Strategies for Entering International Markets: Types and Examples

UPI Study › Courses › Business Essentials › Free lessons › Lesson 3.3 Free with a free account

Strategies for Entering International Markets: Types and Examples

Business Essentials · Chapter 3: International Business and Global MarketsSection 3.3 · lesson 16 of 10514 min · free with a free account

← Dynamics of Global Trade: Imports, Exports, and Why They MatterNext lesson: Key Factors Shaping Global Trade Patterns →

Earn 3 college credits for Business EssentialsRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 100 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Business Essentials · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Types and examples, weighed by control, commitment, and risk.

  • Describe the international entry modes
  • Explain the control and commitment trade-off
  • Link an expansion's purpose to its mode
  • Choose a mode for a described business

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,972 words). Read along, or search it.

International Business and Global Markets

Strategies for Entering International Markets

Once a business has decided to serve customers abroad, it faces a second decision. How, exactly, does it get there? This section maps the options, from selling through a distant intermediary to owning a full business overseas. We'll see that three variables separate them. Control, commitment, and risk. Then we'll walk through each mode, with its strengths and its standing weaknesses. We'll ask what an expansion is actually for, because the purpose points toward the mode. And we'll finish with the factors that decide the choice, and a case where a sensible choice still went wrong. We'll also see why the way out deserves thought before the way in. Keep one idea in mind throughout. There is no best mode, only a best fit.

Entry Modes

Three Variables Separate the Modes

An entry mode is the structural arrangement a business uses to reach a foreign market. At one end, the firm sells through an intermediary and never meets a foreign customer. At the other, it owns and runs a whole business overseas. Three variables separate the modes. Control is how far the business directs operations, quality, pricing, and the way its brand is presented. Resource commitment is the capital, people, and management attention it puts at stake. And risk exposure is what it stands to lose if the venture fails. Here's the crucial point. These options don't line up from worse to better. The low-commitment modes give you safety and speed, but you pay for them in control. The high-commitment modes give you control, but you pay for it in exposure. So no mode is best in itself. The right one depends on what the business is trying to do, and what it can afford to lose.

The Trade-Off

Control and Commitment Rise Together

Picture the modes plotted on two axes, with control going up and resource commitment going across. These positions are illustrative judgments, not data. But the pattern is clear. The modes climb in a staircase, from exporting at the lower left to the wholly owned subsidiary at the upper right. Why do control and commitment rise together? Because a business cannot direct what it has not invested in. That's why the upper-left corner is empty. Real control without real commitment simply isn't on offer. As commitment rises, the risk of losing control falls, because the firm is making more of the decisions itself. But the risk of financial loss rises, because more is at stake. Now think about a firm with limited capital. However attractive the upper-right modes look, it can't choose them. Its options cluster at the lower left. So its real decision is which lower-commitment mode gives it the best position.

Exporting

The Lowest-Commitment Mode

Start at the bottom of the staircase, with exporting. That's selling goods produced at home to buyers abroad. In indirect exporting, the firm sells to a domestic intermediary, like an export trading company, which resells abroad. So the firm never has to deal with a foreign customer at all. In direct exporting, the firm itself deals with foreign buyers or distributors. Exporting is the lowest commitment of all the modes. It needs no foreign investment. And if things go badly, the firm can withdraw just by ceasing to ship. The weaknesses are the flip side of that ease. The firm depends on an intermediary or distributor, whose interests may differ from its own. And it has limited control over how its product is presented, priced, and serviced abroad. Indirect exporting suits a firm testing foreign demand with almost no capital. Direct exporting suits proven demand, where the firm wants to own its customer relationships. The mechanics, including payment and documents, were covered in section three point two.

Licensing And Franchising

Renting Out What You Know

The next step up is licensing. Here, the owner of intangible property, like a patent, a process, a trademark, or a design, lets a foreign firm use it. In return, it collects a fee or a royalty. Licensing offers rapid reach with little capital, because the licensee bears the cost of production and distribution. But it has two standing problems. First, the licensor has limited control over quality, and a poor product can harm its reputation. Second, the licensee learns the licensor's methods. When the deal ends, or even during it, the licensee may become a competitor. So licensing suits a capability the firm can't deploy itself, in a market it can't serve. There's a legal trap as well. Intellectual property protection is largely national. A patent or trademark registered at home doesn't protect it abroad, so firms register it in each market where they rely on it. Franchising is a form of licensing that grants a complete business system, meaning the brand, the methods, and support, for fees. It gives more control than a simple license, because the franchisor prescribes how the business is run, and can monitor compliance. And it lets a firm expand using the capital of local operators. Its risks are inconsistent standards, and disputes with franchisees. It suits a replicable format, in many markets that need local operators. In the United States, franchise sales fall under a Federal Trade Commission disclosure rule, plus state law. Abroad, each host country has its own rules. Section four point three returns to franchising as a form of business ownership.

Contract Manufacturing

Made Abroad, Sold Under Your Name

Contract manufacturing is a different kind of deal. A firm has its products made by another firm abroad, to its own specifications. Then it sells them under its own name, either in that country or somewhere else. The appeal is cost or proximity, without the investment of building a plant. But it raises the supply chain questions from section one point five. The firm now depends on the contractor for quality, for delivery, and for the conditions in which the work is done. Here's the uncomfortable part. The firm may be held accountable for those conditions, even though it doesn't control them. Customers and critics see the brand on the product, not the contractor behind it. So standards have to be written into the contract, and then actually checked. On the staircase, contract manufacturing sits at moderate control and low to moderate commitment.

Shared Arrangements

Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances

Now we reach arrangements where control is shared. A joint venture is a separate business, created and jointly owned by two or more parents. Here, that's typically a foreign firm and a local one. It brings local knowledge, shared risk, and shared capital. It also opens markets where the law, or the practicalities, require local participation. Its characteristic weakness is governance. Two parents with different objectives must agree on strategy, investment, and how to divide the profit. The disagreements that follow are the most common cause of joint venture failure. A strategic alliance is looser. It's a cooperative arrangement that doesn't create a new company. For example, two firms might agree to share distribution, or technology, for a defined purpose. An alliance commits less than a joint venture, and it can be undone more easily. But that cuts both ways. Its obligations are less clearly defined, and the partners' goals may drift apart.

Full Ownership

The Wholly Owned Subsidiary

At the top of the staircase sits the wholly owned subsidiary, a foreign business fully owned and controlled by the parent. It offers maximum control, over operations, over the brand, and over proprietary capability. And nobody else shares the profits or the decisions. The price is full commitment and full exposure. The parent bears every loss, and every change in the host country's conditions. It suits a firm protecting proprietary capability in a large, important market. There are two routes in. Acquisition means buying an existing foreign business. It buys speed, customers, and market position, all at once. The cost is integration. You're absorbing another organization, with its own culture, systems, and obligations. New establishment, sometimes called a greenfield investment, means building the operation from scratch. It can be designed exactly as the parent wants. But it takes time, and it starts with no customers. Either way, check the law first. Host governments may screen or restrict foreign ownership in some sectors, so legal advice comes before the choice.

Why Go Abroad

Four Drivers of Internationalization

The entry mode describes how a firm goes abroad. A more useful question asks what the expansion is for. There are four drivers. Market-seeking expansion aims at new customers. Maybe the home market is saturated, or the foreign one is larger or growing faster. Resource-seeking expansion aims to obtain inputs, like raw materials, energy, or specialized skills, that are unavailable or costlier at home. Efficiency-seeking expansion aims to lower costs. It locates activities where they're cheapest, or it captures economies of scale across markets. Strategic asset-seeking expansion aims to acquire capabilities, like technology, brands, or distribution networks, that strengthen the firm's long-term position. Why does the purpose matter? Because it points toward different modes. A firm seeking a resource may need to own the source. A firm that's merely seeking customers may find that a distributor is enough.

Choosing A Mode

Five Factors in the Decision

So how does a business actually choose? Five factors bear on the decision. Market size and growth come first. A large or fast-growing market may justify a heavy investment that a small one couldn't. Regulatory requirements may limit the menu. A country might require local participation, or forbid foreign ownership in a sector. The firm's resources and experience matter too. A firm with little capital, or no foreign experience, can't responsibly commit heavily to an unfamiliar market. The need to protect proprietary capability favors higher-control modes. Licensing a valuable process, after all, hands it to a potential rival. And the speed required matters. Acquisitions and alliances are fast. New establishment is slow. Here's the honest part. These factors often conflict. So the final choice isn't a calculation. It's a judgment about which considerations dominate.

Over Time

Sequence, Born Globals, and the Exit

Entry choices also play out over time. Many firms follow a sequential pattern of internationalization. They begin with low-commitment modes in nearby or familiar markets, and commit more as their experience and knowledge grow. The logic is simple. Mistakes get made while the stakes are still small. Some firms skip that pattern entirely. They're called born global businesses, and they're international from the start. Often they sell digital products, or specialized goods, to a market that's worldwide from day one. Then there's the decision almost nobody plans at entry, but everybody should. The exit. A business may need to leave because the market didn't develop, conditions changed, or the strategy shifted. The routes out include selling the operation, selling a stake to a partner, converting to a license, or winding down. How hard that is depends on the original choice. A wholly owned subsidiary has employees, leases, and contracts that make leaving costly. And a joint venture agreement that says nothing about separation can turn a withdrawal into a dispute. Exit provisions written at entry are cheap insurance.

Case Vignette

A Partner With Different Goals

Let's close with a composite case. Ilse directs international development at a food manufacturer. The market she wants requires local participation for the distribution she needs. So she forms a joint venture with a local distributor that holds the retail contacts, and understands the regulations. Each parent contributes capital, and each owns half. The agreement settles ownership, the product range, and the initial budget. But it doesn't settle who decides whether profits get reinvested or paid out. After two profitable years, that question arrives. Ilse's firm wants to reinvest in capacity, to grow market share. The local partner funds its own business largely from dividends, so it wants the profits paid out. With equal ownership, neither side can outvote the other, and the venture's decisions stall. Notice that nobody broke the agreement. Its governance was simply never designed for this disagreement. A deadlock clause would have meant discussing disagreement at the outset, just when both sides were keen to agree. Ilse concludes the mode was right for the goal, but shared control was a cost she should have priced in. So she proposes an amendment, with a formula for reinvestment and a method for resolving future deadlocks.

About Business Essentials at UPI Study

Business Essentials (Business 100) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 24 chapters, from the business environment, economics and global markets to ownership, management, leadership, operations, people, marketing, accounting, finance and banking. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Business Essentials vs Principles of Management

Why take it here

Why students take Business Essentials with UPI Study

How a business works, end to endBusiness Essentials is a survey of how companies work: economic systems, global trade, forms of ownership, management and leadership, operations, human resources, marketing, accounting, finance and the banking system. It is a common first course in business, management and accounting degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Business Essentials carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Strategies for Entering International Markets: Types and Examples

What are the main ways to enter a foreign market?
The main entry modes are exporting, licensing, franchising, contract manufacturing, joint ventures, strategic alliances, and wholly owned subsidiaries. They differ in control, resource commitment, and risk exposure. Control and commitment rise together, from exporting, which needs no foreign investment, to a wholly owned subsidiary, which gives maximum control but full exposure. No mode is best in itself; the right one depends on the firm's goals and what it can afford to lose.
What are the risks of international licensing?
International licensing has two standing risks: limited control over quality and the chance that the licensee becomes a competitor. Licensing lets a foreign firm use a patent, process, trademark, or design for a fee or royalty, giving fast reach with little capital. But a poor product can harm the licensor's reputation, and the licensee learns its methods. Intellectual property protection is largely national, so patents and trademarks generally need registering in each market where the firm relies on them.
What is the difference between a joint venture and a strategic alliance?
A joint venture is a separate business created and jointly owned by two or more parents, while a strategic alliance is a looser cooperative arrangement that creates no new company. Joint ventures bring local knowledge, shared capital, and shared risk, but disagreements between the parents over strategy, investment, and profits are a common cause of failure. Alliances commit less and are easier to undo, but their obligations are less clearly defined.
What is the difference between a greenfield investment and an acquisition abroad?
A greenfield investment builds a foreign operation from scratch, while an acquisition buys an existing foreign business. Both are routes to a wholly owned subsidiary. An acquisition buys speed, customers, and market position at once, but the buyer must integrate another organization's culture, systems, and obligations. A greenfield operation can be designed exactly as the parent wants, but it takes time and starts with no customers.

About the Business Essentials course

How many college credits is Business Essentials?
Business Essentials (Business 100) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Business Essentials cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 105 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Business Essentials take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 105 lessons total about 24 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Essentials.

105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Business Essentials →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Business Essentials
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →