Attraction Across Borders: Types, Cultural Differences, and Interpersonal Draw

UPI Study › Courses › Advanced Social Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 7.5 Free with a free account

Attraction Across Borders: Types, Cultural Differences, and Interpersonal Draw

Advanced Social Psychology · Chapter 7: Belonging, Attraction, and Interpersonal RelationshipsSection 7.5 · lesson 44 of 8510 min · free with a free account

← The Role of Appearance: Physical Traits, Phenomena, and Ratios in AttractionNext lesson: Bonds That Define Us: Key Theories and Definitions of Interpersonal Relationships →

Earn 3 college credits for Advanced Social PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 310 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Which parts of attraction are shared machinery, and which are local script.

  • Classify the principal types of interpersonal attraction
  • Compare individualist and collectivist mate selection
  • Apply the passionate and companionate distinction cross-culturally
  • Separate universal mechanisms from culture-specific scripts

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,280 words). Read along, or search it.

Belonging, Attraction, and Interpersonal Relationships

Attraction Across Borders

Every finding so far in this chapter came from somewhere. Usually from a small number of wealthy, Western samples. So the obvious question is whether any of it travels. This section answers that, but it refuses the question as posed. Universal or cultural turns out to be a false choice. The useful move is to split the claim into two levels. The level of the mechanism, and the level of the script. Mechanisms tend to be shared. Scripts, meaning who meets whom and how, tend to be local. Hold that distinction and the cross-cultural literature stops contradicting itself.

Not One Phenomenon

Three Ways Attraction Varies

Before comparing cultures, we need a taxonomy. Because attraction is not a single phenomenon at all. It varies in three ways, and each one matters. First, target. A friend, a romantic partner, a kin member, a stranger. Who the attraction is aimed at changes what a normal expression of it looks like. Second, function. What is the tie actually for? Companionship, sexual interest, support, identity confirmation. Third, temporal profile, which is easy to dismiss as a detail. Compare the brief intensity of infatuation with the slow accretion of a friendship. The reason to classify first is protective. A theory about why infatuation fades looks false if you test it on kinship.

The Taxonomy

Five Types and What Defines Them

Five types cover the territory. Platonic attraction is mutual liking, with little sexual component. It is voluntary and chosen, in peer groups, workplaces, and neighborhoods. Romantic or passionate attraction is intense longing and sexual interest. With idealization, and rapid escalation, early in romantic relationships. Companionate attraction is deep affection, trust, and comfortable interdependence. It develops gradually, in long marriages, lifelong friendships, and family bonds. Familial attraction is embedded in kinship, and it is non-voluntary. Parent and child, siblings, extended family. And acquaintance or situational attraction is bounded by a role. Colleagues, classmates, fellow commuters, with little spillover beyond the context. Two properties do most of the sorting here. Whether the tie is chosen, and whether it spills past its setting.

Two Kinds Of Love

Passionate and Companionate

Within romantic attraction, one distinction organizes most of the literature. Hatfield and Berscheid separated passionate love from companionate love. Passionate love means intense longing, and physiological arousal. Idealization, and emotional volatility. In its most intense form it is generally short-lived. Most longitudinal studies find measurable declines within roughly two to three years. Companionate love is the slower one. Affection, trust, and interdependence, and it characterizes enduring relationships. Here is the part worth holding onto. Companionate love tends to grow over the same period in which passion declines. One curve falls while the other rises, across the same years. Read only the falling curve, and every long relationship looks like a decline.

Sternberg

Three Components, Eight Shapes

Sternberg, in nineteen eighty-six, went finer than a two-way split. His triangular theory decomposes love into three relatively independent components. Intimacy is the first: closeness, connectedness, bondedness. Call it the warmth component. Passion is the second: drives toward romance, physical attraction, arousal. That is the motivational component. Commitment is the third, and it is the coolest of the three. The decision to love, and then to maintain that love. Because each can be present or absent independently, you get eight shapes. And that is where the cross-cultural value lies. Cultures differ less in whether each component exists. They differ in which combinations are expected and rewarded, at which life stage.

The Marriage Question

Would You Marry Without Love?

Now the single most cited item in this entire literature. Levine, Sato, Hashimoto, and Verma, in nineteen ninety-five. An eleven-country study, built around one blunt question. If a person had all the other qualities you desired, would you marry them? Even if you were not in love with them. The proportion answering no varied enormously. Above eighty percent in highly individualist societies. Below twenty-five percent in some collectivist societies. Now be careful about what that does and does not show. It is not that passionate love is absent in the second group. Abundant evidence shows it is not. What differs is love's institutional status, not its existence.

Two Arrangements

Where Mate Selection Is Embedded

In practice, collectivist contexts embed mate selection in family and community. With weighty input from parents and elders. And longer-term economic and lineage considerations in play. Companionate love is expected to develop within the marriage. Rather than to be its precondition. Individualist contexts emphasize personal choice, and romantic compatibility. The couple's emotional bond sits at the center of the decision. Now the result that surprises students most. Neither system reliably produces higher satisfaction or stability. The predictors of well-being inside a marriage are largely the same. Respect, equity, communication. Only the path into the marriage differs.

A Continuum

Arranged, Love, and Hybrid Marriages

Contemporary research has also softened the categories themselves. Arranged and love marriages are increasingly treated as endpoints of a continuum. Not as two discrete kinds of thing. Look at the actual practices and the boundary blurs immediately. Many marriages globally are family-introduced. With the partners themselves holding final consent. And many so-called love marriages lean on social-network introductions. Plus family approval, quietly doing a lot of filtering. So the two labels describe different mixes of the same ingredients. Which tells you what to compare instead. Not systems, but mechanisms operating to different degrees across them. Autonomy, fit, support, and commitment.

Friendship

Same Functions, Different Structures

Friendship varies cross-culturally along the same contrast. Adams and Plaut compared West African and North American samples. In the collectivist contexts, close friendships were described as fewer in number. More tightly embedded in extended kin and community networks. And carrying heavier obligations of material aid. North American participants described something structurally different. Larger and more elective friendship circles. Looser obligations of practical support, but heavy expectations of emotional availability. But across cultures, friendships supply the same things: belongingness and social support. Identity validation, and instrumental help. The weighting differs, and the institutional expectations differ. The underlying needs friendships address do not.

Buss, 37 Cultures

What Everyone Wants, and What Varies

The touchstone for this whole debate is Buss, from nineteen eighty-nine. A study of mate preferences across thirty-seven cultures. It is useful because it produced three different kinds of result at once. Some preferences were broadly shared. Kindness, intelligence, and emotional stability were valued highly almost everywhere. Some showed reliable sex differences across cultures. Though their size varied with gender equality in the society. Read that middle row carefully, because it is often quoted badly. A difference whose magnitude depends on gender equality is not a fixed constant. And some preferences were strongly culturally patterned. The weight attached to chastity ranged from very high to near zero. One study, three patterns, and all of them real.

The Synthesis

Mechanisms Travel, Scripts Do Not

So here is the synthesis the field has settled on. Universal psychological mechanisms operate within culturally varying scripts. The mechanisms are the ones this chapter has been building. The value of kindness. The operation of similarity. The rewards of reciprocated regard, and the effects of reward, proximity, and disclosure. The scripts are a different kind of thing entirely. They specify whom you are supposed to meet. In which settings, and with what permitted forms of approach. And to what institutional ends. Compress it into one sentence worth memorizing. The mechanisms travel. The scripts do not. Most apparent contradictions here resolve once you ask which level is meant.

Consolidate

A False Binary, and How to Escape It

Asking whether attraction is universal or cultural poses a false binary. The machinery operates across human populations. The contexts in which it operates differ substantially. Carry a short list forward. Classify attraction before comparing it: target, function, temporal profile. Passionate love declines while companionate love grows, across the same years. Sternberg's three components generate eight shapes, and cultures reward different ones. Levine and colleagues found marriage without love ranging enormously across countries. Buss found universals, moderated sex differences, and pure cultural patterning together. And if you study attraction outside your own setting, keep the two levels apart. Mechanism, likely shared. Script, likely particular.

About Advanced Social Psychology at UPI Study

Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) is a self-paced online course of 85 video lessons in 12 chapters, from attitudes, persuasion and the self to prejudice, attraction and relationships, conformity and obedience, helping, aggression and social life online. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Social Psychology vs Sociology

Why take it here

Why students take Advanced Social Psychology with UPI Study

How other people shape what we think and doAdvanced Social Psychology explains how people think about, influence and relate to one another: attitudes and persuasion, the self, prejudice and intergroup conflict, attraction and close relationships, conformity and obedience, helping and aggression. It is a common upper-level course in psychology and sociology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Advanced Social Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Attraction Across Borders: Types, Cultural Differences, and Interpersonal Draw

What is the difference between passionate and companionate love?
Passionate love is intense longing, physical attraction, and emotional volatility, while companionate love is deep affection, trust, and comfortable interdependence. Elaine Hatfield and Ellen Berscheid drew the distinction. Passionate love in its most intense form tends to fade over the first few years of a relationship, while companionate love often grows during the same period. Seeing only the decline in passion makes long relationships look like a loss rather than a change.
What are the main types of attraction between people?
A common classification has five types. Platonic attraction is chosen liking with little sexual component; romantic or passionate attraction involves intense longing and sexual interest; companionate attraction is the deep affection and trust of long partnerships and friendships; familial attraction is rooted in kinship and not chosen; and situational attraction is bounded by a role, such as coworker or classmate. Two questions sort them: is the tie chosen, and does it extend beyond its setting?
Do people in every culture marry for love?
Not to the same degree. In Levine, Sato, Hashimoto, and Verma's 1995 eleven-country study, people were asked whether they would marry someone with all the qualities they desired if they were not in love. Over 80 percent said no in individualist countries such as the United States and England, compared with under 25 percent in India. Passionate love exists across cultures; what differs is whether it is treated as a requirement for marriage.
How does friendship differ across cultures?
Friendship takes different shapes in different cultural settings. In a 2003 comparison, Glenn Adams and Victoria Plaut found that West African participants described fewer close friends, more tightly embedded in kin and community networks and carrying heavier obligations of practical and material help. North American participants described larger, more freely chosen friendship circles with lighter practical obligations but strong expectations of emotional support. Across both settings, friendship still involves mutual liking and support.

About the Advanced Social Psychology course

How many college credits is Advanced Social Psychology?
Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Advanced Social Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 85 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Advanced Social Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 85 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Advanced Social Psychology.

85 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Advanced Social Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →