Building Beliefs: How Attitudes Form and Develop Over Time

UPI Study › Courses › Advanced Social Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 2.2 Free with a free account

Building Beliefs: How Attitudes Form and Develop Over Time

Advanced Social Psychology · Chapter 2: Attitudes and BehaviorSection 2.2 · lesson 8 of 8512 min · free with a free account

← The ABC Model: How Affect, Behavior, and Cognition Shape AttitudesNext lesson: Forces That Drive Us: Personal, Social, and Demographic Influences on Behavior →

Earn 3 college credits for Advanced Social PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 310 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Six routes by which attitudes are built, and why the route determines the strength.

  • Distinguish the main routes to attitude formation
  • Explain why direct experience produces stronger attitudes
  • Summarize the behavioral-genetic evidence
  • Predict how the dominant route shifts across the lifespan

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,532 words). Read along, or search it.

Attitudes and Behavior

Building Beliefs

Nobody is born with an opinion about jazz, or vegetarianism, or democracy. Every attitude you hold was built, and most of them were built without you noticing. This section covers the routes by which that construction happens. Conditioning, reinforcement, observation, mere exposure, and direct experience. There is also a genetic contribution, which surprises most students. But the central claim is about consequences, not just mechanisms. The route by which an attitude formed predicts how strong it will be. It predicts how stable it will be, and how hard it will be to change. So the history of an attitude is not trivia. It is diagnostic.

The Organizing Split

Built From Experience, or Built From Others

One distinction runs through the entire section, so start there. Experiential formation means the attitude is built from your own encounters. You met the object, you had an experience, and an evaluation followed. Vicarious formation means the attitude was acquired from other people. By observing them, listening to them, or simply being told. Both routes are powerful. They are not equivalent. Fazio and Zanna, in nineteen eighty-one, established the difference. Direct experience yields attitudes that are more accessible and more stable. And more predictive of what the person actually does. Vicarious routes are far faster, and that speed is why they dominate. They explain the bulk of the attitudes we hold toward things we have never met. So the trade is speed against strength, and most of our attitudes took the fast route.

Route 1

Evaluative Conditioning: Valence by Association

Route one is the oldest experimental work, and it borrowed straight from Pavlov. Staats and Staats ran it in nineteen fifty-eight. They paired nonsense syllables with positively or negatively valenced words. One group heard the syllable YOF alongside words like gift and happy. Another group heard the same syllable alongside thief and bitter. The first group later rated the syllable as pleasant. The second rated it negatively. A meaningless string of letters had acquired a valence. And it transferred even when participants could not articulate the pairing. Modern work calls this evaluative conditioning. It has been documented with brand logos, unfamiliar faces, and political candidates. It differs from Pavlovian conditioning in two specific ways. It is relatively resistant to extinction once acquired. And it transfers valence rather than a specific response. The mechanism is still contested, but both camps agree the effect is robust.

Route 2

Operant Conditioning: Approval as Reinforcement

Route two is operant conditioning, and Insko demonstrated it in nineteen sixty-five. The design is worth following, because it heads off the obvious objection. Students made attitudinal statements to an interviewer. Some of those statements were verbally reinforced. Good. That's right. So far this could be simple compliance with the person in the room. But the follow-up came a week later, from a different researcher. And the attitudes had genuinely shifted. The same principle operates far beyond the laboratory. Reinforcement from parents, peers, teachers, and from algorithmic feedback on platforms. Here is how approval becomes belief. Attitudes that earn approval get expressed more frequently. Then self-perception and consistency processes take over. Repeated expression turns, over time, into internalization.

Route 3

Observational Learning: Inheriting an Evaluation

Route three is observational learning, from Bandura in nineteen seventy-seven. His social-cognitive theory established something important. Attitudes, like behaviors, can be acquired without any direct reinforcement of the learner. Watch a respected model evaluate something positively, and your own attitude shifts. Watch that model be rewarded for the evaluation, and the shift is larger. The developmental consequence is where this really matters. Children acquire evaluations of unfamiliar groups, foods and ideas. They acquire them long before they have any personal experience of the object. Largely from parents and siblings, and increasingly from screen-mediated models. This is also the uncomfortable case, and it should be named plainly. This is the route by which prejudices are inherited. No direct experience of the group is required, and none is ever collected.

Route 4

Mere Exposure: Liking Without a Reason

Route four is the strangest of them, and it belongs to Zajonc, in nineteen sixty-eight. Repeated exposure to a stimulus increases liking for it. With no reinforcement at all. No reward, no argument, no content. He demonstrated it with Chinese ideographs, novel polygons, and unfamiliar faces. Evaluations rose monotonically with exposure frequency. More exposures, more liking, in a steady climb. The effect is strongest under specific conditions. When stimuli start out neutral or weakly positive, and when exposures are brief and varied. And strikingly, when participants cannot consciously recognize the stimuli at all. Bornstein documented that last point in nineteen eighty-nine. Mere exposure explains why advertising repetition works without persuasive content. It explains why we prefer the side of our own face we see in the mirror. And it explains affinity for our own neighborhoods, dialects and customs.

Route 5

Direct Experience Builds the Strongest Attitudes

Route five produces the strongest attitudes of all, and the finding is precise. Fazio and Zanna held the content of the attitude constant. Same evaluation, same object. Only the formation route differed. Attitudes formed through direct behavioral experience won on four measures. More accessible from memory. More stable over time. More resistant to counter-persuasion. And more predictive of behavior. The mechanism is straightforward once you see it. Direct experience strengthens the object-evaluation association in memory. That raises the chance the attitude activates automatically next time. A student who has visited a country holds a stronger attitude toward it. Stronger than one who has only read about it. This principle informs experiential learning, and intergroup contact theory.

Compared

Six Routes, Ranked by Speed and Strength

Let us put the six routes side by side, on speed and strength. Evaluative conditioning is fast, and moderate in strength. Brand affect and conditioned phobias are the examples. Operant conditioning is slow, and also moderate. Politically reinforced opinions are the typical case. Observational learning is fast, and variable in strength. Inherited family prejudices sit here. Mere exposure is slow, and weak to moderate. Direct experience is slow, and strong. Reasoned analysis is slowest of all, and also strong. Notice the pattern. Nothing in that table is both fast and strong. And read the word strength carefully here. It means accessibility, stability and predictive validity. Not how strongly the person says they feel.

The Genetic Floor

Attitudes Are Partly Heritable

Now the finding that unsettles most students. Attitudes are partly heritable. Tesser, in nineteen ninety-three, and later twin studies showed the pattern. Identical twins reared apart show greater attitudinal similarity. Greater than fraternal twins reared together, in the same house. Across topics ranging from preferences for jazz to attitudes toward capital punishment. Heritability estimates typically fall between about point three and point five. Now, be careful about what that means. The genes do not code for attitudes directly. There is no capital punishment gene. What genes shape is temperament, sensory thresholds, intelligence, and conditionability. Those in turn channel which experiences you seek and how you process them. The attitude is still built from experience. The building materials are pre-sorted. So the finding does not diminish socialization. It constrains the blank-slate assumption that has long pervaded persuasion research.

Across A Lifetime

The Dominant Route Keeps Moving

The dominant formation route does not stay put across a life. In early childhood, observational learning leads. Family evaluations arrive before the child has any experience to weigh them against. In adolescence, peer influence rises sharply. And reasoned reflection becomes available for the first time. That is not a coincidence. It rises as formal-operational thought matures. The capacity has to exist before the route can be used. Early adulthood brings the impressionable years, roughly ages seventeen to twenty-five. Then mid and later life shift toward experience-based consolidation. Genetic and temperamental contributions run through all of it. But each developmental stage channels them differently.

Who Does The Building

Socialization Agents, and the Adult Window

Across the first two decades, four agents do most of the work. Family dominates in early childhood. Children's evaluations of foods, religious symbols and out-groups track their parents' closely. That is Sears, in nineteen eighty-three. Peer influence grows sharply in early adolescence. It occasionally produces dramatic short-term shifts, as Brown documented in two thousand and four. Schooling acts more on the cognitive component, supplying belief content. Mass media acts more on the affective component, through repeated affect-laden imagery. Contemporary digital platforms blur all four of those channels. Algorithmic curation delivers peer-like familiarity and parent-like authority at once. With mass-media reach on top, and measurable consequences for adolescent polarization. Now, adult attitudes are not frozen either. The impressionable-years hypothesis says attitudes formed between seventeen and twenty-five endure. Later ones are more sensitive to specific persuasive episodes and direct experience. Major life transitions open experiential windows. Entering the workforce, becoming a parent, migration, retirement. In later life, weakly held attitudes stay plastic. Strong, identity-linked attitudes show striking stability instead.

Consolidate

Same Attitude, Different History, Different Fix

Here is a case that shows why the formation route matters practically. Two adults hold equally negative attitudes toward a particular cuisine. Adult A was repeatedly told as a child that the cuisine was inferior. That is observational learning. Adult B once got food poisoning after eating it. That is single-trial conditioning under aversive reinforcement. The two attitudes have identical content and will behave completely differently. A's attitude is more sensitive to persuasion and to counter-modeling. B's is more accessible, more resistant, and tied to physiological avoidance. So, to consolidate. Attitudes are built. By conditioning, reinforcement, observation, exposure and direct experience. All layered on genetic and temperamental predispositions. And before trying to change any attitude, ask how it was formed. The route predicts which counter-message has any chance at all.

About Advanced Social Psychology at UPI Study

Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) is a self-paced online course of 85 video lessons in 12 chapters, from attitudes, persuasion and the self to prejudice, attraction and relationships, conformity and obedience, helping, aggression and social life online. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Social Psychology vs Sociology

Why take it here

Why students take Advanced Social Psychology with UPI Study

How other people shape what we think and doAdvanced Social Psychology explains how people think about, influence and relate to one another: attitudes and persuasion, the self, prejudice and intergroup conflict, attraction and close relationships, conformity and obedience, helping and aggression. It is a common upper-level course in psychology and sociology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Advanced Social Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Building Beliefs: How Attitudes Form and Develop Over Time

How are attitudes formed?
Attitudes form through several routes: evaluative conditioning, operant reinforcement, observational learning, mere exposure, direct experience, and reasoned analysis, alongside some genetic and temperamental influence. Learning from others is fast and explains many attitudes toward things people have never encountered. Direct experience is slower, but Russell Fazio and Mark Zanna showed in 1981 that it produces attitudes that are more accessible, stable, resistant to persuasion, and predictive of behavior.
What is evaluative conditioning in attitude formation?
Evaluative conditioning is a change in liking for a stimulus after it is repeatedly paired with positive or negative stimuli. In classic 1950s studies by Arthur and Carolyn Staats, a nonsense syllable such as YOF came to be rated pleasant when paired with words like gift and happy, and unpleasant when paired with words like thief and bitter. Similar effects have been found with brand logos, unfamiliar faces, and political candidates.
What is the mere exposure effect?
The mere exposure effect is the tendency to like something more simply because you have encountered it repeatedly, with no reward or argument involved. Robert Zajonc demonstrated it in 1968 with Chinese-like characters, unfamiliar words, and faces, with liking rising as exposures increased. A 1989 meta-analysis by Robert Bornstein found the effect is often stronger when people cannot consciously recognize the stimuli, which helps explain why repeated advertising can work.
Are attitudes genetic?
Attitudes are partly heritable, but genes do not code for specific attitudes. Twin studies, discussed by Abraham Tesser in 1993, show that identical twins are more similar than fraternal twins on many attitudes, with heritability estimates often falling roughly between 0.3 and 0.5. Genes likely act indirectly through temperament, sensory sensitivity, and intelligence, which shape the experiences people seek and how they process them, so attitudes are still built from experience.

About the Advanced Social Psychology course

How many college credits is Advanced Social Psychology?
Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Advanced Social Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 85 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Advanced Social Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 85 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Advanced Social Psychology.

85 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Advanced Social Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →