UPI Study › Courses › Criminology › Free lessons › Lesson 7.3 Free with a free account
Chicago School's Social Disorganization Theory and Merton's Strain Theory
Criminology · Chapter 7: Sociological Theories of Crime and DevianceSection 7.3 · lesson 24 of 91video coming soon
← Economic, Racial, and Gender Disparities and Their Impact on CrimeNext lesson: Social Process Theories: Origins, Development, and Control Theory →
In this lesson
The Chicago School's place-based account and Merton's goals-means gap.
- Explain social disorganization theory and its origins.
- Describe the concentric zone persistence finding.
- Explain Merton's strain theory and five adaptations.
- Apply both theories to a community pattern.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,118 words). Read along, or search it.
Opening Question
Why Does One Neighborhood Stay High-Crime
Picture one neighborhood beside a city's business district. Over fifty years, wave after wave of newcomers moves in, and later moves on. Yet its offending rate stays high the whole time. What does that tell you about the cause? This lesson covers the two foundational structural theories of crime: social disorganization, from the Chicago School, and Robert Merton's strain theory. Watch how each points to a different target for intervention.
Chicago Method
Concentric Zones and the Zone in Transition
The Chicago School, from seven point one, was distinguished above all by its method: it treated the city itself as a natural laboratory. Researchers systematically mapped offense patterns and observed neighborhoods directly, rather than speculating about causes. Their signature research divided a city into roughly concentric zones radiating from the central business district. Next comes the zone in transition, then the working-class zone, the residential zone, and the commuter zone. The zone in transition, immediately surrounding the business district, became the focus, because its elevated rates persisted across successive, different immigrant and migrant populations. That's Figure 7.3.1.
Core Logic
Persistence Points to Place, Not Groups
That persistence finding is the heart of the theory, so follow its logic. The observation: the zone in transition showed persistently elevated rates of offending. The turnover: the populations moving through it changed entirely over time; as one group moved out and another moved in, the elevated rate remained. The inference: if the groups changed completely but the rate didn't, group characteristics can't explain the rate. Something about the zone itself, as a place, produced it. That shifted criminology's attention from the individual offender to the community as a unit of analysis.
Definition
Social Disorganization and Weakened Informal Control
The persistence finding produced social disorganization theory. Social disorganization is a community's reduced capacity to realize its common values, and to exercise effective informal control over its members' conduct. The theory names three structural factors associated with that reduced capacity: poverty, residential mobility, which limits time for relationships to form, and population heterogeneity, a mix of backgrounds, norms, and often languages. Here's the point students often miss: the theory doesn't say poverty or mobility directly cause crime. They undermine the informal relationships and mutual supervision that let a community enforce its own norms, and that weakened informal control is what drives the rate.
Revision
From Deficit to Measurable Capacity
Later research revised the framing, as the collective efficacy discussion in four point two anticipated. The original theory treated disorganization as a deficit, something a community lacks, usually inferred from poverty, mobility, and heterogeneity statistics. The revision treats social control as a capacity: the measurable ability of neighbors to supervise public space, intervene in problems, and act collectively toward shared goals. That capacity is the variable that drives the rate, and it can be measured directly, not just inferred.
Critique
Cultural Difference Is Not Disorganization
The original framing also carries a documented critique. Early research often treated the presence of immigrant communities as a marker of disorganization, conflating cultural difference from the researchers' own background with a real breakdown in informal control. That reflected the biases of the researchers and their era; it wasn't a finding about immigrant communities' actual capacity for self-governance. Contemporary versions explicitly separate heterogeneity, a structural condition, from any assumption of disorganization. And the lesson generalizes: a structural factor correlated with lower measured control is one thing; evidence that a specific group can't exercise control is something else entirely.
Key Concept
Merton's Gap Between Goals and Means
Robert Merton's strain theory starts from a different mechanism: a disjunction, or gap, between goals and means. On one side are culturally prescribed goals, such as material success, which a society broadly encourages everyone to pursue. On the other are institutionalized means, such as education and stable employment, which aren't equally distributed across the social structure. When goals are held out as universal but legitimate means aren't universally available, strain results, creating pressure toward alternative ways of pursuing the same goals, some of them illegitimate.
Five Modes
Merton's Modes of Adaptation
Merton described five modes of adaptation, defined by accepting or rejecting the goals and the means. Conformity accepts both: pursuing a career through education and steady work; non-criminal by definition. Innovation accepts the goals but rejects the legitimate means: an unconventional legal business, or, criminally, success through illegitimate channels. Ritualism scales down the goals while still following the means: routine, low-aspiration work, not typically linked to crime. Retreatism rejects both, withdrawing from conventional success; its criminal example is sustained withdrawal into illicit substance use. And rebellion rejects both and substitutes new goals and means: a lawful movement for structural change, or unlawful action aimed at replacing the existing order.
Quick Check
Identify the Mode: Accepted Goal, Illegitimate Means
Quick check. Someone still wants conventional success, but pursues it through an illegitimate channel. Which mode is that? Pause, and decide. Innovation: the goal is accepted, the legitimate means rejected. And notice: rebellion and retreatism differ only in whether something new replaces what's rejected.
Scope and Limits
What Strain Theory Explains and Misses
Strain theory is built to explain rate differences across social positions: why groups with less access to legitimate means show higher rates of certain offending, in aggregate. It doesn't predict an individual's choice, so it can't say why one strained person innovates while another conforms or retreats. It draws three standing critiques. Its focus on material success leaves offending by the economically advantaged largely unaddressed. It neglects non-economic goals like status, respect, or belonging; and it's silent on why some strained people don't offend at all. General strain theory widens what counts as strain, and proposes negative emotions, such as anger and frustration, as the link to offending.
Applied Case
Two Planners, Two Intervention Targets
Apply both to a case. A planning body studies a neighborhood whose high rate has persisted for decades across several waves of residents. One planner proposes strengthening neighbors' capacity for informal supervision and collective action: that follows social disorganization, targeting informal control. Another proposes expanding access to legitimate employment and education: that follows strain theory, targeting the gap between goals and means. Persistence matters to both, because it points to the place: disorganization reads it as lasting weakness in informal control; strain, as lasting blocked access to legitimate means.
Comparing Predictions
Where the Two Theories Diverge
Compare the predictions. High turnover and low supervision, but broad employment: disorganization predicts an elevated rate; strain predicts a lower one. A stable community with strong ties but limited employment reverses the split. With both present, both predict elevated rates; with neither, both predict lower. And the reverse problem: an intervention expands employment, yet the rate doesn't fall, because residents still lack informal channels for supervising public space. It neglected disorganization's mechanism.
Key Takeaways
Recap of Zones, Disorganization, and Strain
Let's recap. The Chicago School mapped concentric zones, and found rates that persisted while populations changed. Social disorganization holds that weakened informal control, not poverty itself, drives the rate; and cultural difference isn't disorganization. Merton's strain theory locates pressure in the gap between goals and legitimate means, with five modes of adaptation. Each theory points to a different intervention. Next, Subchapter seven point four turns to social process, beginning with control theory.
About Criminology at UPI Study
Criminology (Criminology 150) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 21 chapters, from classical criminology and crime data to theories of crime, victims, policing, courts and corrections. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Criminology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Criminology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Chicago School's Social Disorganization Theory and Merton's Strain Theory
What is social disorganization theory in criminology?
Why did the zone in transition keep a high crime rate even when different immigrant groups moved in and out?
What are Merton's five modes of adaptation in strain theory?
How do social disorganization and strain theory explain the same high-crime neighborhood differently?
About the Criminology course
How many college credits is Criminology?
How much does Criminology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Criminology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Criminology.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →