UPI Study › Courses › Business Essentials › Free lessons › Lesson 1.6 Free with a free account
Ethics in Contemporary Business Conduct
Business Essentials · Chapter 1: The Business Environment and Ethical FoundationsSection 1.6 · lesson 6 of 10514 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Business Essentials.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Business Essentials
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Building an Ethical Framework: Compliance-Based versus Integrity-Based Approaches →← Exploring the Global Business Environment: A Detailed ExaminationNext lesson: Building an Ethical Framework: Compliance-Based versus Integrity-Based Approaches →
In this lesson
Why lawful is not the same as right, and how to reason through a hard call.
- Distinguish business ethics from legal compliance
- Describe four ethical frameworks by their questions
- Recognize common rationalizations and their counters
- Apply a seven-step process to a business decision
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,987 words). Read along, or search it.
The Business Environment and Ethical Foundations
Ethics in Contemporary Business Conduct
Most business wrongdoing does not start with a villain. It starts with a reasonable person under pressure. This section is about how to reason well when that pressure arrives. First, we separate ethics from the law, and see why the law is only a floor. Then we meet four ethical frameworks, each defined by the question it asks. We apply them to a fictional jacket maker with a faulty zip. We list the situations that keep recurring, and the rationalizations that make wrong conduct feel acceptable. Then comes a seven-step process for working through a hard decision. And we finish with a manager who has to object to a proposal that is perfectly legal.
Ethics And The Law
Compliance Is a Floor
Business ethics is the examination of right and wrong conduct in business decisions. It overlaps with the law, but it is not the same thing. Legal compliance means conforming to the laws and regulations that apply. It is a floor, not a standard. Conduct can be lawful, and still wrong. A business that asks only whether an action is legal has asked the minimum question. Law also tends to trail behavior. Practices are usually harmful for a while before legislators or courts respond. In that interval, the conduct a later law prohibits was lawful, and often widely practiced. So a business whose only test is the current law is following a standard known to lag. Why is ethics a business subject, and not only a personal one? Three features of business decisions explain it. They are made under pressure of time, targets, and competition. They are made within systems that spread responsibility so widely that nobody feels fully answerable. And they affect people who never consented, and were not in the room. Customers, employees, suppliers, and neighbors. Each feature weakens the ordinary moral checks between individuals. That is why business needs explicit ethical attention.
Legal, Ethical, Customary
Lawful and Common Are Not Enough
Here is a useful picture. Three overlapping circles, for what is legal, what is ethical, and what is customary. Customary simply means what people commonly do. The shaded areas are the uncomfortable ones. They hold actions that are lawful, or common, or both, yet sit outside the ethical circle. Picture two hypothetical actions that fall inside the legal circle, but outside the ethical one. And a third that is customary and nothing more. It has neither legal nor ethical standing, just habit. The lesson is direct. A practice can be lawful, common, or both, without being right. So neither legality nor custom can stand in for ethical judgment. Keep this picture in mind. Two of the most common rationalizations lean on exactly these circles.
Ethical Frameworks
Four Questions Worth Asking
Ethical frameworks are systematic approaches to deciding what is right. Each is best understood by the question it asks. Consequentialist reasoning asks which course produces the greatest overall benefit, counting everyone affected. Its strength is attention to real effects. Its difficulty is that benefits and harms are hard to measure and compare. And it may permit serious harm to a few, if the total benefit is large. Duty-based reasoning asks what obligations and rights are engaged, regardless of outcome. Promises made, honesty owed, rights respected. It protects individuals from being sacrificed to totals. But duties can conflict, and it may seem to ignore results. Virtue reasoning asks what a person of good character would do. It focuses on who you become through repeated choices. Its difficulty is that the answer depends on shared views of what good character is. Justice reasoning asks whether benefits and burdens are fairly distributed. Are like cases treated alike? Did those bearing costs have a say? The frameworks usually agree. The hard cases are when they do not. Laying off some staff to save the remaining jobs may satisfy consequentialist reasoning, since more people keep their livelihoods. But duty points to promises made to those let go, and justice asks whether the choice of who goes is fair. No framework gives a mechanical answer. They make the considerations visible, so you cannot attend to only one.
Table 1.6.1
Kestrel Outfitters and the Faulty Zip
Now apply all four to one decision. Kestrel Outfitters is a fictional maker of outdoor jackets. It learns that a batch has a zip that may fail in cold weather. The risk of injury is low. But the jackets would then be unusable in exactly the conditions they are sold for. It is unclear whether any law requires a recall. And replacing them would consume a large share of the season's profit. Consequentialist reasoning weighs replacement cost against harm to customers, and the lasting loss of trust. It likely favors notifying and replacing. Duty-based reasoning notes the implied promise that the jackets work as described, and the honesty owed. Notify, and offer a remedy. Virtue reasoning asks what an honest, responsible maker would do. It would not let customers discover the defect in the field. Justice reasoning sees customers bearing a defect they could not see, while the company keeps the revenue. A remedy is owed, though its size is debatable. So all four lean toward notification and a remedy, by different routes, and with different reservations. When the frameworks agree, confidence rises. A business that finds all four pointing one way should need strong reasons to act otherwise.
Recurring Situations
Where Ethical Problems Keep Appearing
Certain ethical situations arise so often in business that they can be listed. A conflict of interest exists when a private interest, like a financial stake or a family tie, could improperly influence a business decision. Honesty in marketing and reporting asks whether claims to customers, investors, and regulators are truthful, and complete. Treatment of employees concerns fairness in pay, safety, discipline, and dismissal. Supplier and customer relationships concern fair dealing, including keeping promises about payment and quality. Use of information concerns how confidential and personal information is obtained, protected, and used. And then there is the unmeetable target. A goal can only be reached by cutting corners. So the person responsible must choose between failing, and acting improperly. That last situation is among the most frequent sources of wrongdoing. The next subchapter returns to it.
Rationalizations
Five Reasons That Feel Acceptable
People who act wrongly rarely see their conduct as wrong at the time. They get there through a rationalization, a reason that makes questionable conduct feel acceptable. Five are common, and each has a counter. It is legal treats the floor as the standard. Ask whether you could defend the action if those affected understood it. Everyone does it treats custom as justification. But a practice does not become right by being common. Nobody will be harmed assumes harm is visible and immediate. Identify who bears the cost, including those not present. It is not my responsibility uses the division of labor to dissolve accountability. The counter is to ask what you would do if the matter were your own. It is for the good of the business confuses the organization's interest with the standard of conduct. The counter is that a business benefiting from wrongdoing is usually borrowing against its own future. Each one sounds reasonable in the moment. That is precisely why they work.
Application
The Year-End Gift Basket
Here is a rationalization at work. A purchasing officer at a fictional firm is offered an expensive gift basket, by a supplier whose contract is up for renewal. The officer thinks it through. Everyone in the department accepts something at year end. The gift breaks no rule the officer can find. And the supplier would be offended by a refusal. Three rationalizations are working at once. Everyone does it, it is legal, and nobody will be harmed. Now ask the questions directly. Would the firm's other suppliers see the renewal as fairly decided, if they knew about the gift? Would the officer accept it, if someone else were making the renewal decision on the officer's behalf? The answers show a real harm, even though no single person can point to it. The harm is to the confidence of every other supplier in the fairness of the process.
A Structured Process
Seven Steps Through a Hard Decision
A structured process reduces the pull of pressure and rationalization. It has seven steps. First, identify the decision and who is affected, including those with no voice in it. Second, gather the facts, separating what is known from what is assumed. Third, name the obligations in conflict, whether legal, contractual, or moral. Fourth, generate options. A choice framed as one of two is often a failure to look for a third. Fifth, test the options against the frameworks, and against two simple checks. Would the decision be comfortable if made public? Would it be acceptable if you were on the receiving end? Sixth, decide. Seventh, document the reasoning. That lets you check it, and lets others review it. The process does not remove judgment. It puts judgment to work on the whole problem.
Kestrel, Step By Step
Testing the Options
Run the Kestrel zip decision through the process. Those affected include customers holding the jackets, retailers who sold them, employees whose seasonal work depends on the company, and the owners. The facts to gather are how many jackets, how likely the zip is to fail, under what conditions, and what the law actually requires. The obligations in conflict are honesty to customers, preserving the business employees depend on, and any legal reporting duty. Four options emerge. A full recall and replacement. A voluntary repair offer on request. A public notice with a refund. And silence until complaints arrive. Silence is worth writing down, because it is the option a pressured manager most often drifts into, without ever choosing it. Testing shows that silence fails both the public-disclosure check and the fairness check. A repair offer on request may reach only the customers who happen to notice the problem. The decision is made, and the reasoning recorded, including the facts that were uncertain. If the zip later fails less often than feared, the decision was still a good one. It was sound on the information available. A good decision is sound reasoning on the information reasonably available. A good outcome is a favorable result. Judge decisions only by outcomes, and you reward recklessness when it succeeds, and punish care when it fails.
Speaking Up
Between Silence and Protest
What if you believe a decision is wrong? The options lie between silence and public protest. You can raise the concern with the decision-maker, and propose an alternative. You can seek advice from a manager further up. You can use an internal reporting channel, or consult legal or compliance staff. Some laws protect certain reports from retaliation. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of two thousand two, for instance, protects employees of publicly traded companies who report certain kinds of fraud. Many states have protections of their own. But the scope of such protections is often narrow, and it varies. So anyone considering a report should find out what applies, before acting. The case that follows shows these steps taken in order.
Case Vignette
The Lawful Proposal
Leila is a regional sales manager at a fictional distribution firm. Her director proposes ending a long-standing agreement with a small local supplier, using a clause that permits termination on notice. The timing is the point. It lands just before an annual volume rebate the firm has led the supplier to expect. The saving is material to the supplier. Counsel confirms the clause permits it, so the proposal is lawful. Leila believes it is wrong. To say so, she needs more than a feeling. She works the process. The supplier and its employees are affected, and the firm's past conduct created a reasonable expectation. The obligations in conflict with the saving are the duty of fair dealing, and the firm's stated values. She frames her objection as a question. What would the firm say if the supplier asked why that timing was chosen? She takes it to her director first, in writing. She proposes paying the rebate pro rata, and ending the agreement on longer notice. If that failed, she would go to the director's manager, and then, if necessary, to the reporting channel. Whatever her director decides, Leila has made a good decision to act. Lawful was never the question. Fair was.
About Business Essentials at UPI Study
Business Essentials (Business 100) is a self-paced online course of 105 video lessons in 24 chapters, from the business environment, economics and global markets to ownership, management, leadership, operations, people, marketing, accounting, finance and banking. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Business Essentials with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Business Essentials carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Ethics in Contemporary Business Conduct
What is the difference between business ethics and legal compliance?
What are the four main ethical frameworks used in business decisions?
What are common rationalizations for unethical behavior at work?
What are the steps of an ethical decision-making process?
About the Business Essentials course
How many college credits is Business Essentials?
How much does Business Essentials cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Business Essentials take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Business Essentials.
105 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →