Psychological Theories of Crime: Assumptions, Criticisms, and Policy Impact

UPI Study › Courses › Criminology › Free lessons › Lesson 6.5 Free with a free account

Psychological Theories of Crime: Assumptions, Criticisms, and Policy Impact

Criminology · Chapter 6: Choice, Trait, Biological, and Psychological TheoriesSection 6.5 · lesson 18 of 9110 min · free with a free account

← Biological Theories of Crime and Somatotype Theory: Definitions and ApplicationsNext lesson: Integrating Rational Choice and Trait Perspectives in Criminological Research →

Earn 3 college credits for CriminologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Criminology 150 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Criminology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Assumptions, criticisms, and policy impact.

  • Describe the principal psychological approaches to offending.
  • State the criticism and evidence bearing on each approach.
  • Weigh claims about intelligence and mental illness carefully.
  • Explain the policy applications psychological theories produced.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,175 words). Read along, or search it.

Opening Question

Why One Bump Reads Two Ways

Between classes, in a busy classroom, someone bumps into Eli. One student would read that as an accident. Another would see an attack. Why? Psychological theories look for answers inside the mind: in how people learn, think, and feel. They fall into four broad approaches: psychodynamic, behavioral and learning, cognitive, and personality-based. For each, you'll meet its central criticism, and the policies it produced.

Approach One

Psychodynamic Theory and Falsifiability

Psychodynamic accounts hold that offending expresses an unresolved unconscious conflict, usually from early childhood, surfacing in behavior the person doesn't consciously understand or control. The long-standing objection is the falsifiability objection, and it has two parts. First, the proposed conflict isn't directly observable. Second, the theory can usually be adapted after the fact to explain almost any outcome. So it's hard to say in advance what evidence would count against it, which has limited its standing as a testable account of offending. Its influence in clinical practice is a separate matter.

Approach Two

Learning Through Conditioning, Reinforcement, Modeling

Behavioral and learning accounts explain offending through three mechanisms. Conditioning: associating a behavior with a stimulus before or after it. Reinforcement: strengthening a behavior through a rewarding consequence. And modeling: acquiring behavior by observing others. That leads to the observational learning finding, well established in psychology: people can acquire new behaviors simply by watching others, without being reinforced themselves. But state it carefully. It shows observation is one channel for acquiring behavior; it doesn't show that any specific observed content reliably produces offending in the watcher.

Approach Three

Cognitive Accounts as Modest Tendencies

Cognitive accounts examine how a person processes information relevant to a decision. Moral development stages describe a proposed progression in reasoning about right and wrong. Some research links offending to reasoning typical of an earlier stage, a modest and contested association. Cognitive scripts are learned routines for interpreting and responding to a type of situation; some can make an aggressive response feel routine in certain settings. Hostile attribution is a tendency, documented in some research on aggressive individuals, to read ambiguous cues as hostile, like Eli's reading of the bump. And deficits in consequential thinking describe a reduced tendency to weigh future consequences before acting. Each is a modest, probabilistic tendency in some research populations, not a fixed trait present in everyone who offends.

Approach Four

Psychopathy Construct and Its Limits

Personality-based accounts include the psychopathy construct: a clinical personality construct defined by a specific cluster of interpersonal, affective, and behavioral features. Trained evaluators assess it with structured clinical instruments. This lesson describes the construct and how it's measured, with no diagnostic content. Responsible use requires trained clinical assessment, yet the term is often invoked casually and inaccurately outside clinical settings. Applying it to someone from limited observation isn't legitimate. And even in legitimate clinical use, it predicts group-level patterns better than any individual's future conduct: the base rate limitation from Subchapter six point three.

Comparison Table

Four Approaches, Criticisms, and Implied Policies

Table 6.5.1 lines up the four approaches. Psychodynamic accounts face the falsifiability objection, and imply depth-oriented psychotherapy. Behavioral and learning accounts are often overstated beyond what observational learning shows, and imply reinforcement-based intervention. Cognitive accounts rest on modest, probabilistic associations, and imply cognitive-behavioral restructuring. Personality-based accounts face casual, non-clinical application and weak individual prediction, and imply structured assessment and management, not casual labeling.

Quick Check

Re-Reading the Ambiguous Bump

Quick check. A counselor teaches students to stop and re-read an ambiguous bump before reacting. Which approach does that program draw on? Pause, and decide. Cognitive: the program targets hostile attribution, the habit of reading ambiguous cues as hostile.

Critique

Intelligence Scores and Shared Common Causes

Historical claims linking measured intelligence to offending have a history of overreach, comparable to the biological claims of Subchapters six point two and six point four. The central critique: intelligence tests measure a mix of general reasoning and exposure to specific schooling and cultural content, so a score reflects educational opportunity as much as capacity. People with less access to quality schooling tend to score lower on tests built around that schooling, and also face greater structural disadvantage, which is independently linked to system contact. So the score and the outcome share a common cause, rather than one producing the other. Any residual association, after accounting for confounds, is small, and supports no claim whatsoever about any social group's inherent capacity.

Perception Versus Evidence

Mental Illness, Violence, and Stigma

The gap between public perception and evidence on mental illness is itself an important criminological fact. Survey research shows the public substantially overstates the link between serious mental illness and violence. Research literature, including large community studies, finds a real but small association, concentrated in a narrow set of conditions and circumstances. It appears particularly where substance use or a lapse in treatment co-occurs. It isn't a general link across all mental illness. Critically, people with serious mental illness are substantially more likely to be victimized than to offend, the opposite of public perception. Overstating the link carries a direct stigma cost: it ties a whole population, most of whom never offend, to a danger the evidence doesn't support.

Policy Impact

Cognitive-Behavioral Programs and Risk Assessment Bias

Psychological theory's clearest policy legacy is the cognitive-behavioral program, used widely in correctional settings. It targets cognitive distortions and consequential-thinking deficits through structured skill-building, not punishment alone. But a program is only as effective as its fidelity to the model: poor delivery can produce a null result that reflects implementation failure, not a failed theory. A second application is the actuarial risk assessment instrument, which combines measured factors into a score informing supervision, release, or sentencing decisions. It faces the bias question: are its errors, wrongly flagging someone as high-risk, or wrongly clearing someone who reoffends, distributed equally across groups? If they fall unevenly, the tool can reproduce existing disparities under a scientific-sounding label, even when overall accuracy looks similar across groups. Subchapter six point seven develops this fully.

Applied Case

Testing Whether the Program Worked

A composite case: a program manager is evaluating a cognitive-behavioral program that targets the hostile-attribution tendency. One colleague suggests tracking overall reoffending as the only measure. Another argues for also measuring the specific tendency the program targets. Which approach would actually test whether the program worked as intended? Pause, and decide. Measure the tendency too. Reoffending is shaped by many factors beyond the program, so on its own, a change or a null result can't be traced to the mechanism. Measuring hostile attribution shows whether it actually shifted, and separates a failed theory from a program that wasn't delivered with fidelity.

Scope and Limits

What Psychology Explains and Where It Stops

So what does psychological explanation contribute, and where does it stop? It explains how a person processes information, learns from consequences, and reasons about a decision in the moment, a level biological and rational choice theories don't reach alone. It stops well short of explaining why offending rates differ between communities, or across time; those questions belong to Chapter seven's sociological theories. And it doesn't license any individual diagnosis or group-level claim. Read at the level it's built for, it's a genuine contribution; read as more, it repeats earlier overreach.

Key Takeaways

Lesson Recap Across All Approaches

Let's recap. Psychodynamic accounts face the falsifiability objection. Learning accounts show observation is one channel, not a reliable cause. Cognitive accounts describe modest, probabilistic tendencies. Clinical constructs like psychopathy need trained, structured assessment. Intelligence and mental illness claims have been overstated, and programs must answer the fidelity critique, and risk tools the bias question.

About Criminology at UPI Study

Criminology (Criminology 150) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 21 chapters, from classical criminology and crime data to theories of crime, victims, policing, courts and corrections. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →

Why take it here

Why students take Criminology with UPI Study

Understand crime and justiceCriminology explains why crime happens, how it is measured and how the justice system responds. It is a core course for criminal justice, sociology, psychology, law and policing degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Criminology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Psychological Theories of Crime: Assumptions, Criticisms, and Policy Impact

What are the main psychological theories of crime, and what is the main criticism of each?
Four approaches dominate: psychodynamic, behavioral and learning, cognitive, and personality-based. Psychodynamic theory faces the falsifiability objection, since its unconscious conflicts can't be observed and it can be adapted to fit any outcome. Learning accounts are often overstated beyond what observational learning shows. Cognitive accounts rest on modest, probabilistic associations. Personality-based accounts face casual misuse and weak individual prediction.
What is hostile attribution, and how does it relate to aggression?
Hostile attribution is a tendency to read ambiguous cues as hostile, such as treating an accidental bump in a hallway as an attack. Some research on aggressive individuals documents it. It is a modest, probabilistic tendency, not a fixed trait found in everyone who offends. Cognitive-behavioral programs often target it by teaching people to re-read situations before reacting.
Does low intelligence or mental illness cause crime?
No, the evidence does not support either claim as a general cause. IQ scores reflect schooling and cultural exposure as much as capacity, and disadvantage is independently linked to system contact, so score and outcome share a common cause. Mental illness shows a real but small association with violence, mostly where substance use or lapsed treatment is present. People with serious mental illness are more likely to be victims than offenders.
What policies came out of psychological theories of crime, and what problems do they face?
The clearest legacy is the cognitive-behavioral program, which builds skills to correct cognitive distortions and weak consequential thinking. A null result may reflect poor delivery, not a failed theory, so evaluators should measure the targeted tendency as well as reoffending. Actuarial risk assessment tools face a bias question: their errors, such as wrongly flagging people as high-risk, may fall unevenly across groups.

About the Criminology course

How many college credits is Criminology?
Criminology (Criminology 150) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Criminology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 91 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Criminology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 91 lessons total about 4 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Criminology.

91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Criminology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Criminology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →