UPI Study › Courses › Business Essentials › Free lessons › Lesson 7.1 Free with a free account
Foundations and Architecture of Organizational Management
Business Essentials · Chapter 7: Organizational Design and BehaviorSection 7.1 · lesson 36 of 10514 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Business Essentials.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Business Essentials
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Organizational Design and Structure: A Formal Overview →← Applying the 5Ps Leadership Analysis FrameworkNext lesson: Organizational Design and Structure: A Formal Overview →
In this lesson
Where organizational thinking came from, and what it assumes about people.
- Describe the 3 classical strands of management theory
- Explain the behavioral response to classical management
- Contrast Theory X and Theory Y assumptions
- Identify the assumptions behind a management practice
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,985 words). Read along, or search it.
Organizational Design and Behavior
Foundations and Architecture of Organizational Management
Every management practice you'll ever meet carries a hidden picture of what people are like. This section traces where those pictures came from. We'll start in the late nineteenth century, when management first became a subject of study. Then we'll take the three classical strands in turn. Scientific management, administrative theory, and bureaucratic theory. Next comes the behavioral response, which discovered that output is social. After that, two sets of assumptions about workers, called Theory X and Theory Y. We'll see how those assumptions can confirm themselves. And we'll finish by learning to read the assumption hidden inside an ordinary policy.
The Historical Context
Why Management Became a Subject
An organization is a deliberately structured group, working toward goals none of its members could reach alone. Management is the work of coordinating people and resources, so the organization reaches those goals. Small organizations are ancient. Armies, harvests, and building projects all needed them. But the factory of the late nineteenth century created a different problem. Owners who had supervised a dozen craftspeople now ran hundreds, or thousands, in one complex. Many had come from farms or small workshops, with no experience of a factory's pace. And there was no shared body of management knowledge to consult. Each owner improvised. The first systematic thinking about organizations was a response to those three conditions. Its central hope was to turn management into something that could be studied, taught, and improved. Between roughly the eighteen nineties and the nineteen thirties, that hope produced classical management theory. It has three strands, and they differ mainly in what they look at. Scientific management looks at the task. Administrative theory looks at the whole organization, and the manager's work. Bureaucratic theory looks at structure and authority.
Scientific Management
Taylor: Find the Best Method by Measuring
Scientific management was developed by the American engineer Frederick W. Taylor. He set it out in a nineteen eleven book, The Principles of Scientific Management. His claim was bold. The best method for any task could be found by measurement, not tradition. First, replace rule-of-thumb methods with a science of each element of the job. Second, select and train workers systematically, instead of leaving them to train themselves. Third, management cooperates with workers, so the work really follows the scientific method. Fourth, divide the work. Managers take over the planning, and workers concentrate on execution. The main tool was the time study. A job is broken into elementary motions, and each is timed with a stopwatch, to find the fastest reliable sequence. The result is a standard. A defined amount of output, for a defined method, at a defined pace. Taylor then tied a reward to the standard. His version was the differential piece rate. Output at or above the standard earned a higher rate per unit than output below it.
Kestrel Foundry (Illustrative)
Planning Separated From Doing
Here's the logic at work, using illustrative figures built for this exercise. At Kestrel Foundry, a fictional casting plant, an analyst times a worker loading crates. The job has six motions. The fastest worker saves a walking step by staging crates nearer the conveyor. The method is rewritten around it. The standard becomes what a trained worker can sustain all day, with a bonus for meeting it. Now the method, the pace, and the pay are all designed by someone other than the worker. That's the fourth principle, the separation of planning from execution. It's also the source of the strongest criticisms. Critics said it caused deskilling, stripping the worker's knowledge and judgment out of the job. And intensification. Improved methods turned into more demanded output, rather than more ease. Its view of motivation was too narrow. Workers also want recognition, security, fairness, and meaning. Defenders replied that jobs really can be analyzed, measured, and improved. The abuses came from employers. Part of this dispute is empirical, about what actually happened to skill, pace, and health. Part is normative. How much of the pace and design of work should management alone decide? The tradition lives on, in standard work, units per hour, and pay for output above a threshold.
Administrative Theory
Fayol: Management as a Teachable Activity
Administrative theory looks at the whole organization, and treats management as a teachable activity. Its best-known author was Henri Fayol, a French mining executive, whose major work appeared in nineteen sixteen. He described managerial work as planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling. The modern four-function framework in section five point two is a compressed descendant of that list. Five of his principles matter most here. Division of work says specializing tasks raises the volume and quality of output. The authority principle says authority and responsibility must match. No one should be held accountable for outcomes they lack the power to influence. Unity of command says each employee takes orders from one superior, preventing conflicting instructions. Span of control is how many people report directly to one manager. Classically, it has a limit. And the scalar chain is the unbroken line of authority, from the top to the lowest level. The chain can be too slow, so Fayol allowed a direct link between peers for urgent matters. But he presented these principles as universal. Section seven point six shows they depend on conditions.
Bureaucratic Theory
Weber's Ideal Type of Bureaucracy
Bureaucratic theory comes from the German sociologist Max Weber. He studied how large organizations, in government, the military, the church, and business, coordinated dependably. Weber built an ideal type, a deliberately simplified, exaggerated model to compare real cases against. It's an analytical tool. It isn't a recommendation, or a claim that any real organization matches it. His ideal bureaucracy has defined roles, a hierarchy of offices, uniform written rules, and selection on merit. It also has impersonality. Decisions follow the rule and the facts of the case, not the people involved. Here's the counterintuitive part. Impersonality was proposed as a protection. Where Weber looked, offices were often filled through family ties, patronage, and favoritism. An applicant judged by written criteria can't be turned away for lacking the right relatives. Hiring rubrics, grading criteria, and competitive procurement all exist for the same reason. The dysfunctions showed up later. Chief among them is goal displacement, where following the rule becomes the goal. Rules written for typical cases handle unusual ones poorly. And decisions slow as they climb the hierarchy. Yet the same features make a bureaucracy consistent, auditable, and hard to bend for favored parties.
The Behavioral Response
Output Is Social
The classical approaches stressed structure, method, and rules, with little attention to how workers felt. The behavioral response began with studies at an electrical equipment plant near Chicago, starting in the mid-nineteen twenties. The earliest experiments varied conditions such as lighting, and output rose regardless of what was done. So the researchers suspected social factors, such as being observed, and being treated as important. Later work watched a group of workers wiring equipment. The group had its own unwritten standard of a fair day's output. Anyone producing much more, or much less, was pressured to conform, whatever pay incentive management offered. Later studies questioned some early conclusions. But the main lesson is widely accepted. Group norms, the unwritten shared expectations within a group, affect output, and can outweigh formal incentives. This gave us a lasting distinction. The formal organization is the designed structure, the one on the chart. The informal organization is the web of relationships, norms, and communication paths that grows up on its own. A manager who sees only the chart misses who is really consulted, and why sensible changes meet quiet resistance.
Table 7.1.1
4 Approaches, 4 Pictures of the Worker
This table lines up the three classical strands and the behavioral response. Scientific management studies the task, and assumes workers are motivated mainly by pay. It also assumes they need methods designed for them. Its legacy is standard work, metrics, and output-based pay. Administrative theory studies the whole organization, and the manager's job. It assumes people fit into a designed structure, and respond to clear authority and defined duties. Its legacy is job descriptions, reporting lines, and span-of-control decisions. Bureaucratic theory studies roles, rules, and authority. It treats people as role-holders whose loyalties shouldn't sway decisions. Its legacy includes written procedures and audit trails. The behavioral response studies the person and the group, and sees workers as social beings. Its legacy is attention to morale, teamwork, and informal networks. Here's why the table matters. A practice inherits the assumptions of the tradition it came from. So naming the tradition is the first step in seeing what a practice takes for granted.
McGregor, 1960
Theory X and Theory Y
Each approach rests on a view of people, whether or not the manager has ever stated it. Douglas McGregor, in a nineteen sixty book on the human side of enterprise, described two contrasting sets of assumptions. Theory X assumes employees dislike work and avoid responsibility. So they must be directed, controlled, threatened with penalties, or bound by incentives. Theory Y assumes employees can find satisfaction in work. They'll exercise self-direction toward goals they're committed to, and seek responsibility under the right conditions. McGregor didn't claim either was simply true of everyone. His point was that managers act on one or the other, and the choice shapes results. The mechanism is a self-fulfilling prophecy. A belief leads to actions that bring about the very outcome it predicted. So it seems confirmed.
Figure 7.1.1
The Self-Fulfilling Cycle of a Monitoring Control
Here's that cycle, traced for a detailed activity-monitoring control. It begins with an assumption, that employees will shirk. So the manager installs close controls. Employees respond by doing only what's measured. They avoid risk, and withhold any effort no one is counting. The manager then sees limited initiative, and concludes the original assumption was right. And that reading feeds straight back into the first step. The trap is this. The behavior was produced by the control itself. So the manager's evidence can never contradict the assumption. That's why a control system can survive long after it has stopped working. The opposite belief can confirm itself too. Trust and discretion tend to produce people who use their discretion. The fair conclusion is that neither set describes everyone. But a manager's practices strongly influence which pattern appears.
Reading a Policy
Making the Assumption Visible
You can practice spotting these assumptions, in four steps. First, state what the policy requires of employees, and what it takes away from them. A policy that removes discretion, or measures every action, carries a different view from one that grants latitude. Second, ask what problem the policy is answering, and what behavior it fears. Third, identify the tradition it descends from, using the comparison table. Fourth, imagine the policy under the opposite assumption, and compare the two. Take expenses. Sign-off on every expense, however small, assumes employees can't be trusted with small sums. A spending limit with review afterward assumes most people will act responsibly, and exceptions can be caught. Neither is automatically wrong. The right choice depends on the stakes, and on what past experience shows. The value of the exercise is that the assumption becomes visible. Then it can be examined, rather than inherited.
Case Vignette (Composite)
The Monitoring Dashboard
Here's a composite case. Ibrahim directs operations at Larkspur Claims Services, a fictional insurance-processing office. A few processors seem to spend long stretches away from their screens, and volume is flat. So he installs software that records keystrokes, flags any five-minute gap, and posts a ranked daily activity list. He must justify its cost to his own manager. The trade-off is visibility against discretion. Within two months, activity time is up. But suggestions for the intake form, once a few a week, stop. Processors take simple claims first, because those raise their scores, and complex claims are left to age. Two experienced processors stop coaching newer colleagues, because coaching doesn't register as keystrokes. Ibrahim decides the workforce needs more watching, and considers a tighter threshold. But the software encodes the belief that employees will drift unless observed. Anything unmeasured counts as worthless. Employees responded rationally to what was counted. That's evidence of the control's effect, not of the workforce. A better decision would start by asking why the gaps occurred. Were processors waiting on approvals, for example? And it would measure outcomes, completed claims and their quality, rather than keystrokes.
About Business Essentials at UPI Study
Business Essentials (Business 100) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 24 chapters, from the business environment, economics and global markets to ownership, management, leadership, operations, people, marketing, accounting, finance and banking. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Business Essentials with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Business Essentials carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Foundations and Architecture of Organizational Management
What is scientific management?
What did Max Weber mean by bureaucracy?
What were the Hawthorne studies?
What is the difference between Theory X and Theory Y?
About the Business Essentials course
How many college credits is Business Essentials?
How much does Business Essentials cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Business Essentials take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Essentials.
105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →