UPI Study › Courses › Business Ethics › Free lessons › Lesson 15.1 Free with a free account
Environmental Ethics: Philosophical Foundations and Real-World Relevance
Business Ethics · Chapter 15: Environmental Ethics, Law, and SustainabilitySection 15.1 · lesson 80 of 10512 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Business Ethics.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Business Ethics
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: The Legal Landscape: Key Environmental Laws and Their Origins →← Navigating the Ethical Dimensions of Technology in Business EnvironmentsNext lesson: The Legal Landscape: Key Environmental Laws and Their Origins →
In this lesson
Where nature’s moral importance comes from.
- Define environmental ethics.
- Distinguish 3 positions by their source of moral value.
- Show how an unstated philosophy shapes business decisions.
- Treat the 3 positions as competing, not settled.
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,532 words). Read along, or search it.
Environmental Ethics, Law, and Sustainability
Environmental Ethics: Philosophical Foundations
This lesson begins a chapter on environmental ethics, law, and sustainability. It starts not with regulations or reporting, but with the ideas that sit underneath them. Most environmental debates in business seem to be about facts, like emissions, habitats, or resources. Underneath many of them, though, sits a philosophical question about where nature's moral importance comes from. First, you will define environmental ethics, and then you will distinguish three major positions: anthropocentrism, biocentrism, and ecocentrism. You will explain what each one treats as the actual source of moral value. You will see how a business's environmental philosophy shapes concrete decisions, even when nobody states it out loud. And you will learn to treat these as competing positions, not settled conclusions, each with real implications.
The central question
What environmental ethics asks
Environmental ethics examines what moral obligations, if any, humans and human institutions have toward the natural world. Notice the words if any: the field does not assume the answer in advance. The central question is not simply whether the environment matters, but where that mattering actually comes from. Is nature owed anything in its own right, or does it matter only indirectly, because of what it does for people? Two key terms capture this split. Instrumental value is value a thing has because of what it provides or contributes to something else. Intrinsic value is value a thing has in itself, independent of any usefulness to another party. Different answers to the underlying question lead to genuinely different conclusions about business decisions. That holds even when everyone involved agrees that the environment matters.
Position 1
Anthropocentrism: nature matters for people
The first position is anthropocentrism, meaning centered on human beings. It holds that nature's value is instrumental: the environment matters because, and to the extent that, it serves human interests. The source lists those interests: health, resources, and aesthetic and recreational enjoyment. They also include the wellbeing of future human generations. Under this view, environmental protection is justified by the benefit it provides to people. It is not justified by any claim about nature's own standing. But do not mistake this for a view that never protects anything. Because it counts future generations and enjoyment, a human-centered view can support a great deal of protection. What makes it anthropocentric is the reason given, not the amount of protection.
Position 2
Biocentrism: every living thing has worth
The second position is biocentrism, meaning centered on life. It holds that every living thing possesses inherent moral worth simply by being alive, independent of any usefulness to humans. This view extends direct moral consideration to individual organisms, so a tree or an animal has standing of its own. It matters not merely because of what it provides to people, but because it is alive. The key unit here is the individual organism. Biocentrism asks about this tree and this animal, not about the forest or the species as an abstract total. In a business setting, that means an organism's own standing is relevant, beyond its value as timber, food, or scenery. That focus on individuals becomes important when we compare it with the third position.
Position 3
Ecocentrism: the ecological whole has value
The third position is ecocentrism, meaning centered on the ecosystem. It extends moral consideration beyond individual organisms to whole ecosystems, species, and ecological processes. Under this view, the health and integrity of an ecological system as a whole carries its own value. Species count, and so do processes, the relationships that keep a system functioning over time. Here is the counterintuitive part: preserving the whole can sometimes conflict with the interests of a specific organism within it. That is exactly where ecocentrism and biocentrism can pull apart. A biocentrist focuses on each living individual, while an ecocentrist focuses on the system those individuals belong to. So what protects a system may not protect every organism inside it.
Figure 15.1.1
3 positions, 3 scopes of moral consideration
The source's figure draws the three positions as concentric circles, shown here as nested regions. At the center is anthropocentrism, labeled human interests are what matter. Around it is biocentrism, labeled every living thing has inherent worth. The outermost region is ecocentrism, labeled the ecosystem as a whole has worth. The caption explains the idea: the positions differ in how widely they extend moral consideration. That reach runs from human interests alone, to individual living things, to entire ecological systems. One caution is worth stating: a wider scope is not automatically a better position. The figure compares scope; it does not rank the views or settle conflicts between them.
Source of value
Where each position locates moral value
The source then summarizes where each position locates the source of value. For anthropocentrism, the source of moral value is human interests and wellbeing. It protects nature because nature benefits people or is valued by them. For biocentrism, the source is the life of each individual organism. It protects a specific living thing because that thing has worth in itself. For ecocentrism, the source is the functioning ecological whole. It protects an ecosystem's integrity, even independent of any one organism. Notice something practical here: two positions may support the very same protective action. Yet they can still disagree about why that action is justified. And when the reasons differ, the conclusions can split as soon as circumstances change.
Why it matters in practice
2 sincere businesses, opposite conclusions
Why does the philosophical starting point matter in practice? Two businesses can both sincerely claim to care about the environment, yet reach opposite conclusions on the same decision. The difference lies in which position actually shapes their reasoning, even if it is never explicitly named. A company reasoning from an anthropocentric starting point asks one question. Does this environmental impact threaten a resource or benefit that people rely on or value? A company reasoning from an ecocentric starting point asks a different question. Does the impact damage an ecological system that carries worth on its own, regardless of any human benefit? Both companies care; they simply care about different things, for different reasons. That is why surfacing the unstated philosophy helps explain a disagreement.
1 forest, 3 analyses
A logging company considers harvesting old-growth forest
The source makes this concrete with one forest and three analyses. A logging company is deciding whether to harvest a section of old-growth forest. An anthropocentric analysis weighs the economic value of the timber and any human recreational use of the forest. It sets those against the resource value that the standing forest provides to people. A biocentric analysis considers the worth of each individual tree and animal living in that section. It does so independent of any human use of the land, either way. An ecocentric analysis asks a broader question: would harvesting this section damage the forest ecosystem's integrity as a functioning whole? That question reaches beyond the fate of any single tree or animal. The facts are identical in all three analyses. What changes is the question being asked, and so the answer can change too.
Think About It
An endangered plant with no known human use
The source stresses that these are genuinely competing philosophical positions, not a settled conclusion one can simply look up. Thoughtful people and traditions weigh them differently, and none is treated here as the correct answer. The source then poses a case to think about. A company argues that an endangered plant species has no known medicinal, economic, or recreational use. So, it concludes, its habitat can be cleared without any real ethical loss. That argument assumes anthropocentrism, since it treats human use as the only source of value. A biocentrist would reply that each plant has worth simply by being alive, so lack of use is beside the point. An ecocentrist would reply that the species and its habitat belong to an ecological whole whose integrity matters. Notice too that the argument counts only current, known uses. Even an anthropocentrist might ask about future generations, who are among the interests the source lists.
Review questions
5 model answers
Let's work through the five review questions. First, beyond whether the environment matters, environmental ethics asks where our obligations toward nature come from. Is nature owed something in its own right, or does it matter only through its effects on people? Second, anthropocentrism locates value in human interests, treating nature's value as instrumental. Biocentrism locates inherent moral worth in each individual living organism, independent of usefulness. Third, ecocentrism adds entire ecosystems and ecological processes to the scope of consideration. It holds that the whole has value, sometimes independent of any single organism within it. Fourth, two businesses that both value the environment can disagree because of their underlying philosophy. That philosophy, often unnamed, shapes where they think value comes from and what justifies protection. Fifth, the material treats the positions as competing because the questions are genuinely unsettled. The goal is to understand how each resolves the same facts, not to declare a single correct answer.
Key takeaways
Ask where the value comes from
Let's close with the source's key takeaways. Environmental ethics asks where humanity's obligations toward nature come from, not only whether the environment matters. Anthropocentrism locates value in human interests. Biocentrism locates it in each individual living organism, and ecocentrism locates it in the ecological whole. A business's underlying environmental philosophy shapes its actual conclusions, even when that philosophy is never stated. The same facts, such as a forest harvest decision, can be analyzed very differently depending on which position does the analyzing. And these are genuinely competing positions, which reasonable people weigh differently. When two sides of an environmental dispute seem to talk past each other, ask where each one thinks the value comes from.
About Business Ethics at UPI Study
Business Ethics (Business 211) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 19 chapters, from moral reasoning and compliance to governance, diversity, government and society, social responsibility, consumers, advertising, technology, the environment and global business. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Which ethics course? · Business Law vs Business Ethics
Why take it here
Why students take Business Ethics with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Business Ethics carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Environmental Ethics: Philosophical Foundations and Real-World Relevance
What is environmental ethics?
What is the difference between anthropocentrism, biocentrism and ecocentrism?
What is the difference between intrinsic and instrumental value in nature?
Can ecocentrism and biocentrism lead to different conclusions?
About the Business Ethics course
How many college credits is Business Ethics?
How much does Business Ethics cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Business Ethics take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Ethics.
105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →