UPI Study › Courses › Advanced Social Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 11.4 Free with a free account
Harm Without Hands: Relational Aggression, Bullying, and Their Impact
Advanced Social Psychology · Chapter 11: Aggression and ViolenceSection 11.4 · lesson 75 of 8510 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Advanced Social Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Advanced Social Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Learning to Be Aggressive: Bandura's Social Learning Theory and Media Influence →← When Frustration Turns Hostile: The Frustration-Aggression Principle and CatharsisNext lesson: Learning to Be Aggressive: Bandura's Social Learning Theory and Media Influence →
In this lesson
When the harm is to reputation, belonging, or selfhood, and nobody throws a punch.
- Define relational, indirect, and social aggression
- State Olweus's 3 criteria for bullying
- Name the 6 participant roles and why bystanders matter
- Explain what cyber-bullying changes
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,294 words). Read along, or search it.
Aggression and Violence
Harm Without Hands
Not all aggression is delivered with the hands. Some of it travels through reputation, through belonging, through friendship. The perpetrator never throws a punch, and the harm is entirely real. This section covers relational aggression and bullying. It starts with a story about measurement, which turns out to matter enormously. For decades the field measured only the channel it expected to find. And so it found exactly that channel, and missed a parallel one. We will then define bullying precisely, following Olweus. Look at the six roles people occupy in a bullying episode. And ask what moving online actually changes.
A Blind Spot
The Measure Was Finding What It Looked For
Crick and Grotpeter published a study of elementary-school children in nineteen ninety-five. It was a turning point, and the reason is methodological rather than theoretical. Until then, the default measure of aggression was physical or directly verbal. Notice that this is exactly the channel more often used by boys. So the instrument was quietly deciding the answer. Crick asked a different question of the children's peers. Who tells others not to play with someone? Who says mean things behind their backs? That question uncovered an entire parallel system of harm-doing. It was used at least as much by girls as by boys. It was stable across the school year. And it predicted social-emotional maladjustment for perpetrators and victims alike.
Three Terms
One Phenomenon, Three Emphases
Three terms circulate in this literature, from three research traditions. Relational aggression is the one you will meet most often. It is behavior intended to harm by damaging someone's peer relationships. Indirect aggression emphasizes something slightly different. It stresses the covert delivery of the harm. The term comes from Lagerspetz, Bjorkqvist, and Peltonen, in nineteen eighty-eight. Social aggression emphasizes the damage done to the target. Damage to their self-esteem, or to their social inclusion. That term comes from Galen and Underwood, in nineteen ninety-seven. Here is the practical advice about all three. They are now used largely interchangeably. Do not spend effort separating them.
Three Refinements
What Later Research Corrected
Later research refined the picture in three important ways. First, the early claim that girls predominate has weakened considerably. A large meta-analysis by Card, Stucky, Sawalani, and Little settled this. It found only a small overall sex difference in indirect aggression. And it found substantial overlap between girls and boys. Second, relational aggression is moderately correlated with physical aggression. Which implies something specific about aggressive children. Many of them deploy whichever channel the situation happens to reward. Third, the downstream costs are real, and this is the crucial finding. Chronic targets show elevated anxiety, depression, and somatic complaints. They also show school avoidance. And all of that appears even when no physical aggression is involved.
Olweus
Bullying Is a Configuration, Not a Synonym
Now bullying, which is not a synonym for aggression. It is a specific configuration of it. Following Olweus, writing in nineteen ninety-three, three features must all be present. First, the behavior is intended to harm. Second, it is repeated or sustained over time, rather than a one-off. Third, there is a power imbalance between perpetrator and target. An imbalance that makes self-defense difficult. All three, not any one. Consider what happens if you drop one. Drop repetition, and a single insult counts as bullying. Drop the power imbalance, and an even fight counts. The definition is restrictive on purpose.
The Imbalance
Four Ways Power Can Be Uneven
The power imbalance is the criterion people most often skip past. And it takes more forms than the obvious one. It may be physical, which is the case everyone pictures. It may be numerical: one target, several perpetrators. It may be social, which means status, popularity, and control over who belongs. In cyber-bullying it may be informational. Knowing something about the target that the target cannot control. And it may be an asymmetry in audience size. That last one is worth pausing on. An adult scanning a playground for physical imbalance will miss most bullying. The social and informational forms are the ones that actually scale.
Prevalence
How Common, and Who Is Worst Off
How common is this? International school surveys give a consistent range. Between ten and thirty-five percent of students are involved in a given school year. That counts perpetrators, victims, and those who are both. The figure comes from a meta-analysis by Modecki and colleagues. Rates are highest in mid-adolescence. And the mix changes with age in a predictable way. Physical bullying tends to decline as students get older. While relational and cyber forms rise. One subgroup is small and carries most of the risk. Perhaps five to ten percent are bully-victims: children who both perpetrate and are targeted. They show the worst psychosocial profile of any involved group.
Salmivalli, 1996
Six Roles in a Bullying Episode
Picture a bullying episode as six roles rather than two people. At the center are the bully and the victim, which everyone sees. But four more roles surround them, and they belong to peers. Assistants join in with the perpetrator. Reinforcers laugh and cheer without aggressing themselves. Outsiders avoid the scene entirely. And defenders intervene on the target's behalf. Those four bystander roles are not neutral positions. Collectively, they either reward the behavior or they extinguish it. Which means the episode is decided largely by people who are not in the dyad. That is a genuinely different way to picture the problem.
Why Roles Matter
The Audience Is Not Neutral
Salmivalli's participant-role analysis, from nineteen ninety-six, transformed the field. Before it, a bullying episode was conceptualized as a dyad. A bully and a victim, with everyone else as scenery. After it, the peers are inside the episode, occupying structured roles. Look closely at the reinforcer role in particular. Reinforcers contribute no aggression of their own. They laugh, and they cheer, and that is all. And they are essential to whether the behavior continues. The outsider role is equally instructive. Neutrality is not actually available in this situation. Withdrawal is itself a contribution to the outcome. So interventions that mobilize bystanders outperform those targeting the bully alone. The KiVa program is the best-known example of that approach.
Online
Same Definition, Different Physics
Moving online preserves all three defining features of bullying. But it transforms how they operate. Three affordances do the work. The first is persistence and searchability. A single act of humiliation can be repeated indefinitely. By audiences the perpetrator never anticipated. Notice what that does to the repetition criterion. Repetition no longer requires any further effort from the perpetrator. The second affordance is asynchronicity. It removes the immediate feedback that often inhibits face-to-face cruelty. You never see the face of the person you are harming. The third is anonymity, which weakens identifiability and amplifies deindividuation. Most cyber-bullies also bully offline, so these are not separate populations. Yet cyber-victimization adds risk of depression and suicidal ideation beyond offline victimization.
Long Term
The Great Smoky Mountains Cohort
Longitudinal studies converge on a sobering conclusion. Childhood bullying involvement predicts psychiatric morbidity well into adulthood. Copeland, Wolke, Angold, and Costello followed the Great Smoky Mountains cohort. Their report was published in two thousand thirteen. Pure victims showed increased adult anxiety and depression. Pure bullies showed elevated antisocial outcomes. And bully-victims carried the highest risk of all three groups. Depression, anxiety, suicidality, and panic disorder. Now the methodological point that makes this more than a correlation. The associations survive controls for childhood psychiatric problems. And for family hardship. That supports a causal contribution, rather than mere selection into the groups.
Consolidate
Different Channel, Same Vulnerabilities
Relational aggression and bullying are not soft phenomena. They should not be contrasted with so-called real violence. They use different channels, and they tap the same human vulnerabilities. The need to belong. The need to be seen as competent. And the need to feel safe in one's own social world. Three things are worth carrying forward. Olweus's three criteria: intent, repetition, and power imbalance. Salmivalli's six roles, four of which belong to bystanders. And the finding that bully-victims, not pure victims, carry the highest long-term risk. The chapter now turns from documentation to remediation. Beginning with the developmental period in which these patterns are first laid down.
About Advanced Social Psychology at UPI Study
Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) is a self-paced online course of 85 video lessons in 12 chapters, from attitudes, persuasion and the self to prejudice, attraction and relationships, conformity and obedience, helping, aggression and social life online. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Social Psychology vs Sociology
Why take it here
Why students take Advanced Social Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Advanced Social Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Harm Without Hands: Relational Aggression, Bullying, and Their Impact
What is relational aggression?
What are the three criteria for bullying according to Olweus?
What are the participant roles in bullying?
What are the long-term effects of being bullied in childhood?
About the Advanced Social Psychology course
How many college credits is Advanced Social Psychology?
How much does Advanced Social Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Advanced Social Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Advanced Social Psychology.
85 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →