UPI Study › Courses › Business Ethics › Free lessons › Lesson 15.2 Free with a free account
The Legal Landscape: Key Environmental Laws and Their Origins
Business Ethics · Chapter 15: Environmental Ethics, Law, and SustainabilitySection 15.2 · lesson 81 of 10512 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Business Ethics.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Business Ethics
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Balancing Environmental Protection with Economic Priorities →← Environmental Ethics: Philosophical Foundations and Real-World RelevanceNext lesson: Balancing Environmental Protection with Economic Priorities →
In this lesson
How the core of U.S. federal environmental law arrived within about a decade.
- Describe the shift from a state patchwork to a federal framework.
- Identify the core federal environmental laws.
- Describe the common standard-permit-enforcement pattern.
- Explain how CERCLA’s polluter pays principle differs.
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,588 words). Read along, or search it.
Environmental Ethics, Law, and Sustainability
The Legal Landscape: Key Environmental Laws
Almost the entire framework of United States federal environmental law was written within about a decade. This lesson asks what made that particular window so different from everything before it. First, you will describe how environmental law shifted from a state-by-state patchwork to a federal framework. Second, you will identify the core federal environmental laws and what each one addresses. Third, you will describe the common structural pattern that most of these laws follow. Finally, you will explain how one law, known as CERCLA or Superfund, breaks that pattern through the polluter pays principle. Where dates and legal details matter, this lesson checks them against official government sources. That matters, because a law's popular name and its enactment year are not always as simple as they look.
Before 1970
A patchwork of state and local rules
Before nineteen seventy, environmental protection in the United States was largely a patchwork of state and local rules. There was no comprehensive federal framework governing air quality, water quality, or industrial waste. A factory's obligations could depend heavily on which state, or even which city, it operated in. What changed was public awareness, because people could see pollution's effects on air, on water, and on wildlife. Through the late nineteen sixties, that awareness built pressure for a different approach. One precision point is worth adding: no comprehensive framework does not mean there was no federal law at all. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the Air Pollution Control Act of nineteen fifty-five funded research into air pollution. And the Federal Water Pollution Control Act dates to nineteen forty-eight. Those earlier laws, however, did not add up to the comprehensive framework that came next.
A concentrated decade
The framework was built almost from scratch
That public pressure produced a remarkably concentrated period of federal lawmaking. Within about a decade, the core of the modern federal environmental framework was put in place, almost entirely from scratch. That included the agency structure needed to run it, and the Environmental Protection Agency opened on December second, nineteen seventy. It consolidated environmental functions that had been scattered across several federal departments. In other words, the new laws arrived together with a new federal regulator to administer them. Why does this window matter to a business today? Much of the environmental compliance a company faces traces back to statutes written in this short period. Those statutes have been amended many times since, but their basic architecture still dates from the nineteen seventies.
Table 1
The core federal environmental laws
The source identifies six statutes as the backbone of this framework. The National Environmental Policy Act, known as NEPA, dates to nineteen seventy. It requires environmental review before major federal actions. The Clean Air Act, also nineteen seventy, sets national air quality standards and emissions limits. The Clean Water Act, from nineteen seventy-two, regulates the discharge of pollutants into waterways. The Endangered Species Act, from nineteen seventy-three, protects species at risk of extinction and their habitats. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, from nineteen seventy-six, governs the handling and disposal of hazardous waste. Finally, CERCLA, better known as Superfund, from nineteen eighty, funds and assigns liability for cleaning up contaminated sites. Notice the range, because these laws cover review, air, water, wildlife, waste, and cleanup.
Figure 1
6 laws in about a decade
The source's first figure places the same six laws on a timeline. Nineteen seventy brings NEPA and the Clean Air Act. Nineteen seventy-two brings the Clean Water Act, and nineteen seventy-three the Endangered Species Act. Nineteen seventy-six brings RCRA, and nineteen eighty closes the run with CERCLA. Three of the six, NEPA, the Clean Air Act, and the Clean Water Act, arrived in just the first three years. The figure spaces the laws evenly by order, so the gaps are not drawn to scale. Even so, the point is visible at a glance: the backbone of federal environmental law was enacted between nineteen seventy and nineteen eighty. That is about ten years, from environmental review at the start to Superfund cleanup at the end.
Reading the dates precisely
What each year marks
Dates in law can be slippery, so it helps to read these years precisely. NEPA's official title is the National Environmental Policy Act of nineteen sixty-nine. It passed Congress in nineteen sixty-nine, and was signed into law on January first, nineteen seventy. The Clean Air Act built on earlier laws from nineteen fifty-five and nineteen sixty-three. The Environmental Protection Agency describes the nineteen seventy law as a major shift. It created national ambient air quality standards and emissions standards for sources and pollutants. The Clean Water Act grew from the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of nineteen forty-eight. That law was significantly reorganized and expanded in nineteen seventy-two. RCRA, in the agency's words, controls hazardous waste from cradle to grave, from generation through disposal. The Endangered Species Act conserves threatened and endangered plants, animals, and their habitats. It is administered by the Fish and Wildlife Service and by NOAA Fisheries. So each year in the table marks a decisive law, not always the very first federal action on that topic.
A common pattern
Standard, permit, enforcement
Most of the laws in the table share a structural pattern. It is a classic form of direct regulation, which a later chapter compares with market-based tools. First, the law sets a standard for acceptable conduct. Second, it requires a permit before certain activities can proceed. Third, it relies on ongoing agency enforcement to hold that standard in place going forward. The Clean Water Act gives a clear example, because under it, discharging any pollutant from a point source into navigable waters is unlawful without a permit. Those permits are issued through EPA's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. Notice the direction of time in this pattern: standards, permits, and enforcement all govern what a business does from now on.
Think About It
Why does CERCLA need a different approach?
The source poses a natural question: if most environmental laws follow the standard, permit, and enforcement pattern, why does CERCLA need something different? The answer turns on time, since that pattern works well for governing future conduct. But CERCLA was written specifically to address contamination that already existed. Often that contamination came from activity that occurred before any standard applied to it. You cannot issue a permit for pollution that is already in the ground. Nor can you enforce a standard against conduct that happened before the standard existed. Yet the contamination is still there, and someone has to pay for, and carry out, the cleanup. That is a problem the ordinary pattern was not built to solve.
Figure 2
Most environmental law vs. CERCLA’s polluter pays
The source's second figure sets the two approaches side by side. On the left is most environmental law, which sets a standard for future conduct, requires a permit to operate, and enforces the standard going forward. On the right is CERCLA's polluter pays approach. First, it identifies the parties responsible for existing contamination. Second, it assigns the cost of cleanup to those parties, even retroactively. Third, it funds cleanup even when a responsible party cannot be found. That third step is a notable fallback, because contamination is not simply left in place because no violator can be identified or held liable. That distinguishes CERCLA from laws that depend entirely on an identifiable violator.
CERCLA in detail
Polluter pays, with a fallback
Let's define the central terms. The polluter pays principle holds that parties responsible for contamination bear the cost of its cleanup. That holds even when the contamination predates the law. CERCLA stands for the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of nineteen eighty. It is commonly known as Superfund, and the Environmental Protection Agency describes three features of its liability. It is retroactive, so parties can be liable for acts that happened before the law was enacted in nineteen eighty. It is strict, so a party cannot escape simply by saying it was not negligent, or followed industry standards. And it is joint and several, so one party may be liable for an entire cleanup when the harm cannot be separated. For the fallback, the agency states that when there is no viable responsible party, Superfund gives it funds and authority to clean up. For a business buying land or a facility, these features make past contamination a very present risk.
Review questions
5 model answers
Let's work through the five review questions. First, around nineteen seventy, a patchwork of state and local rules gave way to federal lawmaking. Public awareness of pollution built pressure, and the core of the federal framework appeared within about a decade. Second, name any three core laws with what each addresses. For instance, NEPA requires environmental review, the Clean Water Act regulates discharges, and RCRA governs hazardous waste. Third, the common pattern is to set a standard, require a permit, and rely on ongoing agency enforcement. Fourth, CERCLA needed a different approach because it targets contamination that already exists. The polluter pays principle identifies responsible parties and assigns them cleanup costs, even retroactively. Fifth, when no responsible party can be identified or held liable, CERCLA funds cleanup through other means. That sets it apart from laws that depend entirely on finding a specific violator.
Key takeaways
A decade that built the framework
Let's close with the source's key takeaways. Before nineteen seventy, environmental protection in the United States was a patchwork of state rules, with no comprehensive federal framework. NEPA, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, RCRA, and CERCLA form its core. All six were enacted within about a decade. Most of these laws follow a standard, permit, and enforcement pattern that governs future conduct. CERCLA departs from that pattern through the polluter pays principle. It assigns responsibility for existing contamination rather than regulating future behavior. One more key term completes the picture. An environmental impact statement is a document required under NEPA. It assesses the environmental effects of a proposed major federal action.
About Business Ethics at UPI Study
Business Ethics (Business 211) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 19 chapters, from moral reasoning and compliance to governance, diversity, government and society, social responsibility, consumers, advertising, technology, the environment and global business. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Which ethics course? · Business Law vs Business Ethics
Why take it here
Why students take Business Ethics with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Business Ethics carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About The Legal Landscape: Key Environmental Laws and Their Origins
What are the major federal environmental laws in the United States?
Why was the core of U.S. federal environmental law passed between 1970 and 1980?
How do most environmental laws regulate businesses?
What is the polluter pays principle under Superfund?
About the Business Ethics course
How many college credits is Business Ethics?
How much does Business Ethics cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Business Ethics take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Ethics.
105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →