Ethical Dilemmas: Truth-Telling, Confidentiality, Consent

UPI Study › Courses › Healthcare Organization and Management › Free lessons › Lesson 3.1 Free with a free account

Ethical Dilemmas: Truth-Telling, Confidentiality, Consent

Healthcare Organization and Management · Chapter 3: Ethical Dimensions of Healthcare PracticeSection 3.1 · lesson 13 of 1059 min · free with a free account

← Legal Compliance and Risk Management in HealthcareNext lesson: Ethics in Mental Health Care and Critical Care Nursing →

Earn 3 college credits for Healthcare Organization and ManagementRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Health 302 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Healthcare Organization and Management · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Ethical principles applied to truth-telling, confidentiality, consent, and moral distress.

  • Distinguish ethical dilemmas from legal questions and operational problems
  • Explain the four principles of biomedical ethics as prima facie duties
  • Apply truth-telling, error disclosure, and confidentiality duties to a patient case
  • Describe moral distress and the manager's role in addressing its causes

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,269 words). Read along, or search it.

Opening Case

A Serious Diagnosis for Ruth

On 4 South, Ruth Abernathy is seventy-eight, sharp, and fully able to make her own decisions. She's waiting on test results. The results come back, and they confirm a serious diagnosis.

The Dilemma

A Son Asks the Team to Stay Silent

Before anyone talks to Ruth, her son Paul stops the charge nurse, Ellen Murphy, in the family lounge. He asks the team not to tell his mother. She's frail, he says, she'll lose hope, and the family knows her better than the team does. Danny Reyes, a new nurse, asks Ellen what the unit should do. Is this the family's call? And if not, whose is it?

Sorting Decisions

Legal, Operational, or Ethical

Ellen starts by sorting the situation, because hard decisions come in three kinds, and each belongs in a different place. A legal question has an answer you can look up, or get from counsel. It may be unwelcome, but it's settled. An operational problem has a known right answer. The hard part is doing it: time, staff, or money. An ethical dilemma is different. Two defensible obligations both apply, and honoring one means failing the other. Mix them up, and the case goes to the wrong place. Learning that you're allowed to do something doesn't answer whether you should.

Four Principles

Autonomy, Beneficence, Non-Maleficence, and Justice

Ellen brings in Priya Nair, the chief nursing officer. To name the obligations, Priya uses four principles. They come from Tom Beauchamp and James Childress, in their 1979 book, Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Autonomy: respect people's capacity to make their own decisions. Beneficence: act for others' good, not just avoid hurting them. Non-maleficence: avoid causing harm, a duty usually seen as stronger than the duty to help. And justice: share benefits and burdens fairly, and treat like cases alike. For managers, justice is everywhere: which service grows, whose wait is tolerated, and who bears the cost of a saving.

Prima Facie Duties

Principles Without a Fixed Ranking

The principles don't come ranked. Put autonomy first, or avoiding harm first, and some case will make that rule look plainly wrong. So each is a prima facie duty, a term from the philosopher W. D. Ross: it binds, unless a stronger duty outweighs it in this case. That puts the weight on reasoning. A defensible decision can say which obligation it set aside, and why.

Quick Check

An Interpreter Line Goes Down

Quick check. On the night shift, the phone interpreter service goes down for hours. A patient who speaks only Vietnamese needs to give consent, and everyone agrees she needs an interpreter first. Which kind of situation is this? Pause, and decide. An operational problem. Nobody disputes the right course; the constraint is a resource, so it goes to management, recorded as a risk. Ethical dilemma is tempting, because consent is at stake. But no two obligations are pulling against each other here.

Applying Principles

Ruth's Autonomy Versus Paul's Fears

Back to Ruth. Priya and Ellen apply the principles to her case. Autonomy points to Ruth: it's her diagnosis, and her decisions to make. Veracity, the duty to tell the truth and not deceive, is engaged the moment Ruth asks a question. Paul's case rests on beneficence and non-maleficence, and it isn't frivolous. He fears a real harm, and he knows his mother. One thing isn't in dispute: a family can't direct that a capable adult be kept uninformed. What's open is what Ruth herself wants to know. Nobody has asked her.

Truth-Telling

Decline of the Therapeutic Exception

Ellen sits down with Paul. Medicine once allowed a therapeutic exception: withholding information if telling would harm the patient. It has largely declined, for three reasons. Patients told hard news usually cope better than predicted, and those not told often know anyway, and face it alone. It was applied unevenly, tracking the clinician's discomfort more than the patient's vulnerability. And almost any news is distressing, so it could swallow the duty. What survives is narrower: care with timing and pace, and the patient's own wish about how much she wants to know.

Error Disclosure

Telling Ruth About the Late Scan

Back at the desk, Ellen flags a second thing Ruth must hear. Her scan ran a day late because an order was missed. It caused no harm. Disclosing an error is truth-telling at the level of the organization. The patient has a claim to know what happened. Disclosure programs may also reduce claims, but that isn't why the duty exists. A practice adopted only to cut claims collapses the first time the math points the other way.

Confidentiality

A Duty Broader Than Privacy Law

Later, in the lobby elevator line, Danny starts telling Ellen about Ruth's results. Ellen stops him with a look. Confidentiality is an ethical duty broader than privacy law. The law permits many uses that don't settle whether a use respects what the patient assumed. And the duty covers what the rules barely reach: a hallway conversation, a detail repeated at home, recognizing a neighbor on a list. It isn't absolute. It yields to a serious risk to an identifiable person, to a legal reporting duty, or to defined public health needs. Only a weightier duty defeats it, not curiosity.

Consent as Process

Organizations Must Make Consent Possible

Priya adds a point about consent. Legally, a signature can be obtained from a patient who understood very little. Ethically, consent is a process: the patient comes to a decision that's genuinely her own. The signature is evidence only if that process happened. That makes consent an organizational job. It needs time in the schedule, a private place to ask questions, and interpreters at the hour care happens. It needs materials at a reading level patients can use, and staff who aren't penalized for taking longer. Without these, the organization has made good consent impossible, then blamed the clinician.

Moral Distress

Knowing the Right Thing but Blocked

That night, in the staff break room, Danny admits the day has shaken him. He'd known what Ruth deserved, and felt pressure to stay silent. That has a name. Andrew Jameton, a nursing ethicist, called it moral distress in 1984: knowing the right thing to do, but being blocked from doing it. It isn't an ethical dilemma, because the person isn't unsure. Its causes are mostly structural: thin staffing, policies staff consider wrong, and escalation routes that don't work. Left alone, people withdraw, stop speaking up, and the most committed leave. Offering resilience training while the cause stays put doesn't fix it. The manager's job is to examine the constraint, change it if it isn't needed, and if it can't change, say so plainly and explain why.

Quick Check

Silence and Departures on Another Unit

Quick check. A unit on another floor has sick calls climbing, its most experienced nurses transferring out, and hasn't raised a single ethics concern in two years. What has that organization most likely failed to address? Pause, and decide. Unaddressed moral distress. Selective loss of the most committed staff, plus silence, is its pattern. Quiet is more often exhaustion than agreement. A simple staffing shortfall is tempting. But staffing alone doesn't explain why reporting and ethics concerns stopped, or why the most experienced are the ones leaving.

Case Resolution

Asking Ruth What She Wants to Know

Back to Ruth. Ellen and the physician ask her how much she wants to know, and who she wants with her. Ruth says she wants all of it, and she wants Paul there. So the obligation is clear, and Paul gets support with a decision that wasn't his to make. They also tell her about the late scan, and apologize. The conversation was slower and harder than a simple refusal. In exchange, Ruth's own wishes decided the outcome.

Key Takeaways

Sort the Case, Name the Trade-Off

To recap. First, sort the case: an ethical dilemma, a legal question, or an operational problem. The four principles are prima facie duties with no fixed ranking, so name what you set aside. Tell the truth, and disclose errors because patients have a claim to know. Confidentiality and consent are duties broader than the law, and consent needs the organization's support. Moral distress is a structural condition, so fix the cause, not the person.

About Healthcare Organization and Management at UPI Study

Healthcare Organization and Management (Health 302) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 18 chapters, from health systems and the law to ethics, leadership, teams, strategy, informatics, finance, quality, human resources, marketing and evidence-based practice. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Health courses Every course with PRO →

Why take it here

Why students take Healthcare Organization and Management with UPI Study

How hospitals and clinics are runHealthcare Organization and Management covers how care organizations are led and run: health law and ethics, leadership and teams, strategic planning, health informatics, budgets, quality improvement, staffing and marketing. It is a core course in healthcare administration and health management degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Healthcare Organization and Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Ethical Dilemmas: Truth-Telling, Confidentiality, Consent

What are the four principles of biomedical ethics?
The four principles, from Tom Beauchamp and James Childress's 1979 book Principles of Biomedical Ethics, are autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. Autonomy respects people's capacity to decide for themselves. Beneficence means acting for others' good. Non-maleficence means avoiding harm. Justice means sharing benefits and burdens fairly. They have no fixed ranking, so each works as a prima facie duty that a stronger duty can outweigh.
Can a family ask doctors not to tell a patient a diagnosis?
A family can raise concerns, but it cannot direct that an adult with decision-making capacity be kept uninformed. The diagnosis and the decisions belong to the patient. The ethical approach is to ask the patient how much she wants to know and who she wants present, then respect her answer, while supporting the family with their worries.
What is moral distress in health care?
Moral distress, a term nursing ethicist Andrew Jameton introduced in 1984, is knowing the right thing to do but being blocked from doing it. It differs from an ethical dilemma, where a person is genuinely unsure. Its causes are mostly structural, such as thin staffing, policies staff consider wrong, and escalation routes that do not work. Left unaddressed, staff withdraw, stop speaking up, and committed people leave.
What is the therapeutic exception and why has it declined?
The therapeutic exception allowed clinicians to withhold information if telling the patient would cause harm. It has largely declined because patients usually cope with hard news better than predicted, it was applied unevenly according to clinicians' discomfort, and nearly any bad news is distressing, so it could swallow the duty to inform. What remains is care over timing and pace, and respect for the patient's own wishes.

About the Healthcare Organization and Management course

How many college credits is Healthcare Organization and Management?
Healthcare Organization and Management (Health 302) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Healthcare Organization and Management cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 105 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Healthcare Organization and Management take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 105 lessons total about 17 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Healthcare Organization and Management.

105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Healthcare Organization and Management →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Healthcare Organization and Management
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →