UPI Study › Courses › Healthcare Organization and Management › Free lessons › Lesson 7.3 Free with a free account
Interpersonal Skills and Clear Workplace Communication
Healthcare Organization and Management · Chapter 7: Team Dynamics and Communication in Healthcare SettingsSection 7.3 · lesson 44 of 10510 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Healthcare Organization and Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Healthcare Organization and Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Cross-Cultural Communication and Diversity in Teams →← Team Building and Managerial CommunicationNext lesson: Cross-Cultural Communication and Diversity in Teams →
In this lesson
Listening, clear requests, feedback, and hard conversations for healthcare managers.
- Describe the four behaviors that make up active listening
- Distinguish assertive, passive, and aggressive communication in clinical settings
- Plan a difficult conversation using purpose, facts, impact, listening, and agreement
- Separate positions from interests when two managers compete for a resource
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,288 words). Read along, or search it.
Opening Case
A Conversation Put Off Too Long
In one week, two new graduate nurses ask to transfer out of Larkfield's emergency department. Both mention the same name: Nadia Volkov, fifteen years in the department, and its most skilled clinician. Jamal Carter, the ED nurse manager, has known for a month. He's put the conversation off, because Nadia is excellent, and it will be awkward. So how does he start a conversation he's been dreading, without wrecking a relationship he can't afford to lose?
Active Listening
Four Behaviors That Make Up Listening
Jamal starts with listening, which is usually called an attitude. It's better treated as four separate behaviors. Attending: visible, undivided attention. No notes, no phone, no rehearsing a reply. It makes speaking up worth the effort. Reflecting: saying back what you understood, in your own words. It catches errors while they're cheap, and often draws out a correction. Clarifying: asking about what's ambiguous, instead of assuming. Summarizing: pulling it together now and then, so the speaker hears their own position back. The commonest failure is listening in order to reply. A manager building her answer stopped receiving when it formed, often before the real issue came out.
Question Types
Open First, Probe Next, Close Last
Next, his questions. Open questions invite an account, and they're how a manager learns something she didn't already suspect. Closed questions confirm or rule out a fact. Probing questions follow up on what was just said, and that's where most useful information comes from. Leading questions contain the expected answer, and they reliably get it. So they find out almost nothing. The usual mistake is opening closed or leading, which keeps the talk inside what the manager already believes. Spend the first third open, then probe, and close last.
Clear Requests
Cutting the Hedges From a Request
Then clarity. A month ago, Jamal emailed Nadia: perhaps it might be worth being a bit gentler with the new folks, when you get a chance. In his mind, that was a firm request. She read an optional suggestion with no deadline. Both were being reasonable. Clarity is a set of choices. Be specific: name the behavior, the number, and the time. Cut the hedges: perhaps, when you get a chance, it might be worth. And confirm understanding by asking what the person will now do. Asking whether they understood always gets a yes.
Communication Patterns
Assertive, Passive, and Aggressive Styles
Three patterns shape every exchange. Assertive communication states your position clearly while respecting the other person's. Passive communication withholds the position to avoid friction. Aggressive communication pushes at the other person's expense, through blame or pressure. In health care, passive is the bigger danger. A concern that's hedged and phrased as a question can be correct and still functionally silent. That's why structured formats like SBAR exist: situation, background, assessment, recommendation. They force an assertive statement out of someone under pressure from hierarchy. Aggressive gets instant compliance and lasting silence. The new nurses Nadia corrects in front of patients now avoid asking her anything.
Quick Check
Naming the Night Nurse's Pattern
Quick check. A night nurse is worried about urine output. She tells the attending it has been under thirty milliliters an hour for four hours, and asks him to come now. Which pattern is this? Pause, and decide. Assertive. She states the concern, the evidence, and what she wants, without blame. Aggressive is tempting because she is forceful. But aggressive pushes through blame or pressure, and nothing here blames anyone.
Giving Feedback
Four Requirements for Useful Feedback
What Nadia needs is feedback, the most common uncomfortable exchange. It has four requirements. Address the behavior, not the person. Give it soon after the event, and in private. Make it specific. And end with an explicit request for change. Two habits are worth dropping. The praise sandwich teaches people that praise means bad news is coming, and the criticism often goes unheard. And saving it for the annual review means the behavior ran for a year, about events nobody remembers. Receiving feedback matters too. Ask for the specific instance, settle accuracy before delivery, and say what you'll do.
Conversation Plan
Purpose, Facts, and Impact
Jamal prepares the conversation in five stages, instead of rehearsing a speech. First, purpose, in one sentence: I want to talk about how new nurses get corrected. Second, facts, observed and specific. Three times last week, you corrected a new nurse in front of a patient. He deletes a line he'd drafted, that she doesn't want new nurses here. He can't prove it, and it would start an argument about her motives. Third, impact: two new graduates have asked to leave, and the others have stopped asking questions.
Listening for New Facts
The Precepting Load Comes Out
Fourth, listen: ask for her account, and stop talking long enough to hear something new. And Nadia says something Jamal didn't know. Since the unit educator left in the summer, she's been precepting three new graduates alone, on top of a full assignment. She's frightened one of them will miss something. Fifth, agreement: what changes, by when, and how both will know. Two more nurses share the precepting. Corrections happen away from patients. They'll check in two weeks. The two classic derailments are the ones Jamal avoided: inference smuggled into the facts, and a rehearsed manager who can't hear new information.
Positions and Interests
Two Managers, One Float Nurse
A week later, Jamal hits a different kind of conflict. He and Ellen Murphy on 4 South both demand the same float nurse from three to eleven. Those are positions: what each side says it wants. An interest is the need underneath. Roger Fisher and William Ury made the distinction famous in Getting to Yes, in nineteen eighty-one. Jamal needs cover for the evening surge, from five. Ellen needs help with discharges, which finish by seven. The interests barely overlap. Positions clash far more often than interests do. Ask what each side needs it for, and ask before anyone commits publicly, since backing down in public is costly.
Handling Distress
Acknowledging an Angry Family Member
Some conversations carry real distress. Amos Reed's wife has waited six hours for a bed, and he's angry at the front desk. Jamal acknowledges the emotion out loud first, because unacknowledged distress grows and eats the rest of the conversation. He doesn't start problem-solving until Amos can take part. He's accurate about what he can do, since a false reassurance is worse than a plain limit. And he knows his role's boundary. Questions about her treatment go to her nurse and doctor, not to a manager improvising.
Quick Check
Facts Without Guessing at Motives
Quick check. A lab supervisor is preparing a talk with a technician whose reports keep running late. Which line belongs in the facts stage? Pause, and decide. Four reports went out after noon this week. It's observed, specific, and doesn't guess at motives, so there's nothing to argue about. Lost interest is tempting, since it sounds gentle. But it's an inference about an inner state neither person can prove, and it starts exactly the wrong argument.
Nonverbal Cues and Records
Reading Signals and Documenting Agreements
Two last habits. Nonverbal signals carry information, and they're routinely over-read. Folded arms may mean resistance, or a cold room. Treat a signal as a prompt to ask a question, never as a conclusion. Its meaning also varies across cultures. And document conversations about performance or commitments routinely: the date, what was discussed, what was agreed, and by when. Share it so the other person can correct it. A manager who documents only when things go wrong has turned documentation itself into a warning sign.
Case Resolved
Corrections Move Away From the Bedside
Back to the ED, two weeks after Jamal's talk with Nadia. Neither new graduate has transferred. Nadia precepts one of them now, and corrections happen at the nurses' station, not at the bedside. Jamal's own lesson is the one to keep. If he'd skipped the listening stage, he'd have delivered fair, well-structured, and completely misdirected feedback.
Key Takeaways
Listen, Ask, Clarify, Agree
To recap. Listening is four behaviors: attend, reflect, clarify, and summarize. Ask open questions first, probe next, and close last. Be specific, cut the hedges, and confirm what will happen. Run hard conversations through purpose, facts, impact, listening, and agreement. And look for the interest behind every position.
About Healthcare Organization and Management at UPI Study
Healthcare Organization and Management (Health 302) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 18 chapters, from health systems and the law to ethics, leadership, teams, strategy, informatics, finance, quality, human resources, marketing and evidence-based practice. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Health courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Healthcare Organization and Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Healthcare Organization and Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Interpersonal Skills and Clear Workplace Communication
What is SBAR and why is it used in healthcare communication?
What is the difference between a position and an interest in workplace conflict?
Why is the praise sandwich a poor way to give feedback?
What belongs in the facts stage of a difficult workplace conversation?
About the Healthcare Organization and Management course
How many college credits is Healthcare Organization and Management?
How much does Healthcare Organization and Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Healthcare Organization and Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Healthcare Organization and Management.
105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →