UPI Study › Courses › Business Essentials › Free lessons › Lesson 10.3 Free with a free account
Human Resource Management (HRM): Legal Framework and Compliance Requirements
Business Essentials · Chapter 10: Human Resource ManagementSection 10.3 · lesson 51 of 10515 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Business Essentials.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Business Essentials
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Employee Performance, Appraisal and Compensation →← Motivating Employees: Theoretical Models and Strategic UsesNext lesson: Employee Performance, Appraisal and Compensation →
In this lesson
The statutes, the theories of discrimination, and the employer's duties.
- Identify the main federal statutes and what each prohibits
- Distinguish disparate treatment from disparate impact
- Describe duties on harassment and accommodation
- Outline the 4 parts of a compliance structure
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,999 words). Read along, or search it.
Human Resource Management
HRM: Legal Framework and Compliance Requirements
Every HR practice from the last two sections runs inside a legal framework. This section maps that framework, so you know which situations are legally sensitive. We will cover four things. First, the principal federal employment statutes, and what each one prohibits. Second, the difference between disparate treatment and disparate impact. Third, the employer's duties on harassment and accommodation. And fourth, the four-part compliance structure that meets those duties. One theme runs throughout. Good intentions are not enough. What counts is what the employer can show.
How the Law Is Built
A Federal Floor, With Layers Above It
Employment law is the body of statutes, regulations, and court decisions governing employers and employees. In the United States it comes in layers. Federal statutes apply across the country, and they set a floor. That is the minimum protection required everywhere. State and local laws frequently go further. They may set higher minimum wages, protect more characteristics, require longer or paid leave, or cover smaller employers. Where state law is more protective, the employer must follow it. Some matters, like workers' compensation, are governed mainly by the states. Federal statutes are enforced by agencies. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission handles most anti-discrimination law. The Department of Labor handles wages, leave, and benefits. And OSHA handles workplace safety. Courts interpret the statutes, and their decisions can change how a law applies. One caution before we go on. This is a business course, not legal training. The goal is a map. Real cases need counsel, and every threshold must be checked against current sources.
Non-Discrimination
Who the Statutes Protect
The first group of statutes prohibits decisions based on protected characteristics. Title Seven of the Civil Rights Act of nineteen sixty-four is the foundation. It bars discrimination in hiring, pay, promotion, and discipline, because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It also requires religious accommodation, and prohibits harassment and retaliation. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of nineteen seventy-eight made clear that pregnancy discrimination is sex discrimination. In twenty twenty, the Supreme Court held that bias over sexual orientation or gender identity is sex discrimination. Agency guidance on applying that holding has shifted, though, so it should be verified. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of nineteen sixty-seven protects workers aged forty and older. The Americans with Disabilities Act of nineteen ninety protects qualified people with disabilities, and requires accommodation. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of two thousand eight bars using genetic information, including family medical history. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act of twenty twenty-two requires accommodating pregnancy-related limitations, unless that causes undue hardship. And the Equal Pay Act of nineteen sixty-three bars sex-based pay differences for substantially equal work.
Table 10.3.1
Wages, Leave, Safety, and Benefits
The remaining statutes cover wages, leave, safety, and benefits. The Fair Labor Standards Act of nineteen thirty-eight sets a federal minimum wage. Only Congress can change it. Many states and cities set higher minimums, which apply instead. Non-exempt employees earn overtime at one and a half times their rate, past forty hours a week. An exempt employee has no overtime entitlement, because the job meets tests of both duties and salary. That depends on actual duties and pay, not the job title. Misclassification is a frequent source of liability. The Family and Medical Leave Act of nineteen ninety-three grants unpaid, job-protected leave, up to a yearly limit. Group health benefits continue during that leave, and a growing number of states add paid leave programs. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of nineteen seventy requires a workplace free from recognized serious hazards. Workers' compensation is separate. It is a state-run, no-fault insurance system for workplace injuries. ERISA, from nineteen seventy-four, regulates retirement and health plans, but does not require an employer to offer any. COBRA, from nineteen eighty-five, lets people keep group health coverage, at their own cost, after job loss. Here is a common trap. Each statute sets its own coverage threshold, and counts employees its own way. An employer with eighteen employees might be covered by one statute, but not another.
At-Will Employment
Any Reason, But Not Every Reason
At-will employment is the default rule in nearly every state. Absent a contract or legal limit, either side may end it at any time, for any reason or none. Montana is the notable departure. Its statute requires good cause after a probationary period. The essential qualification is that the exceptions are numerous. At-will does not mean without risk. Statutory exceptions forbid firing for a discriminatory reason, or in retaliation for protected activity. Public policy exceptions, recognized in many states, bar firing someone for refusing to break the law. They also protect jury service, and filing a workers' compensation claim. Contract exceptions arise when an agreement, a handbook, or repeated assurances create an enforceable promise. Some states also recognize an implied duty of good faith. Union agreements, covered in Chapter eleven, typically require just cause. And the scope of each exception varies by state.
Treatment vs. Impact
2 Routes to a Discrimination Claim
Discrimination claims travel by two different routes. Disparate treatment is intentional less favorable treatment because of a protected characteristic. Refusing to hire someone because of religion is a classic example. So is dismissal because of age. Intent is the essential element. But it can be inferred from circumstances, and never needs to be admitted. The key circumstantial evidence is a comparator. That is a similarly situated employee, outside the protected group, who was treated more favorably. Courts use a burden-shifting framework. The employee shows facts suggesting discrimination. The employer states a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason. Then the employee may show that reason is a pretext. Reasons documented at the time of the decision are the employer's best evidence. Disparate impact is different. A neutral practice falls more harshly on a protected group. No intent is required. The claimant identifies a specific practice, and shows it causes a disparity. The employer must show the practice is job-related, and consistent with business necessity. Even then, the claimant wins by showing a less discriminatory alternative the employer refuses to adopt.
The Four-Fifths Rule
Orrin Distribution's Diploma Requirement
Disparate impact has an arithmetic side, so let us work an example. Orrin Distribution is a composite case. It requires a high school diploma for warehouse loaders. Using figures built for the exercise, sixty of one hundred Group A applicants meet it. Only thirty of one hundred Group B applicants do. So Group B's selection rate is half of Group A's. The ratio is point five. Federal guidelines from nineteen seventy-eight offer a rule of thumb, called the four-fifths rule. A selection rate below eighty percent of the highest group's rate is generally regarded as adverse impact. Point five is well below that. But this is a screening measure, not a legal test. So Marisol, the HR manager, asks whether the loader job actually requires the diploma. A job analysis shows loaders lift, scan labels, and follow posted instructions. Nothing depends on the diploma. The firm believes the diploma screens for reliability. But it is unlikely to meet the test of business necessity. A less discriminatory alternative exists, a short practical test of the real tasks. So she replaces the requirement, documents the analysis, and rechecks selection rates.
An Area in Motion
Disparate Impact Is Under Dispute
The status of disparate impact is currently disputed, and it is changing. One position calls it an essential tool. Practices can bar a group as effectively as intentional exclusion. Intent is very hard to prove. And Congress wrote the theory into Title Seven in nineteen ninety-one. The opposing position says liability based on outcomes, without regard to intent, creates pressure. Employers may start deciding by group membership just to avoid disparities. It also raises constitutional concerns. Part of the disagreement is empirical. How often do neutral practices produce disparities the job cannot justify? Part is normative. Should liability rest on a practice's effect, or on the intent behind it? Two documented developments followed. On June fourth, twenty twenty-six, the EEOC adopted a new National Enforcement Plan. It said the agency would not commence or continue litigation advancing disparate impact claims. On June ninth, the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel called the agency's disparate impact guidelines unconstitutional. But the statutory provision has not been repealed, and that opinion is not a court decision. Private plaintiffs and state agencies can still bring claims. Because this area is moving, verify the current position.
Harassment
2 Forms, and What the Employer Must Do
Harassment is unwelcome conduct based on a protected characteristic. It becomes unlawful when it is made a condition of employment, or creates a hostile or abusive environment. Quid pro quo harassment ties a hire, a promotion, or a dismissal to submitting to unwelcome sexual conduct. A hostile work environment means conduct severe or pervasive enough to alter the conditions of employment. One trivial incident does not qualify. One severe incident can, and so can a pattern of lesser ones. And harassment can be based on any protected characteristic, not sex alone. Liability depends on who harasses, and what the employer did. If a supervisor's harassment ends in a tangible employment action, the employer is liable. If not, the employer may have a defense, if it took reasonable care and the employee unreasonably did not complain. For coworker harassment, the employer is liable if it knew or should have known, and failed to act. So the obligations are concrete. A policy, and several reporting routes, so no one must report to the harasser. A prompt, impartial investigation, even without a formal complaint. Proportionate correction, and protection from retaliation. A policy on paper, without those actions, does not meet the obligation.
Accommodation
Disability and Religion
Reasonable accommodation is a change to the job, the environment, or the usual way of doing things. It lets a qualified person do the job, or practice a religion, unless it imposes undue hardship. Under the disability law, examples include adjusted schedules, modified equipment, reassignment to a vacant position, and policy changes. There, undue hardship means significant difficulty or expense. Religious accommodation may mean schedule changes, or exceptions to dress and grooming rules. In twenty twenty-three, the Supreme Court clarified the religious standard. Undue hardship requires a substantial increased cost to the business. A minimal burden is not enough. The interactive process is the good-faith dialogue to identify the limitation, and explore accommodations. Think of it as an obligation to engage, not a decision. Refusing to discuss a request, or ignoring it, fails that obligation, whatever the request's merits. No special words are needed to trigger the duty. And the employer should record the discussion and its reasons.
Cross-Cutting Protections
Retaliation and Monitoring
Retaliation is an adverse action taken because a person engaged in protected activity. That includes complaining of discrimination or harassment, joining an investigation, or requesting an accommodation. It also covers taking protected leave, reporting a safety hazard, and asserting wage rights. This is the cross-cutting protection. Nearly every statute in this section contains one. The reason is simple. These laws only work if employees are willing to come forward. A retaliation claim can succeed even when the original complaint fails. The protection attaches to complaining in good faith, not to being right. So any adverse decision affecting someone who recently complained needs careful review, and a documented, independent basis. Finally, monitoring. Federal law permits monitoring business systems in defined cases, especially with notice or consent. Several states add notice rules or limits, including on biometric data and recorded communications. The durable principle is notice and proportionality. Say what is monitored and why, and intrude no more than needed.
Compliance Architecture
4 Parts That Meet the Obligations
So how does an employer actually meet all these obligations? With a compliance structure in four parts. Policy states the rules in plain written language, in line with the law of every state where the employer operates. Training comes next. Managers make most decisions, so they are the most likely to create liability. They need to recognize legally sensitive situations when they arise. Employees, meanwhile, need to know their rights, and the routes for raising concerns. Documentation records decisions and their reasons at the time. That way the employer can later show what it did, and why. Audit is the periodic review of selection, pay, classifications, and complaint handling. Its purpose is to find problems before a claim does. Next, section ten point four puts that documentation and consistency into daily practice, through appraisal and pay.
About Business Essentials at UPI Study
Business Essentials (Business 100) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 24 chapters, from the business environment, economics and global markets to ownership, management, leadership, operations, people, marketing, accounting, finance and banking. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Business Essentials with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Business Essentials carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Human Resource Management (HRM): Legal Framework and Compliance Requirements
What is the difference between disparate treatment and disparate impact?
What is the four-fifths rule in employee selection?
Which federal laws prohibit employment discrimination?
What counts as retaliation under employment law?
About the Business Essentials course
How many college credits is Business Essentials?
How much does Business Essentials cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Business Essentials take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Essentials.
105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →