UPI Study › Courses › Business Ethics › Free lessons › Lesson 17.6 Free with a free account
The Decision to Outsource: Drivers, Criteria, and Consequences
Business Ethics · Chapter 17: Going Global: International Business Ethics and StrategySection 17.6 · lesson 94 of 10515 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Business Ethics.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Business Ethics
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Governance and Economic Frameworks as Variables in Global Strategy →← When Work Moves Abroad: The Logic and Trade-Offs of OffshoringNext lesson: Governance and Economic Frameworks as Variables in Global Strategy →
In this lesson
Test the drivers against strategic importance, service needs, total cost, risk, and stakeholder consequences.
- Separate the provider choice from the location of the work.
- Explain 4 drivers and 4 decision criteria.
- Interpret the source’s decision path and its limits.
- Apply the electronics call-center and hospital billing scenarios.
- Answer 5 reviews using company and stakeholder consequences.
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,896 words). Read along, or search it.
Going Global: International Business Ethics and Strategy
The Decision to Outsource
Outsourcing contracts a business function to an external provider instead of performing it internally. That provider choice differs from offshoring, which concerns moving work to another country. This lesson examines why outsourcing looks attractive and whether it fits a particular function. The source identifies cost reduction, strategic focus, specialized capabilities, and flexibility as common drivers. Decision criteria then test strategic importance, quality, reliability, total cost, and provider dependency. An attractive driver does not establish that the specific arrangement meets the company's needs. Consequences also extend beyond the company's ledger to employees, provider workers, and consumers. We will examine the source's decision path and its simplified assumptions about strategic fit. The worked example concerns an electronics company's proposed move from internal support to a provider. The hospital billing scenario asks what evidence is needed beyond savings and better software. Neither scenario supplies numerical savings or a universal recommendation to outsource the function. Use drivers, criteria, and consequences together. Make the proposed arrangement clear and assessable.
The decision being made
External provider or internal operation?
Outsourcing concerns who performs a business function: an internal operation or an external provider. Offshoring concerns where the function is performed after work relocates to another country. Contracting a domestic provider to perform work at home is outsourcing without offshoring. Moving work to the company's own foreign subsidiary is offshoring without an external-provider contract. Contracting a provider to perform relocated work abroad combines outsourcing with offshoring. Those examples show why the two decisions should not be treated as interchangeable labels. This lesson focuses on the choice between an external provider and an internal operation. Location remains relevant, but it requires its own assessment alongside that provider choice. Classify where work actually occurs, rather than inferring location only from a provider's headquarters. A foreign-owned provider can perform work domestically, while a domestic provider can use foreign operations. Neither the provider's nationality nor its name fully identifies the location of the function. Keeping the decisions separate helps explain which change creates a particular benefit or risk.
Four drivers
Why outsourcing may look attractive
The first driver is cost reduction through capabilities or scale available from a specialized provider. A provider serving several customers may spread costs differently from one company's internal operation. However, that possible scale advantage does not guarantee a lower price or lower total cost. The second driver is focusing internal resources and management attention on the company's core competency. A core competency is a capability central to the company's competitive advantage in its market. The third driver is access to expertise or technology that would be difficult to develop internally. The fourth is flexibility to adjust capacity instead of relying entirely on fixed internal resources. Flexibility depends on the provider's capacity, contract, and the actual requirements of the function. The client still needs management capacity to establish expectations and oversee the external arrangement. Therefore, outsourcing does not automatically remove every internal coordination task or management responsibility. These drivers explain why a business starts considering outsourcing, rather than completing its decision. The criteria next ask whether those attractions apply to the particular function and proposed provider.
Four decision criteria
Does outsourcing fit this particular function?
Strategic importance asks whether outsourcing could undermine a capability central to competitive advantage. That assessment includes important customer experiences, rather than only the company's main product activity. The source treats core functions cautiously, but that guidance is not an absolute prohibition. Quality and reliability ask whether a provider can consistently deliver the required standards. The business must also consider how it can monitor performance and identify a developing problem. Total cost of ownership includes relevant costs beyond the headline price in the contract. Transition, coordination, and monitoring can change the comparison between the provider and internal operation. Relevant service consequences can matter too, including costs connected with declining customer satisfaction. Vendor dependency risk is exposure created by relying on an external provider for an important function. Consider failure, price changes, misconduct, continuity, and whether alternative capacity is available when needed. These criteria test whether the arrangement supports the company's actual strategic and operational requirements. A lower contract price alone does not establish acceptable overall cost. Service and risk also need assessment.
The source’s decision path
Strategic fit precedes the cost-and-service test
The source's decision path begins by asking whether the function is core to competitive advantage. Its yes branch recommends keeping the function internally to protect what makes the company distinct. Its no branch proceeds to a test of provider quality, reliability, and genuinely lower total cost. If that test succeeds, the path recommends outsourcing with clear monitoring of the arrangement. If the test fails, the source's other branch recommends keeping the function internally. These are the questions and outcomes shown by the diagram's four labeled arrows. Treat the path as a simplified heuristic rather than a complete rule for every business. Core activities can involve external partners when the strategic assessment supports that arrangement. Likewise, lower cost is not the only possible justification for accessing specialist expertise or flexibility. The business still needs to evaluate dependency, applicable requirements, and consequences for other stakeholders. Monitoring remains necessary on the outsource branch; the diagram does not recommend abandoning oversight. Use the path to organize questions, then complete the wider assessment of the proposed arrangement.
Stakeholder consequences
The company’s ledger is only part of the decision
The company may gain lower costs or sharper focus while facing dependency and quality problems. Displaced employees may lose jobs, experience career disruption, and affect the surrounding community's economy. Transition support or later opportunities depend on the actual decision and its implementation. The source does not establish that every displaced person will obtain a compensating benefit. Provider workers may gain employment opportunities, but their conditions can be less visible to the client. Less visibility is a management concern, rather than proof that every provider has poor conditions. Consumers may receive lower prices or faster innovation if the arrangement actually supports those outcomes. They may instead experience service problems or less transparency about how work is performed. Cost savings are not automatically passed through to prices, and outsourcing need not create net employment. The client can retain influence through provider selection, contractual standards, and relevant performance oversight. Trace the particular effects instead of assuming every stakeholder experiences the same gain or loss. Those consequences belong in the decision alongside the company's strategic, service, cost, and risk assessment.
Worked example: electronics support
The labor-cost driver does not settle the choice
The source's unnamed mid-sized electronics company currently runs its customer support call center domestically. It performs the function internally and considers contracting a provider that would perform the work abroad. The illustration assumes a substantial labor-cost difference between the existing and proposed locations. It also suggests focusing company resources on product design and engineering as a driver. However, support may carry strategic weight for a premium brand's customer experience and reputation. Being outside engineering does not by itself establish that the function is strategically unimportant. Quality assessment asks whether the provider can maintain service consistency and relevant language capabilities. Fit with actual customer needs matters, rather than assumptions based on national or cultural labels. Total cost must include transition and relevant consequences of declining service or customer satisfaction. The source supplies no named company, country, numerical savings, or independently verified outcome. Treat its cost difference as an illustrative assumption to be tested in a real decision. The example shows why an apparently attractive saving can be complicated. Strategic and service criteria matter.
Finish the call-center assessment
Plan oversight and evaluate the affected people
Finish the electronics assessment by examining dependence on the provider and the plan for oversight. Ask what happens if service fails, contract prices change, or the expected capacity disappears. Decide how the client will verify service quality, reliability, and appropriate safeguards for relevant information. A provider contract changes the operating arrangement without automatically eliminating the client's relevant responsibilities. Domestic call-center employees can face job loss, so identify affected jobs and feasible transition support. The provider's workers may gain employment, while their actual conditions and continuity still need assessment. Consumers may receive a cheaper or improved service, or experience a worse overall result. Specify what evidence supports the expected changes instead of assuming price and quality move together. If the external provider performs the function abroad, the proposed option combines outsourcing and offshoring. That classification helps identify both the provider change and the location change under consideration. Assess drivers, criteria, and consequences together rather than treating the contract price as the complete answer. The source invites a reasoned recommendation based on the arrangement, not an automatic outsourcing instruction.
Think About It: hospital billing
What must be answered before recommending outsourcing?
The hospital network considers outsourcing medical billing and coding to a specialized third-party firm. It cites significant savings and the provider's more advanced software as reasons for considering the arrangement. The source asks what additional questions should be answered before recommending that decision. Assess accurate coding, reliable claims handling, and the service experience that patients will receive. Calculate migration, training, integration, monitoring, and correction costs alongside the proposed contract price. Consider service interruptions, provider dependency, information access, and how an eventual transition would be managed. Identify consequences for internal staff, the provider's workers, and patients affected by billing performance. Determine the privacy and security requirements applying to the actual jurisdiction and information involved. For a United States covered entity, relevant billing services can involve a business associate under HIPAA. When that relationship involves protected health information, appropriate business associate agreements and safeguards matter. The source does not identify its jurisdiction, so that example is not a universal legal conclusion. Better software and a savings claim begin the assessment. They do not resolve the remaining questions.
Five review questions
Use the entire framework
The first review distinguishes outsourcing from offshoring and requests an example involving only one. Domestic contracting shows outsourcing alone; an own foreign operation shows offshoring without an outside provider. The second asks for three common drivers, selected from the four covered in this lesson. Choose cost reduction, strategic focus, access to expertise or technology, and flexibility in capacity. The third asks why strategic importance often receives attention before the other decision criteria. A saving can undermine a capability or customer experience central to the company's competitive advantage. The fourth asks for two stakeholder groups and one potential cost borne by each group. Displaced employees can lose jobs; provider workers can face conditions less visible to the client. The fifth review applies the full framework to the source's proposed electronics call-center arrangement. Weigh strategic customer experience, service quality, total costs, provider risk, and effects on workers and consumers. Identify missing evidence and the conditions required for acceptable performance before recommending the arrangement. The source presents an assessment problem rather than establishing that every similar company should outsource.
Carry forward
An attractive driver must survive the decision criteria
Outsourcing chooses an external provider, while offshoring separately concerns the foreign location of work. The drivers explain why a company begins considering an external arrangement for a business function. The criteria test whether that arrangement fits the function's strategic importance and operational requirements. Strategic importance can include customer experience beyond the activity associated with the main product. Quality and reliability require clear standards and a workable way to monitor the provider's performance. Total cost includes transition, coordination, and monitoring rather than stopping at the contract price. Dependency assessment considers what happens if the provider fails, changes terms, or cannot maintain service. The consequences also include affected employees, provider workers, communities, and consumers connected with the function. Savings, better technology, or potential flexibility do not independently settle all of those questions. Use the call-center and billing scenarios to connect attractive drivers with the evidence still needed. Maintain relevant oversight and responsibilities alongside whichever operational structure the company ultimately chooses. A reasoned decision considers expected gains, continuing requirements, and who bears the consequences of the arrangement.
About Business Ethics at UPI Study
Business Ethics (Business 211) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 19 chapters, from moral reasoning and compliance to governance, diversity, government and society, social responsibility, consumers, advertising, technology, the environment and global business. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Which ethics course? · Business Law vs Business Ethics
Why take it here
Why students take Business Ethics with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Business Ethics carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About The Decision to Outsource: Drivers, Criteria, and Consequences
Why do companies outsource business functions?
What is a core competency, and should it be outsourced?
What is total cost of ownership in outsourcing?
What is vendor dependency risk?
About the Business Ethics course
How many college credits is Business Ethics?
How much does Business Ethics cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Business Ethics take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Ethics.
105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →