Drawing the Line: Cyberbullying, Prevention, and Staying Safe Online

UPI Study › Courses › Advanced Social Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 12.7 Free with a free account

Drawing the Line: Cyberbullying, Prevention, and Staying Safe Online

Advanced Social Psychology · Chapter 12: Social Psychology in the Digital AgeSection 12.7 · lesson 85 of 8510 min · free with a free account

← Generosity Goes Digital: Prosocial Behavior, Crowdfunding, and Online Kindness

Earn 3 college credits for Advanced Social PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 310 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Cyberbullying as a configuration of intent, repetition, and power - reshaped by the technical environment.

  • Define cyberbullying and apply Willard's 7-form typology
  • Compare cyber and traditional bullying structurally
  • Explain perpetrator and bystander dynamics
  • Evaluate the 3-tier prevention framework

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,195 words). Read along, or search it.

Social Psychology in the Digital Age

Drawing the Line

This is the closing section of the course, and it is a practical one. Cyberbullying is not a new kind of behavior. It is an old configuration of behavior, running on new infrastructure. So the first job is defining it precisely enough to measure. That turns out to be harder than it sounds, and the reason is instructive. Then we map the seven behavioral forms, plus two recent additions. We compare cyber and traditional bullying on structural dimensions. And we look at where intervention actually has leverage. The answer to that last question is not the perpetrator. It is the bystanders, and the evidence on that point is strong.

Definition

Willful, Repeated, Electronically Mediated

The most influential definition comes from Hinduja and Patchin, in two thousand eight. Cyberbullying is willful and repeated harm. Harm inflicted through the use of computers, phones, and other electronic devices. It retains all three classical features: intent, repetition, and power imbalance. What digital mediation adds is a further three properties. Anonymity potential. Asynchronous reach. And the persistence of harmful content. One more thing worth knowing about this construct. It sits at the intersection of four disciplines. Social psychology, developmental psychology, criminology, and law.

Contested Criteria

What Counts as Repetition, and as Power

Two of the criteria are genuinely contested, and both debates matter. Some scholars argue a single online act can satisfy it. If that act remains visible and is repeatedly viewed by others. The act happens once; the victimization repeats every time it is seen. Now take power imbalance. Offline it is a function of physical or social asymmetry. Online the operative dimensions change entirely. Technical skill. Anonymity. Audience access. These are not semantic quarrels, because they change measurement. Prevalence estimates range from roughly ten percent to over forty percent. That is adolescents reporting victimization in the past year. A fourfold range means a prevalence figure is mostly a claim about definitions.

Willard, 2007

Seven Forms, Part One

Willard published a typology in two thousand seven that is now widely adopted. It distinguishes seven principal behavioral forms. The first is flaming: heated public exchanges. The second is harassment: repeated targeted messages. The third is denigration: spreading damaging information about the target. The fourth is impersonation: hijacking someone's identity to cause harm. Notice how different those four mechanisms actually are. Flaming is public and hot, and everyone can see it happening. Denigration works through third parties instead. And impersonation harms by making the target appear to act. A single label like online abuse would obscure all of that.

Willard, 2007

Seven Forms, Part Two

Three more forms complete the typology. Outing is the forced disclosure of private material. Trickery is the deceptive elicitation of compromising content. Content that is then used against the person who supplied it. And exclusion is coordinated social removal. Trickery and outing are worth reading as a sequence. Trickery obtains the material. Outing publishes it. Treating them as separate categories makes the first step visible as an offense. Which matters, because that is the step a target might still be able to stop. One caveat applies to the whole typology. The categories are not mutually exclusive. A single incident may combine several of them.

The Typology

Seven Behaviors Around One Construct

Picture the seven forms arranged around the central construct. Flaming, at the public and immediate end. Harassment, which is repeated and targeted. Denigration, which works through what others come to believe. Impersonation, which borrows the target's own voice. Outing, which publishes what was private. Trickery, which manufactures the material to publish. And exclusion, which removes rather than attacks. Seeing them together makes one thing obvious. Only some of these involve saying anything to the target at all. Which is why definitions built around insults miss most of the category.

Two More

Doxxing and Coordinated Harassment

Two further behaviors often appear alongside the classical seven. Both are more recent, and both are especially severe. The first is doxxing. That is publication of private identifying information. Published specifically in order to enable offline harm. The second is coordinated harassment. Organized brigading by networked actors. Both intensify the technical and psychological asymmetries at the core of victimization. And both have prompted legal responses in multiple jurisdictions. Doxxing deserves particular attention. It converts an online conflict into an offline risk. Which collapses the one boundary targets could previously rely on.

Structural Contrast

Six Dimensions of Difference

Cyberbullying and traditional bullying differ in structurally important ways. Cyberbullying dominates on anonymity. Anonymity is rare offline and common online. It weakens the target's ability to identify perpetrators, or to seek support. Cyberbullying dominates on reach. Offline, harassment is bounded by physical co-presence and by time. Online it continues across all waking hours, and into the home. It dominates on permanence, and on audience size. Traditional bullying dominates on two dimensions. Physical asymmetry, and adult awareness. That second one is the practical problem, since adults see far less online. But permanence is the difference in kind. The harm does not end with the incident.

Why It Happens

Disinhibition, Then Disengagement

Two mechanisms from earlier in the course explain the perpetrator question. And they explain different halves of it. Online disinhibition explains the first act. It accounts for why people say online what they would not say offline. Disinhibition explains a lowered threshold. It does not explain why the threshold stays low over time. For that you need moral disengagement theory, from Bandura. Repeated exposure to such acts gradually weakens self-sanctions. The very sanctions that would otherwise inhibit the behavior. So the first mechanism opens the door. And the second one explains why it does not close again.

Who Is Involved

Perpetrators, Targets, and an Unstable Dichotomy

Perpetration is associated with a familiar cluster of individual differences. Lower empathy. Higher impulsivity. Moral disengagement. And exposure to peer norms that tolerate aggression. But the offline perpetrator-target dichotomy is unstable online. Many adolescents report having occupied both roles. Sometimes within a single incident. Those bully-victims carry the most severe psychological outcomes of any group. Targets show elevated rates of depression and anxiety. Also somatic complaint, and academic decline. And in severe cases, suicidality. One more finding complicates any simple causal story. The relationship is bidirectional. Prior vulnerability raises risk of victimization, and victimization worsens symptoms.

The Leverage Point

Six Roles, and the One That Predicts Prevalence

Bystander behavior is the leverage point most amenable to intervention. Salmivalli's participant-role framework identifies six roles in total. The perpetrator initiates the harm. Assistants actively join in without initiating anything themselves. Reinforcers amplify, through likes, shares, or supportive comments. Notice that reinforcers contribute no aggression of their own. Outsiders withdraw, or stay passive despite being aware. Their driver is pluralistic ignorance, and the bystander effect. Defenders intervene for the target, by reporting or by counter-commenting. Their drivers are empathy, self-efficacy, and supportive norms. And the target receives the harm, sometimes occupying other roles elsewhere. Here is the single most useful statistic in this section. The proportion of defenders is among the strongest predictors of prevalence.

Consolidate

Three Tiers, and the Core Insight

Effective intervention rests on a three-tier public-health framework. Primary prevention is universal. It builds digital literacy, empathy, and platform-level friction. Secondary intervention is targeted. It identifies and supports at-risk users, and it activates bystanders. Tertiary response is individualized. Acute safety, trauma-informed care, and recourse through removal and law. Gaffney, Farrington and Ttofi tested this in a meta-analysis. Whole-school programs incorporating bystander activation work. The reductions are modest but reliable, and comparable to offline programs. And that gives us the core insight of the whole chapter. Cyberbullying is shaped by disposition, norms, and the technical environment together.

About Advanced Social Psychology at UPI Study

Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) is a self-paced online course of 85 video lessons in 12 chapters, from attitudes, persuasion and the self to prejudice, attraction and relationships, conformity and obedience, helping, aggression and social life online. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Social Psychology vs Sociology

Why take it here

Why students take Advanced Social Psychology with UPI Study

How other people shape what we think and doAdvanced Social Psychology explains how people think about, influence and relate to one another: attitudes and persuasion, the self, prejudice and intergroup conflict, attraction and close relationships, conformity and obedience, helping and aggression. It is a common upper-level course in psychology and sociology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Advanced Social Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Drawing the Line: Cyberbullying, Prevention, and Staying Safe Online

What is the definition of cyberbullying?
Cyberbullying is willful and repeated harm inflicted through computers, cell phones, and other electronic devices, a definition from Sameer Hinduja and Justin Patchin. It keeps the classic bullying features of intent, repetition, and power imbalance, but adds anonymity, round-the-clock reach, and permanence. Researchers debate whether a single post counts when it is shared and viewed repeatedly, which helps explain prevalence estimates ranging from about 10 to over 40 percent.
What are the different types of cyberbullying?
Nancy Willard's widely used typology includes flaming, or heated public exchanges; harassment, or repeated targeted messages; denigration, or spreading damaging information; impersonation, or posing as the target; outing, or exposing private material; trickery, or deceiving someone into sharing secrets; exclusion; and cyberstalking. Doxxing, publishing private identifying information, and coordinated harassment are newer forms. One incident can combine several types.
How is cyberbullying different from traditional bullying?
Cyberbullying differs from traditional bullying mainly in anonymity, reach, audience size, and permanence. Perpetrators can hide their identity, harassment can follow a target home at any hour, many people can see it, and posts can persist and be reshared long after the incident. Traditional bullying more often involves physical power differences and is more visible to adults. Many cyberbullies also bully offline, so the two overlap heavily.
What is the most effective way to prevent cyberbullying?
School-based prevention programs reduce cyberbullying modestly but reliably; a 2019 meta-analysis by Hannah Gaffney, David Farrington, and colleagues found reductions in both perpetration and victimization. Bystanders are a key target, since classrooms with more students who defend victims, by reporting or posting support, tend to have less bullying. Digital literacy, empathy training, and platform friction add further protection.

About the Advanced Social Psychology course

How many college credits is Advanced Social Psychology?
Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Advanced Social Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 85 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Advanced Social Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 85 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Advanced Social Psychology.

85 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Advanced Social Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →