UPI Study › Courses › Criminology › Free lessons › Lesson 18.2 Free with a free account
The Criminal Justice Process, Crime Control, and Due Process Models
Criminology · Chapter 18: The U.S. Criminal Justice SystemSection 18.2 · lesson 77 of 91video coming soon
← History, Development, and Structure of the U.S. Criminal Justice SystemNext lesson: The Role of Police in Democratic Societies and Historical Impact in America →
In this lesson
12 stages, heavy attrition, and 2 competing sets of values.
- Describe the stages of the criminal process.
- Explain attrition, plea negotiation, and pretrial detention.
- Explain what the crime control and due process models prioritize.
- Apply the models to a procedural rule or practice.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,647 words). Read along, or search it.
Opening Question
One Case, Many Decisions
Follow one case from investigation to appeal. At every step, someone decides, and the case could end right there. Where do most cases actually end? A criminal case is not one decision, but a long chain of them. This lesson walks through that chain, stage by stage.
Roadmap
Stages, Real Action, and Two Models
We look at the constitutional protections attached to key stages, and at how cases drop out along the way. We examine plea bargaining, pretrial detention, and defense representation, where much of the real action happens. Then we meet two models that frame debates about criminal procedure: crime control and due process. We score six procedural rules against those models. Finally, we practice applying the models to new rules. The goal is not to pick a winner, but to see the trade-off each rule strikes.
Process Stages
Investigation Through Pretrial Release
The criminal process moves through eleven stages, and each one is a decision by a specific actor. Investigation is conducted by law enforcement, before any charge is filed. Arrest is an officer's decision to take a person into custody, based on probable cause. Charging is the prosecutor's decision about which offense, if any, to formally charge. At the initial appearance, a judge informs the accused of the charge and basic rights. The pretrial release decision, made by a judge, sets whether and on what conditions the accused is released.
Process Stages
Preliminary Hearing Through Appeal
A preliminary hearing before a judge, or a grand jury proceeding, tests whether evidence is sufficient to proceed. At arraignment, the accused formally enters a plea. Discovery and motions involve exchanging evidence, and the judge ruling on disputed legal questions. Plea negotiation happens between prosecutor and defense. Trial, before a judge or jury, determines guilt where there is no plea. Sentencing sets the penalty within legal bounds, and on appeal, an appellate court reviews claimed legal errors.
Constitutional Protections
Miranda, Gideon, and Brady Attach
Specific constitutional protections attach at several stages. At custodial interrogation, Miranda versus Arizona, decided in nineteen sixty-six, applies. A person in custody must be advised of specified rights before interrogation, including the right to remain silent and the right to counsel. At the point counsel is needed, Gideon versus Wainwright, decided in nineteen sixty-three, applies. Gideon held that states must provide appointed counsel to indigent defendants charged with felonies. Later cases extended that guarantee to any case that actually results in imprisonment. So the line is actual imprisonment, not merely the possibility of it. At discovery, Brady versus Maryland, also decided in nineteen sixty-three, applies. The prosecution must disclose evidence favorable to the defense that is material to guilt or punishment. Each holding is significant at the stage where it applies.
Quick Check
Withheld Witness Statement
Quick check. After trial, the defense learns prosecutors held back a witness statement that favored the defendant. Which landmark rule did that violate? Pause, and decide. Brady versus Maryland. Prosecutors must disclose favorable, material evidence to the defense. Miranda governs interrogation, and Gideon governs appointed counsel.
Key Figure
The Funnel of Attrition
This figure draws the process as a funnel. Investigation sits at the wide top, and appeal at the narrow bottom. At every stage, some cases leave. This is attrition. The bars in the figure are illustrative, not measured, but the shape is the point. Only a small share of cases that enter at investigation ever reach trial. Most are resolved, or dropped, through decisions made much earlier. And each exit is someone's discretionary decision.
Research Implications
Trial Cases Are an Atypical Slice
Attrition works the same way as the crime measurement funnel from Subchapter three point two. Not every investigation produces an arrest, and not every arrest produces a charge. Not every charge produces a conviction, and not every conviction is appealed. So the cases at the end of the process are a small, and potentially unrepresentative, subset of those at the beginning. That matters for research and for public understanding. A study of cases that reach trial describes a small, atypical slice of the caseload. Its findings do not automatically generalize to the far larger group resolved earlier. Whenever you meet a finding drawn from court records, ask which stage of the funnel the sample came from.
Plea Bargaining
Pressure to Plead and the Innocence Problem
Plea negotiation resolves the great majority of criminal cases. In American criminal process, trial is the exception, not the norm. Charge stacking means charging multiple offenses arising from the same conduct. It raises the sentence a defendant faces if convicted at trial on everything, which shifts bargaining power. That creates pressure to plead, regardless of how strong the state's case really is. Critics point to the innocence problem. Severe sentencing exposure can pressure even a factually innocent defendant to accept a plea, rather than risk a much harsher sentence. They treat this as a serious structural flaw. Defenders respond that plea negotiation is what lets the system process its actual caseload at all. Eliminating or sharply curtailing it would require resources, or create delays, with serious costs for defendants and the system. This lesson states both positions without adopting either.
Pretrial Detention
Money Bail and Release Reform Debate
The pretrial release decision determines whether an accused person stays detained until trial. Money bail is a financial condition of release. Research has found that pretrial detention itself, independent of a case's facts, is associated with worse outcomes for detained defendants. Plausible reasons include a weaker bargaining position, and an impaired ability to help with one's own defense. Risk assessment tools increasingly inform release decisions. The fairness debate over those tools, developed in Subchapter six point seven, applies directly here. A reform movement has pushed to reduce reliance on money bail. Proponents argue that money bail detains people based on their financial resources, rather than their actual risk. Critics of reform argue that removing financial conditions without a validated alternative risks more failures to appear, or reoffending. This lesson takes no position on that debate.
Defense Representation
Overloaded Public Defenders Limit the Right
Gideon requires appointed counsel for indigent defendants, but a right on paper depends on resources in practice. The resourcing of indigent defense varies substantially across jurisdictions. Caseload evidence shows that public defenders in many jurisdictions carry caseloads well beyond professional standards. Those standards describe what is manageable, and many offices operate far past that line. That reality shapes how much individualized attention any one case can receive. It bites hardest at the base of the wedding cake, from Subchapter eighteen point one. Routine, low-visibility cases are exactly where an overloaded defender has the least time. So the quality of the right to counsel varies with where, and in which tier, a case falls.
Two Models
Packer's Crime Control and Due Process
Two models, associated with the legal scholar Herbert Packer, frame debates over criminal procedure. Each is a coherent value position, not a caricature. The crime control model prioritizes efficiency and finality. It assumes early stages, especially investigation and charging, reliably filter out the innocent. If that is true, then extensive, resource-intensive process at every later stage is unnecessary. On this view, moving efficiently to resolution serves public safety and most defendants, who benefit from prompt resolution. The due process model prioritizes reliability and formal adjudication. It holds that convicting an innocent person is so serious that safeguards are justified at every stage. It accepts the costs in the other direction: some guilty people go unpunished, and cases take longer. That price is worth paying, on this view, to avoid the more serious error.
Scoring Rules
Miranda, Pleas, Gideon, and Bail
Now, let's score six procedural rules against the two models. Miranda warnings serve reliability of confessions, and protection against compelled self-incrimination, so due process dominates. Broad plea bargaining serves efficient resolution of high case volume, so crime control dominates, in tension with the innocence problem. Appointed counsel under Gideon serves reliability through adversarial testing, which is a due process value. Money bail offers efficient, low-burden release screening, a crime control value.
Scoring Rules
Brady, Sentencing, and an Even Split
Money bail also sits in tension with equal treatment, regardless of financial resources. Brady disclosure serves reliability, by giving the defense full access to the evidence, so due process dominates. Determinate sentencing serves predictability and finality of outcome, which places it with crime control. Notice that the six rules split evenly, three and three. That is a clue to the next point.
Interpreting Models
Competing Values, Not Descriptions
The two models are best read as competing value priorities, not competing descriptions of how the system works. Each describes an idealized, internally consistent system. The real American system contains elements of both, in an ongoing and unresolved negotiation. So a reform offered in the name of efficiency is not automatically good, and neither is a safeguard offered in the name of reliability. Each must be judged by the specific trade-off it strikes.
Applying Models
Weighing Trade-Offs in a Risk Tool
For any rule, ask whether it mainly serves efficiency and finality, or reliability and formal process. Then ask what it costs on the value it does not serve. Consider a case: a pretrial agency plans to rely more on a risk tool, and less on money bail. Moving toward individualized assessment leans toward due process values, such as equal treatment regardless of resources. The risk is a cost in efficiency, along with the open fairness debate over the tool itself.
Practice
Classifying Rules by Model
Let's classify these procedural rules. Broad plea negotiation, a fixed sentencing range, expedited scheduling, and quick, low-cost release screening express crime control priorities. Disclosure of favorable evidence, rights advisement before interrogation, appointed counsel, and extensive motion practice express due process priorities.
Practice
Discretion and Review in Decisions
Next, compare four key decisions by their discretion and review. Charging, release, plea negotiation, and sentencing all involve wide discretion. Of these, the charging decision faces the most limited external review.
Quick Check
Where Outcomes Are Really Settled
Now flip it around. A case's outcome was effectively settled long before trial, even though the formal process kept going. Where was it most likely determined? Pause, and decide. Most likely, it was determined at plea negotiation, shaped by the charges the prosecutor chose. Arraignment and discovery move a case along; plea negotiation is where its outcome is usually fixed.
Key Takeaways
The Chain, Attrition, and Trade-Offs
Let's pull it together. The process is a chain of stages, each a decision by a specific actor. Attrition means few cases reach trial. Plea bargaining, bail, and defense resources shape real outcomes. And the two models help judge the trade-off each rule strikes.
About Criminology at UPI Study
Criminology (Criminology 150) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 21 chapters, from classical criminology and crime data to theories of crime, victims, policing, courts and corrections. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Criminology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Criminology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About The Criminal Justice Process, Crime Control, and Due Process Models
What is attrition in the criminal justice process?
Why do most criminal cases end in a plea bargain instead of a trial?
What is the difference between the crime control model and the due process model?
Do Miranda warnings and broad plea bargaining fit the crime control or due process model?
About the Criminology course
How many college credits is Criminology?
How much does Criminology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Criminology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Criminology.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →