conditions, and take appropriate control. Being available is therefore more meaningful than merely occupying a seat while ignoring all relevant information. Classification alone does not establish a universally safe response time for every person and situation. The human role, operating limits, and transition design must all support the intended allocation of tasks.
Vehicle-to-Everything
Different Connections Link a Vehicle to Its Surroundings
Vehicle-to-everything describes connections between a vehicle and other systems, extending its available information and services. The diagram places the connected vehicle at the center, with six different categories around it. Vehicles and road infrastructure can share information relevant to traffic, hazards, and signal operation. Connections involving people can support awareness of pedestrians or cyclists using compatible devices. Networks connect the vehicle with cloud information and services beyond its immediate local environment. Grid interaction concerns compatible electric vehicles, charging equipment, energy coordination, and potentially bidirectional power use. Device connections include phones or other equipment used inside the vehicle during a trip. These links serve different purposes. The entire family should not be treated as one safety-warning system. Safety messages can reveal events beyond direct sight, while other links mainly provide services or charging coordination. The diagram organizes connected parties. Actual equipment and compatible deployments determine which capabilities are available.
Six Connection Types
Identify the Other Party and the Relevant Information
V two V means vehicle-to-vehicle, where other vehicles can share relevant traffic or hazard information. V two I connects the vehicle with infrastructure, such as traffic signals or roadway equipment. V two P involves pedestrians and cyclists, generally through compatible devices that participate in information exchange. V two N reaches networks and cloud services, supplying information or connected functions beyond nearby vehicles. V two G connects compatible electric vehicles with grid and charging functions, including coordinated energy interaction. V two D links devices inside the vehicle, such as a phone or other connected equipment. These labels identify the other party, rather than guaranteeing a particular radio technology or message. Grid interaction can involve a physical charging connection alongside communications that coordinate charging or energy exchange. A vehicle must have suitable equipment, and the other party must support the relevant connection. Understanding the partner and purpose helps distinguish useful safety information from network services and charging activities.
Beyond Line of Sight
A Message Can Reveal What Local Sensors Cannot Yet See
Consider a roadway hazard around a blind curve, outside the approaching vehicle’s camera view. Another vehicle beyond that curve detects the problem and shares relevant information through a compatible connection. The approaching vehicle can receive a warning before its own sensors have a direct view. This is the central awareness benefit: communication can carry information beyond local line of sight. Road infrastructure can provide another example, sharing signal information before a traffic light becomes visible. The message is useful only when it is relevant, sufficiently timely, and credible for the situation. Outdated or misleading information can create problems, even when the communication link itself is functioning. Connected information therefore complements onboard sensing and appropriate driving judgment, rather than replacing every source of evidence. Receiving a warning does not itself guarantee a safe response. It also cannot promise complete coverage of roadway hazards. The benefit depends on compatible systems, trustworthy information, and a suitable response to what is learned.
Vehicle Cybersecurity
Separate Safety-Critical Functions and Protect Connected Paths
Connected features expand the vehicle’s attack surface by adding interfaces through which systems exchange information. Cellular links, Bluetooth connections, infotainment software, and maintenance interfaces can become potential access paths. A compromised system might expose information, affect access controls, or create more serious physical safety concerns. Research demonstrations have shown serious consequences, but a reachable interface does not automatically imply control of braking. Layered design isolates safety-critical steering and braking functions from components that communicate with external systems. Boundaries and access controls restrict which messages or operations can cross between those parts. Important communications need appropriate protection for authenticity and integrity, with confidentiality where the application requires it. Software updates also need authorization and verification. Protect both their delivery and their installation. Over-the-air updating offers a way to distribute patches, while creating processes that must themselves be secured. Encryption is useful within this architecture, but it cannot replace isolation, access control, or trustworthy update handling.
Review and Apply
Connect Measurements, Driver Roles, Messages, and Defenses
To review, explain how telematics adds specific driving and usage measurements to an insurance pricing decision. Gentle braking and less late-night driving may affect a program’s assessment. No universal discount follows. Next, distinguish driver assistance functions by whether they warn, intervene briefly, or continuously support control. Warnings and momentary actions differ from sustained steering or speed support, so their automation classifications can differ. For Level two, the human continuously supervises the driving environment even when both control categories are supported. For Level three, the system monitors the task in supported conditions, with human readiness for required fallback. Describe how a compatible message can reveal a hazard around a blind curve before local cameras see it. Also recognize that grid, network, and in-car device connections can serve purposes beyond immediate hazard warnings. Finally, connect the larger attack surface with isolation, protected messages, authorized updates, and controlled access. A responsible assessment matches the claimed capability with its actual conditions, human role, information quality, and defenses.
About Ethics in Technology at UPI Study
Ethics in Technology (Computer Science 195) is a self-paced online course of 116 video lessons in 15 chapters, from cybersecurity basics, privacy and surveillance to big data, hacking, malware, network defense, intellectual property, cybercrime, encryption, emerging technology and digital citizenship. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Computer Science courses
Compare: Cybersecurity vs Ethics in Technology · Which ethics course?
Why take it here
Why students take Ethics in Technology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Ethics in Technology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Sensors, Telematics, and Autonomous Features Transforming How We Drive
How does usage-based car insurance work?
What are the SAE levels of driving automation?
What is V2X communication in cars?
Can connected cars be hacked?
About the Ethics in Technology course
How many college credits is Ethics in Technology?
How much does Ethics in Technology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Ethics in Technology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Ethics in Technology.
116 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →