UPI Study › Courses › Advanced Social Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 7.7 Free with a free account
More Than Just Connection: The Types and Functions of Interpersonal Relationships
Advanced Social Psychology · Chapter 7: Belonging, Attraction, and Interpersonal RelationshipsSection 7.7 · lesson 46 of 8510 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Advanced Social Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Advanced Social Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Friends for Life: How Friendships Form and Evolve Across the Life Span →← Bonds That Define Us: Key Theories and Definitions of Interpersonal RelationshipsNext lesson: Friends for Life: How Friendships Form and Evolve Across the Life Span →
In this lesson
What relationships are for, and what happens when they stop doing it.
- Classify relationships by function rather than structure
- Identify the 4 classical forms of social support
- Explain self-expansion and capitalization
- Weigh the health evidence, including its costs
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,416 words). Read along, or search it.
Belonging, Attraction, and Interpersonal Relationships
More Than Just Connection
This is the last section of the chapter, and it changes the question. Everything so far asked what relationships are, and how they form. This one asks what they are for. That sounds like a small shift, and it is not. It leads to a claim that should unsettle you slightly. Being in a relationship does not, by itself, predict very much. What predicts things is whether the relationship performs its functions. We will cover four forms of social support along the way. A model of how partners enlarge each other. And a health literature large enough to be worth taking seriously.
A Different Cut
Classifying by What Relationships Do
The previous section organized relationships by their structural dynamics. How interdependence is arranged, evaluated, and maintained. This section classifies them by what they do for the people inside them. That is a functional analysis, and it earns its place clinically. And developmentally, for the same reason. Here is why. Much of the variance in health is not predicted by the obvious thing. It is not predicted by whether a person is in a relationship at all. It is predicted by which functions their relationships actually serve. So counting relationships tells you very little. The useful question is which needs are being met, and by whom. And whether any of them go unmet inside a bond that looks entirely intact.
Five Functional Types
What Each Kind of Bond Is For
Five functional types cover most of a person's social world. Family and kin anchor identity, supply material support, and transmit across generations. Their distinctive feature is that they are non-voluntary. The obligations hold independently of moment-to-moment satisfaction. A romantic partner supplies sexual intimacy, emotional connection, and life-project coordination. In adulthood the partner is typically the primary attachment figure. Close friendships supply belongingness, identity validation, and companionship. They are voluntary, and sustained by mutual investment rather than formal status. Workplace ties handle task coordination, mentoring, and network access. And then community ties, which are the easiest ones to underrate. Granovetter called them the strength of weak ties: individually shallow, easily discounted. Their value is aggregate. It shows up in the network, not in one friendship.
Social Support
Four Forms, Four Situations
Social support is the most studied function, and a top documented predictor of well-being. House, in nineteen eighty-one, and researchers after him, separated four forms. Emotional support is first: affection, empathy, reassurance. The I am here with you function. It is most valuable during distress, and during bereavement. Instrumental support is practical aid: money, transport, childcare, shared labor. It matters most during concrete crises, and life transitions. Informational support is advice, guidance, and relevant knowledge. Most useful when someone faces an unfamiliar decision. Appraisal support is feedback that helps a person evaluate their own situation. It ties closely to self-esteem, and to identity work. The common failure here is a mismatch between form and need. Offering advice to someone who needs emotional support reads as a refusal.
The Surprise
Perceived Support Beats Received Support
Now a nuance that runs directly against intuition. Two things can be measured: support received, and support perceived. Perceived support is the belief that help would be available if needed. And it predicts well-being more reliably than support actually used. Sarason and Sarason reviewed this in two thousand nine. Merely knowing you are embedded in a supportive network buffers stress. Even on days when no actual help is exchanged at all. There is a measurement reason too. Help is usually delivered during a crisis. So measured receipt travels with whatever went wrong to require it. The practical implication is easy to state and easy to miss. Interventions that focus only on delivering aid miss the other task. Communicating availability, credibly, before anything has gone wrong.
Self-Expansion
Relationships as a Route to a Larger Self
The next model explains something support cannot. Why relationships feel expansive, rather than merely comforting. Aron and Aron proposed the self-expansion model in nineteen eighty-six. It posits a basic motive: acquiring resources, perspectives, and identities that expand the self. Things that increase your capacity to act in the world. Close relationships are one of the most efficient routes to that. Because the other's resources, perspectives, and identities become available to you. We say we know a city, through a partner who grew up there. That we speak a language a friend taught us. Or that we understand a discipline, through a mentor. The model says that language is not loose. The boundary of the self really moves.
Non-Obvious Predictions
Why New Love Feels Like That
The model generates several non-obvious predictions, and they have support. Two of them reframe experiences people normally explain very differently. First, new love. Its intense excitement can be reinterpreted as rapid self-expansion. A great deal of new territory is being acquired, very quickly. Second, and more useful, the long-term dip. Longer relationships sometimes flag in satisfaction. Not because anything has gone wrong, but because expansion has slowed. Aron and colleagues tested that directly, in two thousand. Couples were assigned to novel, exciting joint activities. They reported increased relationship quality afterward. Compared with couples assigned to merely pleasant, routine activities. The diagnostic payoff is real. A couple reading a slowdown as a fault will hunt for one. They may simply have run out of new territory, which has a different fix.
Capitalization
How Partners Respond to Good News
Here is a second thing the support literature nearly missed entirely. Gable and colleagues studied capitalization, in two thousand four and two thousand six. Capitalization means sharing good news with a close other. Their finding: the response to good news matters as much as the response to bad. Responding actively and constructively works: asking questions, expressing genuine enthusiasm. That predicts higher satisfaction and stability than the alternatives. Better than responding actively but destructively, and better than passively or dismissively. So relationships are sustained by the celebration of good moments. As much as by the support offered in the bad ones. Decades of research studied only responses to distress. A whole second channel was carrying comparable weight all along.
The Health Evidence
Alameda County, and What It Found
Now the health evidence, which is genuinely overwhelming. The foundational prospective study is Berkman and Syme, from nineteen seventy-nine. It is known as the Alameda County study. They tracked nearly seven thousand adults over nine years. Prospective, which means the social measures were taken before the outcomes. That ordering is what makes the result usable. People with smaller, weaker networks died at roughly twice the rate of the well-connected. And the effect survived the controls, which is the crucial part. They controlled for baseline health, socioeconomic status, and health behaviors. The obvious objection is that sick people simply have fewer friends. Controlling for baseline health is what answers that objection.
Two Routes
Main Effect and Buffering
Holt-Lunstad and colleagues extended the finding in twenty ten. A meta-analysis of one hundred and forty-eight prospective studies. The protective effect on mortality was comparable to quitting smoking. And larger than the effect of reducing obesity. Two mechanisms are proposed, and they operate in parallel. The main-effect route says social integration is directly beneficial, at all times. Through routine activity, identity, meaning, and behavioral regulation. The buffering route says something narrower. Supportive relationships are especially valuable during stress. They moderate cardiovascular and immune responses. Responses that would otherwise erode health over time. Both routes have empirical support, so most models keep both.
The Honest Reckoning
When Relationships Harm
The functional view forces an honest reckoning, and here it is. Some relationships fail to perform their functions. And three patterns are associated with worse health than being unpartnered. Chronic interpersonal conflict is the first. Ambivalent relationships are the second: high in positive and negative components at once. Third, relationships marked by criticism, or by contempt. Then a finding that reframes the chapter: loneliness inside an ostensibly intact relationship. Being with a partner, and feeling unseen. That predicts depression and physical illness as reliably as objective isolation. Holt-Lunstad's later work makes the moderating role of quality clear. So the question is not merely whether bonds exist. It is whether the bonds do what bonds are supposed to do.
Consolidate
The Arc of the Chapter
Step back and look at the shape of the whole chapter. It moved from the need for connection, to the mechanisms of attraction. Then to the structures and functions of the resulting relationships. And each step reframes the one after it. Belonging is a basic need, with an alarm system and health consequences. Attraction is the entry process by which the need begins to be met. Reward, proximity, similarity, reciprocity, disclosure. Relationships are the structures in which the need is sustained over time. And the functions those relationships perform decide the outcome. Whether the need is genuinely satisfied, or only appears to be. A relationship that fails its functions is incomplete, from the motivational system's standpoint. However securely it appears to exist on paper.
About Advanced Social Psychology at UPI Study
Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) is a self-paced online course of 85 video lessons in 12 chapters, from attitudes, persuasion and the self to prejudice, attraction and relationships, conformity and obedience, helping, aggression and social life online. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Social Psychology vs Sociology
Why take it here
Why students take Advanced Social Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Advanced Social Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About More Than Just Connection: The Types and Functions of Interpersonal Relationships
What are the four types of social support?
Is perceived social support more important than received support?
What is the self-expansion model of relationships?
How do social relationships affect health and lifespan?
About the Advanced Social Psychology course
How many college credits is Advanced Social Psychology?
How much does Advanced Social Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Advanced Social Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Advanced Social Psychology.
85 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →