UPI Study › Courses › Business Ethics › Free lessons › Lesson 17.1 Free with a free account
How and Why Businesses Expand Internationally
Business Ethics · Chapter 17: Going Global: International Business Ethics and StrategySection 17.1 · lesson 89 of 10515 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Business Ethics.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Business Ethics
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: The Environments Multinational Firms Must Navigate →← Why Environmental Stewardship Makes Business SenseNext lesson: The Environments Multinational Firms Must Navigate →
In this lesson
Connect the reason for entering a market with the commitment, control, and knowledge each mode requires.
- Identify 4 motivations for international expansion and give examples.
- Describe exporting, licensing/franchising, joint ventures, and wholly owned operations.
- Explain the general commitment–control trade-off and its limits.
- Apply the exact 4 milestones in the source’s illustrative market-entry path.
- Evaluate the joint-venture choice and answer 5 review questions.
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,935 words). Read along, or search it.
Going Global: International Business Ethics and Strategy
How and Why Businesses Expand Internationally
Selling products abroad and owning a foreign facility both count as international business activity. However, their arrangements involve different resource commitments. They also provide different degrees of internal ownership control. This lesson explains four motivations: market growth, cost advantages, resource access, and risk diversification. A company can pursue several motivations together, rather than choosing only one reason to expand. The four entry modes are exporting, licensing or franchising, joint ventures, and wholly owned subsidiaries. We distinguish rights to use an asset from shared or complete ownership of business operations. The source orders these arrangements by a general tendency toward greater commitment and control. Specific investment, risk, and decision rights still depend on the project and its actual terms. We also consider why a suitable local partner might help in an unfamiliar market. The illustrative company progresses through four relative milestones, in years one, three, six, and nine. Its distributor, license, joint venture, and owned facility show changes in participation over time. The example explains a strategic path, rather than prescribing a schedule that every company follows. Connect each purpose with its arrangement and the evidence supporting commitment.
Four motivations
A single expansion can serve several purposes
Market growth means reaching additional customers beyond the company's existing home-market opportunities. Domestic saturation can motivate that decision, but international expansion need not wait for complete saturation. Cost advantages mean pursuing lower labor or material costs through activity in another location. Evaluate total costs before claiming savings. Cheaper inputs alone do not prove the operation will save money. Resource access concerns raw materials or specialized talent that the company cannot readily obtain at home. The practical access arrangements and suitability of those resources still matter to the proposed strategy. Risk diversification spreads exposure across several economies, rather than depending entirely on one economy. That mechanism is conditional, because markets can move together and new locations introduce additional exposures. The four motivations therefore describe possible reasons, rather than guaranteed benefits from crossing a border. One foreign operation could reach customers and obtain useful resources while also pursuing cheaper inputs. It could simultaneously broaden the company's economic exposure, although the overall risk still requires evaluation. Explain the mechanism behind each claimed advantage and identify the evidence supporting that particular claim. Several motivations can coexist without every proposed benefit being realized.
Four market-entry modes
Identify how the company participates in the market
A market entry mode describes how the company begins participating in a foreign market. Exporting sells goods produced at home into that market, directly or through another party. It differs from owning a production operation abroad, even when both approaches reach foreign customers. Licensing authorizes specified use of a brand, technology, or other intellectual property under agreed terms. Franchising can include a broader system for operating a business, together with the brand rights. The source groups those approaches. Their agreements can grant different rights and obligations. An equity joint venture shares ownership of a business operation with another participating company. The partner is often local in this comparison, contributing resources or experience relevant to that market. A wholly owned subsidiary is entirely owned by the expanding company, through building or acquiring operations. These four labels describe different arrangements for participating, rather than an obligatory sequence of steps. The available options depend on resources, contracts, market conditions, and the rules applying to the activity. Start by identifying the arrangement before assuming its investment amount or its actual decision-making powers. The same label can describe projects with different commitments and risks.
Terms and boundaries
Rights to use assets differ from ownership of operations
Licensing involves an agreed payment for permission to use specified intellectual property in another market. That permission is different from transferring complete ownership of the company's foreign business operations. A business-format franchise adds a system for operating the business, alongside the relevant brand rights. This distinction explains why licensing and franchising should not be treated as perfectly identical agreements. The source illustrates a joint venture through shared ownership of a newly created business entity. Joint ventures more broadly can use other arrangements; the new entity is this lesson's equity example. Foreign direct investment involves a lasting ownership relationship with significant influence in a foreign enterprise. Direct investment does not require owning every share. A wholly owned subsidiary is one possible form. A qualifying equity joint venture can therefore also involve foreign direct investment through partial ownership. Keep permission, shared ownership, complete ownership, and direct investment distinct when describing the chosen arrangement. The label alone does not supply every contractual right, obligation, payment, or governance detail. Those details determine how the parties participate and which decisions each party can actually make. Accurate terminology connects the general structure with the relationship's specific terms.
Commitment and control
The source’s ordering is a general strategic comparison
The source presents a general comparison between commitment and control across the four entry modes. Exporting avoids owning foreign production, although its sales arrangement can still involve substantial commitments. Pricing and channel influence depend on direct sales, intermediary agreements, and other actual operating conditions. Licensing or franchising uses another party's operations and grants specified rights through an agreed relationship. The company's control depends on those rights, required standards, and the terms governing their use. An equity joint venture shares resources and ownership, while its governance determines important decision-making powers. A wholly owned subsidiary commits resources to entirely owned operations. This ownership provides greater internal control. However, complete ownership does not remove applicable local rules, market constraints, or practical resource limits. Moving toward owned operations generally increases commitment and internal control in this strategic comparison. It does not establish identical investment amounts or a universal risk ranking for every possible project. A large export arrangement can have different commitments from a small owned operation. Use the source's tendency to frame questions, then examine the project-specific costs, rights, and exposures. Greater ownership control is one consideration, rather than automatic proof that a mode is preferable.
Think About It: joint venture or owned operation?
Shared ownership can combine resources and local knowledge
Why might a company choose a joint venture instead of immediately establishing an owned subsidiary? The source emphasizes shared risk and the firsthand knowledge contributed by a suitable local partner. Those benefits can matter when the expanding company has little experience of the particular market. Actual contributions and agreed terms determine how commitment and exposure are shared between the parties. Relevant experience and relationships determine whether the partner supplies the practical knowledge the project needs. Shared ownership also brings shared governance, requiring attention to decision rights and possible disagreements. Therefore, the answer compares the partner's contribution with the conditions of the resulting shared arrangement. A local partner does not automatically provide sufficient knowledge. Nor does that partner eliminate business risk. A wholly owned subsidiary can also hire experienced local staff or acquire an established local operation. The joint venture offers access through a partner, rather than the only possible route to market knowledge. Explain why this particular partner and agreement might help this particular company in the unfamiliar market. Then consider whether the benefits justify sharing control instead of relying on an entirely owned operation. Compare how knowledge and resources are obtained, alongside the ownership structure.
Illustrative progression in one market
Four relative milestones across nearly a decade
The source follows one unnamed company through four milestones in the same foreign market. In year one, the company exports products through a local distributor serving that market. In year three, it licenses its brand to a local manufacturer under a licensing arrangement. In year six, it forms a joint venture to share local market knowledge through partnership. In year nine, it opens a wholly owned facility in the market for entirely owned operations. The diagram's arrows show this example's chronology, with later steps changing the company's participation. The relative years are not calendar dates and do not prescribe deadlines for other companies. The progression illustrates increasing commitment and internal ownership control across the arrangements in this case. The sequence is not compulsory. Exporting or licensing need not always precede a joint venture or owned facility. Nor does it identify a real company whose investment amounts or performance have been independently verified. The example is useful because it makes changes in the company's market relationship concrete over time. Read each milestone's actual action before explaining what additional commitment or control the transition represents. Chronology describes the path; relevant evidence would justify a comparable real expansion.
The exact milestone actions
Explain the transition rather than treating time alone as evidence
The first milestone uses a local distributor to sell the company's exported products in the market. The second authorizes a local manufacturer to use its brand, rather than establishing complete ownership. The third introduces a joint venture for sharing local market knowledge through the partner relationship. The fourth opens an entirely owned facility, changing the company's ownership position within that market. Why does the company wait several years between these steps in the source's teaching example? The source connects later commitments with the gradual development of market knowledge and greater confidence. Those factors can help explain a willingness to commit additional resources or pursue greater internal control. The passage supplies no named company or investment totals. It also provides no measured outcomes or verified management history. We therefore explain the intended strategic reasoning, rather than claiming evidence of particular managers' actual motives. A real next step also requires evaluating demand, resources, risks, and the constraints applying to operations. Elapsed time alone does not establish that a company has gained enough knowledge or resources to proceed. The illustration connects learning with commitment, while the real decision depends on relevant evidence and circumstances. Preserve the exact actions without making the example a universal schedule.
Five review questions
Connect motivation, arrangement, and decision evidence
The first review asks for two motivations with examples. Any two of the four categories qualify. Market growth reaches customers, while cost advantages pursue cheaper inputs; resources and economic diversification also qualify. The second review asks about commitment and control, using the source's ordering of the four modes. Owned operations generally commit more resources and provide greater internal control, with project-specific costs and rights. The third review asks for an advantage of a joint venture in an unfamiliar market. A suitable local partner can share commitment and contribute firsthand knowledge through the actual partnership arrangement. Remember that owned operations can also obtain local expertise through staff or an acquired business. The fourth review asks why years pass between the illustrative company's four market-entry milestones. The example links increasing knowledge and confidence with willingness to make a greater commitment later. That explanation does not make waiting alone sufficient evidence of readiness for a real investment. The fifth review asks why a company might pursue several motivations through one expansion decision. Reaching customers, obtaining resources, pursuing lower costs, and spreading exposure can serve compatible strategic purposes. Explain each mechanism and distinguish possible benefits from demonstrated outcomes.
Apply and carry forward
Choose an arrangement that fits the purpose and evidence
An accurate expansion analysis begins with why the company wants to participate in this foreign market. Identify which of the four motivations is supported and how the proposed activity would serve it. Then determine how the company will participate through exporting, contractual rights, shared ownership, or owned operations. Examine the resources, obligations, decision powers, and practical constraints associated with that particular arrangement. Greater commitment generally supports greater internal control, but the project's actual details determine the comparison. Do not assume complete ownership provides unlimited freedom or guarantees that the business will succeed. A suitable partner can supply knowledge and share exposure, while also introducing shared governance considerations. Owned operations can obtain local knowledge too, so evaluate the actual source of the required capability. The source's relative years one, three, six, and nine illustrate one company's changing participation over time. Its distributor, brand license, joint venture, and owned facility are exact actions in the teaching example. Other companies can choose different paths when their purposes, resources, evidence, and market constraints differ. A later date alone does not prove a better strategy. Nor does a stronger ownership position by itself. Justify the arrangement through its purpose, commitments, decision rights, and supporting evidence.
About Business Ethics at UPI Study
Business Ethics (Business 211) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 19 chapters, from moral reasoning and compliance to governance, diversity, government and society, social responsibility, consumers, advertising, technology, the environment and global business. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Which ethics course? · Business Law vs Business Ethics
Why take it here
Why students take Business Ethics with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Business Ethics carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About How and Why Businesses Expand Internationally
Why do companies expand internationally?
What are the main market entry modes in international business?
What is the difference between licensing and franchising?
Why would a company choose a joint venture instead of a wholly owned subsidiary?
About the Business Ethics course
How many college credits is Business Ethics?
How much does Business Ethics cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Business Ethics take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Ethics.
105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →