UPI Study › Courses › Criminology › Free lessons › Lesson 19.3 Free with a free account
Local Law Enforcement: Types, Agencies, and Responsibilities
Criminology · Chapter 19: Policing in AmericaSection 19.3 · lesson 80 of 91video coming soon
← Federal and State Law Enforcement: Agencies, Roles, and ModelsNext lesson: Community Policing and Zero-Tolerance Policing: Definitions, History, and Strategies →
In this lesson
Where most American policing happens, and why agency size matters.
- Describe the types of local agency and their responsibilities.
- Explain the distinct position of the sheriff.
- Explain how agency size shapes capacity and practice.
- Weigh consolidation, shared services, and local political economy.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,478 words). Read along, or search it.
Opening Question
Who Answers to Whom Locally
In one county, a city department, a sheriff, a campus force, and a tribal agency may all work within a few miles. Who answers to whom? Most American policing does not happen in federal agencies, or even state ones. It happens locally, in thousands of separate departments.
Lesson Roadmap
Agency Types, Capacity, and Politics
This lesson surveys the types of local agency, from city police to sheriffs, special jurisdiction agencies, and tribal law enforcement. We pay special attention to the sheriff, whose position is unlike any other. Then we ask how agency size shapes what a department can actually do. We weigh consolidation against shared services as responses to small-agency limits. And we look at the local political economy of policing, including the debate over collective bargaining. We close with a few practice cases.
Scale of Policing
Many Small Agencies, Few Large Ones
Local policing is where most American policing actually occurs. Bureau of Justice Statistics data document a large number of separate local agencies across the country. Officers, though, are concentrated in a small number of them. A comparatively small number of large agencies employ a substantial share of all local officers. Meanwhile, the great majority of local agencies are very small, with only a handful of sworn officers each. That pattern has a direct implication for any generalization about typical policing. A statement about the typical officer reflects the large agencies where most officers work. A statement about the typical agency reflects the many small departments, and the two can be quite different. Several capacity problems in this lesson apply specifically to the many small agencies.
Sheriff Focus
The Elected Sheriff's Distinct Accountability
A municipal police department is governed by, funded by, and accountable to elected local government. That usually means a city council or a mayor, within the municipality's boundaries. Local political accountability, through officials who control the budget and appoint leadership, is the main formal link to the public. The sheriff's office occupies a distinct position. In many states, the sheriff is an elected office with constitutional status, established in the state constitution itself. The sheriff combines county policing, court security, service of civil process, and jail operation. That is a much broader mix than a municipal department's policing focus. Described neutrally, this produces a specific accountability consequence. A sheriff answers directly to voters, not to an appointing authority such as a mayor or city manager. Accountability runs through elections, rather than through the administrative chain that governs an appointed chief.
Coverage
County Police and Unincorporated Areas
Some counties maintain a separate county police department alongside an elected sheriff. Typically, the county police handle general policing, while the sheriff keeps court security, jail operation, and civil process. This arrangement varies by state and by county, and many counties with a sheriff have no separate county police. A related question is coverage: unincorporated areas lie outside any municipal boundary, so no city police department has jurisdiction there. In most states, the sheriff's office is the default policing authority for those areas. That role follows directly from the sheriff's county-wide jurisdiction. That can strain a sheriff's office with limited staff, especially in rural counties. There, a large geographic area may depend on a small population base to fund policing.
Special Jurisdiction
Agencies Limited to a Domain
Special jurisdiction agencies hold policing authority limited to a specific physical domain or institution. Transit police cover public transit systems. Campus police cover a college or university's property. Housing police cover public housing properties, and port police cover port facilities. School policing covers school property and school-related activity, connecting to the school authority questions in section seventeen point two. Each agency works within limits specific to its domain, unlike the general geographic jurisdiction of a city department or sheriff. Other local offices also exist: constables and local marshals hold varying responsibilities from state to state. These sometimes include civil process service, or limited peace-keeping authority. Their scope varies considerably by state, and in some cases by county.
Tribal Agencies
Three Factors Shape Tribal Jurisdiction
Tribal law enforcement operates within a genuinely complex jurisdictional framework, described here at the level of structure. Jurisdiction over conduct on tribal lands can depend on three factors. The first is the legal status of the land, and the second is whether the people involved are tribal members or non-members. The third is the specific category of offense. A change in any one factor can change which authority applies to the very same conduct. Depending on those factors, tribal, federal, and sometimes state authority may be involved. This reflects the distinct legal status of tribal nations within the American federal system. The many specific jurisdictional questions it raises are beyond this lesson, but the structure explains why they arise.
Comparison
Five Agency Types, Five Accountability Paths
Now, compare five types of local agency by who each one answers to. A municipal department is governed by an elected council or mayor, within municipal boundaries, with a chief that government appoints and can remove. A sheriff's office is led by a directly elected sheriff, covering the county plus court, jail, and civil process functions. Its accountability is direct and electoral. A county police department, where it exists, answers to county government and handles general policing. A special jurisdiction agency answers to the institution it serves, within that institution's specific domain. Tribal law enforcement answers to tribal government. Its jurisdiction depends on land status, party status, and offense category, with federal and state overlap in some circumstances. Notice how many different paths of accountability exist, even within one county.
Agency Size
Capacity Functions That Scale With Size
Agency size is a major determinant of institutional capacity. Several organizational functions scale directly with size. They include training depth, specialization in particular investigative or operational areas, and supervision ratios. They also include a functioning internal investigation capacity, policy infrastructure, and data capability. Each requires a scale of staffing and resources that a very small agency may simply lack. The consequence is significant: with only a handful of officers, a department may have no realistic way to maintain a dedicated internal investigation function. The same goes for a specialized training program or a robust data system. And that holds regardless of how committed the department's leadership is.
Figure
Capacity Drops Sharply Below a Threshold
This figure illustrates a threshold pattern. Here, the bars compare relative capacity across agencies of different sizes. The values are illustrative, not measured data, and the same shape holds for each of the capacity functions we just listed. The point is the shape: below a certain size, capacity in each function drops sharply. Above it, capacity levels off. So small agencies are not simply smaller versions of large ones. They face a qualitatively different operating reality. That is why the capacity problems in this lesson fall mainly on small agencies.
Responses
Consolidation Versus Shared Services
Two responses to the small-agency capacity problem are commonly discussed. Consolidation merges small agencies into a larger one. It can improve capacity, but it reduces local control over the resulting agency. Shared services pool specific functions, such as dispatch, training, or forensic services, across several small agencies. They preserve local control, but they address only the functions that are pooled, so other capacity gaps remain. Choosing between them, or choosing neither, is ultimately a local political decision, not a purely technical one. Many communities are reluctant to give up a locally controlled department, even where a larger agency could be better resourced. They are weighing local control and identity against concrete capacity gains. Reasonable communities can, and do, reach different conclusions.
Political Economy
Spending, Unions, and Bargaining Debate
Local policing also operates within a specific political economy. Policing typically represents a substantial share of local government spending. Police unions and associations are influential in many jurisdictions. They negotiate over working conditions, and can shape policy debates directly. In many jurisdictions, collective bargaining provisions affect discipline procedures specifically, which draws a genuine policy debate. Proponents of strong bargaining protections argue that officers facing discipline deserve due process, as in any other employment. Critics argue that certain provisions can significantly weaken accountability for serious misconduct. This lesson states both positions without adopting either.
Practice Case
Matching Responsibilities to Agency Types
Let's assign responsibilities to agency types. Operating a county jail, serving civil process, securing county courts, and policing unincorporated areas by default belong to the sheriff. General policing within a municipal boundary belongs to the municipal department. Transit systems and college campuses belong to special jurisdiction agencies. Policing where jurisdiction depends on land and party status is tribal law enforcement.
Practice Case
Comparing Small and Large Agencies
Now compare small and large agencies: small agencies typically have less specialized training, thinner supervision, and weaker data systems.
Working Backward
The Unexamined Misconduct Complaint
Now work backward: a resident files a serious misconduct complaint, and months later, no one has looked into it. Which capacity was most likely missing? Pause, and decide. The missing capacity was most likely a functioning internal investigation function.
Vignette
A Small Department's Shared Investigation Option
Picture a small department with only a handful of officers: it may have no one free to run such an investigation. A shared-service arrangement could pool internal investigation with other agencies, or arrange for one to investigate, without full consolidation.
Key Takeaways
Local, Elected, Sized, and Chosen
Let's pull it together. American policing is mostly local, in many small agencies. The sheriff answers directly to voters. Agency size drives capacity. Consolidation and shared services are local political choices.
About Criminology at UPI Study
Criminology (Criminology 150) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 21 chapters, from classical criminology and crime data to theories of crime, victims, policing, courts and corrections. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Criminology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Criminology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Local Law Enforcement: Types, Agencies, and Responsibilities
How is a county sheriff different from a municipal police chief?
What are the main types of local law enforcement agencies and who does each answer to?
Why do small police departments have trouble with things like internal investigations and training?
What is the difference between consolidating police agencies and sharing services?
About the Criminology course
How many college credits is Criminology?
How much does Criminology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Criminology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Criminology.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →