UPI Study › Courses › Criminology › Free lessons › Lesson 10.3 Free with a free account
Robbery and Hate Crimes: Definitions, Statistics, and Examples
Criminology · Chapter 10: Violent CrimeSection 10.3 · lesson 41 of 91video coming soon
← Assault and Battery: Legal Classifications, Facts, and StatisticsNext lesson: Workplace Violence and Kidnapping: Trends, Facts, and Impacts →
In this lesson
Force against a person, and bias added to an underlying offense.
- State the elements of robbery.
- Distinguish robbery from theft and burglary.
- Explain how hate crime law defines the bias element.
- Describe why hate crime data are undercounted.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,488 words). Read along, or search it.
Opening Question
Was Tam Really Robbed?
Tam says she was robbed. But was she? A phone taken outside the library, a phone lifted from a cafe table, an apartment entered while she was away. The law uses three different words. This lesson covers two offense categories that test the edges of the violent crime definition. Robbery involves property, yet it is classified as violent. Hate crime is not a separate act at all, but an element added to another offense. You will learn the elements of robbery, and how they separate it from theft and from burglary. You will learn how hate crime is defined in law, and exactly what the bias element requires. And you will see why hate crime data are undercounted at several points in a chain of decisions. Both categories reward careful reading of elements, rather than reliance on everyday labels. In everyday speech, people say they were robbed when their home was burglarized, but the law draws sharper lines.
Definition
Robbery as a Violent Offense
Robbery is the taking of property from a person's presence, by force or by the threat of force. That definition explains why robbery is a violent offense, rather than a property offense. The reason is that its defining feature is the use or threat of force against a person. The taking of property alone would not make it violent, and this is what distinguishes robbery sharply from ordinary theft. A stolen phone and a phone taken at the threat of harm involve the same property. But only the second puts a person in danger, and that is what the law grades. Keep this in mind whenever you read robbery statistics, because they are counted among violent offenses, not property offenses. A rise in robbery is therefore a rise in confrontations with people, not simply a rise in losses.
Key Elements
Separating Robbery From Theft and Burglary
Professor Reed breaks down the three offenses. Two features distinguish robbery from theft. The first is the presence of a person, from whom the property is taken. The second is the use or threat of force directed at that person, and theft requires neither. Burglary, examined fully in Chapter thirteen, differs in another way, because it requires unlawful entry into a structure. Robbery has no such requirement, and can occur entirely in a public space, with no entry into any building. Many states also grade robbery into degrees. The aggravating categories resemble those for assault in Subchapter ten point two. They include the presence of a weapon, or the degree of harm caused, and as always the details vary by jurisdiction.
Comparison
Three Offenses, Element by Element
Now line the three offenses up, element by element. Theft has a property element, the taking of property. It requires no person to be present, and no force at all. Robbery has the same property element, but it adds a person element, since the property is taken from a person's presence. And it adds a force element, since force or the threat of force is required. Burglary often involves property, though whether that is required depends on the jurisdiction. It requires no person to be present and no force against a person, but it does require unlawful entry. Reading across the three notes, the person and force elements are what make robbery a violent crime.
Routine Activities
Where Offenders, Targets, and Guardians Converge
Where does robbery happen? Mostly where three things meet. Robbery shows the same concentration in place and time, already established for violent crime in Subchapter ten point one. Its pattern also connects to the routine activities account introduced in Subchapter five point four. Robbery typically requires three elements to converge. There must be a motivated offender, and a suitable target. The target is often someone carrying visible property of value. And there must be no capable guardian, no one positioned to notice and respond. Because robbery depends so directly on that convergence, its pattern tracks exposure and guardianship closely. As in Chapter five, suitability describes a situation, and it never assigns blame to the person robbed.
Definition
Bias as an Added Element
Now a different kind of offense. Imagine a window smashed at Imani's corner shop, with a hateful message about her faith left behind. A hate crime is an offense in which the victim is selected, because of an actual or perceived protected characteristic. Race and religion are examples, alongside other categories specified by law. The crucial point is structural. Bias functions as an element added to an underlying offense, already defined elsewhere in the criminal code. That underlying offense might be assault or vandalism, and bias is not a freestanding crime on its own. So a hate crime charge always requires an underlying offense, to which the bias element attaches. Note also the word perceived. The law looks at why the offender selected the victim, even if the offender was mistaken about the characteristic.
Legal Framework
Constitutional Limits and Proving Motive
Both federal and state law provide hate crime frameworks. States vary considerably in which characteristics their own statutes protect, the same jurisdictional variation seen throughout this course. Courts have also drawn a settled constitutional line. Punishing the underlying criminal conduct is constitutionally permissible, but punishing pure expression or belief is not. Enhanced penalties survive because they punish the conduct of selecting a victim discriminatorily, not the defendant's beliefs as such. That leads to the evidentiary difficulty. Proving the bias element is often the most demanding part of a hate crime case. It requires establishing the offender's motive for selecting a particular victim. The underlying offense usually turns only on conduct, and on intent to commit that conduct. Motive is harder to prove than either.
Data Problem
The Chain Behind Hate Crime Undercounts
Hate crime data are undercounted, for reasons that compound across several decision points. This builds on the voluntary reporting structure described in Subchapter three point two. First, a victim must recognize and report the bias element, in addition to the underlying offense. Next, the responding agency must make a local classification decision to record that bias element. Then the agency must participate in the relevant federal program, and submit its data accurately. A gap at any one of these points removes an incident from the final count. Ordinary offenses lose cases at the reporting step too. Hate crimes lose them at every additional step as well. That is why the undercount runs well beyond what applies to ordinary offense categories. The first decision belongs to the victim, who must recognize the bias, and may not recognize it, or may doubt it. The second is the victim's report to police, which carries the same reporting gap as other offenses. The third belongs to the agency, which must add the bias element through a local classification decision. Those decisions are inconsistent from one agency to another. The fourth is the agency's submission of data, which depends on voluntary program participation. Each of these links is a point where an incident can drop out. Losses at one link cannot be recovered at a later one. So the final total reflects every drop-out along the chain, not just the first.
Debate
Rationale, Objections, and Causes of Bias Crime
Why punish bias-motivated offenses more severely? A commonly stated rationale is that they harm beyond the direct victim. They send a threatening message to an entire community that shares the targeted characteristic. There are objections, and one is the concern that enhancement punishes the same underlying conduct more severely, because of the offender's beliefs. Another is the practical evidentiary difficulty already described. This course states the rationale and the objections without taking a position between them. On causes, realistic conflict theory, from Subchapter eight point two, offers one explanatory frame. It proposes that intergroup hostility, including bias-motivated violence, intensifies under conditions of resource competition. Other explanatory frames exist alongside it, and none is treated here as the complete explanation.
Applied Scenario
An Investigator Weighs the Bias Element
Consider a composite investigator reviewing a completed underlying offense. The question is whether the available evidence supports adding a bias element to the charge. The investigator's task is to identify specific evidence that would meet the evidentiary standard. Statements made at the time of the offense are one kind of evidence. A documented pattern of similarly selected victims is another. What the investigator must not do is assume the element is established, simply because the victim belongs to a protected category. Membership in a category shows who the victim is. The bias element requires evidence of why the offender selected that victim.
Quick Check
Sorting Tam's Three Incidents
Quick check, back to Tam. At the cafe, her phone was lifted from the table beside her, with no force and no threat. Robbery, theft, or burglary? Pause, and decide. Theft. She was present, but without force or threat it is not robbery, and nobody entered a structure. Her apartment, entered while she was away, would be burglary. And the taking outside the library is robbery only if force or a threat was used.
Key Takeaways
Check Every Link Before Reading a Count
To recap: robbery is a taking, by force or threat, from a person. Hate crime adds a bias element to an underlying offense. And the data lose cases along a chain of decisions. So before reading a count, check every link: recognition, reporting, classification, and participation. Next, workplace violence and kidnapping.
About Criminology at UPI Study
Criminology (Criminology 150) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 21 chapters, from classical criminology and crime data to theories of crime, victims, policing, courts and corrections. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Criminology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Criminology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Robbery and Hate Crimes: Definitions, Statistics, and Examples
What are the elements of robbery?
What is the difference between robbery, theft, and burglary?
How does the law define the bias element in a hate crime?
Why are hate crime statistics undercounted?
About the Criminology course
How many college credits is Criminology?
How much does Criminology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Criminology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Criminology.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →