UPI Study › Courses › Criminology › Free lessons › Lesson 2.2 Free with a free account
General Classifications of Crime: Legal and Social Criteria
Criminology · Chapter 2: The Legal Nature and Classification of CrimeSection 2.2 · lesson 4 of 9114 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Criminology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Criminology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Criminal Justice Research Organizations and Their Contributions →← Legal Characteristics, Fundamental Features, and Elements of CrimeNext lesson: Criminal Justice Research Organizations and Their Contributions →
In this lesson
Legal and social criteria, and what each scheme reveals and conceals.
- Describe the principal legal classifications of crime.
- Explain social and criminological classifications.
- Connect classification to measurement and sentencing.
- Assess what each scheme reveals and conceals.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,693 words). Read along, or search it.
Opening Question
One Act, Four Possible Labels
Take one act: an employee takes funds from their employer, without authorization. Is that a felony? A property offense? A white-collar crime? Embezzlement? Here's the surprise: it can be all four at once, and each label answers a different question. Calling something a crime is only the first step; the next question is what kind of crime it is.
Roadmap
Surveying the Schemes That Sort Crime
This lesson surveys the schemes used to classify crime: the legal tiers, the interest harmed, and the mode of conduct. Then criminological categories, how data systems classify when they count, and what every scheme reveals, and conceals.
Definitions
Felony, Misdemeanor, and Infraction Tiers
The most consequential legal classification sorts offenses by seriousness, into three broad tiers. A felony is the most serious: it's generally defined by exposure to a lengthy term of incarceration, with the heaviest collateral consequences. A misdemeanor is less serious: it generally carries a shorter maximum term, served in a local rather than a state facility. An infraction is the least serious tier, generally punishable only by a fine, or a similar limited penalty, with typically no exposure to incarceration at all.
Key Concept
Collateral Consequences Follow the Label
These labels aren't merely descriptive: each one brings distinct legal consequences, which follow automatically from the classification. Collateral consequences are effects of a conviction beyond the sentence itself. They're one reason the tier matters so much to the person convicted.
Table Walkthrough
Comparing Tiers on Process and Custody
Table 2.2.1 compares the three tiers on procedure, custody, and collateral consequences. Felony prosecutions typically involve more extensive pretrial process, such as a preliminary hearing, or grand jury review. A felony carries exposure to a lengthy term, served in a state facility. Its collateral consequences are the heaviest, affecting occupational licensing, voting rights, and firearm possession. Misdemeanors move through a more streamlined process, and carry a shorter maximum term, typically served locally. Their collateral consequences are lighter, but can still affect licensing, or employment. Infractions involve minimal process, often resolved without a full trial. They typically carry no custody exposure, and consequences usually limited to the fine or penalty itself. Read down the rows, and the tiers form a scale, from lengthy imprisonment to no custody at all.
Second Scheme
Classifying by Interest the Law Protects
A second scheme classifies offenses by the interest the law is protecting. Offenses against persons protect bodily integrity and life. Offenses against property protect ownership, and possessory interests in things. Offenses against public order protect the general peace, safety, and orderly function of shared public space. Offenses against the state protect the government's own functions and authority. And offenses against the administration of justice protect legal proceedings themselves, from interference with investigation, testimony, or judicial process.
Background
Protected Interests and Common Law Roots
This scheme asks what society is protecting, not how harshly it punishes. So an offense's seriousness tier doesn't determine its interest category, or the reverse. Much of this traces to common law heritage categories, developed by English courts over centuries. Modern American codes have largely replaced judge-made definitions with statutes, yet the logic of protected interests still shapes how those codes are structured.
Third Scheme
Violent, Property, and White-Collar Modes
A third scheme classifies offenses by the general mode of the conduct. Violent offenses involve force, or the threat of force, against a person. Property offenses interfere with property interests, without force against a person. White-collar offenses involve deception or breach of trust, usually within a lawful occupation or business relationship. That third category fits only imperfectly: white-collar offenses are often property offenses in substance, since they cause financial rather than physical harm. But the setting, the relationship, and the lack of direct confrontation set them sharply apart.
Consequence
Hard-to-Categorize Offenses Stay Hidden
The misfit has a further consequence: offenses that are hard to categorize by mode are often hard to detect, prosecute, and count. Deception inside a business rarely produces a visible incident, like a reported assault or a discovered burglary. So a mode-based classification can't be read as a direct measure of how much harm a category causes.
Criminological Categories
Expressive, Instrumental, Street, and Suite Crime
Alongside the legal schemes, criminologists classify crime by patterns in conduct and offenders. Expressive offending is driven by emotion, such as anger or jealousy, rather than calculated gain. Instrumental offending is a calculated means to a further end, typically material gain. Street crime is offending visible in public space, and it's heavily represented in routine policing, and in official crime counts. Suite crime occurs within legitimate business, professional, or organizational settings. It's comparatively underrepresented in those counts, even when the financial harm is substantial.
Key Point
Categories That Cut Across Legal Schemes
These categories cut across the legal schemes, rather than tracking them. An expressive offense and an instrumental offense can be charged under the identical statute, and receive the identical seriousness tier, despite very different dynamics. Legal classification generally doesn't turn on motivation, which is exactly what these categories capture.
Quick Check
Telling Two Assaults Apart
Quick check. Two assaults are charged under the same statute, at the same tier. One came from a burst of jealousy; the other was a calculated means to material gain. Which classification tells them apart? Pause, and decide. Expressive versus instrumental: the legal labels match, but the motivation differs, and that's what this category captures.
Patterns Over Time
Occasional Versus Career Offending
Another pair of categories describes patterns over time. Occasional offending means infrequent, situational involvement in crime. Career offending means sustained, repeated involvement over an extended period, often across several offense types. These describe a person's conduct over time, not a property of any single offense. So the same statutory offense can appear in both kinds of record, classified identically.
Contested Category
The Debate Over Victimless Offenses
Victimless offenses are a contested category. They violate a statute without an identifiable, non-consenting victim in the immediate transaction. Some criminologists see the label as accurate for a narrow set of offenses. Others argue it hides diffuse harms to third parties, or to the participants themselves. That debate returns in Chapter 15. Criminologists keep these categories separate from legal schemes, because they answer different questions, about patterns and motivation.
Fourth Scheme
Hierarchy Rule Versus NIBRS Counting
A fourth scheme is built into how crime is counted. The Uniform Crime Reporting program's traditional hierarchy rule counted only the most serious offense in an incident. So a complex incident could appear in statistics under just one classification, though several offenses occurred. If an incident included a property offense, and a more serious offense against a person, only the person offense was recorded. The National Incident-Based Reporting System, or NIBRS, records every offense in an incident separately. That gives a more granular picture, but it isn't directly comparable, offense for offense, to the older hierarchy-based counts.
Data Caution
Incidents, Offenses, and System Switches
A single incident can now generate several offense records. So analysts must say clearly whether a figure counts incidents, or offenses. Switching systems can shift a jurisdiction's reported figures, even when actual crime hasn't changed. One update to keep in mind: the FBI retired its summary reporting system in 2021. Since then, national data have been collected through NIBRS, a topic Chapter 3 develops fully.
Pause and Predict
One Embezzlement, Four Classifications
Now, a pause-and-predict. Figure 2.2.1 takes one act, and classifies it four ways. The act is the one from the start: taking funds from an employer, without authorization. What label does each scheme give it: by seriousness, by interest harmed, by mode, and by data system? Pause, and predict. By seriousness, the example treats it as a felony. By interest harmed, it's a property offense. By mode, it's a white-collar offense, because it involves a breach of trust in an employment relationship. By data system, the FBI's crime reporting program counts it as embezzlement, which it explicitly keeps separate from larceny-theft. The conduct never changes across the four boxes. Only the criterion changes, and with it, the label. These schemes are complementary tools, not competing ones.
Why It Matters
Downstream Effects of Classification
Classification isn't neutral bookkeeping, because each scheme has downstream consequences. For measurement, a data system's scheme decides what becomes visible, and what is absorbed into another category. For sentencing, the tier a legislature assigns fixes the outer limits of custody exposure and procedure, before any individual circumstance is considered. For social seriousness, treating conduct as street crime or as suite crime shapes public perception of its danger, sometimes independent of the actual harm.
Policy Signal
Reclassification Is More Than Technical
That's why reclassification is a policy signal, not a technical adjustment. Moving an offense between felony and misdemeanor changes custody, procedure, and collateral consequences, all at once. Legislatures usually do this only when judgments about seriousness, or practical cost, have shifted. But a tier change doesn't change the interest protected, or the mode: a reclassified property offense remains a property offense.
Limits
Every Strength Mirrors a Blind Spot
Each scheme's strength mirrors a corresponding blind spot. A seriousness classification shows how harshly the law treats conduct, but conceals what interest is protected, and what kind of person typically commits the offense. An interest-harmed classification shows what society protects, but not how seriously an instance is treated. A mode classification shows how an offense is carried out, but obscures offenses that straddle modes. A data-system classification shows how an offense is counted, yet it can make identical conduct seem to rise or fall, for reasons unrelated to real behavior.
Common Mistake
Labels Are Not Moral Verdicts
One more caution applies to all four schemes. None was designed to measure the moral seriousness of conduct directly. Treating any label as a final moral verdict is the most common misreading of criminal classification.
Practice Exercises
Sorting Offenses by Interest Harmed
Let's apply the schemes to the practice exercises, by interest harmed. False testimony, and destroying evidence, harm the administration of justice. Bodily injury in a confrontation is an offense against persons. Taking a vehicle without consent, and trespassing on land, harm property interests. A late-night neighborhood disturbance is an offense against public order. Bribing a public official, and evading taxes, are best seen as offenses against the state.
Vignette
Making Low-Value Property Offenses Misdemeanors
Now the vignette: a legislature would make low-value property offenses misdemeanors, below a set threshold. Supporters cite disproportionate collateral consequences, and want felony resources freed for serious cases. Opponents fear a signal of reduced seriousness, and weaker deterrence for repeat offenders. Whatever side you favor, some consequences follow automatically. Custody exposure shrinks, procedure becomes more streamlined, and collateral consequences become lighter. Likewise, moving a regulatory violation to an infraction typically removes custody exposure entirely.
Key Takeaways
Many Labels, Different Questions Answered
Let's recap: one act can wear several labels at once, and each label answers a different question. Tiers set procedure, custody, and collateral consequences; interest and mode describe what's protected, and how. Criminological categories capture motivation, setting, and patterns; and counting rules classify too. And no scheme is a moral verdict: each reveals something, and conceals something else.
About Criminology at UPI Study
Criminology (Criminology 150) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 21 chapters, from classical criminology and crime data to theories of crime, victims, policing, courts and corrections. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Criminology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Criminology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About General Classifications of Crime: Legal and Social Criteria
What is the difference between a felony, a misdemeanor, and an infraction?
Can one crime fall into several classifications at once?
What is the difference between expressive and instrumental crime?
How does the way crime is classified affect crime statistics?
About the Criminology course
How many college credits is Criminology?
How much does Criminology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Criminology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Criminology.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →