Digital Communication and Internet Collaboration: Platforms and Influence

UPI Study › Courses › Business Essentials › Free lessons › Lesson 17.2 Free with a free account

Digital Communication and Internet Collaboration: Platforms and Influence

Business Essentials · Chapter 17: Information Systems and Digital BusinessSection 17.2 · lesson 78 of 10514 min · free with a free account

← Leveraging Information Systems for Competitive AdvantageNext lesson: Business Intelligence: Turning Data Into Strategic Insight →

Earn 3 college credits for Business EssentialsRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 100 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access

In this lesson

Platforms and influence: why the agreement matters more than the tool.

  • Describe the 7 categories of collaboration tool
  • Distinguish synchronous from asynchronous work
  • Match a message to the richness it needs
  • Assess a team's collaboration norms

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,880 words). Read along, or search it.

Information Systems and Digital Business

Digital Communication and Internet Collaboration

Most businesses now talk to themselves through screens: chat, email, video calls, shared files. This section isn't about any particular product, because products change faster than any course can track. Instead, we'll describe tools by function, by what each one is actually for. We'll separate synchronous communication from asynchronous, and see why that matters across time zones. We'll look at channel richness, and the matching principle that pairs each message with a channel. Then two predictable costs of digital tools: the always-on problem, and information overload. And we'll make the central argument. Collaboration trouble is usually a problem of norms, not tools. We'll finish with an insurer that added a messaging platform, and got more confusion, not less.

Categories by Function

What Each Tool Is For (1 of 2)

Seven categories of tool cover most business use. Here are the first four. Messaging and chat tools carry short, quick exchanges, good for brief coordination and informal questions. They're poor for complex or sensitive matters, the kind that need context. Email carries longer, more formal messages, and it leaves a durable record. That makes it good across organizations, and for anything that needs a paper trail. But for quick back-and-forth, email feels slow. Video conferencing carries face-to-face interaction across distance. It's good for discussion, negotiation, and building relationships. It's poor as a record, because a conversation is harder to search than text. Shared document and file systems hold and version content that several people work on together. They're excellent for drafting together, but poor as a channel in themselves. A comment buried in a document is easy to miss.

Categories by Function

What Each Tool Is For (2 of 2)

The remaining three categories cover work, reference, and culture. Project and task platforms track work items, owners, and deadlines. They show clearly who is doing what. They're poor for nuanced discussion. Intranets and knowledge repositories hold reference material that doesn't change often, which suits onboarding and policy lookup. But they're poor for anything time-sensitive. People consult a repository when they think of it. Nothing is pushed to them. Social and community platforms, used internally, support broad, informal connection across a large organization. They're good for culture and cross-team awareness, and poor for anything that requires a decision, or an answer. Now look at the pattern across all seven. Every category is well suited to some purposes, and poorly suited to others. So the skill isn't finding the best tool. It's knowing what each one is for.

Timing

Synchronous and Asynchronous

The next distinction is about timing. Communication is synchronous when people exchange messages in real time, and expect an immediate response. A phone call is synchronous. So is a video meeting, or a chat exchange in progress. Communication is asynchronous when a message is sent, and the reply may come later, as with email or a document comment. The distinction matters most for distributed work, especially across time zones. Synchronous communication needs everyone available at once. Across many time zones, that becomes costly, or simply impossible. Asynchronous communication lets each person contribute whenever they're working. The cost is slower resolution of anything that needs quick back-and-forth. Picture a team spread across distant time zones that runs mostly on meetings. Every time, the hour is inconvenient for someone. The better pattern shifts most matters to asynchronous methods, and saves synchronous time for what truly needs it. That uses the availability of every team member far more efficiently.

Channel Richness

How Much a Channel Can Carry

Channels also differ in how much they can carry. That property is called channel richness. Richness has four parts. Carrying multiple cues, like tone and expression, and giving immediate feedback. Then carrying a personal focus, and using natural, informal language. A face-to-face conversation is the richest channel available. It carries tone, expression, and instant back-and-forth. A brief text message is among the leanest. Only words, no immediate feedback, and little personal cue. Video conferencing sits between the two. It carries tone and expression, with some feedback delay and technical friction. Email sits leaner still. It's asynchronous, and it carries no vocal or visual cue at all. Richness leads straight to the matching principle. Ambiguous, emotionally loaded, or consequential messages need rich channels. Routine, unambiguous messages don't. And using more richness than a routine message needs wastes time, without adding any value.

2 Mismatches

Matching Richness to the Message

Ignoring the matching principle produces two errors, and they sit at opposite corners. Picture two axes. One measures how ambiguous and emotionally weighted a message is. The other, the richness of the channel used. Where richness matches need, a message sits close to the diagonal. A schedule change sent as a short message is a match. So is difficult news delivered in person. The first error is delivering difficult news by a lean channel. Think of a termination, a serious criticism, or a significant organizational change, sent by email or chat. The recipient loses the chance to ask questions, to be heard, and to see the message delivered with care. So it's very often experienced as callous, whatever the sender intended. The second error runs the other way. It spends rich-channel time on routine information. A meeting called to relay a schedule change could have been a two-line message. It wastes the time of everyone who attends. And for a widely distributed team, that cost can feel even greater than for a team in one office.

Predictable Costs

Always On, and Overloaded

Digital tools also carry two costs that are predictable, not accidental. Tools that reach a person anywhere remove the old boundary between work time and non-work time. The result is the always-on problem. Employees feel obliged to stay reachable, and to answer messages outside working hours. Sometimes that's an explicit expectation. Often it's just habit. The effects include less recovery time, and difficulty letting go of work concerns. For some, it becomes a persistent sense of never being fully off duty, and that wears on well-being. Organizations respond in several ways. Some state explicit expectations about after-hours response times. Some discourage, or technically limit, messages sent outside a defined window. Others train managers to model boundaries themselves. And some separate truly urgent channels from routine ones, so an ordinary message doesn't interrupt like an emergency. None of these removes the tension. Each trades some responsiveness for the well-being of the business's people. The second cost is information overload, when the volume of messages and alerts exceeds what anyone can attend to. Here's the counterintuitive part. A new channel usually adds volume, rather than replacing an old one. Introduce messaging alongside email, and email traffic typically doesn't fall to match. So adopting a tool is never just a convenience. It's a decision with a cost in attention.

Norms, Not Tools

The Missing Agreement

That leads to the central argument of this section. A team's collaboration difficulties are usually norm problems, not tool problems. The tools available are typically adequate. What's missing is shared agreement about how to use them. Four norms do most of the work. First, which channel carries which kind of message. Otherwise an urgent matter gets buried in a channel nobody checks quickly. Second, expected response times for each channel, so nobody worries over a delay that was perfectly normal. Third, documentation practice, so a decision made in conversation gets captured somewhere others can find it. And fourth, a decision record. That's a brief note of what was decided, by whom, and why, kept where the team can refer back to it. It sounds bureaucratic. In practice, it stops a team from arguing over the same decision twice.

Table 17.2.1

The Norm Each Category Needs

This table pairs each of the seven categories with the norm it needs. Messaging needs agreement on what belongs there, and what doesn't. Email needs an expected response time, and a shared sense of what counts as urgent. Video calls need the habit of a brief written summary afterward, because the call itself is hard to search. Shared documents need a convention for where discussion of the document actually happens. Project and task platforms need status kept current. Otherwise the visibility can't be trusted. Intranets and repositories need a named owner, who keeps each page current. And social platforms need clarity that they're not where official decisions are recorded. Every norm aims at the same thing. It stops a tool being used for the wrong purpose. A team with the right tools and no agreed norms still gets confused, just like a team with the wrong tools. The tool is rarely where the problem actually lies.

Remote and Hybrid

Designing In What Used to Happen by Chance

Remote work is work performed away from a shared physical location. Hybrid work combines remote and in-person time. Both make interaction mediated. It's carried through a tool, instead of happening directly. And that changes what collaboration requires. In a shared office, a great deal of coordination happens incidentally. A conversation is overheard in a hallway. A question gets asked in passing. None of that happens by accident when people aren't physically together. So organizations that work well remotely deliberately design in the contact that used to happen by chance. They schedule informal time, and hold structured check-ins that go beyond status reporting. And they run explicit onboarding, introducing a new employee to people they'd otherwise have met by chance. Skipping that design step doesn't eliminate the need it served. It simply means the need goes unmet.

Further Governance

External Channels and Lasting Records

A few further concerns are matters of governance. The first is external communication, through a business's website, social media accounts, and customer support channels. A public channel carries reputational exposure. A public post can be seen, shared, and criticized far beyond its original audience. So anything said there may be read as the business's official position. Handling a public crisis was covered in chapter sixteen. Digital channels are where much of that exposure now occurs. Next, digital communications are records. A retention policy sets how long each category of communication is kept, before it's deleted. It's guided by business need, and by any legal requirement to preserve certain records for a stated period. Discoverability is the ability to locate and produce communications when required, say in litigation, or a regulatory inquiry. A business with poor records or scattered systems may find that difficult, and costly, when the need arises. These are policies set with legal counsel, and security and access are treated the same way here. A business sets policy on who may access which systems and data, assigns responsibility for it, and reviews it periodically.

Case Vignette

A New Channel, No New Rules

Here's a composite case, built for instruction. Deepak leads operations at a regional insurer. The insurer introduces a messaging platform, hoping to cut internal email and speed up routine coordination. But nobody decides what belongs on the new platform, and what stays on email. Staff use whichever channel feels convenient, and they often post the same update to both. Within a few months, employees are checking more channels than before, not fewer. Important messages get missed. The tool works exactly as intended. The difficulty is a norm problem. Adding a channel added volume, as it typically does. Nothing told people to stop using the old one. Deepak faces a trade-off. Setting and enforcing norms takes effort, and rules that limit how people communicate feel uncomfortable. And habits, once formed, are hard to change. His reasoning is that the fix isn't a third tool. It's an agreement. Routine updates go on the new platform. Decisions go to a shared log anyone can search. Email is for communication outside the organization. The technology was never the problem, and no new technology will fix it.

About Business Essentials at UPI Study

Business Essentials (Business 100) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 24 chapters, from the business environment, economics and global markets to ownership, management, leadership, operations, people, marketing, accounting, finance and banking. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Compare: Business Essentials vs Principles of Management

Why take it here

Why students take Business Essentials with UPI Study

How a business works, end to endBusiness Essentials is a survey of how companies work: economic systems, global trade, forms of ownership, management and leadership, operations, human resources, marketing, accounting, finance and the banking system. It is a common first course in business, management and accounting degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Business Essentials carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Digital Communication and Internet Collaboration: Platforms and Influence

What is the difference between synchronous and asynchronous communication at work?
Synchronous communication happens in real time with an immediate response expected, as in a phone call, video meeting, or live chat, while asynchronous communication lets replies come later, as with email or document comments. Synchronous exchanges resolve back-and-forth quickly but need everyone available at once, which becomes costly across time zones. Distributed teams often handle most matters asynchronously and save live meetings for issues that truly need them.
What is media richness theory?
Media richness theory, developed by Richard Daft and Robert Lengel in the 1980s, ranks communication channels by how much they can carry, based on multiple cues, immediate feedback, personal focus, and natural language. Face-to-face conversation is the richest; applied to newer tools, video conferencing sits below it, and email and short text messages are leaner. Ambiguous, emotional, or consequential messages need rich channels, while routine, unambiguous messages are better suited to lean ones.
Why is it a mistake to deliver bad news by email?
Delivering difficult news such as a termination, a serious criticism, or a major change by email or chat denies the recipient the chance to ask questions, be heard, and see the message delivered with care. It is very often experienced as callous, whatever the sender intended. The opposite mismatch wastes resources too, such as calling a meeting to share a routine schedule change that a two-line message could have handled.
Why do new collaboration tools often make communication worse?
New tools often disappoint because the underlying problem is missing norms, not missing technology. A new channel usually adds message volume instead of replacing an old one, so people end up checking more places and missing important messages. Teams work better when they agree which channel carries which kind of message, the expected response time for each, how decisions made in conversation get documented, and where a decision record is kept.

About the Business Essentials course

How many college credits is Business Essentials?
Business Essentials (Business 100) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Business Essentials cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 105 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Business Essentials take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 105 lessons total about 24 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Essentials.

105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Business Essentials
3 credits · NCCRS
Enroll →