Breaking the Cycle: Coping Strategies and Interventions for Aggressive Behavior

UPI Study › Courses › Advanced Social Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 11.7 Free with a free account

Breaking the Cycle: Coping Strategies and Interventions for Aggressive Behavior

Advanced Social Psychology · Chapter 11: Aggression and ViolenceSection 11.7 · lesson 78 of 8510 min · free with a free account

← Young Minds, Big Emotions: Emotion Regulation and Aggression in Early ChildhoodNext lesson: Mind Meets Machine: Technology, Cognition, and Coping in the Digital Era →

Earn 3 college credits for Advanced Social PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 310 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

What works, at which level, for whom - the science of aggression brought to bear on practice.

  • Separate universal, selective, and indicated prevention
  • Name the core ingredients of parent-management training
  • Explain the cognitive-behavioral anger loop
  • Identify interventions that are null or harmful

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,234 words). Read along, or search it.

Aggression and Violence

Breaking the Cycle

The chapter closes with the practical question. Given everything we now know about aggression, what actually works? The answer depends on who you are treating, and on how much risk they carry. So this section is organized around a tiered public-health model. Universal programs for everyone. Selective programs for elevated risk. And indicated programs for individuals already in trouble. We will name specific programs with controlled-trial evidence behind them. And we will name several that do not work, including one that does harm. That last part matters more than it sounds. Some of the most intuitively appealing interventions make things worse.

The Practical Claim

Three Tiers, Because Risk Is Not Uniform

If the earlier sections converge on one practical claim, it is this. Aggressive behavior is neither unitary nor inevitable. Different levels of risk call for different intensities of intervention. The public-health model of prevention supplies the structure. It was imported into the aggression literature by Mrazek and Haggerty. And consolidated by the Institute of Medicine. Universal interventions reach an entire population, without regard to risk. Selective interventions target groups at elevated statistical risk. And indicated interventions go to individuals already showing problematic behavior. Those three words are worth learning precisely, because they are used loosely elsewhere.

The Trade-Off

Cost Rises, Reach Falls

The tiers are not a ranking from worst to best. They trade two quantities against each other, in a fixed direction. As you move up the pyramid, cost per person rises. And reach falls. Which yields a design consequence for any real system. A sound prevention system invests in all three tiers. Tier one alone leaves the highest-risk children untreated. Tier three alone treats after the damage, at the highest unit cost. So treat the tiers as a matching rule, not a quality hierarchy. The characteristic failure is applying a good program at the wrong tier. That is one common way a real intervention produces a null result.

Tier 1

Social-Emotional Learning in Schools

At the universal level, the best evidence comes from schools. Specifically, from social-emotional learning curricula. The key meta-analysis was published in two thousand eleven. By Durlak, Weissberg, Dymnicki, Taylor, and Schellinger. It pooled two hundred and thirteen controlled trials. The programs produced a modest but durable reduction in conduct problems. And an increase in prosocial behavior, and in academic achievement. Read both halves of that result carefully. Modest rules out treating this as a solution on its own. Durable, across two hundred and thirteen trials, rules out dismissing it. And notice the academic gain in particular. It means the program is not competing with instruction time so much as contributing.

Two Programs

PATHS and KiVa

Two universal programs have particularly strong evidence. The first is PATHS, which stands for Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies. It comes from Greenberg and colleagues, in nineteen ninety-five. It teaches emotion labeling, self-talk, and problem-solving across the primary years. The second is KiVa, developed in Finland. It targets the bystander dynamics of bullying rather than the bully alone. And it has been replicated internationally. Notice why KiVa's target is the interesting choice. Bullying is sustained by audience response. So a program aimed at the audience is aimed at what maintains the behavior. And PATHS is aimed at exactly the regulatory skills that define early development. Neither program is aimed where intuition would put it.

Tier 2

Parent-Management Training and the Coercive Cycle

At the selective tier, the workhorse is parent-management training. It was pioneered by Gerald Patterson at the Oregon Social Learning Center. The training teaches caregivers four things. To track behavior accurately. To use clear instructions. To apply consistent, non-punitive consequences. And to break what Patterson called the coercive cycle. That cycle is worth understanding on its own. Child and parent escalate each other's aversive behavior in turn. Each escalation is reinforced by the other's eventual retreat. So the cycle trains both parties into producing more of it.

The Evidence

Three Programs With Trial Support

Three branded programs carry strong trial evidence. The Incredible Years, developed by Webster-Stratton. Parent-Child Interaction Therapy, developed by Eyberg. And Triple-P, developed by Sanders. Their effect sizes are moderate. Roughly zero point three five to zero point five five. And they tend to persist at follow-up. Persistence is the part worth noticing. It is what distinguishes a skill-building program from a compliance intervention. Now notice what all three have in common. None of them treats the child directly. They change the contingencies the child lives inside.

A Real Hazard

When Grouping At-Risk Youth Backfires

There is a real hazard at this tier, and it is easy to walk into. Bringing aggressive adolescents together in unstructured groups can backfire. It can increase antisocial behavior rather than reduce it. The mechanism is called peer deviancy training. Group members mutually reinforce each other's rule-breaking talk. Dishion, McCord and Poulin documented this in nineteen ninety-nine. This is an iatrogenic result: the intervention itself causes the harm. And it happens by accident, because grouping by risk seems administratively obvious. So effective selective interventions do one of three things instead. They work with parents. Or they deliver tightly structured peer activities. Or they mix at-risk youth with prosocial peers. The general lesson is that who else is in the room is part of the treatment.

Tier 3

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anger

At the indicated tier, cognitive-behavioral therapy has the strongest evidence. The treatment has four components, each aimed at a different point. First, identifying triggers. What reliably starts the sequence? Second, restructuring hostile appraisals. That targets the hostile attributional bias directly. The habit of reading ambiguous acts as deliberately hostile. Third, training relaxation and problem-solving. That works on arousal, and on the response options available. Fourth, rehearsing alternative responses. Because a script that has never been practiced will not be there under load. Meta-analyses report moderate to large effects, in adult and youth samples alike.

The Loop

Where the Therapy Cuts In

Picture the anger sequence as a loop rather than a line. A trigger occurs. It is met with a hostile appraisal of what just happened. That appraisal generates arousal. The arousal issues in aggressive behavior. And the behavior feeds back into the situation, supplying the next trigger. Now notice where the therapy cuts in. It introduces entry points at the appraisal stage. And at the arousal stage. Both of those come before behavior is enacted. That ordering is deliberate rather than incidental. Intervening earlier in a sequence costs less than intervening later.

The Intensive End

Whole-System Therapies, and Medication

For adolescents with serious antisocial behavior, the interventions go wider. Multisystemic Therapy, developed by Henggeler, is the best known. It intervenes across family, peer, school, and neighborhood systems. All of them simultaneously, rather than one at a time. Functional Family Therapy, developed by Alexander, uses the same multi-system logic. Randomized trials show reductions in re-arrest. And reductions in out-of-home placement. With effects strongest when treatment fidelity is high. That fidelity condition is not a footnote. It is a known failure point. Finally, medication. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors, atypical antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers. These have a limited adjunctive role for specific comorbid presentations. They are not first-line treatments for aggression itself.

Consolidate

What Does Not Work, and What the Chapter Adds Up To

A responsible review has to flag what does not work. Scared-straight prison-visit programs are the clearest case. Across rigorous trials they show no effect. Or a small increase in reoffending. Generic boot camps show similarly null or harmful effects. And catharsis-based interventions fail for reasons we have already established. Venting rehearses the script rather than draining it. So here is the throughline of the whole chapter. Aggression is a product of identifiable inputs on identifiable internal states. Which makes it, in principle, modifiable. The interventions that work share four features. They act early, work across systems, and build skills rather than only suppressing. And they respect the evidence, even where it contradicts intuition.

About Advanced Social Psychology at UPI Study

Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) is a self-paced online course of 85 video lessons in 12 chapters, from attitudes, persuasion and the self to prejudice, attraction and relationships, conformity and obedience, helping, aggression and social life online. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Social Psychology vs Sociology

Why take it here

Why students take Advanced Social Psychology with UPI Study

How other people shape what we think and doAdvanced Social Psychology explains how people think about, influence and relate to one another: attitudes and persuasion, the self, prejudice and intergroup conflict, attraction and close relationships, conformity and obedience, helping and aggression. It is a common upper-level course in psychology and sociology degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Advanced Social Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Breaking the Cycle: Coping Strategies and Interventions for Aggressive Behavior

What are universal, selective, and indicated prevention programs?
Universal, selective, and indicated are the three tiers of the public-health prevention model. Universal programs reach everyone regardless of risk, such as school social-emotional curricula. Selective programs target groups at higher statistical risk. Indicated programs serve individuals already showing problem behavior. Cost per person rises and reach falls as you move up the tiers, so a strong prevention system invests in all three.
Do social-emotional learning programs reduce aggression?
Yes, school-based social-emotional learning programs modestly but reliably reduce conduct problems. A 2011 meta-analysis by Joseph Durlak and colleagues, covering 213 school-based programs, found fewer conduct problems, more prosocial behavior, and better academic performance among participating students. A well-studied example is PATHS (Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies), which teaches emotion labeling, self-talk, and problem-solving across the elementary years.
What is peer deviancy training?
Peer deviancy training is the process by which grouping antisocial youth together increases their problem behavior, because they reinforce each other's rule-breaking talk. Thomas Dishion, Joan McCord, and Francois Poulin described this harmful, or iatrogenic, effect in 1999. Safer approaches work through parents, use tightly structured activities, or mix at-risk youth with prosocial peers instead of placing them in unstructured groups.
Do scared straight programs work?
No, scared straight programs, which take at-risk youth to visit prisons, do not reduce offending and may slightly increase it, according to systematic reviews of randomized trials. Generic boot camps show similarly null or harmful results. Better-supported options include parent-management training such as the Incredible Years, cognitive-behavioral therapy that targets hostile interpretations, and Multisystemic Therapy for serious adolescent antisocial behavior.

About the Advanced Social Psychology course

How many college credits is Advanced Social Psychology?
Advanced Social Psychology (Psychology 310) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Advanced Social Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 85 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Advanced Social Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 85 lessons total about 15 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Advanced Social Psychology.

85 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Advanced Social Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Advanced Social Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →