UPI Study › Courses › Healthcare Organization and Management › Free lessons › Lesson 5.8 Free with a free account
Aligning Management Functions with Organizational Goals
Healthcare Organization and Management · Chapter 5: Core Management Functions in Healthcare OrganizationsSection 5.8 · lesson 32 of 1059 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Healthcare Organization and Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Healthcare Organization and Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Accountability Frameworks and Performance Monitoring →← Innovation and Trends in Healthcare ManagementNext lesson: Accountability Frameworks and Performance Monitoring →
In this lesson
Test whether structure, measures, rewards, and resources serve stated goals.
- Apply the four-way alignment test of structure, measure, reward, and resources
- Identify proxy measures and pair them with balancing measures
- Explain reward misalignment and how budgets reveal real priorities
- Sequence realignment from confirming the priority to moving the reward
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,219 words). Read along, or search it.
Opening Case
Utilization Versus Access
Larkfield's strategic plan names three priorities, and the first is better access to care for the local community. Dana Whitfield runs the outpatient clinics. Her quarterly review is almost entirely about one number: utilization, how full her clinic slots are. She could hit it easily. Fill the slots with straightforward cases, and push complex referrals onto a waiting list her measures never see. Her numbers would shine, and access would get worse for the people the plan was written for. So which goal is Larkfield really pursuing?
Definition
What Alignment Means
Helen Wu, the chief executive, tells Dana that every management function can be done well and still fail, if the functions point in different directions. Alignment is consistency between what an organization says it wants, how it's structured, what it measures, and what it rewards, with resources to match. When a plan names a priority, the structure makes it nobody's job, the measure tracks a stand-in, and the reward pays for something else, nobody has made a mistake. The organization still fails.
Four-Way Test
Structure, Measure, Reward and Resources
That gives a four-way test for any stated goal. Structure: is there a position with authority over enough of the process to be held responsible? Measure: does it capture the goal, or a stand-in that can move the opposite way? Reward: do recognition, promotion, and senior attention, not only money, follow the goal or the stand-in? And resources: does the funding match the priority claimed? A goal that fails any one isn't being pursued, whatever the plan says. The test turns a vague unease into a specific finding. Its standard symptom is goal displacement, where the measure replaces the goal. It's visible from outside: staff describe what they're asked to achieve, and it isn't what the plan says.
Structure
When Structure Lags Strategy
Start with structure. Alfred Chandler argued in 1962 that structure follows strategy. It does, but slowly, and the lag is where most execution failures live. A hospital that commits to integrated care pathways, while staying grouped by profession, has a strategy its structure can't deliver. Goodwill fills the gap, until the people leave. The test: if this strategy failed, which single position would be accountable? If the honest answer is the chief executive, the structure hasn't caught up. But naming an accountable position without matching authority is worse. It manufactures someone to blame for an outcome they couldn't control.
Quick Check
A Coordinator Without Authority
Quick check. Larkfield's plan says it will cut readmissions. It funds a transitions coordinator, puts readmissions on every report, and the chief executive reviews them monthly. But the coordinator can't book follow-up visits or arrange home care. Only each department can do that. Which link fails the test? Pause, and decide. Structure. The goal has an owner on paper, but she can't act on the process that produces readmissions. Accountability without authority. Resources is tempting, because more money often helps. But this priority is funded and measured. What it lacks is the power to move the work.
Measurement
Proxies and Balancing Measures
Next, measurement. Tom Brennan, the chief financial officer, knows the usual trap is a proxy: something easier to count that drifts from the goal exactly when effort is applied to it. Utilization stands in for access. Length of stay stands in for efficient care. Complaint volume stands in for service quality, and it falls when complaining gets harder. Two disciplines help. Write down what each measure is a proxy for, right beside it. And pair every improvement measure with a balancing measure, the term the Institute for Healthcare Improvement uses, that would move the wrong way if the goal were being subverted. For utilization, the share of complex referrals accepted. For length of stay, readmissions. It doesn't need to be perfect. It needs to make the subversion visible in the same report.
Reward
Rewarding A While Hoping for B
Reward misalignment is the oldest failure in management. Steven Kerr named it in 1975: the folly of rewarding A while hoping for B. Reward means everything handed out for performance: recognition, interesting work, promotion, control over one's time, senior attention. Money is the smallest part. An organization that praises teamwork but promotes only individual stars rewards individual stars. One that praises candor, while managers who report problems get extra scrutiny, rewards silence. Nobody writes that down, and everyone learns it quickly.
Resources
Budgets Reveal the Real Priorities
Resources are the most honest statement of priority, because budgets, positions, and protected time are the only statements of intent that cost something. A priority with no funded post, no budget line, and no protected time is a preference, and staff read it as one. So here's a diagnostic move. Compare the stated priorities with where money moved in the last budget round. The difference is the real priority order.
Cross-Department Alignment
Shared Goals With Shared Consequences
One manager can align a department. Alignment between departments is harder, and it's where most patient-facing goals fail. What works is a shared goal, with a shared measure that neither department can move alone, and a consequence for both. If either side can move the measure alone, one will, and call it done. And a consequence for only one side isn't sharing. It's transferring the blame. To diagnose misalignment, don't read the plan. Ask staff four things: what are you measured on? What gets people promoted? What would you stop doing? Which decisions go upward?
Realignment Order
Fixing Misalignment Step by Step
Fixing it takes the right order, and the common error is starting with the announcement. A change to structure alone gets pulled back soon by incentives that survived it. First, confirm the goal truly is the priority, and drop something to make room. A priority added to a full list isn't a priority. Second, name the accountable position and give it the authority, and the resources, the goal requires. Third, change the measure so the goal is visible, pair it with a balancing measure, and let a baseline form. Fourth, move the reward: recognition and promotion first, since they beat pay.
Quick Check
Balancing a Faster ED Discharge
Quick check. Larkfield's emergency department is measured on time from arrival to discharge, and the number is improving fast. Which balancing measure would reveal it if patients were being rushed out too soon? Pause, and decide. Returns within seventy-two hours. If speed is bought by sending people home too early, more of them come back, and it shows in the same report. Patients seen per hour is tempting, but it rises with rushing too. A balancing measure has to move the wrong way when the goal is subverted.
Case Resolution
A Finding Instead of a Complaint
Back to Dana. Instead of quietly gaming utilization, she runs the four-way test, and brings Helen a finding instead of a complaint. Structure: no one owns access end to end, since referral triage and booking sit in different departments. Measure: utilization is a proxy that diverges. Reward: her review and her recognition follow utilization. Resources: access is in the plan, with no funded post. She proposes a balancing measure beside utilization, the share of complex referrals seen within thirty days, and labels utilization as a proxy. And she asks who owns access. She tells Helen her own numbers will look worse before they look better. That's the point.
Key Takeaways
Say It, Structure It, Measure It, Fund It
To recap. Align what you say with structure, measures, rewards, and resources. Fail one link of the four-way test, and the goal isn't really being pursued. Label proxies as proxies, and pair them with balancing measures. Follow the money to find the real priorities. And realign in order: confirm the priority, empower an owner, fix the measure, then move the reward.
About Healthcare Organization and Management at UPI Study
Healthcare Organization and Management (Health 302) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 18 chapters, from health systems and the law to ethics, leadership, teams, strategy, informatics, finance, quality, human resources, marketing and evidence-based practice. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Health courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Healthcare Organization and Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Healthcare Organization and Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Aligning Management Functions with Organizational Goals
What is a balancing measure in healthcare quality improvement?
What is goal displacement in an organization?
What did Steven Kerr mean by rewarding A while hoping for B?
How can a strategy fail because of organizational structure?
About the Healthcare Organization and Management course
How many college credits is Healthcare Organization and Management?
How much does Healthcare Organization and Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Healthcare Organization and Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Healthcare Organization and Management.
105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →