Clicks and Connections: How the Internet Reshapes Interpersonal Relationships

UPI Study › Courses › Advanced Social Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 12.5 Free with a free account

Clicks and Connections: How the Internet Reshapes Interpersonal Relationships

Advanced Social Psychology · Chapter 12: Social Psychology in the Digital AgeSection 12.5 · lesson 83 of 8510 min · free with a free account

← Scrolling and Shifting: Social Media's Influence on Attitudes, Bias, and DiscriminationNext lesson: Generosity Goes Digital: Prosocial Behavior, Crowdfunding, and Online Kindness →

Earn 3 college credits for Advanced Social PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 310 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Strong ties, weak ties, and what actually determines whether digital contact helps.

  • Distinguish strong from weak ties and their social capital
  • Adjudicate the displacement and stimulation hypotheses
  • Apply hyperpersonal and choice-overload reasoning to dating
  • Analyze parasocial and long-distance relational forms

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,304 words). Read along, or search it.

Social Psychology in the Digital Age

Clicks and Connections

Relationships have been the central object of social psychology for decades. And digital communication has reorganized them without dissolving them. That distinction matters, and this section defends it. We begin with an assumption that used to be foundational and no longer holds. That physical proximity is what makes closeness possible. Then we take up Granovetter's distinction between strong and weak ties. And the long argument about whether time online displaces offline life. That argument has a resolution now, and it is more useful than either side. We finish with online dating, parasocial attachment, and long-distance couples. Across all of them, one rule keeps reappearing.

A Retired Assumption

Proximity Was the Enabling Condition

Earlier relationship theory presupposed geographic proximity. The classic propinquity studies are emblematic of that view. Festinger, Schachter and Back published them in nineteen fifty. Contemporary relational life routinely violates that presupposition. Intimacy is sustained across distance, time zones, and asynchronous schedules. So the research question has moved. It is no longer whether close relationships can form online. That question is settled, and the answer is obviously yes. The question is how the affordances of digital channels reshape them. Their formation, their maintenance, and their dissolution.

Three Meta-Trends

What Has Changed About Networks

Three meta-trends frame everything else in this section. First, networks are increasingly heterogeneous. Strong ties and weak ties now mix in a single visible graph. That was almost never true of pre-digital social worlds. Second, relational maintenance has become lightweight. It is performed through low-cost signals rather than discrete events. Likes, brief messages, viewing someone's story. That second trend is the structural one, so consider what it implies. When maintenance costs almost nothing, effort stops limiting how many ties you keep. Which changes the shape of a network, not merely its size. Third, the boundary between interpersonal and parasocial attachment has blurred. Creators address audiences in second-person registers that mimic private exchange.

Granovetter, 1973

The Strength of Weak Ties

Granovetter's nineteen seventy-three distinction remains foundational. Strong ties involve frequent interaction, closeness, reciprocity, and multiplexity. Multiplexity means the relationship runs through more than one context. Weak ties involve infrequent, acquaintance-level contact. Now the counter-intuitive part, which is why the paper is famous. Weak ties provide disproportionate access to novel information and opportunity. That has been validated in job-search research. Also in innovation research, and in information-diffusion research. The logic behind it is about redundancy. Your strong ties largely know what you already know, because they share your circles. A weak tie is connected to information you do not have.

Two Kinds Of Capital

What Platforms Are Actually Good At

Putnam mapped that architecture onto two kinds of social capital, in two thousand. Bonding social capital is within-group solidarity. It maps onto strong ties. Bridging social capital is across-group access. It maps onto weak ties. Ellison, Steinfield and Lampe tested which one platforms actually serve. Their two thousand seven study found something specific. Intensity of Facebook use was more strongly associated with bridging capital. More strongly, that is, than with bonding capital. Which suggests these sites are especially good at one particular job. Maintaining weak ties that would otherwise simply lapse. That relational maintenance function is the genuinely new capability. Preserving connections at low marginal cost. The telephone never kept a hundred acquaintances warm on your behalf.

Two Hypotheses

Does Online Time Displace or Stimulate?

Two opposing hypotheses have structured this research area for decades. They make directly contradictory predictions, which is what you want. The displacement hypothesis came from Kraut and colleagues in nineteen ninety-eight. Time spent online substitutes for offline interaction. And that substitution weakens social bonds. It is a zero-sum account, assuming a fixed social budget. The stimulation hypothesis came from Valkenburg and Peter in two thousand seven. Online communication enriches and extends offline relationships. Particularly through self-disclosure with friends you already have. On that view digital contact is a complement, not a substitute. Contemporary syntheses find that neither is uniformly correct. That is not a failure. Both effects are real, and the job was to say when.

The Resolution

Active Use Helps; Passive Use Costs

The resolution turns on what kind of use you are measuring. Active use means direct communication with people you know. It predicts well-being benefits, consistent with the stimulation account. Passive use means scrolling content from acquaintances and strangers. It predicts well-being costs, consistent with displacement. Verduyn and colleagues consolidated that distinction in twenty seventeen. So the relevant moderators are activity type and partner identity. Along with platform affordances. And crucially, the relevant moderator is not raw screen time. Which explains why screen-time studies produce such inconsistent results. Two people can log identical hours and do opposite things to their social lives. A measure that cannot tell them apart is measuring the wrong variable.

Online Dating

Three Dynamics Organize the Literature

Online dating now mediates a large share of romantic introductions globally. Three social-psychological dynamics organize the literature on it. The first is hyperpersonal misalignment, which you already know the mechanism for. Intense early attraction, followed by reality-collision at the first meeting. The second is choice overload, produced by the architecture of profile browsing. As alternatives multiply, decision satisfaction declines. And so does commitment to the partner eventually chosen. The third is that social-exchange reasoning becomes unusually explicit. Earlier introduction contexts did not foreground that at all. Exchange reasoning was always present in mate selection, of course. What is new is that the interface makes it visible and countable. And visible comparison is exactly what feeds choice overload.

The Funnel

Where the Attrition Happens

Picture the process as a funnel, because attrition is where the action is. At the top is browsing. Profiles are evaluated and alternatives multiply. Choice overload begins here, before any contact has been made. Next comes matching, when mutual interest is recorded. That is the widest surviving step, and it costs neither party anything. Then messaging, and this is where most matches simply stop. It is also where hyperpersonal impressions get built. Asynchronous crafting on both sides, with no disconfirming information. Finally, offline contact, which most messaging never reaches. That is the narrowest stage, and it is the reality-collision point. Two things happen at that last transition. The impression is tested, and the crafted self-presentation stops working.

What It Really Changed

Access, Not Matching

Finkel, Eastwick, Karney, Reis and Sprecher made an argument in twenty twelve. It reframes most popular claims about this technology. The central innovation of online dating is not improved matching. It is expanded access. That is a different effect, and a largely beneficial one. Notice how far that is from the story usually told about these services. The claim being corrected is that they match people better. What the evidence supports is the size and reach of the pool instead. Expanded access matters most for people outside dense local networks. But it introduces novel risks alongside the benefit. Risks of misrepresentation, and of overload.

Horton And Wohl, 1956

Parasocial Intimacy, Intensified

Parasocial relationships were named by Horton and Wohl in nineteen fifty-six. They are perceived one-sided intimacy with a media figure. The figure does not personally know the perceiver. These have intensified in the creator-economy era, and technique explains why. Classical parasocial attachment involved broadcast figures. Those figures addressed mass audiences, and it was evident that they did. Contemporary creators do three things differently. They address viewers in second-person registers. They post unedited behind-the-scenes content. And they respond selectively to viewer messages. Together those produce an illusion of bidirectional intimacy. Research documents benefits: companionship, and modeling. And costs: displacement of reciprocal relationships, and vulnerability to exploitation.

Consolidate

Five Relational Forms, and One Rule

Five relational forms are worth holding in view together. Strong-tie maintenance across distance is generally positive. Its benefit is mediated by self-disclosure. Weak-tie cultivation through low-cost signals builds bridging capital. And with it, access to novel opportunity. Long-distance dating relies on video and asynchronous channels. Once treated as inherently fragile, it now shows comparable satisfaction. Comparable, that is, to geographically close relationships. The trade-off is elevated idealization, and difficult reunion adjustment. Online-only friendships can carry genuine intimacy, and are open to deception. And parasocial attachment can be companionship or displacement, depending on context. One rule runs through every row of that table. Channel features matter less than how the channel is used, and by whom.

About Advanced Social Psychology at UPI Study

Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) is a self-paced online course of 85 video lessons in 12 chapters, from attitudes, persuasion and the self to prejudice, attraction and relationships, conformity and obedience, helping, aggression and social life online. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Social Psychology vs Sociology

Why take it here

Why students take Advanced Social Psychology with UPI Study

How other people shape what we think and doAdvanced Social Psychology explains how people think about, influence and relate to one another: attitudes and persuasion, the self, prejudice and intergroup conflict, attraction and close relationships, conformity and obedience, helping and aggression. It is a common upper-level course in psychology and sociology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Advanced Social Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Clicks and Connections: How the Internet Reshapes Interpersonal Relationships

What are strong ties and weak ties?
Strong ties are close relationships with frequent contact, emotional closeness, and reciprocity, such as close friends and family, while weak ties are acquaintances you see rarely. Mark Granovetter's 1973 paper The Strength of Weak Ties showed that weak ties give disproportionate access to new information and opportunities, such as job leads, because acquaintances move in different circles and know things your close friends do not.
Does social media help or hurt relationships?
It depends on how it is used. Active use, such as messaging people you know, tends to support well-being, while passive scrolling through others' content tends to be linked with lower well-being, a distinction consolidated by Philippe Verduyn and colleagues in 2017. This helps reconcile the displacement hypothesis, which predicted online time would replace offline bonds, with the stimulation hypothesis, which predicted it would strengthen them, though later research suggests the split is not perfectly clean.
How does Facebook use affect social capital?
Facebook use is especially associated with bridging social capital, meaning connections across different groups. Robert Putnam distinguished bridging capital from bonding capital, the close support within a group. In a 2007 study, Nicole Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe found that intensity of Facebook use among college students was most strongly linked to bridging capital, suggesting such sites help keep weak ties alive at low cost.
Is online dating better at matching people?
Not clearly. In a 2012 review, Eli Finkel, Paul Eastwick, Benjamin Karney, Harry Reis, and Susan Sprecher concluded that online dating's main benefit is expanded access to potential partners, not superior matching algorithms. That access especially helps people outside dense local social networks. Browsing many profiles can also cause choice overload, and idealized impressions built through messaging are tested, and often deflated, at the first meeting.

About the Advanced Social Psychology course

How many college credits is Advanced Social Psychology?
Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Advanced Social Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 85 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Advanced Social Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 85 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Advanced Social Psychology.

85 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Advanced Social Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →