UPI Study › Courses › Business Ethics › Free lessons › Lesson 2.7 Free with a free account
Identifying and Addressing Unfair Competition in Business
Business Ethics · Chapter 2: Organizational Ethics, Compliance, and Fair CompetitionSection 2.7 · lesson 14 of 10515 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Business Ethics.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Business Ethics
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Competition in Free Markets: Forms, Functions, and Implications →← When Professional Conduct Meets Legal ObligationNext lesson: Competition in Free Markets: Forms, Functions, and Implications →
In this lesson
Distinguish vigorous rivalry from abusive pricing and violations of protected rights.
- Distinguish unfair competition from ordinary competitive behavior.
- Explain the predatory-pricing pattern and its legal qualifications.
- Explain intellectual property violations and their potential harms.
- Identify safeguards and responses for pricing and intellectual property risks.
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,856 words). Read along, or search it.
Organizational Ethics, Compliance, and Fair Competition
Unfair Competition
Firms compete through better products, lower prices, and service that gives customers more value. Aggressive rivalry can make competitors uncomfortable without establishing that the conduct is unfair. This lesson distinguishes merit-based competition from deceptive, exclusionary, or rights-violating business practices. We will examine predatory pricing alongside intellectual property violations, and their different potential harms. Predatory pricing presents a pattern of losses now, followed by possible higher prices later. The source illustrates that pattern, but its simplified description is not a complete legal test. Intellectual property rights protect particular interests; their scope and exceptions must be examined carefully. Using another firm’s work without permission is not automatically unlawful in every circumstance. We will retain the source’s patent scenario, while separating infringement from possible buyer deception. Practical safeguards include pricing review, rights audits, licensing, relevant training, and appropriate enforcement routes. The aim is informed prevention that preserves lawful competition, rather than discouraging ordinary rivalry.
Competing on the Merits
Aggressive Competition Can Benefit Customers without Being Unfair
Unfair competition gains market position through deception, abuse of market power, or rights violations. Ordinary competition wins customers through a better offering, including price, quality, or service. The difference depends on the mechanism, rather than how aggressive the tactic feels. A price cut can benefit customers even while it reduces a competitor’s sales. A new product can challenge an established firm without necessarily violating protected rights. Conversely, deception about origin or unauthorized protected conduct may raise a different concern. The source contrasts success on the merits with advantages obtained through these improper means. Its two examples are predatory pricing and intellectual property infringement, not an exhaustive list. The source gives no evidence establishing that these are the most frequent forms. A rival’s discomfort or lost revenue is not enough to establish an unfair practice. Identify the actual conduct, applicable rights, and market conditions before drawing a conclusion.
Pricing Pattern
The Source Illustrates Low Prices Followed by a Post-Exit Increase
The predatory-pricing story begins with a firm cutting prices below an illustrative cost level. Its strategy is to eliminate competitive pressure, rather than merely offer customers a better deal. The firm initially accepts losses, expecting later conditions to permit recovery through higher prices. In the source, both firms’ prices fall, making the first phase resemble healthy rivalry. The rival then exits, and the remaining firm raises prices above the starting level. Customers appear to benefit initially, but reduced competition can create a later pricing disadvantage. A genuine sale does not depend on a rival disappearing before it can succeed. However, a diagram alone cannot establish that actual below-cost pricing is legally predatory. The relevant legal inquiry examines costs, exclusion, market conditions, and the prospect of recovering losses. An assessment need not wait for every hypothetical event to occur after harm develops. The pattern organizes a concern; qualified analysis determines what the evidence actually supports.
Source Figure
Read the Price Path as a Hypothetical Pattern, Not Measured Evidence
This figure selectively redraws the source’s firm-price path and its illustrative cost reference. The horizontal axis represents months, and the vertical axis gives prices in U.S. dollars. The firm starts near ten dollars, while the dashed cost line remains at six dollars. Its price falls below that line, reaching approximately four dollars around months five and six. The original also shows the rival’s prices falling, with its line ending around month six. After the depicted exit, the firm’s price rises, approaching fourteen dollars at month twelve. These are approximate readings of a hypothetical source chart, rather than measured market observations. The redraw preserves its timing and central pattern without claiming an exact underlying dataset. Below-cost pricing and a later increase deserve investigation, but do not alone prove liability. Actual assessment needs evidence about the relevant cost measure, market power, and possible recoupment. Use the figure to explain the proposed mechanism, not to diagnose a real firm automatically.
U.S. Legal Qualification
Low Prices and a Rival’s Higher Costs Do Not Establish Predation
FTC guidance emphasizes that low prices ordinarily benefit buyers and represent desirable competition. Even pricing below a firm’s own costs is not necessarily unlawful under U.S. antitrust law. Being below another firm’s costs does not establish that the pricing firm is acting illegally. The relevant analysis includes the firm’s own appropriate cost measure and the governing legal standard. It also examines the prospect of recovering losses through sustained prices above competitive levels. Market power and conditions affecting entry can matter to whether that prospect is plausible. If new competitors can readily enter, maintaining those later prices may be difficult. Intent and duration can inform the evidence, but neither is a complete legal test. Do not infer predation simply from firm size, an aggressive discount, or a rival’s exit. Use qualified antitrust review for the actual facts, jurisdiction, and applicable requirements. The practical lesson is to flag risk without equating every low price with unfairness.
Intellectual Property
Protected Rights Have Defined Scope, Conditions, and Exceptions
Intellectual property infringement involves violating another party’s actual protected rights, within their defined scope. Different rights protect different interests, and their requirements cannot be treated as interchangeable. Trademark infringement generally requires the relevant likelihood of confusion, rather than unauthorized use alone. Copyright protects expression, with limits and exceptions that can permit use without permission. Fair use is context-specific, and public-domain material does not require permission from a copyright owner. Patents can cover protected inventions; unauthorized acts within the patent’s scope may infringe. Independent development does not automatically prevent patent infringement, and buyer confusion is not required. Trade-secret misappropriation concerns improper acquisition, use, or disclosure of qualifying secret information. Proper reverse engineering and independent derivation are excluded from improper acquisition under the cited definition. Not every idea or imitation is protected, and lawful competitive learning remains possible. Check the particular right, conduct, jurisdiction, and exceptions before assuming a license was required.
Patent Scenario from the PDF
Using a Rival’s Patented Design Creates a Different Risk from Price Cutting
The source’s second figure describes a firm launching a product using a rival’s patented design. It does so without a license, presenting a possible advantage from another firm’s development investment. If the conduct violates a valid patent’s protected scope, it creates an infringement concern. The patent holder may lose opportunities to benefit from the work it paid to develop. Buyers may also be misled if the product is presented as original or genuinely associated. That possible deception is distinct from patent liability, which does not require buyer confusion. The source identifies a cease-and-desist demand or a lawsuit as possible rights-holder responses. A demand alleges a problem; it is not by itself a court’s determination of infringement. The actual right and conduct must be evaluated before asserting that the launch is unlawful. This example illustrates one risk, rather than describing every product inspired by another firm. Preserve the development-cost concern while distinguishing protected use, lawful alternatives, and possible customer harm.
Compare the Practices
The Mechanism, Initial Appearance, Harm, and Safeguard Differ
The source comparison separates the practices by mechanism, initial appearance, harm, and typical response. The pricing concern involves an exclusionary below-cost strategy with a prospect of later recoupment. At first, it may appear to be an ordinary sale, discount, or price war. Its potential customer harm arises through reduced competition and sustained higher prices afterward. The intellectual property concern involves conduct within another party’s protected rights without a lawful basis. It may appear as a new product, a new brand, or an attractive copied feature. The rights holder can suffer losses, and buyers may face deception depending on the facts. Pricing review examines relevant costs and strategy, while intellectual property audits examine protected rights. Licensing can provide permission when needed, subject to its actual terms and protected scope. Protection encourages innovation but does not guarantee recovery of every investment or prohibit all imitation. Neither an unsuccessful competitor nor disappointed investor alone establishes that these violations occurred.
Prevention before Launch
Use Pricing Review, Rights Audits, Licensing, and Relevant Training
Prevention begins before a pricing strategy, product, or brand is released to the market. Internal pricing review compares proposed prices with relevant costs and investigates potentially exclusionary strategies. The source suggests an internal cost-based floor, together with review of aggressive pricing moves. Such controls support risk management, rather than establish the complete legal standard for predation. A prelaunch intellectual property audit checks trademarks, patents, copyrighted materials, and the sourcing of secrets. It can identify problems whether a proposed violation was intentional or simply overlooked. When permission is required, negotiate a license with an appropriate scope before using protected work. Check what the license permits, rather than assume any agreement covers every planned use. Training helps pricing, product-development, and marketing staff recognize concerns early and escalate them appropriately. An audit is a safeguard, not a guarantee that every possible rights issue disappears. Use review, lawful permissions, and informed staff together to prevent avoidable competitive misconduct.
Respond to a Suspected Violation
Preserve Evidence and Assess the Proper Enforcement Route
A suspected violation calls for an assessment of evidence, applicable rights, and the relevant jurisdiction. Preserve relevant pricing records, product details, or rights information so qualified reviewers can examine it. Cease-and-desist means a formal demand that another party stop an alleged unlawful or infringing practice. The source presents that notice as one possible response before further legal action. A notice does not itself establish liability, or automatically become a binding court order. A rights holder may pursue legal action when the evidence and applicable procedures support it. Suspected predatory pricing can be raised with the relevant competition authority for appropriate examination. Internal and external responses should follow qualified advice, rather than assumptions based on appearance. Licensing, dispute procedures, enforcement, and control improvements address different aspects of the problem. Train affected staff and improve the particular review that failed or needs strengthening. The goal is a justified response, respecting both protected rights and lawful competitive activity.
Think About It
A Brief Promotional Price Match Does Not Establish the Predatory Pattern
Consider a large firm that sharply cuts prices to match a smaller rival’s promotional sale. Once the promotion ends, the firm returns to its normal price rather than maintaining the discount. The stated facts describe a temporary competitive response, not an established strategy of eliminating the rival. They do not establish recovery of below-cost losses through sustained prices after competition disappears. On those facts, treat the match as ordinary competition rather than proven predatory conduct. However, the source’s focus on intent and duration is not a complete U.S. legal test. Further review would examine relevant own costs, market conditions, exclusionary strategy, and possible recoupment. Firm size, a sharp discount, or a brief duration cannot settle the question alone. Nor does this scenario create a universal legal exemption for every short-lived price cut. The answer should explain the missing predatory pattern, while preserving the need for actual evidence. Distinguish a classroom example’s supported conclusion from a final legal judgment about additional facts.
Review and Apply
Distinguish the Mechanism, Check the Evidence, and Choose a Safeguard
What separates hard rivalry from unfair competition? Examine the means used to win customers. Better quality, price, and service differ from deception, abusive exclusion, or violations of protected rights. Why can the first pricing phase be hard to identify? Falling prices appear beneficial to buyers. The source shows both prices falling, but actual analysis needs costs and recoupment evidence. Who can intellectual property violations harm? Rights holders, and sometimes buyers misled about the product. Do not assume buyer confusion is required for every right, including patent infringement. Name a pricing safeguard: qualified review of relevant costs and the proposed strategy. For intellectual property, use prelaunch audits and checks for lawful permission or applicable exceptions. Is the brief promotional match predatory? The stated facts do not establish that conclusion. Assess the full standard rather than relying on intent, duration, or an illustrative graph alone. Compete on lawful merits, supported by review, licensing where needed, appropriate enforcement, and relevant training.
About Business Ethics at UPI Study
Business Ethics (Business 211) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 19 chapters, from moral reasoning and compliance to governance, diversity, government and society, social responsibility, consumers, advertising, technology, the environment and global business. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Which ethics course? · Business Law vs Business Ethics
Why take it here
Why students take Business Ethics with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Business Ethics carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Identifying and Addressing Unfair Competition in Business
What is unfair competition in business?
What is predatory pricing?
Is matching a competitor's sale price predatory pricing?
What counts as intellectual property infringement?
About the Business Ethics course
How many college credits is Business Ethics?
How much does Business Ethics cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Business Ethics take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Ethics.
105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →