UPI Study › Courses › Business Ethics › Free lessons › Lesson 17.5 Free with a free account
When Work Moves Abroad: The Logic and Trade-Offs of Offshoring
Business Ethics · Chapter 17: Going Global: International Business Ethics and StrategySection 17.5 · lesson 93 of 10516 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Business Ethics.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Business Ethics
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: The Decision to Outsource: Drivers, Criteria, and Consequences →← Cross-Cultural Leadership Across National BordersNext lesson: The Decision to Outsource: Drivers, Criteria, and Consequences →
In this lesson
Separate the location of work from the choice of an internal operation or external provider.
- Distinguish offshoring from outsourcing and classify all 4 combinations.
- Explain location costs, talent access, and proximity to customers.
- Evaluate company, home-workforce, and destination trade-offs.
- Compare the source’s 2 customer-service arrangements.
- Explain reshoring and answer 5 review questions.
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,964 words). Read along, or search it.
Going Global: International Business Ethics and Strategy
When Work Moves Abroad: Offshoring
Offshoring and outsourcing describe different choices about how a company performs a business function. Offshoring concerns relocating that work to another country, whether an internal operation or provider performs it. Outsourcing concerns contracting the function to an external provider, whether the work occurs domestically or abroad. A company can make either choice alone, combine both, or keep the work internally at home. We will classify the four arrangements before evaluating their business logic and consequences for affected people. The source emphasizes location costs, particularly labor costs for functions that require substantial labor. Specialized talent and proximity to customers can also support a decision to perform work abroad. Those possible advantages come with coordination, quality, management, and provider-dependence questions that require assessment. Workers in a relocated function can face concentrated displacement, while the destination may gain jobs and income. The source illustrates the decision through customer service performed by a subsidiary or external call center. Reshoring brings previously offshored work home, while leaving the internal or external provider choice separate. Use the two dimensions to classify the arrangement, then assess its actual costs and responsibilities. Neither location nor provider labels guarantee savings. Stakeholder benefits also require evidence.
Two independent choices
Location and provider answer different questions
Start with two questions: where is the work performed, and who performs the business function? The location question distinguishes domestic work from foreign work. Offshoring relocates a function abroad. The provider question distinguishes an internal company operation from an external provider contracted through outsourcing. An internal foreign subsidiary can therefore perform offshored work without an outside vendor being involved. A domestic provider can perform outsourced work without moving that function outside the home country. Classify the actual location of the work, rather than relying only on the vendor's headquarters. A foreign-owned vendor performing the function domestically does not by itself make the work offshore. Likewise, a domestically headquartered provider can arrange for the function to be performed abroad. That arrangement can involve offshoring even though the provider's headquarters remains in the home country. Ownership nationality and a mailing address are therefore insufficient substitutes for understanding the operational arrangement. The source uses internal and external operations as the other dimension of its four-way comparison. That dimension identifies the provider, rather than transferring every responsibility, data right, or intellectual-property right. Keeping the questions separate prevents the common mistake of using offshoring and outsourcing as interchangeable labels.
All four combinations
Location and provider produce four arrangements
The domestic, internal arrangement keeps the business function inside the company and at home. That arrangement involves neither offshoring nor outsourcing under the distinctions used in this lesson. The domestic, external arrangement contracts a provider to perform the work in the home country. It is domestic outsourcing, because the provider changes while the work remains at home. The foreign, internal arrangement uses the company's own subsidiary to perform the work abroad. It is captive offshoring, because location changes without contracting the function to an outside provider. The foreign, external arrangement contracts an outside provider to perform the relocated function abroad. It is offshore outsourcing, because both the foreign-location and external-provider dimensions apply to the work. These are the four combinations shown in the source's comparison, expressed here as a table. Captive means that the company's own foreign operation performs the function instead of an outside vendor. Offshore outsourcing combines the decisions that the previous examples demonstrated can also occur separately. The internal or external distinction does not establish who owns every dataset or intellectual-property right. Assess those rights separately. Also assess continuing responsibilities and applicable requirements for the arrangement.
Why relocate a function?
Assess the full business logic
The source identifies location cost differences as a primary business reason for offshoring a function. Labor costs can be particularly relevant when the function requires substantial labor relative to its output. However, a lower wage is only one input into total delivered cost. Other relevant expenses need assessment. Productivity, coordination, quality, and other relevant expenses can change the expected result of the comparison. Assess total delivered cost instead of treating a lower wage as proof of automatic overall savings. The source connects specialization with the earlier trade lesson, but the concepts need careful separation. Formal comparative advantage concerns relative opportunity cost, rather than simply which location has lower wages. A cost difference can support a business case without independently proving that formal economic relationship. Specialized skills or a concentrated talent pool can provide another reason to locate a function abroad. Operating near a growing customer base can also improve the fit between location and service needs. The actual decision may combine these reasons instead of being explained by one input alone. Test the assumptions about capabilities, demand, productivity, and coordination before concluding that relocation is worthwhile. A favorable estimate supports a proposed decision; it does not guarantee the savings eventually realized.
The company’s trade-off
Potential advantages come with coordination and control needs
The company's possible advantages include lower costs, access to talent, and proximity to relevant customers. Those advantages need to be assessed alongside the challenges created by the actual operational arrangement. Distance and time zones can increase coordination complexity when work depends on timely communication across locations. Quality and integration still require management, whether an internal foreign operation or outside provider performs work. The external-provider arrangement adds dependence on another company's capacity, priorities, and continued ability to deliver. Reduced direct operational control does not mean the client loses every influence over the function. Contracts can specify standards, and the client can monitor performance and discuss problems with the provider. Appropriate data handling also requires attention. An outsourcing contract does not automatically eliminate the client’s relevant responsibilities. Federal Trade Commission security guidance emphasizes provider selection, clear security expectations, contractual safeguards, and oversight. That guidance supports the general point without establishing identical legal obligations for every company worldwide. An internal foreign subsidiary preserves ownership control, but it still faces practical constraints and local requirements. Evaluate the specific costs and responsibilities instead of assuming either provider arrangement eliminates management work. The relevant trade-off concerns how the function will be operated, coordinated, controlled, and responsibly overseen.
Workforce and destination effects
Trace the particular mechanism and affected people
For home-country workers, the source highlights concentrated displacement in the particular function that moves abroad. Affected employees can lose jobs or face difficult adjustment when their existing work is relocated. That mechanism does not establish that every home-country worker loses or that no retained role benefits. Some retained roles may benefit if a company expands or remains viable, depending on the circumstances. For the destination, the source identifies possible new jobs, skill development, and additional income. These are potential gains, rather than proof that every resident or every worker benefits equally. Job quality, duration, and the actual distribution of income remain questions for a specific assessment. The destination can also become dependent on a contract or investment decision made somewhere else. Consumers may gain from lower prices when relevant cost savings actually reach the prices they pay. Savings are not automatically passed through, and the effect can differ between products and customers. This connects offshoring to the earlier distinction between concentrated losses and more widely distributed gains. The arrangement provides a concrete mechanism, rather than explaining every employment change or price movement. Identify the affected people and the mechanism. Evaluate the evidence about magnitude and duration.
Source case: relocating customer service
Two ways to perform the same function abroad
The source asks us to compare two ways of relocating a company's customer service abroad. Under captive offshoring, the company opens its own foreign subsidiary to operate a call center. It owns and manages that operation, including decisions concerning staffing, service quality, and data handling. The source contrasts that commitment with contracting an existing foreign company to provide call-center services. The external provider runs its operation, while the client relies on the agreed service arrangement. The illustration associates the captive option with higher upfront commitment and more direct operational control. It associates the external option with potentially faster launch and more flexible capacity through provider resources. Treat those rankings as the illustration's comparison, rather than universal facts about every possible project. Actual time and cost depend on facilities, contracts, and integration. Capacity and management needs also matter. The external option still requires appropriate client oversight of service quality and relevant data safeguards. The internal option still requires effective management and compliance with the requirements applying to the operation. Neither option avoids every trade-off, and no numerical cost or verified launch outcome is supplied. Compare the real arrangements against the company's service needs and responsibilities before deciding between them.
Classify a move and a return
Reshoring changes location; the provider choice remains separate
The source's classification question begins with customer service moved to the company's own foreign subsidiary. That choice is captive offshoring: the location changes, but the company keeps the function internally. Therefore, the arrangement involves offshoring alone rather than contracting the function to an external provider. If an external foreign call center performs the relocated work, the arrangement combines both choices. It is offshore outsourcing, because the work occurs abroad and the provider is external. If an external provider instead performs the function at home, the arrangement is outsourcing alone. These classifications follow the actual location and provider, rather than the provider's name or nationality. Reshoring means bringing a previously offshored business function back to the company's home country. The return changes location, but it does not independently determine whether the function becomes internal. A company can reshore work by contracting a domestic provider, so the function remains outsourced. It can also return the work to its own domestic operation, changing both relevant dimensions. The lesson's distinctions remain useful when a company reverses a previous decision about foreign location. Ask both questions again when work returns home. A return does not automatically end outsourcing.
Five review questions
Classify the arrangement and evaluate its effects
The first review asks how offshoring differs from outsourcing, despite the terms sometimes being confused. Offshoring concerns foreign location; outsourcing concerns an external provider, and either can occur without the other. The second compares captive offshoring and offshore outsourcing. Who performs the work? Captive offshoring uses the company's own subsidiary; offshore outsourcing uses an external provider operating abroad. The third review asks about the primary business logic behind relocating a particular function abroad. The source emphasizes location cost differences, especially labor costs in functions requiring substantial labor. Evaluate those differences alongside productivity and total cost, without equating wages with formal comparative advantage. The fourth review asks about the source's trade-off between the two customer-service arrangements abroad. Own-operation commitment and direct control are compared with external-provider capacity, flexibility, and vendor dependence. Actual launch speed, scaling, investment, and oversight needs depend on the particular arrangements being compared. The fifth review asks how offshoring connects with the earlier framework of gains and losses. It can concentrate home-country job losses, create destination employment and income, and support possible consumer savings. The size, duration, distribution, and net value of those effects require evidence beyond the classification label.
Carry forward
Use both dimensions and evaluate the actual arrangement
A complete offshoring assessment starts by identifying where the function is actually performed and by whom. Foreign location and an external provider are independent dimensions, rather than two names for one decision. Captive offshoring uses the company's own foreign operation, while offshore outsourcing also contracts an outside provider. Domestic outsourcing keeps the work at home, and the domestic internal arrangement involves neither choice. Reshoring returns previously offshored work home without automatically ending the use of an external provider. Location costs, specialized capabilities, and customer proximity can support the business logic for a proposed move. The assessment must also address productivity, total cost, coordination, quality, and the continuity of the function. Provider contracts and internal ownership create different management arrangements, while appropriate responsibilities still require attention. Trace potential consequences for the workers whose function moves, the destination, and the customers being served. Concentrated job losses can coexist with gains elsewhere, without proving a particular net result by themselves. Likewise, lower company costs do not guarantee lower consumer prices or benefits for every affected person. Use the source's customer-service comparison to practice classification and evaluate the specific operational trade-offs involved. Consider the business case and continuing responsibilities together. Include the distribution of consequences in that assessment.
About Business Ethics at UPI Study
Business Ethics (Business 211) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 19 chapters, from moral reasoning and compliance to governance, diversity, government and society, social responsibility, consumers, advertising, technology, the environment and global business. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Which ethics course? · Business Law vs Business Ethics
Why take it here
Why students take Business Ethics with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Business Ethics carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About When Work Moves Abroad: The Logic and Trade-Offs of Offshoring
What is the difference between offshoring and outsourcing?
What is captive offshoring?
Why do companies offshore work?
What is reshoring?
About the Business Ethics course
How many college credits is Business Ethics?
How much does Business Ethics cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Business Ethics take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Ethics.
105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →