When Relationships Struggle: The Key Threats to Interpersonal Bonds

UPI Study › Courses › Advanced Social Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 8.6 Free with a free account

When Relationships Struggle: The Key Threats to Interpersonal Bonds

Advanced Social Psychology · Chapter 8: Friendship, Love, and Close RelationshipsSection 8.6 · lesson 52 of 8510 min · free with a free account

← Love, Commitment, and Family: Courtship, Marriage, and ChildbearingNext lesson: Letting Go: How and Why Relationships End, and the Strategies We Use to Exit →

Earn 3 college credits for Advanced Social PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 310 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Jealousy, betrayal, conflict patterns, and why people stay anyway.

  • Map the 4 categories of threat to relationship stability
  • Explain jealousy, betrayal, and trust violation
  • Identify the most damaging conflict dynamics
  • Apply the investment model to persistence under threat

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,185 words). Read along, or search it.

Friendship, Love, and Close Relationships

When Relationships Struggle

So far this chapter has been about how relationships form and hold. This section is about what damages them. Four categories of threat, and three that get most of the research. Jealousy, betrayal, and destructive conflict patterns. Then the harder question underneath all of them. Why do people stay in relationships that are clearly damaging them? The answer comes from a model you have already met. And it carries an uncomfortable implication we will end on. Persistence in a relationship is not evidence that it is working. The two things are predicted by different variables entirely.

Four Sources

Where Threats Come From

Relationships face threats from multiple sources. Four categories cover the field, and each calls for a different response. Intrapersonal, meaning something inside one of the individuals. Dyadic, meaning something in the interaction between the two. Structural, meaning the circumstances the relationship sits inside. And social network, meaning the people around the couple. Those four categories are not independent, though. They interact, and the interaction is where diagnosis gets hard. Economic stress is the clearest example. It exacerbates dyadic conflict, and reduces the quality of communication.

The Four, Specified

What Each Category Contains

Take each in turn. Intrapersonal threats are individual characteristics. Attachment insecurity, neuroticism, or low self-regulation. Dyadic threats live in the interaction itself. Conflict styles, communication breakdown, sexual dissatisfaction. Plus jealousy, and betrayal, which get their own sections here. Structural threats are about circumstances. Geographic separation, occupational demands, economic stress. And social network threats come from outside the pair entirely. Family disapproval, and competing social ties. Now watch what the interaction does to diagnosis. A structural problem can arrive disguised as a dyadic one.

Jealousy

One Emotion, Three Components

Jealousy first, and it deserves a precise definition. It is a complex aversive emotion. Triggered by the perceived threat of losing a valued relationship to a rival. It has three separable components. First, a cognitive appraisal of threat, real or imagined. Note that the appraisal starts the sequence, not the rival. Second, an affective response, and it is rarely one clean emotion. Combinations of fear, anger, sadness, and humiliation. Third, behavioral tendencies. Surveillance, protest, withdrawal, or violence. The same appraisal can produce very different actions there. Which is why the decomposition matters clinically. You can change what someone does about jealousy without first changing the feeling.

Buss, 1992

Predicted Sex Differences in Jealousy

Evolutionary accounts make a specific prediction about jealousy. Buss set it out in nineteen ninety-two. It is not about how much jealousy is felt, but about what triggers it. Men are predicted to be more distressed by sexual infidelity. Because it threatens paternity certainty. Women are predicted to be more distressed by emotional infidelity. Because it threatens resource provisioning. Now the status of the evidence, stated carefully. These predictions have been partially supported. But they are substantially moderated by culture, and by attachment style. And by the quality of the current relationship. A heavily moderated effect is not a constant, whatever its origin.

Betrayal

The Violation of Relational Expectations

Trust is the cornerstone of intimate relationships. Which makes it the target of the most damaging threats. Betrayal is the violation of implicit or explicit relational expectations. Notice the damage: it undermines the two things trust actually represents. Perceived partner predictability, and perceived partner benevolence. Jones and Burdette, in nineteen ninety-four, cataloged the common betrayals. Discussing private information with others. Lying. Sexual infidelity. Emotional infidelity. Failing to provide support, and breaking significant commitments. Look at the first and the fifth items on that list. Betrayal is defined by the violated expectation, not by the drama of the act.

Forgiveness

What Trust Recovery Depends On

So what does recovery of trust actually depend on? McCullough and colleagues addressed this in nineteen ninety-eight. Four factors, and only one of them the transgressor controls. The severity, and the intentionality, of the betrayal. The transgressor's apology, and their remorse. The victim's dispositional empathy, and their attachment security. And the overall quality of the relationship before the betrayal happened. Then one further finding, which separates two ideas people fuse. Forgiveness is associated with improved well-being for the forgiver. And that holds independent of whether the relationship is maintained. So forgiving and reconciling are different acts. Only one of the two requires the other person to participate.

Attachment

Three Recovery Trajectories

Attachment style predicts how betrayal recovery unfolds. And the two insecure styles fail in opposite directions. Securely attached individuals show faster trust recovery. Faster than insecurely attached individuals, after the same betrayal. Anxiously attached people tend to ruminate on it. They alternate between forgiveness and re-activation of anger. Avoidantly attached people do the reverse. They may suppress emotional processing entirely. And prematurely foreclose genuine recovery. That avoidant pattern is the deceptive one. Suppression resembles resolution from the outside. The topic stops coming up. Which is why a foreclosed betrayal can reappear intact, years later.

Conflict

Solvable Problems and Perpetual Ones

Conflict is inevitable, but it is not uniformly destructive. Gottman's research draws a distinction that changes the goal. Solvable problems are specific, and situational. They are amenable to compromise, because a solution exists. Perpetual problems are a different animal. Fundamental incompatibilities in values, personality, or lifestyle. They are ongoing, and unlikely to resolve. There is no solution there to find. So what do healthy couples do about the second kind? They manage them through dialogue and accommodation, rather than gridlock. Accepting that certain differences are enduring features of the relationship. Rather than treating them as failures to be fixed.

Demand-Withdraw

The Most Damaging Dynamic

One conflict dynamic is more damaging than any other. The demand-withdraw pattern. One partner presses for discussion, and the other disengages. Christensen and Heavy documented it in nineteen ninety. They found the pattern predicts relationship dissatisfaction. It appears most when the demanding partner desires change. And the withdrawing partner resists that change. In heterosexual couples the roles are often correlated with gender. But notice the word the researchers use: structural. The pattern is driven by who wants change, not by personality. Each partner's move is a reasonable response to the other's move. Which is exactly why stopping unilaterally never feels possible.

Rusbult, 1980

Persistence Under Threat

Now the question underneath all of this. Why do people stay when the relationship is clearly damaging? Caryl Rusbult's investment model, from nineteen eighty, answers it. It extends social exchange theory by adding investment size. The resources, time, and shared history sunk into the relationship. The prediction is blunt. Dissatisfied partners stay committed if investments are high. And if the alternatives are poor. That is the explanation for staying in objectively low-quality relationships. Commitment then predicts a set of maintenance behaviors. Accommodation, meaning suppressing destructive impulses for constructive ones. Willingness to sacrifice, and positive illusions about the partner. And derogation of attractive alternatives.

Consolidate

The Uncomfortable Implication

Bring the section together. Threats come from intrapersonal, dyadic, structural, and network sources, and they interact. Jealousy has cognitive, affective, and behavioral components. Its predicted sex differences are partially supported, and substantially moderated. Betrayal damages relationships by undermining trust. Recovery depends on severity, remorse, attachment security, and prior quality. Demand-withdraw and gridlocked perpetual problems are the worst dynamics. And high investments with poor alternatives sustain commitment below the satisfaction threshold. Now the uncomfortable implication of that last point. Positive illusions and derogation of alternatives are the same machinery. Whether the relationship is a good one or a harmful one. The model describes persistence, and persistence is not evidence of quality.

About Advanced Social Psychology at UPI Study

Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) is a self-paced online course of 85 video lessons in 12 chapters, from attitudes, persuasion and the self to prejudice, attraction and relationships, conformity and obedience, helping, aggression and social life online. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Social Psychology vs Sociology

Why take it here

Why students take Advanced Social Psychology with UPI Study

How other people shape what we think and doAdvanced Social Psychology explains how people think about, influence and relate to one another: attitudes and persuasion, the self, prejudice and intergroup conflict, attraction and close relationships, conformity and obedience, helping and aggression. It is a common upper-level course in psychology and sociology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Advanced Social Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About When Relationships Struggle: The Key Threats to Interpersonal Bonds

Are men and women jealous about different kinds of infidelity?
Evolutionary psychologists, led by David Buss in 1992, predicted that men would be more distressed by sexual infidelity and women more by emotional infidelity, because of paternity uncertainty and resource concerns. These predictions have been only partly supported. The difference shifts with culture, attachment style, the quality of the current relationship, and how the question is asked, so it is not a fixed sex difference.
Can trust be rebuilt after a betrayal?
Trust can often be rebuilt, but recovery depends on several factors. Research on forgiveness, including work by Michael McCullough and colleagues, highlights the severity and intentionality of the betrayal, the offender's apology and remorse, the victim's empathy and attachment security, and the quality of the relationship beforehand. Securely attached people tend to recover trust faster. Forgiveness is also linked to better well-being for the forgiver whether or not the relationship continues, so forgiving and reconciling are separate choices.
What is the demand-withdraw pattern?
The demand-withdraw pattern is a conflict cycle in which one partner presses for discussion or change while the other avoids or disengages. Andrew Christensen and Christopher Heavey (1990) found it predicts relationship dissatisfaction. It appears most when the demanding partner wants change and the withdrawing partner resists it. In heterosexual couples the roles often follow gender, but they track who wants change more than personality, and each move provokes the other.
What is the difference between solvable and perpetual problems in relationships?
Solvable problems are specific, situational disagreements that a compromise can settle, while perpetual problems come from lasting differences in values, personality, or lifestyle and are unlikely to ever be fully resolved. The distinction comes from John Gottman's research. Healthy couples manage perpetual problems through ongoing dialogue and accommodation rather than gridlock, accepting some differences as lasting features of the relationship instead of failures to fix.

About the Advanced Social Psychology course

How many college credits is Advanced Social Psychology?
Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Advanced Social Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 85 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Advanced Social Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 85 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Advanced Social Psychology.

85 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Advanced Social Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →