Assessing the Impact of Business Globalisation, Explained

UPI Study › Courses › Foundations of Leadership › Free lessons › Lesson 12.10 Free with a free account

Assessing the Impact of Business Globalisation

Foundations of Leadership · Chapter 12: Global Leadership ModuleSection 12.10 · lesson 90 of 9011 min · free with a free account

← Doing the Right Thing Abroad: Navigating Ethical Minefields

Earn 3 college credits for Foundations of LeadershipRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 205 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Foundations of Leadership · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

The economic, social and environmental ledger - and what it asks of a global leader.

  • Evaluate the economic case and its distributional record
  • Examine social, cultural and labour critiques
  • Assess CSR and ESG as institutional responses
  • Synthesise the chapter's claim about responsible leadership

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,454 words). Read along, or search it.

Global Leadership Module

Assessing the Impact of Business Globalisation

Globalisation is usually argued about as if it had a single verdict. The evidence does not support one, and this section explains why. Business globalisation is the increasing economic integration of national markets. Through cross-border flows of goods, services, capital, technology and people. It has been the defining economic phenomenon of the past four decades. This is the final section of the chapter, so it does two jobs. It takes stock of globalisation's economic, social and environmental impact. And it draws the chapter's themes together into one claim about the global leader's role.

The Ledger

Two Accounts of the Same Four Decades

Start with the two accounts, stated fairly. Proponents credit globalisation with unprecedented poverty reduction. With technology diffusion, and with elevated living standards. Critics attribute to it widening inequality and cultural homogenisation. Environmental degradation. And the erosion of national sovereignty. It would be convenient if one of those lists were simply wrong. Neither is. Both accounts are supported by evidence. Which changes the shape of the question we should be asking. The honest assessment is not a verdict on globalisation as such. It is an accounting of who received which effect.

Economics

Growth in Aggregate, Losses in Particular

The economic case rests primarily on Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage. Nations benefit by specialising where their opportunity cost is relatively lower, and trading for the rest. Empirical evidence broadly supports the proposition that globalisation contributed to growth and poverty reduction. The clearest case is East and Southeast Asia. Export-led growth strategies, anchored by foreign direct investment. Drove dramatic improvements in living standards, from the nineteen seventies onward. But the distributional effects within countries have been highly unequal. Autor, Dorn and Hanson, in twenty thirteen, studied what became known as the China shock. They documented significant and persistent negative effects. On workers in exposed manufacturing industries, and on their communities. Persistent is the word that matters in that finding. These were not adjustment costs that resolved themselves over a cycle. That research contributed to the political polarisation and trade protectionism of the late twenty-tens. Aggregate gains were real. They simply did not reach the people who carried the losses.

Where It Lands

Investment Does Not Arrive Evenly

Global foreign direct investment does not arrive evenly. The source ranks the regions, and the ordering is consistent. Developed economies receive the largest share, by a wide margin. East and Southeast Asia follow closely, driven by export-led growth. Then Latin America, and then South Asia. Then the Middle East and North Africa. And finally Sub-Saharan Africa, the smallest. One caution about the figures themselves, which is worth being open about. The source labels these values as US dollars in billions, in its caption. But it prints them with percent signs. Those two things cannot both be true, so no unit is quoted here. What the figure reliably shows is the ordering. And the ordering is the point. Globalisation is often discussed as a single global condition. The capital flows say otherwise.

Culture

Exchange, or Displacement

Move from economics to culture, where the same phenomenon reads two ways. Cultural globalisation is the worldwide spread of cultural products, values and practices. It is associated with increased cross-cultural exchange. And with the diffusion of human rights norms across borders. Critics look at the same flow and describe cultural imperialism. They point to the dominance of United States and Western cultural products in global media markets. And to the displacement of local cultures, languages and values. By those of economically more powerful nations. Notice that the two readings are not describing different events. They describe the same distribution channel. And they disagree about what happens to a society when things travel along it.

Labour

The Same Investment, Two Records

Labour rights are the second social dimension, and the record there is genuinely double-sided. Multinational investment in low-wage countries has been associated with improved formal sector employment. And with technology transfer into the host economy. The same investment has also been associated with exploitative working conditions. With suppression of union organising. And with regulatory arbitrage. That last term deserves precision, because it names something deliberate. Regulatory arbitrage is the relocation of production to jurisdictions with weaker standards. Weaker labour, environmental or tax standards, specifically. It is not an accident of geography or an unfortunate market outcome. It is a sourcing decision, made with the consequence known in advance.

Environment

The Relationship Runs Both Ways

Environmental impact is where the assessment gets hardest to summarise honestly. Globalisation has contributed to degradation through the carbon intensity of global supply chains. Through the relocation of polluting production to so-called pollution haven countries. And through the resource extraction required to fuel industrialisation in emerging markets. And yet the relationship is genuinely complex, in a way that cuts the other direction. Multinationals typically introduce cleaner technologies than local producers do. And global supply chain scrutiny has driven significant environmental performance improvements. In supplier industries that faced no such scrutiny before. Holding both of those at once is the discipline this whole section is teaching. An account that reports only one of those columns is advocacy. It is not assessment.

Responsibility

Power Without a Matching Regulator

Corporate social responsibility takes on heightened significance in the global context. And there is a specific structural reason for that. Multinationals frequently operate with greater economic power than the host-country governments. The governments that are nominally responsible for regulating them. When the regulated party is more powerful than the regulator, external constraint weakens. Carroll's four-part pyramid, from nineteen ninety-one, is the foundational framework. Economic responsibilities at the base. Then legal. Then ethical, meaning conduct beyond what the law requires. And philanthropic at the top, meaning voluntary contribution. Contemporary scholars argue that pyramid is no longer demanding enough. They call for a standard commensurate with global multinational power. And the power asymmetry we just described is exactly their reason.

Market Response

New Incentives, and a Serious Objection

Two institutional responses have emerged, and both carry a serious objection. Environmental, social and governance frameworks are the first. They created new market mechanisms for incentivising responsible behaviour. Investors evaluating the non-financial performance and risk profile of organisations. The second is the Business Roundtable's statement on the purpose of a corporation, in twenty nineteen. Signed by one hundred and eighty-one chief executives. It marked a significant shift from shareholder primacy toward multi-stakeholder responsibility. The source calls that shift rhetorical, and the word is chosen carefully. Because critics argue that ESG frameworks have been captured by corporate interests. That they function as greenwashing. Masking the structural harms of globalisation rather than correcting them. That critique is not settled, and a serious student of this material should hold it open.

The Arc

From Impact to Leadership Response

It helps to see the whole assessment as a sequence rather than a list. Economic impact comes first. Growth, and its distribution. Social impact second. Labour rights, and culture. Environmental impact third. Carbon, and regulation. Then the corporate social responsibility response. ESG frameworks, and stakeholder models. And finally global leadership, whose job is to integrate and to account. That last stage is not a summary of the other four. It is where the responsibility for them actually sits.

Case

Patagonia: An Existence Proof, Not a Template

Patagonia is the closing case, and it is offered carefully rather than admiringly. The California outdoor clothing company was founded by Yvon Chouinard in nineteen seventy-three. It has systematically prioritised environmental and social mission alongside commercial performance. In twenty twenty-two, Chouinard transferred ownership to a charitable trust and a non-profit organisation. Donating an estimated three billion dollars in value to climate and environmental causes. He described Earth as now our only shareholder. Its supply chain practices set industry standards for transparency and labour rights. It publishes its full supplier list. It conducts independent audits. And it works actively with suppliers to improve wages and conditions. Rather than simply switching to a cheaper alternative supplier when problems appear. That last practice is the substantive one, and the most costly. The source is explicit that this approach is not universally replicable. What it offers is an existence proof. That commercial success and deep social and environmental commitment are not inherently in conflict.

Synthesis

The Assessment Is an Assessment of Leadership

The themes of this chapter converge on one integrative proposition. Effective global leadership is inseparable from responsible global leadership. And the argument for that is not moral exhortation. It is about overlap. The qualities that make leaders effective across cultural and geographic complexity. Global mindset. Cultural intelligence. Cross-cultural communication competence. Ethical integrity. And inclusive management. Those are the same qualities that enable organisations to contribute positively to the societies they operate in. So the assessment of globalisation's impact becomes an assessment of the quality of global leadership. Where multinational activity shows genuine respect for local cultures. Equitable treatment of host-country workers, and transparent ethical conduct. With community investment alongside commercial performance. The balance of globalisation's impacts tends toward positive. Read that carefully, because it is a claim about variance, not an absolution. It says the outcome is not fixed by globalisation itself. It is decided, market by market, by how the organisation is actually led.

About Foundations of Leadership at UPI Study

Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) is a self-paced online course of 90 video lessons in 12 chapters, from the roots of leadership theory and the trait, situational and transformational approaches to power, decision-making, communication, teams, conflict, diversity and global leadership. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB

Why take it here

Why students take Foundations of Leadership with UPI Study

What makes people follow a leaderFoundations of Leadership covers the main theories of leadership and how leaders use power, make decisions, communicate, build teams and handle conflict. It is a common course in business, management and organizational leadership degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Foundations of Leadership carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Assessing the Impact of Business Globalisation

What are the positive and negative effects of globalization?
Globalization has clear benefits and real costs. Supporters credit it with major poverty reduction, technology diffusion, and higher living standards, especially through export-led growth in East and Southeast Asia from the 1970s onward. Critics point to widening inequality, cultural homogenization, environmental damage, and weakened national sovereignty. Evidence supports both accounts, so a useful assessment asks who received which effects rather than delivering a single verdict.
What is the China shock in economics?
The China shock refers to the effects of rising Chinese import competition on American manufacturing workers and their communities, documented by David Autor, David Dorn, and Gordon Hanson in 2013. They found significant and persistent job and wage losses in exposed industries and regions, rather than short adjustment costs that quickly faded. The research showed that the aggregate gains from trade did not reach many of the people who bore the losses.
Is globalization good or bad for the environment?
Globalization has both harmed and helped the environment. It has contributed to degradation through carbon-intensive global supply chains, the relocation of polluting production to countries with weaker standards, and the resource extraction that fuels industrialization in emerging markets. Yet multinationals often introduce cleaner technologies than local producers, and scrutiny of global supply chains has driven environmental improvements in supplier industries. An honest assessment weighs both effects instead of reporting only one.
What is regulatory arbitrage in global business?
Regulatory arbitrage is exploiting differences between countries' rules, for example by relocating production to jurisdictions with weaker labor, environmental, or tax standards. Used this way, it is a deliberate sourcing decision rather than an accident of geography. On the environmental side, it is linked to so-called pollution havens, where polluting production moves to countries with looser rules. Critics see it as one way globalization can lower protections for workers and the environment.

About the Foundations of Leadership course

How many college credits is Foundations of Leadership?
Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Foundations of Leadership cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 90 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Foundations of Leadership take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 90 lessons total about 16 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Foundations of Leadership.

90 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Foundations of Leadership →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Foundations of Leadership
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →