UPI Study › Courses › Quantitative Analysis › Free lessons › Lesson 7.3 Free with a free account
From Vision to Execution
Quantitative Analysis · Chapter 7: Project Planning with PERT and GanttSection 7.3 · lesson 33 of 5510 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Quantitative Analysis.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Quantitative Analysis
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Assigning Responsibility →← Gantt Charts & Bar ChartsNext lesson: Assigning Responsibility →
In this lesson
The phases, steps, and deliverables of project planning.
- Trace the five phases of the project lifecycle
- Explain why Monitoring & Controlling runs in parallel
- Name the five key planning deliverables
- Draft a charter, a scope statement and a risk register
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,454 words). Read along, or search it.
Project Planning with PERT and Gantt · Section 7.3
From Vision to Execution
Every successful project begins long before the first task is executed. It begins with planning. Not a vague intention to be organised, but a deliberate, structured effort. Planning is what turns a high level vision into a concrete roadmap. A roadmap of activities, deliverables, and decisions. This section maps the full project lifecycle. From the first spark of an idea, through planning and execution, to formal closure. Along the way we name the deliverables each phase produces. And we show where the analyst keeps a project on time, on budget, and aligned with stakeholders. By the end you will be able to draft a charter, a scope statement, and a risk register.
The Control Framework
Five Phases, One Feedback Loop
The lifecycle has five phases. Initiation. Planning. Execution. Monitoring and controlling. And closure. Calling that a sequence of steps undersells what it really is. It is a control framework. Each phase has defined inputs, defined outputs, and decision gates. The gates ask one blunt question. Should this project continue, be re-scoped, or be terminated? Now look at the fourth phase again. Monitoring and controlling is not a step between execution and closure. It runs in parallel with planning and execution, the whole way through. It is the feedback loop, not a stop on the line. Understanding that is the difference between a project that drifts, and one that delivers.
Phase One
Initiation: Is This Worth Doing?
Phase one is initiation, and it is where the project is born. Its purpose is narrow, and it is important. Decide whether the proposed work is worth doing at all. And if it is, authorise it formally. Five activities carry the phase. Define the purpose. What problem are we solving, or what opportunity are we capturing? Develop the business case, linking outcomes to strategy and to expected return. Then assess feasibility, in five dimensions. Technical, economic, operational, legal, and schedule. Identify the stakeholders, everyone affected by the project or able to influence it, and judge their interest and their power. Finally, issue the project charter. That single document authorises the project, and it appoints the project manager.
Phase Two
Planning: The Analytical Heavy Lift
Phase two is planning, and it is the analytically intensive one. It converts the charter into a complete, executable plan. Most of the project documentation is produced right here. Start with scope definition. What the project will deliver, and what it will not. Then the work breakdown structure, a hierarchical decomposition of the total work into manageable work packages. Schedule development comes next, sequencing activities and estimating durations. This is where PERT and Gantt charts do their work. Resource planning names the people, equipment, materials and facilities required. The budget baseline turns all of that into a time-phased cost baseline. Three more plans complete the picture. A risk management plan, covering threats and opportunities alike. A communication plan. Who needs what information, when, and through which channel. And a quality management plan, setting the standards the deliverables must meet.
Phases Three And Four
Execution, and the Loop Around It
Phase three is execution. The plan meets reality. The manager directs the team and integrates resources to produce the deliverables. Direct and manage the work according to the approved plan. Lead and develop the team. Perform quality assurance, so the agreed processes are actually followed. And engage stakeholders, managing expectations and addressing issues as they arise. Running alongside all of that is phase four, monitoring and controlling. It measures actual performance against the plan, and identifies the variances. Corrective action is then authorised through a formal change control process. Not by a quiet decision in a corridor. Track scope, schedule and cost against the baselines. Watch the risks. And it runs in parallel with planning and execution, not after them.
The Integrated Measure
Earned Value Analysis
Earned value analysis is the integrated measure inside monitoring and controlling. Integrated means it measures scope, schedule and cost performance at the same time. It tracks three curves over the life of the project. Planned value. Earned value. And actual cost. Two gaps between those curves carry the whole diagnosis. The gap between earned value and actual cost is the cost variance. The gap between earned value and planned value is the schedule variance. Here is why a single number could never do this job. Suppose you have spent less than the budget said you would. That could mean you are efficient. It could equally mean you are behind. Cost on its own cannot tell those two stories apart.
Phase Five
Closure: Ending on Purpose
Phase five is closure, and it formally ends the project. It is not merely an administrative step. This is the phase that captures organisational learning. It is also the phase that releases resources for future work. Four activities. Obtain formal acceptance of every deliverable, from the sponsor and the customer. Document the lessons learned, for the projects that come next. Release the project resources back to the organisation. And close every contract with vendors and suppliers. Skip closure and the damage is quiet. Contracts stay open, people stay assigned, and nothing is written down.
The Five Anchors
Key Planning Deliverables
Five planning deliverables form the backbone of a well managed project. Together they establish what will be done. How performance will be measured. And how the project responds when conditions change. The charter authorises the project, and grants the manager authority over resources. Without it, the manager has no formal mandate. The scope statement defines what is in scope, and what is explicitly out of scope. It is the single most effective tool for preventing scope creep. The schedule baseline is the approved schedule that performance is measured against. The budget baseline is the approved, time phased cost baseline. Variances from it require formal change control. No quiet overruns. And the risk register turns risk from an abstract worry into a managed list.
Worked Example
A One-Page Project Charter
Now a worked example, so the structure becomes concrete. A university is launching an online bachelor of business administration. The sponsor is the Provost, acting for the University Senate. The project manager is the Director of the Office of Online Learning. The business case is simple. Domestic enrolment in on-campus business programs has plateaued. Market research shows strong demand among working adults for a flexible online degree. The program is projected to enrol two hundred and fifty students in year one, and to break even by year three. Three objectives follow. Launch fully accredited by the start of the next academic year. Achieve at least two hundred enrolments in the first intake. And maintain a course completion rate of eighty per cent or higher. The budget is one point eight million dollars. Milestones land at month four, month eight, month nine, and month twelve.
Worked Example
The High-Level Scope Statement
Next, the high level scope statement. In scope are forty fully online courses making up the curriculum, and configuration of the learning management system. Recruitment and training of twenty-five online instructors. A digital admissions process, and a marketing campaign for the first intake. Plus an ACE and NCCRS credit alignment review. Then the list that does the real work. What is out of scope. No on campus or hybrid delivery. No graduate level business programs. No visa processing, and no changes to physical campus infrastructure. And no redesign of the university website. Acceptance criteria make the finish line testable. All forty courses pass internal quality review and external accreditation. Platform uptime of at least ninety-nine point five per cent in the first semester. And documented enrolment of at least two hundred students.
Worked Example
Five Risks for the Register
Finally, five risks for the register. Each entry needs a description, a probability, an impact, and a mitigation. First, enrolment comes in below projection. Medium probability, high impact. Market ninety days earlier, and offer early bird scholarships. Second, accreditation is delayed beyond month four. Medium probability, high impact. Engage the accreditation body early, and assign a dedicated compliance lead. Third, the platform struggles at peak load. Low probability, but high impact. Load test before launch, and contract hosting with a service level agreement. Fourth, faculty resist online teaching methods. Medium and medium. Paid training stipends help, as does pairing them with experienced online faculty. Fifth, curriculum development runs over budget. Medium and medium. Use fixed price content contracts, and review the burn rate monthly. And notice that low probability is never a reason to ignore a risk.
Key Takeaways
What to Carry Forward
Let us pull the section together. The five phase lifecycle is a universal framework for organising project work. Initiation, planning, execution, monitoring and controlling, and closure. Monitoring and controlling is not a sequential phase. It is a continuous activity, running in parallel with planning and execution. Five deliverables anchor a controllable project. The charter, the scope statement, the two baselines, and the risk register. Scope creep is best controlled by writing an explicit out of scope list. Not by hoping the in scope list will be enough. And the risk register is a living document. Risks are reviewed, updated and closed throughout the project. Not just at planning.
About Quantitative Analysis at UPI Study
Quantitative Analysis (Math 250) is a self-paced online course of 55 video lessons in 13 chapters, from decision analysis and simulation to inventory and queuing models, project scheduling, linear programming and transportation models. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Math courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Statistics vs Quantitative Analysis
Why take it here
Why students take Quantitative Analysis with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Quantitative Analysis carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About From Vision to Execution
What are the five phases of the project lifecycle?
Why does monitoring and controlling run alongside the other project phases?
What is the difference between a project charter and a scope statement?
What goes into a project risk register?
About the Quantitative Analysis course
How many college credits is Quantitative Analysis?
How much does Quantitative Analysis cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Quantitative Analysis take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Quantitative Analysis.
55 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →