UPI Study › Courses › Business Essentials › Free lessons › Lesson 1.8 Free with a free account
Corporate Social Responsibility within Organizations
Business Essentials · Chapter 1: The Business Environment and Ethical FoundationsSection 1.8 · lesson 8 of 10514 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Business Essentials.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Business Essentials
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Exploring Economics: Its Range, Dimensions, and Circular Flow →← Building an Ethical Framework: Compliance-Based versus Integrity-Based ApproachesNext lesson: Exploring Economics: Its Range, Dimensions, and Circular Flow →
In this lesson
What a business owes society, and how to tell a commitment from a claim.
- Define CSR and distinguish it from ethics
- State the shareholder and stakeholder positions
- Use stakeholder analysis on a decision
- Assess an initiative and how it is reported
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (2,038 words). Read along, or search it.
The Business Environment and Ethical Foundations
Corporate Social Responsibility within Organizations
A company can give generously to good causes, and still do harm through the way it operates. So what does a business actually owe the society around it? That is the question of corporate social responsibility, and it closes out chapter one. We'll define it carefully first, because it's easily confused with ethics, and with charity. Then we'll set out the two main positions in the debate, each one at full strength. Neither is declared the winner. Your job is to understand both well enough to argue either. After that comes a practical tool, stakeholder analysis, and a look at whether responsibility pays. And we'll finish by learning to judge a real initiative, and to tell a measured commitment from a marketing claim.
Defining CSR
Obligations Beyond Law and Profit
Corporate social responsibility, or CSR, is an organization's obligations to society beyond its legal and economic ones. That sits close to ethics. But the two are not the same thing. Ethics, as the last two sections described, is about how an organization conducts itself in its dealings with others. CSR asks a different question. What does the organization owe the wider society it operates in? And how far should it go in contributing to social or environmental aims? A second confusion is with philanthropy. Philanthropy means voluntary giving, of money, goods, or time, for the benefit of others. It's one form of CSR. It is not the whole of it. Picture a business that donates generously, and pollutes at the same time. That business is philanthropic, without question. Whether it is socially responsible is a further question, and a harder one.
Four Domains
Layers of Responsibility
It helps to divide responsibility into four domains, which are conventionally listed in order. Economic responsibility comes first. It's the obligation to be viable. That can sound selfish, but the logic is simple. A business that fails serves no one. Legal responsibility is the obligation to comply with the law. Ethical responsibility is the obligation to do what is right, beyond what the law requires. Discretionary responsibility is the voluntary contribution, the kind that neither law nor ethics demands. Supporting community programs is the classic example. Notice that the domains are cumulative. Each later one presupposes the earlier ones. A firm that funds community programs while breaking the law has the order backward. And that's where the real argument lives. Much of the debate over CSR is about one thing: how far beyond the first two domains a business ought to go.
The Shareholder Position
The Manager as the Owners' Agent
Should businesses pursue social objectives at all? That question is genuinely contested. So we'll state each side in its strongest form, and offer no verdict. Begin with the shareholder position. On this view, the manager of a business is an agent of its owners, obliged to act in their interests. Now suppose the manager spends the owners' money on a cause they never authorized. However admirable the cause, that exceeds the manager's mandate. In effect, one manager is deciding how other people's resources should be used, without any democratic warrant. Who should set social objectives, then? Democratic institutions, acting through law. Law is accountable to the public, in a way that managerial discretion is not. This position is often misrepresented as a license to ignore everything except profit. That misreads it. In its stronger form, it explicitly requires the business to stay within the law, and within ethical custom. A business that does that, and delivers value to its owners, has discharged its responsibility.
The Stakeholder Position
Groups Beyond the Owners
The stakeholder position starts from a different observation. A business depends on, and affects, groups well beyond its owners. Those groups are its stakeholders, the individuals and groups who have an interest in the business, or are affected by it. That includes employees, customers, suppliers, and the communities where it operates. Two facts about them carry the argument. First, many of them bear the consequences of the firm's decisions, without ever having consented to them. The people living near a plant never voted on how it is run. Second, the business could not function without their cooperation. No workers, no product. No customers, no revenue. It follows, on this view, that the business owes attention to their interests. And its own long-term viability depends on the relationships it keeps with them.
Two Versions
Instrumental and Normative Claims
The stakeholder argument comes in two versions, and they need very different kinds of evidence. The instrumental version says that attending to stakeholders serves the business's own long-term interest. That's an empirical claim. You can test it against outcomes. The normative version says businesses ought to attend to stakeholders because they owe it to them, whatever the effect on profit. That's a claim about obligation. No measurement of returns can settle it. The two are often confused, and the confusion matters. Someone defending the instrumental version may, on examination, be making a point the shareholder side can also accept. If treating stakeholders well raises long-term value, the owners' agent has every reason to do it. So the whole disagreement splits in two. The empirical part asks what attending to stakeholders actually does to a business over time. Evidence can narrow that. The normative part asks whose interests a business exists to serve, and who should decide. Evidence cannot resolve that. This course takes no side, and it attributes no position to either.
Figure 1.8.1
Mapping Interest Against Influence
Whichever position you hold, stakeholder analysis is useful. It's a structured method for identifying stakeholders, assessing their interest and influence, and estimating how a decision affects each one. First, list everyone who is affected, or who can affect the outcome. Next, judge how strongly each is interested, and how much influence each holds. Then consider whether the decision will benefit them, or harm them. Plot interest against influence, and the list becomes a map that tells you how to treat each group. High influence and high interest call for close attention. Influence with little interest means keeping that group satisfied. The corner that deserves the most thought is high interest with little influence. Those groups may need protection, because they cannot protect themselves. Take a fictional case. Brookline Dairy is moving a product line to cheaper packaging that's harder to recycle. The winners are the shareholders, and the packaging suppliers. The costs land on the local community, and on environmental groups. Those are exactly the groups with high interest and the least influence. That's the lesson. The parties with the greatest stake in a decision are not always the ones with power over it. Unless the business looks deliberately, they get overlooked.
The Business Case
Does CSR Pay?
Advocates of CSR often make a simpler argument. It pays. That claim deserves an honest look at the evidence. Research comparing social performance with financial performance has generally found an association. It's positive. It's also modest. And two difficulties limit what we can conclude. The first is the direction of causation. More profitable firms may simply have more to spend on social programs. If so, the association reflects profit leading to CSR, rather than CSR leading to profit. A correlation on its own can't tell those two stories apart. The second difficulty is variation. The effect differs by industry, and by the kind of initiative. It also depends on how well the initiative is connected to the business. So what's the honest reading? Some CSR is financially sensible, and some is not. The evidence doesn't justify the claim that CSR always pays. Nor does it justify the claim that it never does.
Claims and Reporting
A Claim Without Measurement Is Marketing
Once a business starts making social claims, a specific risk appears. Greenwashing is presenting a business, product, or policy as more environmentally or socially responsible than it actually is. The risk arises whenever a claim lacks evidence. Hence a useful rule: a CSR claim without measurement is a marketing claim. Take the word sustainable on a label. On its own, it means little. It starts to mean something when it says what is measured, against what baseline, and over what period. In many places, misleading environmental claims can also attract consumer protection enforcement. Those rules differ by jurisdiction, and change over time. The formal response is sustainability reporting, the disclosure of social and environmental performance, often alongside financial results. Many indices and frameworks exist. They differ in scope, and in whether they're voluntary or required, so check the current rules rather than assuming them. A central principle is materiality. A report should cover what matters most, not everything that could be said. Most, here, means most significant to the organization's impact, and to the people who rely on the report. The field's weak spot is assurance, the independent checking of reported data. It's less developed and less uniform than the checking of financial statements. So a reader often can't be sure that anyone outside the organization has tested the figures.
Integration
Integrated or Peripheral?
How do you tell a credible initiative from a decorative one? Start with where it sits. Integrated CSR is connected to the business. It addresses the effects of core operations, or draws on the firm's own capabilities. Peripheral CSR sits alongside the business, unconnected with how the firm makes money, or what it affects. Integrated CSR tends to be more credible and more measurable. It's also more likely to continue when budgets are tight, because it's part of how the business works. Peripheral CSR is easier to begin, and easier to publicize. And it can do real good. But it leaves the business's own effects untouched. Four questions sharpen the assessment of any initiative. What problem does it address? And does the business have a capability relevant to that problem? What is measured, and by whom? And the hardest one. Would the initiative survive disclosure of its full cost? That cost includes any harm from the firm's own operations that the initiative is meant to offset.
Table 1.8.1
Four Initiatives, Assessed
Now apply those questions to four fictional initiatives. A food producer redesigns its packaging to cut waste in its own operations. It reports its waste in metric tons each year, with an external check. That's integrated, and strongly measured. It's the strongest of the four, because it addresses its own effects, uses its capability, and can be verified. A bank sponsors a community sports day every year, and tracks no outcomes. That's peripheral, with weak measurement. Local people may value it, but it can't be evaluated, and it doesn't touch the bank's operations. A retailer gives employees paid days for volunteering, and logs the hours. Peripheral again, with moderate measurement. Hours measure activity, not benefit. So it's worthwhile as discretionary responsibility, but limited as evidence of wider responsibility. Finally, an apparel maker says its products are sustainably made. It never defines the term, and reports no figure. It claims integration with no measurement at all. Until the term is defined and measured, it's a marketing claim, with greenwashing risk. Here's the pattern. Integration and measurement are independent qualities. Only the first initiative has both, and a favorable assessment generally requires both.
Case Vignette
Funding the Clean-Up
We'll close with a composite case, built for instruction. Rosalind is the sustainability manager at Clearbrook Beverages, a fictional company that sells drinks in single-use plastic bottles. For several years, Clearbrook has sponsored annual shoreline clean-ups run by a charity. They're popular with employees, and with the local media. But the litter counts keep telling the same story. Bottles of the type Clearbrook sells are a large share of what volunteers collect. Rosalind could expand the sponsorship, which is visible, inexpensive, and well received. Or she could redirect part of the budget toward redesigning packaging, and supporting a return scheme. That second path costs more, and takes longer. It earns less publicity in the short run, and its results are uncertain. Run the sponsorship through our questions. It's a genuine contribution, but it's peripheral. It funds cleaning up a problem the core business helps create. And it would look different if the full picture were disclosed. Integration would mean acting on the source of the litter. So Rosalind keeps the sponsorship at its present level, because it does real good. And she sets a measured target for packaging change. That way, the company's social contribution begins to address its own effects. That completes chapter one, which moved from the forces acting on a business to the standards it answers to. Chapter two takes up the first of those forces in full, the economic environment.
About Business Essentials at UPI Study
Business Essentials (Business 100) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 24 chapters, from the business environment, economics and global markets to ownership, management, leadership, operations, people, marketing, accounting, finance and banking. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Business Essentials with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Business Essentials carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Corporate Social Responsibility within Organizations
What is the difference between CSR, business ethics, and philanthropy?
What are the four domains of corporate social responsibility?
What is the difference between the shareholder and stakeholder views of CSR?
What is greenwashing?
About the Business Essentials course
How many college credits is Business Essentials?
How much does Business Essentials cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Business Essentials take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Essentials.
105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →