Doing the Right Thing Abroad: Navigating Ethical Minefields

UPI Study › Courses › Foundations of Leadership › Free lessons › Lesson 12.9 Free with a free account

Doing the Right Thing Abroad: Navigating Ethical Minefields

Foundations of Leadership · Chapter 12: Global Leadership ModuleSection 12.9 · lesson 89 of 9011 min · free with a free account

← Resolving Conflicts in International BusinessNext lesson: Assessing the Impact of Business Globalisation →

Earn 3 college credits for Foundations of LeadershipRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 205 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Foundations of Leadership · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

When home-country ethics, host-country practice and the law all point different ways.

  • Contrast ethical relativism with ethical universalism
  • Explain integrative social contracts theory and hypernorms
  • Distinguish bribery from facilitation payments in law
  • Apply practical tests to cross-cultural ethical dilemmas

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,425 words). Read along, or search it.

Global Leadership Module

Doing the Right Thing Abroad

A shipment is sitting at customs. It is time-sensitive. An official explains that a standard payment will move it along today rather than next week. The payment is routine locally. It may be a crime under two laws that follow your company abroad. International business confronts leaders with ethical challenges domestic operations rarely produce. This section covers the two classic positions on cross-cultural ethics, and the theory that reconciles them. The legal treatment of bribery and facilitation payments. Supply chain labour standards. And three practical tests you can apply under pressure.

The Terrain

Three Ways the Ground Shifts

The difficulty here comes from operating across several frameworks at once. Legal, cultural and institutional, simultaneously. Three kinds of situation follow, and they are distinct problems. First, home-country ethical norms conflict with host-country practices. Second, legal behaviour and ethical behaviour diverge. Third, competing stakeholder interests generate moral dilemmas with no clearly right answer. That second one defeats a purely legal approach, and it is worth dwelling on. Staying within the law of every jurisdiction you operate in is necessary. It is not sufficient, and it does not settle the question of what you should do. Compliance answers a different question than ethics does.

Two Positions

Relativism and Universalism, and Why Neither Holds

Two philosophical positions frame the debate, and both are held sincerely. Ethical relativism holds that moral standards are culturally constructed. And that they vary legitimately across societies. In practice, adapt fully to local norms. Ethical universalism holds that certain moral principles apply regardless of cultural context. Typically derived from human rights frameworks, utilitarian calculus, or Kantian deontology. In practice, apply home standards globally. Each position fails at its own edge, and the failures are serious. Relativism justifies harmful practices, simply by pointing at local acceptance. If it is normal here, the argument goes, then it is permissible here. Universalism risks cultural imperialism. Exporting home-country standards as though they were self-evident to everyone. That is not a stalemate to be split down the middle. It is the problem the next framework was built specifically to solve.

The Resolution

Hypernorms Set the Floor. Local Norms Fill the Room.

Integrative social contracts theory comes from Donaldson and Dunfee, in nineteen ninety-four. It proposes that ethical obligations arise at two levels, rather than one. At the macro level there is a hypernorm contract. It establishes universal minimum standards. Prohibiting forced labour. Prohibiting fundamental deception. At the micro level there are community contracts. These establish context-specific norms, and they are genuinely binding within that community. But with one condition attached. Provided they do not violate a macro-level hypernorm. A hypernorm is defined as a principle so fundamental it takes precedence over any culturally specific norm. Which is what makes this more than a compromise between the two earlier positions. Cultural variation is respected, and respected seriously. But only above a floor that is not open to negotiation.

Four Frameworks

What Each One Costs You

Four frameworks are available for international ethical decision-making. Compare them by their limitations. Ethical relativism says morality is cultural. Adapt fully to local norms. Its limitation is that it justifies harmful practices. Ethical universalism says there are universal moral laws. Apply home standards globally. Its limitation is the risk of cultural imperialism. Integrative social contracts combines hypernorms with local contracts. Local norms within universal limits. Its limitation is that it is complex to operationalise. And stakeholder ethics balances all stakeholder interests, producing context-sensitive decisions. Its limitation is that competing interests are hard to resolve. Read that third column rather than the second one. Every framework on this list has a known failure mode. Choosing one is choosing which failure you have signed up to watch for.

Corruption

The Payment That Is Not Called a Bribe

Corruption is defined here as the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. And it is among the most pervasive ethical challenges in international business. Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index shows enormous cross-national variation in levels. Within that, a distinction is often drawn, and it deserves scrutiny. Bribery means payments to induce a favour beyond what is legally required. A facilitation payment is different in principle. It is a small payment to expedite a routine government action the payer is already legally entitled to. You are not buying an outcome. You are buying the speed of an outcome that was owed to you. That distinction is legally and ethically contested. It is not a settled carve-out that a manager can rely on. Different jurisdictions draw the boundary in different places. And the person standing at the customs desk is the one carrying the ambiguity.

Two Statutes

Extraterritorial Reach, Different Answers

Two statutes dominate this area, and they do not agree with each other. The United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, from nineteen seventy-seven. And the United Kingdom Bribery Act, from twenty ten. The UK Act prohibits facilitation payments entirely. Both have extraterritorial reach, and that phrase carries the practical weight. It means the law of a country you are not standing in, can still govern the payment you are asked for. So the operative question for a multinational is not what is normal in this market. It is that two home jurisdictions may already have answered the question for you. And they have not answered it identically. Which leaves a firm one workable internal rule. The stricter of the two. Not out of virtue, but because it is the only standard that holds in every place it operates.

Supply Chains

Standards That Nobody Local Is Required to Meet

The globalisation of production created a second cluster of ethical problems, in supply chains. Global leaders must ensure suppliers across multiple countries meet ethical standards. Prohibition of forced and child labour. Safe working conditions. Freedom of association. And here is the difficulty. Those standards may not be legally mandated in the supplier's own jurisdiction. So compliance with local law is, again, not the same thing as meeting the standard. The Rana Plaza garment factory in Bangladesh collapsed in twenty thirteen. It killed over eleven hundred workers. The disaster exposed the human cost of inadequate supply chain ethical oversight. And it catalysed the Bangladesh Accord on Fire and Building Safety. That was a legally binding agreement between global brands and trade unions. It marked a new standard for corporate supply chain responsibility. Notice precisely what changed there. Not the sentiment. Voluntary codes had existed throughout. What changed was enforceability.

Practical Tests

Three Tools You Can Actually Use

Three practical frameworks help a leader apply judgement under time pressure. The newspaper front page test is the first. Would this decision be reported as unethical in a major international newspaper? It surfaces reputational risk, and tests whether a decision can withstand public scrutiny. Stakeholder impact analysis is the second. Systematically map the potential harm and benefit to all affected stakeholders. And specifically ensure that less powerful stakeholders are not made invisible in the mapping. International standards alignment is the third. Benchmark against the UN Global Compact, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. And the ILO Core Labour Standards. These give authoritative reference points rather than opinions. The second test exists because the first one has a blind spot worth naming. A front page reports what is visible and newsworthy. Harm to stakeholders with no voice and no press coverage passes that test comfortably.

Case

Siemens: Bribery as Business Development

In two thousand and eight, Siemens reached a settlement of one point six billion dollars. With United States and German authorities. At the time, it was the largest corporate corruption settlement in history. It followed a decade-long investigation into systematic bribery of government officials. Across Argentina, Bangladesh, Iraq, Nigeria, Venezuela and other countries. The mechanics matter, because they rule out the convenient explanation. Slush funds and shell companies channelled hundreds of millions in bribes to secure public contracts. This was not a handful of rogue individuals. Bribery had been institutionalised as a business development strategy. The ethical failure was one of organisational culture. The second half of the case is the rehabilitation, under chief executive Peter Loscher. Four thousand compliance officers. Mandatory ethics training. And an independent compliance monitor. It is widely regarded as the most comprehensive corporate ethics rehabilitation in history.

Consolidate

The Floor Is Fixed. The Room Above It Is Negotiable.

Draw the section together. Legal compliance is necessary here, and it is not sufficient. Integrative social contracts theory resolves the relativism debate pragmatically. Universal hypernorms, with legitimate cultural variation inside those limits. One counter-argument deserves a hearing rather than a dismissal. Critics argue that applying home-country ethical standards to global supply chains is economic imperialism. That it disadvantages developing-country suppliers who did not write those standards. Hypernorms answer part of that objection. They do not dissolve it. And Siemens is the reason a code of conduct is not the answer on its own. Siemens ran slush funds and shell companies while presenting itself as a rule-following firm. What changed the behaviour afterwards was structure. Dedicated compliance staff, mandatory training, and an independent monitor with standing to actually look.

About Foundations of Leadership at UPI Study

Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) is a self-paced online course of 90 video lessons in 12 chapters, from the roots of leadership theory and the trait, situational and transformational approaches to power, decision-making, communication, teams, conflict, diversity and global leadership. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB

Why take it here

Why students take Foundations of Leadership with UPI Study

What makes people follow a leaderFoundations of Leadership covers the main theories of leadership and how leaders use power, make decisions, communicate, build teams and handle conflict. It is a common course in business, management and organizational leadership degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Foundations of Leadership carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Doing the Right Thing Abroad: Navigating Ethical Minefields

What is the difference between ethical relativism and ethical universalism?
Ethical relativism holds that moral standards are culturally constructed and vary legitimately, so a business should adapt to local norms, while ethical universalism holds that certain moral principles apply everywhere, so home standards should be applied globally. Each fails at its edge: relativism can justify harmful practices simply because they are locally accepted, and universalism risks cultural imperialism by exporting home-country standards as if they were self-evident.
What is integrative social contracts theory?
Integrative social contracts theory, proposed by Thomas Donaldson and Thomas Dunfee in 1994, holds that ethical obligations exist at two levels. Hypernorms are universal minimum standards, such as prohibitions on forced labor and fundamental deception, that take precedence over any local norm. Community norms are context-specific rules that are genuinely binding within a community, provided they do not violate a hypernorm. The theory respects cultural variation above a floor that is not negotiable.
Are facilitation payments allowed under the FCPA and the UK Bribery Act?
The two laws differ: the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 contains a narrow exception for facilitating payments for routine government actions, while the UK Bribery Act 2010 prohibits facilitation payments entirely. A facilitation payment is a small payment to speed up a routine action the payer is already entitled to, such as customs clearance. Both laws reach conduct abroad, so many multinationals adopt the stricter rule and ban such payments everywhere.
What practical tests help managers make ethical decisions abroad?
Three tests help. The newspaper front page test asks whether a decision would be reported as unethical by a major international newspaper. Stakeholder impact analysis maps harm and benefit to everyone affected, so less powerful stakeholders are not overlooked. International standards alignment benchmarks the decision against the UN Global Compact, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, and the ILO core labor standards. The second test covers a blind spot of the first, since harm to voiceless groups rarely makes headlines.

About the Foundations of Leadership course

How many college credits is Foundations of Leadership?
Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Foundations of Leadership cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 90 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Foundations of Leadership take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 90 lessons total about 16 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Foundations of Leadership.

90 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Foundations of Leadership →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Foundations of Leadership
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →