UPI Study › Courses › Criminology › Free lessons › Lesson 3.3 Free with a free account
Crime Measurement Programs and Victim and Self-Report Survey Methods
Criminology · Chapter 3: Measuring Crime: Research Organizations and Data SourcesSection 3.3 · lesson 7 of 9112 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Criminology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Criminology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Historical and Contemporary Crime Trends and Demographic Influences →← FBI Uniform Crime Report: Purpose, Benefits, and LimitationsNext lesson: Historical and Contemporary Crime Trends and Demographic Influences →
In this lesson
Incident-based reporting, victimization surveys, and self-report studies.
- Describe incident-based reporting and the transition problem.
- Explain the design and limits of victimization surveys.
- Explain the design and limits of self-report studies.
- Match a measurement source to a research question.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,449 words). Read along, or search it.
Opening Question
Dana's Stolen Bike and Missing Records
Picture Dana, a student whose bike was stolen last spring. She never reported it; it didn't seem worth the trouble. So in police records, it never happened. Police records show only the crimes that reach police. So how do we measure everything else?
Lesson Roadmap
Three Sources Beyond Aggregate Police Counts
This lesson covers the main ways criminologists look beyond aggregate police counts. First, the National Incident-Based Reporting System, which records each incident in detail. Then victimization surveys, which ask the public about crimes they experienced. And self-report studies, which ask people about offenses they committed themselves. We'll see why these three sources are expected to disagree, and how triangulating across them gives a more honest picture. Finally, we'll practice matching the right measure to the right research question.
Definition
NIBRS Records Every Offense Per Incident
The National Incident-Based Reporting System, or NIBRS, succeeds the Summary Reporting System from the last lesson. The summary system aggregated one monthly count per offense category; NIBRS instead records detail about each individual incident. It captures every offense that occurred within the incident. It records characteristics of the victims and offenders involved, and the relationship between them, where that's known. And it describes the circumstances of the incident. Most importantly, NIBRS removes the hierarchy rule: every offense in a multi-offense incident is now recorded separately, so less serious offenses no longer disappear from the count.
Side Effect
Why Switching to NIBRS Raises Counts
That improvement creates a problem of its own. Before, a multi-offense incident added one offense to the count. After the switch, it adds every offense it contained. So a jurisdiction that begins reporting through NIBRS will typically show a rise in its total offense count, purely from the counting change, with no real change in offending. Anyone comparing figures across the transition must account for this first; only then can they draw conclusions about actual trends.
New Approach
Asking the Public About Victimization
A victimization survey takes a completely different approach. It asks a sample of the public directly about offenses they personally experienced, without relying on what was reported to police. The best-known American example is the National Crime Victimization Survey, administered by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. If Dana's household were sampled, and the theft fell within the survey's window, it could be counted after all.
Survey Design
Household Samples and the Reference Period
Its design uses a household sample: a set of households selected to represent the wider population. Members of those households are asked about their experiences over a defined reference period, typically the preceding six months. Because it asks respondents directly, the survey can capture offenses never reported to police. That offers a view of the dark figure of crime that police data structurally can't provide.
Blind Spots
What Household Surveys Can Never See
A household survey has structural blind spots of its own. It can't capture offenses against people outside its sampling frame: for example, people without a stable household address. It can't capture offenses without an individual victim to interview, like many offenses against organizations, or against the public at large. And there's one serious offense it can never capture at all. Which one? Pause, and think. Homicide. The one person who could report the offense is no longer available to be surveyed. So homicide must be measured another way: through police records, and vital-statistics records. Notice the pattern: each instrument's design determines exactly what it can, and can't, see.
Survey Limitations
Recall, Telescoping, Definitions, and Non-Response
Beyond those blind spots, victimization surveys carry the limitations of any survey. Recall error occurs when a respondent misremembers whether, or when, an event occurred. Telescoping is a specific form: the respondent reports an event as more recent than it really was, pulling it into the reference period, so it inflates the count. Definitions cause trouble too: a respondent's understanding of a word like assault may not match the survey's technical definition, causing over-reporting or under-reporting. Finally, non-response: selected people can't be reached, or decline; if they differ systematically from those who respond, the results will be biased.
Definition
Self-Report Studies Ask About Offending
A self-report study flips the question around: instead of asking what offenses people experienced, it asks what offenses they themselves committed. These studies are most often conducted with specific, accessible populations, such as students. They're especially useful for offenses that rarely come to police attention at all, including many forms of substance use, and minor property offenses.
Honesty Problem
Validity Checks on Self-Reported Conduct
The obvious challenge is honesty, because respondents must disclose their own conduct. So researchers build in validity checks. One check asks about a fictitious offense: anyone admitting to it may be over-reporting. Another compares a subsample of answers against official records, where those are available, to assess how honestly respondents are answering.
Big Idea
Three Instruments, Three Reasons to Diverge
So police data, victimization surveys, and self-report studies aren't three attempts at the same measurement. They're three different instruments, built to answer different questions, and each has a systematic reason to diverge. Police data reflect what victims chose to report, and what agencies chose to record. Victimization surveys reflect what a sampled household will disclose to an interviewer about the reference period. Self-report studies reflect what respondents are willing to admit about their own conduct.
Figure
Overlapping Circles of Agreement and Gaps
Figure 3.3.1 shows the three sources as overlapping circles, for a single offense type. The center is the region of agreement: offenses all three sources would capture. Outside the overlap, police data miss unreported offenses, and household surveys miss offenses outside their sampling frame. So disagreement among them is expected, not a sign that one source is simply wrong.
Key Concept
Triangulation Across Imperfect Sources
The practical response to imperfect sources is triangulation: drawing on more than one imperfect source, and treating agreement as stronger evidence. When all three sources point the same way, a researcher can be more confident in the finding. When they disagree, the disagreement itself is informative: it usually points to the specific stage where the sources diverge. That might be reporting, recording, sampling, or disclosure; it rarely settles which single source is correct.
Extensions
Specialized Collections Add Narrower Detail
Several specialized collections extend measurement into narrower areas. Supplementary Homicide Reporting gathers extra incident detail specific to homicide cases. Victimization supplements attach additional questions to an existing survey, to study a narrower population or offense. These are extensions of the three main approaches, not a fourth independent method.
Comparison Table
Comparing Sources on Four Dimensions
Table 3.3.1 compares the three sources on four dimensions. What's counted: police data count offenses reported and recorded; surveys, offenses people recall experiencing; self-reports, offenses people recall committing. Who's missed: unreported and unrecorded offenses; people outside the frame, and offenses with no interviewable victim; and respondents unwilling to disclose. The errors: reporting and recording decisions; recall error, telescoping, and non-response; and under- or over-disclosure. And what each best answers: what reaches police and how agencies respond; how much goes unreported, and who is victimized; and how common an offense is in a population.
Choosing a Source
Let the Research Question Decide
The choice of source should follow from the question. To study police workload across precincts, use police data, because the question is about what reaches police. To count people who experienced an offense they never reported, use a victimization survey. To study substance-related conduct in a specific population, use a self-report study; police and victimization data would miss much of it. And to study national trend direction across decades, use whichever source was measured most consistently: consistency of method matters more than which source you choose.
Worked Example
Priya's Choice for a Rarely Reported Offense
Now consider Priya, a researcher studying a rarely reported offense within a defined population. Police data would capture only a small fraction, understating the true frequency. So which should she choose: a victimization survey, or a self-report study? Pause, and decide what it depends on. It depends on the offense. She chooses a victimization survey if the offenses typically have an identifiable victim, willing to be interviewed. If asking respondents about their own conduct captures the offense better, she chooses a self-report study.
Practice
Matching Published Claims to Their Sources
Let's apply these ideas to some published claims. A claim that most offenses of a type go unreported most likely rests on a national victimization survey; its limits include the sampling frame, recall error, and non-response. A claim that a jurisdiction's clearance rate rose comes from official police data: remember, a clearance isn't a conviction, and recording practices can shift. A finding of high self-admitted minor offending in one group comes from a self-report study: it describes a specific population, and depends on honest disclosure. A claim about the offenses within multi-offense incidents comes from incident-based data, which isn't directly comparable with older summary counts. And for homicide, expect police and vital-statistics records to show the highest count, since surveys can't capture it.
Key Takeaways
Recap of Measures, Limits, and Triangulation
Let's recap. NIBRS records every offense in each incident, so a switch to it can raise counts with no change in crime. Victimization surveys see unreported crime, but miss people outside the frame, victimless offenses, and homicide, and carry recall and response errors. Self-report studies capture offenses that rarely reach police, with validity checks on honesty. The three sources are expected to disagree, so triangulate, and let the question choose the source.
About Criminology at UPI Study
Criminology (Criminology 150) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 21 chapters, from classical criminology and crime data to theories of crime, victims, policing, courts and corrections. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Criminology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Criminology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Crime Measurement Programs and Victim and Self-Report Survey Methods
Why does switching to NIBRS make a jurisdiction's crime count go up?
What can the National Crime Victimization Survey measure that police data can't?
Why can't a victimization survey measure homicide?
How do self-report studies check whether respondents are being honest?
About the Criminology course
How many college credits is Criminology?
How much does Criminology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Criminology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Criminology.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →