Motivation in the Workplace: Theories, Types, and Examples

UPI Study › Courses › Business Essentials › Free lessons › Lesson 9.1 Free with a free account

Motivation in the Workplace: Theories, Types, and Examples

Business Essentials · Chapter 9: Workplace MotivationSection 9.1 · lesson 47 of 10514 min · free with a free account

← Management Information Systems: Using Data for Operational ControlNext lesson: Motivation in Management: Needs-Based, Behavior-Based and Different Forms →

Earn 3 college credits for Business EssentialsRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 100 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Business Essentials · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

What people want from work, and why a raise sometimes changes nothing.

  • Define motivation and its 3 components
  • Diagnose performance before blaming motivation
  • Compare the 4 content theories of motivation
  • Distinguish intrinsic from extrinsic motivation

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,964 words). Read along, or search it.

Workplace Motivation

Motivation in the Workplace: Theories, Types, and Examples

Why do some people work hard on the wrong things? And why does a raise sometimes change nothing? This chapter turns from operations to the people who run them, starting with motivation. We'll define motivation, and break it into three components that fail in different ways. We'll see why a performance problem isn't always a motivation problem. Then four content theories, each asking what people want from work. Maslow's hierarchy, Alderfer's revision, Herzberg's two factors, and McClelland's acquired needs. We'll weigh the evidence for each one honestly. And we'll look at intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, and when rewards can backfire.

What Motivation Is

Direction, Intensity, Persistence

Motivation is the set of forces behind the direction, intensity, and persistence of effort toward a goal. Each names a different aspect of effort, and each can fail on its own. Direction is what a person chooses to work on. Intensity is how hard they work at it. Persistence is how long effort lasts, especially when the task is hard, or progress slow. Picture a sales representative working furiously on the easiest accounts. That's intensity, with poor direction. Another picks the right accounts, but stops calling after two refusals. Good direction, poor persistence. Direction responds mainly to clarity. Making goals, priorities, and the meaning of good work explicit. Intensity responds to challenge, to rewards attached to results, and to meaning in the work. Persistence responds to support, to feedback showing progress, and to belief that effort will pay off. So treat motivation as one dial to turn up, and you'll often use the wrong tool. Someone working hard on the wrong thing needs clarity, not encouragement.

The Performance Equation

Motivation Is Only One Condition

Motivation is only one condition for good performance. The performance equation names three. Motivation, the willingness to exert effort. Ability, the knowledge, skill, and aptitude the work needs. And opportunity. The resources, tools, authority, time, and conditions that let ability be applied. The relationship is multiplicative, not additive. A skilled, eager technician without working equipment produces little. So does an able person with no motivation. So a shortfall must be attributed before it's treated as a motivation problem. Reach for an incentive, a pep talk, or a warning, and you've assumed the cause is motivation. If it's really a training gap or a broken machine, that won't work, and may do harm. Three questions sort it out. First, could they do the job if their life depended on it? If not, it's ability, and the remedy is selection, training, or coaching. Second, do they have the tools, information, authority, and time? If not, remove the obstacle. Only when both answers are yes is motivation the likely cause.

Worked Example

Larkfield Breads: 3 Shortfalls, 3 Causes

Larkfield Breads, a fictional bakery, shows the diagnosis at work. Its delivery driver has begun arriving late, and the manager assumes indifference. The driver is capable. But the loading dock now opens later, so the truck is loaded late. That's an opportunity problem, not a motivation problem. Now three bakers, all producing fewer loaves per shift than the standard. Nadia, six months in, was never shown the new dough divider. So she portions by hand. Could she do it if her life depended on it? No. The problem is ability. Owen is skilled, but a faulty oven thermostat makes him discard one batch in five. That's opportunity. Priya is skilled, has working equipment, and knows what's expected. Yet she does the minimum. Only in her case is motivation the likely explanation. Even then, the manager should ask, before assuming. The same incentive for all three would have helped neither of the first two.

Content Theories

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs

Motivation theories fall into two families. Content theories ask what people want. Process theories ask how motivation works. How people direct effort, and how consequences shape behavior. They complement each other. One says a person values recognition. The other, whether they think effort earns it. This section covers content theories, starting with Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs, from the nineteen forties. Physiological needs are bodily. At work, pay to live on, reasonable hours, and breaks. Safety needs appear as job security, safe conditions, and predictable treatment. Belongingness shows up in relationships with coworkers, team identity, and being included. Esteem means respect, from others and for oneself. Recognition, status, and competence in valued work. Self-actualization is the need to grow, and realize one's potential. Challenging assignments, creative freedom, development. Two principles follow. Prepotency says a need motivates only once the needs below it are reasonably met. And a satisfied need stops motivating. Once pay is adequate, more of it pulls less effort.

Evidence and Revision

From 5 Levels to 3

The evidence should be stated honestly. The hierarchy is influential, but poorly supported when tested. People don't reliably climb one step at a time, and the levels are hard to measure separately. Needs seem to operate together, in different proportions across people and situations. So it's better seen as a useful classification than a proven law of sequence. Its core insight still holds. An unmet basic need can crowd out attention to higher ones. Offer development to people worried their jobs won't exist next month, and expect disappointment. Clayton Alderfer revised the hierarchy into three levels. Existence, relatedness, and growth. Existence combines physiological and material safety needs. Relatedness combines belongingness with the respect of others. Growth combines the internal side of esteem with self-actualization. The revision drops strict prepotency, so more than one level can be active at once. It also adds frustration-regression. When a higher need is blocked, desire for a lower one grows. Someone blocked from growth may fixate on pay. Treat that as greed, and you'll miss the cause. Research support is mixed, but many managers will recognize the pattern.

Two-Factor Theory

Removing Dissatisfaction Isn't Motivating

Frederick Herzberg developed the two-factor theory in the nineteen fifties, from interviews with engineers and accountants. It claims satisfaction and dissatisfaction aren't one scale. They're separate dimensions, with different causes. Hygiene factors surround the job. Their absence produces dissatisfaction. Their presence only removes it. The name comes from public hygiene, which prevents disease without creating health. They include company policy, supervision, working conditions, coworker relationships, job security, status, and pay. Motivator factors are achievement, recognition, the work itself, responsibility, and advancement. The central claim is that removing dissatisfaction isn't the same as creating motivation. Fix the leaking roof, raise salaries, tidy the policies, and employees become merely not dissatisfied. To motivate, change the work. Something meaningful to achieve, responsibility for it, and recognition for success. Two cautions. The placement of pay is contested, since pay also signals recognition and achievement. And the method is criticized. People credit themselves for good experiences, and blame conditions for bad. That alone could produce the two lists. Other methods often fail to reproduce the split. Use it as a caution, not as an exact map of which factor belongs where.

Figure 9.1.1

3 Frameworks, Aligned

Lining the three frameworks up side by side shows where they agree, and where they don't. On the left, Maslow's five levels, from physiological needs at the bottom to self-actualization at the top. In the middle, Alderfer's three. Existence covers the bottom two levels. Relatedness covers belongingness, and the external side of esteem, the respect of others. Growth covers the internal side of esteem, and self-actualization. On the right, Herzberg. Hygiene lines up with the lower levels, motivators with the upper ones. Esteem straddles the shared boundary. Status sits with hygiene, while recognition sits with the motivators. So the frameworks broadly agree. Basic conditions and meaningful work are different things. But they disagree about whether needs form a strict ladder, so they aren't interchangeable.

Acquired Needs

Achievement, Affiliation, Power

David McClelland named three acquired needs, learned through experience and culture, and varying in strength by person. The need for achievement is the drive to excel, and meet high standards. People high in it prefer tasks of moderate difficulty, where success depends on their own effort. They want prompt, concrete feedback. Often strong individual contributors, they may prefer doing the work themselves. The need for affiliation is the desire for warm, close relationships, and acceptance. They prefer cooperation, and may avoid conflict, which makes unwelcome feedback hard to give. The need for power is the desire to influence others. It takes two forms. Personalized power seeks dominance for one's own status. Socialized power seeks influence for the group's goals. The key finding: socialized power has been reported to predict managerial effectiveness, better than achievement does. Management means getting results through other people, not doing everything personally. Since the needs are learned, training may develop them, though the workplace effect is less established. And the profiles describe patterns. Don't assume someone fits one without evidence from their own behavior.

Intrinsic and Extrinsic

When Rewards Can Backfire

Intrinsic motivation comes from the activity itself, because a person finds it interesting, enjoyable, or meaningful. Extrinsic motivation comes from separate consequences. Pay, bonuses, praise, promotion, or avoiding penalties. They aren't mutually exclusive. A physician can find the work meaningful, and also be paid for it. The question is whether adding one affects the other. In the crowding-out effect, an external reward reduces interest in a task people already find interesting. It has to be stated carefully, because it's conditional, not general. It tends to appear when the task is already interesting, and the reward is tangible and expected. Also when the reward is given just for doing the task, and feels controlling rather than informative. It isn't reported for dull tasks, where the reward is often the only reason to do them. And verbal praise that carries real information about competence often increases interest. The empirical debate is the effect's size at work, since much evidence comes from the laboratory. The normative debate is pay design. Rely on performance pay, or use it sparingly to protect meaning?

Applying the Theories

Halvorsen Support: 4 Questions

The theories work best read against one situation. Take Halvorsen Support, a fictional customer-service office. A reorganization left roles uncertain. Staff work hard, but morale is flat and transfer requests rise. The hierarchy of needs asks which level is unmet. Job security is in doubt, a safety need. So development offers will land poorly. The direct lever is saying clearly which roles will continue. Alderfer asks whether anyone's growth is blocked. Bruno, a long-serving agent, was promised a move into training. The reorganization removed that path, and now he asks about pay at every meeting. Find him another route to growth before considering a raise. The two-factor theory asks what's been changed, conditions or the work. Management improved the break room and made a one-time payment. Those are hygiene measures. Expect fewer complaints, not more enthusiasm. That needs work changes, like owning a customer's problem end to end. Acquired needs asks who responds to what. Freya, high in achievement, wants concrete targets and quick feedback. Ian, high in affiliation, feels the loss of his long-standing team, and may need it kept together. The four readings don't conflict. How people choose and compare is left to section nine point two.

Case Vignette (Composite)

The Raise That Changed Nothing

Here's a composite case. The organization and the person are fictional. Mateo directs operations at Larkin Freight Services. His dispatch team scores low on engagement, and feels unfulfilled. He acts on what he controls. Salaries rise, the break room is renovated, and old software replaced. Six months later, satisfaction with pay and facilities is up. Engagement hasn't moved, and the comments continue. He could conclude the team can't be pleased, raise pay again, or look at the work. His budget is mostly spent. It's visible spending on conditions, against slower, less certain job redesign. The reasoning turns on the hygiene-motivator distinction. Pay and facilities are hygiene factors. Improving them removed complaints, and raised satisfaction with those items. But they added no meaning to the job. Dispatchers followed others' routes, couldn't solve customer problems, and heard about their work only when it went wrong. To move engagement, Mateo has to change the work itself. More responsibility for outcomes. Recognition when a difficult shipment is rescued. A path to harder assignments.

About Business Essentials at UPI Study

Business Essentials (Business 100) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 24 chapters, from the business environment, economics and global markets to ownership, management, leadership, operations, people, marketing, accounting, finance and banking. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Business Essentials vs Principles of Management

Why take it here

Why students take Business Essentials with UPI Study

How a business works, end to endBusiness Essentials is a survey of how companies work: economic systems, global trade, forms of ownership, management and leadership, operations, human resources, marketing, accounting, finance and the banking system. It is a common first course in business, management and accounting degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Business Essentials carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Motivation in the Workplace: Theories, Types, and Examples

What are the three components of motivation?
Motivation has three components: direction, intensity, and persistence. Direction is what a person chooses to work on, intensity is how hard they work at it, and persistence is how long effort lasts when the task is hard or progress is slow. Each can fail separately and responds to different fixes: clarity improves direction, challenge and meaningful rewards raise intensity, and support and visible progress sustain persistence.
What is the performance equation in management?
The performance equation says performance depends on motivation, ability, and opportunity, combined multiplicatively rather than added together. A skilled, eager worker with broken equipment produces little, and so does an able person with no motivation. Before treating a shortfall as a motivation problem, ask whether the person could do the job if their life depended on it, which tests ability, and whether they have the tools, information, authority, and time, which tests opportunity.
What is the difference between hygiene factors and motivators in Herzberg's theory?
In Frederick Herzberg's two-factor theory, hygiene factors such as pay, supervision, company policy, working conditions, and job security prevent dissatisfaction but do not create motivation. Motivators such as achievement, recognition, the work itself, responsibility, and advancement generate motivation. So raising pay or fixing facilities may leave employees merely not dissatisfied. The theory is debated, partly because its interview method could produce the split and other methods often fail to reproduce it.
How does Alderfer's ERG theory differ from Maslow's hierarchy of needs?
Clayton Alderfer condensed Maslow's five levels into three: existence, relatedness, and growth. Maslow's prepotency principle says a need motivates only once lower needs are reasonably met, but ERG allows several levels to be active at once. ERG also adds frustration-regression: when a higher need such as growth is blocked, desire for a lower one, such as pay, can grow. Research support is weak for Maslow's strict sequence and mixed for ERG.

About the Business Essentials course

How many college credits is Business Essentials?
Business Essentials (Business 100) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Business Essentials cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 105 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Business Essentials take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 105 lessons total about 24 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Essentials.

105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Business Essentials →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Business Essentials
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →