UPI Study › Courses › Criminology › Free lessons › Lesson 10.4 Free with a free account
Workplace Violence and Kidnapping: Trends, Facts, and Impacts
Criminology · Chapter 10: Violent CrimeSection 10.4 · lesson 42 of 91video coming soon
← Robbery and Hate Crimes: Definitions, Statistics, and ExamplesNext lesson: Domestic Violence and Stalking: Definitions, Causes, and Legal Frameworks →
In this lesson
Typologies, employer duties, and the elements of unlawful confinement.
- Describe the 4 workplace violence types and their risk factors.
- Explain the employer duties that follow from that risk.
- State the elements of kidnapping and false imprisonment.
- Read recorded kidnapping data with caution.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,451 words). Read along, or search it.
Opening Scenario
Omar's Late Shift and Measured Patterns
Omar works the late shift alone at a store, handling cash all night. His risk is not random, and neither is it unavoidable. The pattern is something an employer can plan around. This lesson pairs two topics that share a theme of control over where a person can safely be. The first is workplace violence, which criminologists sort into four types with different risk profiles. You will learn those types, the risk factors used in prevention planning, and the duties employers carry. You will also see why threat assessment cannot reliably predict which concern will escalate. The second topic is kidnapping, and the related offenses of false imprisonment and custodial interference. You will learn the elements that separate them. And you will see why recorded kidnapping figures include so many family and custodial cases, rather than stranger abductions. Both topics reward replacing a dramatic public image with the measured pattern.
Classification
Four Types of Workplace Violence
Workplace violence is conventionally classified into four types. The first is criminal intent by an outsider, where a person with no legitimate connection to the workplace commits an offense there. This type most often affects sectors that handle cash or valuable goods. The second is customer or client violence, by someone the organization legitimately serves. It most affects healthcare, social services, and retail settings. The third is worker-on-worker violence, by a current or former employee, directed at colleagues. The fourth is violence arising from a personal relationship, when a conflict that began outside work, such as a domestic relationship, intrudes into the workplace. The value of the typology is practical, because each type calls for a different prevention response.
Risk Factors
Where Workplace Risk Concentrates
Now a hospital ward, where the risk looks different. Federal occupational safety and labor statistics sources describe where the risk concentrates. Elevated risk appears in healthcare, retail, transportation, and other public-facing roles. That reflects how often these workers are in contact with the public, and in healthcare specifically, it also reflects contact with individuals in acute distress. The prevention literature identifies several environmental and organizational risk factors. They are exchange of money with the public, working alone, and working late hours. They also include mobile or field-based work away from a fixed location, and regular contact with people in distress. These factors are stated strictly for prevention planning. They tell an organization where to direct its safety resources.
Employer Duties
Renata Puts Employer Duties Into Practice
Their employers carry duties too, and Renata, a safety manager, puts them into practice. Employers carry a general duty to provide a workplace free of recognized hazards. That duty extends to workplace violence risk, and in practice it is typically implemented in three ways. The first is recordkeeping, of incidents and also of near-incidents. The second is threat assessment, operated as an organizational process rather than an individual judgment call. A process brings several perspectives and a consistent standard, where one manager's instinct brings neither. The third is a reporting culture. Employees need a clear, low-barrier way to raise concerns. Without it, the threat assessment process has nothing to work with and cannot function at all.
Key Limitation
Threat Assessment Cannot Predict Escalation
Threat assessment has a built-in limit. Subchapter six point seven discussed the limits of predicting individual behavior, and the same limits apply here. Threat assessment cannot reliably predict which specific flagged concern will escalate to violence. That is because most flagged concerns, even genuine ones, never escalate to violence at all. This creates a genuine risk of over-response. Over-response means taking action disproportionate to a person's actual risk, based on a flag with limited predictive value. Yet ignoring flags altogether carries its own risk, since some concerns do turn out to be serious. So organizations must manage this tension, knowing it cannot be resolved completely.
Summary Table
Matching Each Type to Its Controls
Omar's risk is the first type, criminal intent by an outsider, and its sector is retail and cash-handling businesses. The risk factor is exchange of money with the public, and the controls are cash-handling procedures and physical security. For customer or client violence, the sector is healthcare and social services, and the risk factor is contact with people in acute distress. The controls are staff training and environmental design that supports de-escalation. Worker-on-worker violence can occur in any sector, with elevated concern following disciplinary action. Its risk factor is unresolved workplace conflict, and its controls are clear reporting channels and conflict-resolution processes. Personal relationship intrusion can also occur anywhere, particularly in public-facing roles, and its risk factor is exposure to an outside personal conflict. The control is workplace safety planning, coordinated with the employee, as Subchapter ten point five develops.
Definition
Kidnapping Elements and Asportation
Turn now to kidnapping, and Officer Park, who has to tell offenses apart by their elements. Kidnapping requires unlawful confinement of a person against their will. That confinement must be combined with one of two further elements. One is asportation, meaning movement of the victim from one place to another, and the other is concealment. States vary considerably in how much movement satisfies the asportation element. Some require only minimal movement, while others require movement that substantially increases the risk to the victim, beyond what the confinement alone would create. That second approach stops a brief, incidental movement from turning every confinement into kidnapping. Kidnapping can also fall under federal jurisdiction when an interstate element is present. Moving the victim across a state line is the standard example, reflecting the general division between federal and state authority.
Related Offenses
False Imprisonment and Custodial Interference
Now a living room, where a family is in a custody dispute. Two related offenses sit beside kidnapping. False imprisonment is unlawful confinement without the asportation or concealment element that kidnapping requires. It is generally treated as a lesser offense than kidnapping. Custodial interference is a distinct offense. It addresses a parent or family member who unlawfully takes or retains a child, in violation of another party's custodial rights. This offense matters for understanding the data. Official sources report that a substantial share of recorded kidnapping-related cases involve exactly this family and custodial context. That is very different from the stranger abduction that dominates public perception. Keep that gap in mind, because it shapes how every kidnapping statistic in this lesson should be read.
Decision Path
Tracing Confinement to the Right Offense
Picture the three offenses as a decision path. Everything begins from the same starting point: confinement against a person's will. One branch has no movement or concealment, and no custodial dispute. That branch leads to false imprisonment, the lesser offense. The other branch involves movement or concealment of the person, or else a family custody dispute. That branch leads to kidnapping, or, in the family custody context, to custodial interference. The path shows that the offenses differ by their elements, not by how alarming the event sounds. Applying the path means asking, in order, what was done after the confinement began. Was the person moved or concealed, and did the case arise from a family custody dispute?
Reading the Data
Why Kidnapping Counts Mislead
Recorded kidnapping figures come from the FBI's crime reporting programs. They must be read with a caution, because a substantial share of recorded cases are family and custodial matters. Those differ entirely in circumstance from the stranger offense that dominates public attention. So a raw count of recorded kidnappings is not a direct measure of stranger-perpetrated abduction. Anyone citing a kidnapping total as evidence of stranger danger is reading the wrong measure for that question.
Applied Case
Renata Handles an Escalating Threat Report
Back at the office, Renata knows that the response to workplace violence does not end with the incident itself. Organizational obligations extend to supporting affected employees, and to reviewing the organizational process that failed to prevent the incident. That matches the broader coordinated response model developed in Subchapter ten point seven. Now a new report reaches Renata. Her employer, a composite example, receives a threat report from a public-facing team. The report concerns a colleague's escalating behavior. The employer's first task is to route the report through its established threat assessment process. That keeps the decision out of a single manager's individual judgment. The employer must also recognize the limits of prediction. The process should weigh a proportionate response, matched to the risk actually shown. It should also keep in mind that most flagged concerns, even genuine ones, do not escalate to violence. A good process takes the report seriously without treating the colleague as already dangerous.
Quick Check
Child Kept Past Return Date
Quick check: a parent keeps a child past the court-ordered return date, without the other parent's agreement. Which offense is it? Pause, and decide. Custodial interference: it addresses a parent or family member who unlawfully takes or retains a child.
Key Takeaways
Process, Elements, and Family Cases
To recap: workplace violence has four types, each with its own controls. Threat assessment is a process, and it cannot predict escalation. Kidnapping adds movement or concealment to confinement. And recorded kidnapping figures include many family cases; stranger abductions are the minority. Next, Subchapter ten point five turns to domestic violence and stalking.
About Criminology at UPI Study
Criminology (Criminology 150) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 21 chapters, from classical criminology and crime data to theories of crime, victims, policing, courts and corrections. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Criminology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Criminology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Workplace Violence and Kidnapping: Trends, Facts, and Impacts
What are the four types of workplace violence?
What duties do employers have to prevent workplace violence?
What is the difference between kidnapping, false imprisonment, and custodial interference?
Do kidnapping statistics show how common stranger abductions are?
About the Criminology course
How many college credits is Criminology?
How much does Criminology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Criminology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Criminology.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →