Understanding Leadership Orientations, Explained

UPI Study › Courses › Business Essentials › Free lessons › Lesson 6.1 Free with a free account

Understanding Leadership Orientations

Business Essentials · Chapter 6: Leadership Theories and StylesSection 6.1 · lesson 31 of 10514 min · free with a free account

← Management by Objectives: Breaking Down the MBO ProcessNext lesson: Classical Leadership Theories: A Closer Look →

Earn 3 college credits for Business EssentialsRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 100 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Business Essentials · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

The 2 dimensions of leader behavior, and the styles built on them.

  • Describe the task and people dimensions
  • Explain the managerial grid and its limits
  • Match leadership styles to the conditions they suit
  • Identify the style operating in a situation

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (2,025 words). Read along, or search it.

Leadership Theories and Styles

Understanding Leadership Orientations

Is a good leader firm, or kind? It sounds like a fair question. It isn't. This section shows why, starting with research that found two separate dimensions in what leaders do. We'll place leaders on a grid built from those dimensions, and test the grid's boldest claim. Then we'll meet the classical leadership styles, and the conditions each one suits. We'll separate some look-alikes that cause real damage when they're confused. And we'll finish by reading real behavior, and watching a leader switch style without losing her team. This builds on section five point six, where leadership was defined as influence toward a shared goal. This time, the question is how leaders actually behave.

Leader Behavior

2 Dimensions of Leader Behavior

Section five point six defined leadership as influence toward a shared goal. This chapter turns to how leaders actually behave. In the mid-twentieth century, researchers set out to describe what leaders do, without assuming in advance which behaviors mattered. Two research programs, at separate research centers in the United States, reached strikingly similar results. Their questionnaires about leader behavior kept producing the same two clusters. The first was called initiating structure in one program, and concern for production in the other. It's behavior that defines and organizes the work, assigns tasks, and sets standards. It clarifies who is to do what, and by when. The second was called consideration in one program, and concern for employees in the other. It's behavior that shows respect, trust, and warmth. And it shows regard for the feelings and well-being of the people doing the work. For simplicity, we'll call these the task dimension, and the people dimension. When two independent teams find the same pattern, that pattern deserves attention.

Figure 6.1.1

Independent Axes, Not a Single Scale

Here's the central contribution of that research. The two dimensions are independent. It seems natural to treat them as opposite ends of one scale. On that view, a leader more concerned with the task must be less concerned with people. The data showed otherwise. A leader can be high on both, low on both, or high on one and low on the other. And each combination occurs. So the dimensions belong on two separate axes, task along the bottom, and people up the side. This matters in practice. A leader who believes the choice is between being firm and being kind is making a false choice. They'll miss the possibility of being clear and considerate together. Seeing behavior in two dimensions lets a leader ask two separate questions. How clear is the direction? And how much regard am I showing? Then either one can be improved, without sacrificing the other.

The Managerial Grid

5 Named Positions

The managerial grid plots leaders on these two dimensions, each rated from low to high on a nine-point scale. It names five positions. Impoverished management is low on both. It does the minimum needed to keep the job, and to keep others in theirs. Country club management is low on task and high on people. It builds a comfortable, friendly atmosphere, at the expense of results. Authority-compliance is high on task and low on people. It arranges work so that human considerations interfere as little as possible with efficiency. Middle-of-the-road management is moderate on both. It balances the two by compromising on each. And team management is high on both. It achieves results through committed people who share a stake in the outcome. The grid's authors went further. They claimed team management is the best position in all circumstances. That's their claim, stated as they made it. But the contingency thinking of section six point two, applied in six point four, holds that effectiveness depends on the situation. Even a leader high on both can misjudge what a particular moment needs. So the grid stays useful as a description. It's the claim of universality that later theory questioned.

The Classical Styles

Where the Decision Sits

Alongside the dimensions, early experimental work on groups described three leadership styles, meaning characteristic patterns of behavior. In an autocratic style, the leader retains decision authority and decides alone. In a democratic, or participative, style, the leader involves the group in decisions. In a laissez-faire style, the leader provides minimal direction, and leaves the group to itself. These names describe where decisions sit, and how much the leader engages. They aren't descriptions of character. Now a crucial distinction. Directive behavior is about the clarity of instruction. How precisely does the leader say what's to be done, by whom, and how? Autocratic decision making is about something else. It's about who has the authority to decide. The two are independent. A leader can be highly directive and highly participative at once, by asking the group's views, then giving very clear instructions. A leader can also be autocratic and vague, deciding alone and explaining little. Confuse the two, and you'll wrongly believe that clarity requires the leader to decide everything.

Autocratic Style

The Autocratic Style Taken Seriously

The autocratic style is often presented as a foil for participation. That misrepresents it. There are situations in which it's the right choice. And each of them has a time limit. In an emergency, delay is dangerous, so one person must direct quickly, for the duration of the emergency. In a safety-critical situation, a wrong step may injure people. Clear instructions are followed without discussion, until the risk is past. With an inexperienced team, firm direction supplies what the members can't yet supply themselves. But the style should give way as their skill develops. And where a decision must be made faster than consultation permits, the leader decides, and explains afterwards. That explanation is part of the practice. Notice what all four cases share. The limit is what distinguishes appropriate use from habit. An autocratic style that outlasts its condition becomes an obstacle.

Participation

A Continuum, Not a Binary Choice

Participation isn't a binary choice between deciding alone and deciding together. It's a continuum. At one end, the leader decides alone, using information already held. Next, the leader gathers information from others, then decides alone. Further along, the leader consults individuals or the group, listens to their views, and then decides. Further still, leader and group decide jointly, each with an equal say. At the far end, the leader delegates the decision entirely, to the group or an individual, within stated limits. The right point depends on three things. How much the group knows that the leader doesn't. How much commitment the decision requires. And how much time there is. One requirement runs through all of this, and it's an honesty rule. If the leader has already decided, then consulting is a pretense, and staff discover it quickly. People asked their opinion, then overruled without a real hearing, conclude that they were misled. And the next consultation is met with silence. That's why consulting after deciding damages trust more than deciding openly. A leader who has decided should say so, and can still invite views on how to implement the decision.

Easily Confused

Laissez-Faire Is Not Delegation

Laissez-faire is often mistaken for delegation, and the difference matters. Delegation, as section five point one explained, is the deliberate transfer of authority for a task or decision to another person. Boundaries are stated, resources are provided, and the delegator keeps accountability. Laissez-faire is the absence of that transfer. The leader is present in name and absent in practice, and doesn't clarify expectations, decide, or respond. So the difference lies in intention and structure. A delegating leader knows what has been handed over, and checks in at agreed points. A laissez-faire leader has simply not led. Reviews of leadership style research consistently associate laissez-faire behavior with the poorest outcomes, including lower satisfaction and lower effectiveness. That finding is stated in words, without figures.

Table 6.1.1

5 Styles: Where Each Works and Fails

No style is right for every circumstance. So a leader's effectiveness depends on having a repertoire, a range of styles to use as the situation requires. The characteristic weakness is the leader with one good style, and no second option. A leader excellent at participation may have no way to give a clear order in a crisis. A leader excellent at direction may be unable to draw out the ideas of a skilled team. This table sets out five styles, each with where it works, where it fails, and a warning sign of misuse. Autocratic fails when the team is skilled, time is available, and commitment is needed. The sign is people who stop offering ideas. Consultative fails when the consultation is a pretense. The sign is that views never visibly change anything. Participative fails when time is short, or the group lacks knowledge or interest. The sign is long meetings with no decision. Delegating fails when the person lacks skill, or limits aren't stated. Work comes back with surprises. And laissez-faire fails almost always. Where it seems to work, with a highly skilled group, it's really delegation. The point of the last column is practical. A leader who can name the warning sign can notice it in time, and switch.

Worked Application

4 Warehouse Supervisors on the Grid

Let's apply the dimensions to four supervisors in one warehouse. The first begins each shift by stating exactly what has to ship, in what order, and to what standard. She checks progress against the plan every hour. On the task dimension, she's high. She also learns the names of the team's families, notices when someone is unwell, and defends the team when a manager complains. On the people dimension, she's high too. She sits at the team-management corner. She is not somewhere in the middle between firmness and warmth. Saying so would treat the dimensions as one scale. The second gives clear, tight instructions, and cares little how the team feels. That's authority-compliance. His team ships accurately, but turnover is high, and those who stay do exactly what's required and no more. The third is warm and well liked, but reluctant to set deadlines or correct errors. That's the country club position. His team is happy, and behind on its shipments. Notice how each description names two separate things, not one. The fourth is hardly present, unclear about expectations, and inattentive to the team. Low on both, the impoverished position.

Reading The Grid

What the Grid Tells You, and What It Doesn't

Two points follow from this comparison. First, the grid gives a vocabulary for what's gone wrong. It's more precise than calling a supervisor good or bad. The second supervisor doesn't need to get weaker on task. His clarity is an asset. He needs to raise the people dimension. The third doesn't need to care less. He needs to raise the task dimension. Second, the grid doesn't on its own say what each supervisor should do on a given day. If the fire alarm sounds, even the team-management supervisor will give short orders. And if the team is expert and settled, even the authority-compliance supervisor might step back. The dimensions describe habits of behavior. How much of each a situation calls for, is the question for sections six point two through six point four.

Case Vignette (Composite)

Switching Style Without Losing the Team

Here's a composite case, built for instruction, about switching style well. Elena is the operations lead at a food-packaging plant, and she has built a participative team. Planning meetings are open, line workers propose changes to the packing sequence, and she decides schedules jointly with them. It works well, and the team is engaged. Then one afternoon, a cleaning solvent begins leaking near one of the lines, and the fumes are spreading. She doesn't call a meeting. She tells everyone to leave the area immediately, and names the exit route. She assigns one person to shut off the supply, and another to call the safety officer. Nobody questions her. Two months earlier, she'd told the team that in a safety emergency, she would give orders. She'd said she would expect them followed without discussion, and that she'd explain afterwards. Once the leak is contained, she brings the team together. She explains what she saw, why she gave those orders, and where they'll have a say in the review. The trade-off was the group's habit of shared decisions against the need for speed. The constraint was that any delay risked injury. Her reasoning is that a style may be switched when the condition demands it. But only if the change is expected, limited in time, and explained afterwards. The switch didn't cost her the team's trust, because it was announced in advance, and it ended when the danger did.

About Business Essentials at UPI Study

Business Essentials (Business 100) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 24 chapters, from the business environment, economics and global markets to ownership, management, leadership, operations, people, marketing, accounting, finance and banking. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Business Essentials vs Principles of Management

Why take it here

Why students take Business Essentials with UPI Study

How a business works, end to endBusiness Essentials is a survey of how companies work: economic systems, global trade, forms of ownership, management and leadership, operations, human resources, marketing, accounting, finance and the banking system. It is a common first course in business, management and accounting degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Business Essentials carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Understanding Leadership Orientations

What are the two dimensions of leadership behavior?
The two dimensions are a task dimension, called initiating structure in the Ohio State leadership studies, and a people dimension, called consideration. Task behavior defines and organizes work, assigns tasks, and sets standards; people behavior shows respect, trust, and regard for followers' well-being. The key finding is that they are independent rather than opposite ends of one scale, so a leader can be high on both, low on both, or high on only one.
What is the Blake and Mouton managerial grid?
The managerial grid, developed by Robert Blake and Jane Mouton, rates leaders from 1 to 9 on concern for production and concern for people. It names five positions: impoverished (low on both), country club (low task, high people), authority-compliance (high task, low people), middle-of-the-road (moderate on both), and team management (high on both). Its authors claimed team management is best in all circumstances, a universality that contingency theory later questioned.
What are autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire leadership styles?
These three styles describe where decisions sit. An autocratic leader decides alone; a democratic or participative leader involves the group; a laissez-faire leader gives minimal direction and leaves the group to itself. Autocratic leadership suits time-limited conditions such as emergencies or safety risks. Laissez-faire is not delegation, which deliberately transfers authority within stated limits while the delegator stays accountable, and reviews link laissez-faire behavior with the poorest outcomes.
Why is asking for input after a decision is made harmful?
Consulting after the decision is already made damages trust more than deciding openly. Staff soon notice when their views never change anything, conclude they were misled, and answer the next consultation with silence. Participation runs along a continuum from deciding alone, through consulting, to delegating within limits, and the right point depends on what the group knows, how much commitment is needed, and how much time there is. A leader who has decided should say so.

About the Business Essentials course

How many college credits is Business Essentials?
Business Essentials (Business 100) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Business Essentials cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 105 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Business Essentials take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 105 lessons total about 24 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Essentials.

105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Business Essentials →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Business Essentials
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →