Playing a Part: Social Roles and the Lessons of the Stanford Prison Experiment

UPI Study › Courses › Advanced Social Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 9.2 Free with a free account

Playing a Part: Social Roles and the Lessons of the Stanford Prison Experiment

Advanced Social Psychology · Chapter 9: Group Dynamics, Conformity, and ObedienceSection 9.2 · lesson 55 of 8511 min · free with a free account

← Not All Groups Are Equal: Types and Dynamics of Social GroupsNext lesson: Written and Unwritten Rules: Injunctive Norms, Descriptive Norms, and Idiosyncrasy Credits →

Earn 3 college credits for Advanced Social PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 310 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Role theory, the Stanford Prison Experiment, and what survived its reappraisal.

  • Define social role and its related concepts
  • Describe the Stanford Prison Experiment and its termination
  • Evaluate Le Texier's archival findings
  • Compare situationist and social identity accounts

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,345 words). Read along, or search it.

Group Dynamics, Conformity, and Obedience

Playing a Part

This section contains the most famous study in social psychology. And one of the most thoroughly dismantled. Both of those are true, and the sequence matters. We start with role theory, which is the durable part. Then the Stanford Prison Experiment, as it was reported. Then what an archival reappraisal found in Zimbardo's own records. Then a controlled replication that reached a different conclusion. By the end you should be able to say precisely what survives. Which is not nothing, and is not what the textbooks said. Getting that distinction right is the point of the section.

The Definition

Roles Belong to Positions, Not People

Start with the definition. A social role is a cluster of normative expectations. Rights, obligations, and behavioral scripts. All attached to a social position, within a group or institution. Roles are relational, which is the first key property. They define appropriate behavior in relation to complementary roles. Teacher and student. Guard and prisoner. Neither half makes sense alone. The second key property is the crucial one for this section. Roles are held by positions, not by persons. Individuals occupy roles, with varying identification and commitment. So changing who occupies a position should change less than you expect. That is the claim this section tests, and partly retracts.

Role Theory

Social Life as Scripted Interaction

Role theory developed across sociology and social psychology. Merton in fifty-seven, Parsons in fifty-one, and Goffman in nineteen fifty-nine. Its central proposal: social life is organized substantially through role-governed interaction. Goffman gave the idea its most memorable image. The dramaturgical metaphor: social life as theatre. Individuals as actors, performing scripted parts. On front stages, where role norms are tightly enforced. And relaxing those norms backstage, where the audience is gone. The metaphor highlights how performative roles are. And how contextually variable, which is the useful half. Behavior that looks like character often turns out to be stage-dependent.

The Vocabulary

Six Concepts in Role Theory

Six concepts fill out the vocabulary. Role itself, from Merton in nineteen fifty-seven. The expected behaviors, rights, and obligations attached to a position. Role identity, from Burke and Reitzes in nineteen eighty-one. The internalized, self-definitional aspect of occupying a role. A nurse who sees caring for others as core to who they are. Role expectation, from Parsons, is the shared belief about how to behave. Doctors are expected to maintain confidentiality, for instance. Two kinds of conflict follow. Intra-role conflict is incompatible demands within one role. Kahn and colleagues, in nineteen sixty-four: a manager who must be supportive and evaluative. Inter-role conflict is competing demands from two roles held at once. Goode, in nineteen sixty: a parent required at work during a school recital. And role exit, from Ebaugh in nineteen eighty-eight. Disengaging from a role that has been central to your identity.

Salience

Which Role Is Switched On

Roles do not all operate at once, which is where salience comes in. Role salience is how psychologically prominent a role is at a given moment. And it moderates how strongly that role's norms govern behavior. Stryker's identity theory, from nineteen eighty, arranges roles in a salience hierarchy. The more central a role is to self-concept, the more readily its norms activate. And they activate across situations, not only in the matching one. So take someone for whom parent is the most salient identity. They will apply parental norms even in non-parenting contexts. Notice what that does to how the person looks from outside. A highly salient role starts to resemble a personality trait. Consistent across settings, but caused by the hierarchy, not the disposition.

August 1971

The Stanford Prison Experiment

Now the study. Zimbardo and colleagues ran it in August nineteen seventy-one. The published report is Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo, nineteen seventy-three. Twenty-four male college students took part, to test how roles shape behavior. They were screened for psychological health. And randomly assigned to guard or prisoner roles. The setting was a simulated prison, in the basement of Stanford's psychology building. The props were deliberate. Guards got uniforms, batons, and mirrored sunglasses. Prisoners got numbers instead of names, smocks, and ankle chains. The guiding question was dispositional versus situational. Would role assignment alone produce guard-like and prisoner-like behavior? Random assignment was meant to equate personality across the two conditions.

Six Days

The Reported Timeline

The experiment was planned for fourteen days. It was terminated after six. Day one was intake. Participants were arrested at home, fingerprinted, and deloused. Then assigned numbers and uniforms, which begins depersonalization. Across days one and two, prisoners resisted. And guards improvised escalating control tactics, such as push-ups and solitary. Day two brought a rebellion. Prisoners barricaded a cell. Guards used fire extinguishers to suppress the revolt. Across days three to five, deterioration set in. Prisoner number eight six one two showed acute emotional disturbance. He was released, and replaced, and others deteriorated too. Day six ended it, and the reason is important. Christina Maslach visited, objected strenuously, and Zimbardo halted the study. An outside perspective was what broke the situational absorption.

The Interpretation

Situational Absorption and the Lucifer Effect

Zimbardo's interpretation emphasized situational absorption. The institutional context, the roles, and props like uniforms, numbers, and the layout. Those alone, he argued, transformed psychologically healthy young men within days. Into abusive authority figures on one side. And psychologically deteriorating prisoners on the other. He coined a term for the general principle. The Lucifer Effect: good people turned into perpetrators of harm by situations. And he extended it to real-world atrocities, including Abu Ghraib. That is the version that entered textbooks and journalism. Hold it loosely, because the next two slides take it apart.

Le Texier, 2019

What the Archive Showed

In twenty nineteen, Thibault Le Texier published a landmark reappraisal. He worked from Zimbardo's own archive. Audio recordings, field notes, and internal correspondence. And he showed the findings were substantially shaped by experimenter demand. Guards received explicit coaching from a research assistant. They were instructed to be tough, and not to tolerate any defiance. Zimbardo himself played the role of prison superintendent. Which compromised his objectivity in an obvious way. So the study did not demonstrate spontaneous role-driven behavior. It demonstrated instructed compliance, dressed as situational emergence. Now see why that is not a small correction. Spontaneity was the entire finding. If guards were told to be harsh, roles alone were never shown to do it.

The Other Problems

Method and Ethics

Beyond the coaching, the study faces multiple methodological criticisms. The sample was small, all-male, and self-selected. Participants answered a newspaper ad for a prison study, creating expectancy effects. There was no control group at all. Dependent variables were not operationalized, or measured systematically. The behavioral descriptions came largely from Zimbardo's impressionistic accounts. And it was never peer-reviewed before entering public discourse as fact. Ethically, it is a landmark negative case. Zimbardo failed to terminate when participants showed clear psychological harm. Partly because his dual role created a conflict of interest. It is now cited in ethics training for inadequate participant protection. For insufficient debriefing, and for compromised researcher objectivity.

Reicher And Haslam, 2006

The BBC Prison Study

Reicher and Haslam ran the decisive comparison in two thousand six. A carefully controlled prison simulation, conducted for the BBC. It was designed to test Zimbardo's situationist account, and the findings diverged. Guards did not spontaneously become tyrannical. Early guards were uncertain, and inconsistent with one another. Prisoners initially failed to form a cohesive group identity. They grew more organized as that shared identity strengthened. So what did produce the hostile and abusive behavior? Not role assignment alone. A strong, exclusionary group identity among guards. Combined with a charismatic leader who advocated harsh treatment. That is the identity-leadership model, and it maps better onto real atrocities.

Consolidate

Four Conditions for Institutional Harm

Zimbardo served as an expert witness in a real court martial. That of Abu Ghraib guard Ivan Frederick, arguing situational factors explained the abuse. And his book, The Lucifer Effect, generalized the argument in two thousand seven. The empirical foundations are contested, but the conceptual contribution retains value. It directed attention to how institutions constrain and enable behavior. The more defensible lesson combines both studies, in four factors. One, institutional roles that confer authority over others. Two, an ideology that dehumanizes those in subordinate positions. Three, leadership that legitimizes or models harsh treatment. And four, group dynamics that suppress internal dissent. This account has been applied to maltreatment in care homes, and police brutality. To workplace bullying, and to military misconduct.

About Advanced Social Psychology at UPI Study

Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) is a self-paced online course of 85 video lessons in 12 chapters, from attitudes, persuasion and the self to prejudice, attraction and relationships, conformity and obedience, helping, aggression and social life online. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Social Psychology vs Sociology

Why take it here

Why students take Advanced Social Psychology with UPI Study

How other people shape what we think and doAdvanced Social Psychology explains how people think about, influence and relate to one another: attitudes and persuasion, the self, prejudice and intergroup conflict, attraction and close relationships, conformity and obedience, helping and aggression. It is a common upper-level course in psychology and sociology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Advanced Social Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Playing a Part: Social Roles and the Lessons of the Stanford Prison Experiment

What is the difference between intra-role and inter-role conflict?
Intra-role conflict is incompatible demands within a single role, such as a manager expected to be both supportive and evaluative. Inter-role conflict is competing demands from two roles held at once, such as a parent needed at work during a child's school recital. Both come from role theory, which treats a social role as a set of expectations, rights, and obligations attached to a position rather than to a person.
What happened in the Stanford Prison Experiment?
In August 1971, Philip Zimbardo's team randomly assigned male college students to be guards or prisoners in a mock prison in the basement of Stanford's psychology building. Guards escalated control tactics, prisoners rebelled and then showed distress, and the study, planned for two weeks, was stopped after six days when Christina Maslach objected. Zimbardo argued the situation alone turned ordinary people abusive, a claim later research has strongly challenged.
Why is the Stanford Prison Experiment criticized?
The Stanford Prison Experiment is criticized mainly because the guards' harshness was not spontaneous. In 2019, Thibault Le Texier's analysis of Zimbardo's archive showed that guards were coached to be tough, and Zimbardo acted as prison superintendent, compromising his objectivity. The sample was small and self-selected, there was no control group, and behavior was not measured systematically. It is also an ethics case study, because it continued despite clear psychological harm.
What did the BBC Prison Study find?
The BBC Prison Study, run by Stephen Reicher and Alex Haslam and published in 2006, found that guards did not spontaneously become tyrannical. Guards were uncertain and inconsistent, while prisoners grew more organized as they developed a shared identity. Harsh behavior arose from strong group identity combined with leadership that promoted it, not from role assignment alone. This identity-leadership view challenges Zimbardo's claim that roles by themselves drive abuse.

About the Advanced Social Psychology course

How many college credits is Advanced Social Psychology?
Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Advanced Social Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 85 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Advanced Social Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 85 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Advanced Social Psychology.

85 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Advanced Social Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →