UPI Study › Courses › Foundations of Leadership › Free lessons › Lesson 8.4 Free with a free account
Strategic and Managerial Communication
Foundations of Leadership · Chapter 8: Communication ModuleSection 8.4 · lesson 51 of 9011 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Foundations of Leadership.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Foundations of Leadership
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Communication Skills for Effective Leadership →← Workplace and Organizational CommunicationNext lesson: Communication Skills for Effective Leadership →
In this lesson
Which messages deserve craft, which deserve efficiency, and what it costs to confuse the two.
- Separate strategic communication from routine
- Name the five recurring tasks of managers
- Align message, channel and audience deliberately
- Apply crisis principles before the crisis arrives
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,449 words). Read along, or search it.
Communication Module
Strategic and Managerial Communication
Most workplace communication is routine. Status updates, instructions, brief exchanges that keep the work moving. A smaller proportion is strategic. Communication consciously designed to shape decisions, behaviours and perceptions. The distinction matters for a practical reason. Strategic communication rewards the investment of time and craft that routine communication does not. And failing to notice which is which produces a very recognisable pattern. Important communications conducted casually. And casual ones consuming the attention that should have gone to the important ones.
The Distinction
Three Things That Make a Message Strategic
Strategic communication differs from routine communication in three specific respects. First, it has a specific intended effect. To shift a belief, secure a decision, change a behaviour, build or repair trust. Second, it is designed with the audience in mind. It attends to what the receiver already knows, believes, and cares about. Rather than to what the sender finds easiest to express. That is a real discipline. Third, it is iterative. It is conceived as a campaign, not as a single transmission. With attention to reinforcement, repetition through varied channels, and feedback on whether it worked. Notice that none of the three is about writing more clearly.
The Trade
Efficiency Versus Effect
The two kinds of communication are governed by different things entirely. Routine communication is governed by efficiency. The goal is to convey the message at minimal cost and friction. Strategic communication is governed by effect. The goal is to produce the intended change in the receiver. Even when that takes more effort, more channels, and more iteration than efficiency would justify. The error runs in both directions. Treating routine messages strategically wastes time. Treating strategic messages routinely wastes opportunity. The second is far more expensive. It is also far less visible. Nobody files a complaint about a strategic message that was merely sent.
Five Tasks
Managerial Communication Is Not One Activity
Managers communicate constantly, but that constant activity breaks into a small number of recurring tasks. Directing translates organisational priorities into specific expectations for your people. Informing keeps the team aware of the wider context their work sits in. Decisions made above their level, signals from customers, developments in the market. Consulting surfaces the team's knowledge and judgement to improve decisions that affect them. Feedback tells people candidly and constructively how they are doing against expectations. And representing means speaking for the team to the rest of the organisation. And for the organisation back to the team. Treating them as one is why managers who are strong at some are silently weak at others.
Failure Modes
Each Task Fails in Its Own Way
Each of the five fails in its own characteristic way. Directing fails when expectations are unclear, conflicting, or set without any context. Informing fails through over-sharing or under-sharing. Both corrode trust, in quite different ways. Consulting fails when the team senses the decision is already made. At that point the consultation is ceremonial, and everyone knows it. Feedback fails through avoidance, or vagueness. Or, at the opposite extreme, through bluntness untempered by care. Representing fails when the manager carries one set of messages to the team. And a different set to peers and superiors. None of those are failures of clarity. Every one of them can occur in a message that is beautifully written. They are failures of purpose, not of expression.
Reframe
Communication Is Not a Cost Line
Many organisations treat communication as a cost. Something to be done efficiently, minimised where possible, squeezed when budgets tighten. The framing is simply mistaken. Communication is among the highest-leverage investments an organisation can make. Because the cost of getting it wrong compounds across every subsequent decision. And the value of getting it right amplifies every other capability the organisation has. Reframe it as investment and the calculus changes. Time spent crafting an important message is not overhead. It is capital expenditure. And the right comparison is not against the time you saved by speaking briefly. It is against the cost of being misunderstood. That shift in framing is among the most consequential a leader can make.
Under Pressure
Crisis Communication
Crisis conditions amplify every difficulty of ordinary communication, and add several more. Time is compressed. Information is incomplete. And small missteps acquire disproportionate consequences. The discipline of crisis communication has been developed over decades. Writers including Timothy Coombs and Steven Fink distilled a set of principles. Act early rather than late. Communicate even when you do not yet have all the facts. Acknowledge explicitly what is not yet known. Speak with a single, consistent voice. Address those most affected first. And commit to specific subsequent communications, then actually meet those commitments. All of them are difficult to execute under real pressure. Which is precisely why crisis communication is rehearsed before the crisis arrives.
Audiences
Every Significant Message Has More Than One Audience
Beyond outright crisis sits the broader discipline of stakeholder communication. Any significant organisational message reaches multiple audiences. Employees, customers, investors, regulators, partners, the public. A message designed for one of them reaches the others, often within hours. So effective stakeholder communication maps the audiences before crafting the message. Then it asks what each of them will hear in the same words. The words do not change. What they mean to each audience does. Then it adjusts, so no audience is alienated by what was said mainly to another. One caution matters here. This does not mean saying different things to different audiences. That approach corrodes trust the moment it is discovered, and it usually is discovered. It means designing a single message with the full audience map in view.
Alignment
Message, Channel, Cadence
Strategic communication depends on aligning three things. The message, the channel, and the audience. Strategic direction or change needs a cascaded face-to-face effort, plus written reinforcement, repeated. Sent by email alone, it produces confusion, rumour and low adoption. Performance feedback belongs in a one-on-one conversation, soon after the event. Delivered in writing, or delayed, it produces defensiveness and missed development. A routine update belongs in a written channel, batched if possible. Given a meeting, it consumes attention that had better uses. Crisis or sensitive news needs a live channel first, with written confirmation after. Written first, it damages trust and escalates. One question settles most of these before you send anything. Was this channel chosen because it fits the message and the audience? Or because it was convenient for the sender?
The Model
Strategy Communication Is a Campaign
Most strategies that fail were not poorly conceived. They were poorly communicated. Employees did not know what was new. Or did not see the leadership behaviours that would have signalled real commitment. Or did not get the reinforcement that sustains behaviour change past the announcement. Each of those is a communication failure. And each is correctable. Which is why the communication of strategy is not a single act but a sustained pattern. It is announced clearly, so people know what has changed. It is translated into local terms by each layer of management. It is reinforced through repeated reference in everyday decisions. And it is demonstrated through visible leadership behaviour. That last stage is what confirms the strategy is real rather than rhetorical. Skip any one of those and the probability of execution falls substantially. Organisations that take execution seriously treat communication as part of the strategy. Not as the afterthought that follows it.
Case
The Restructure That Was Communicated Three Times
An industrial manufacturer facing a difficult restructuring did something unusual. It communicated the restructuring three times rather than once. The first was a same-day face-to-face cascade. Site visits by senior leaders, town halls, and small-group discussions. With carefully prepared talking points, and real time for questions. The second came forty-eight hours later, in writing. It captured what had been said, and answered the most common questions from the first round. The third ran over six weeks: leadership conversations on implementation questions. The kind that only become visible once changes begin to take effect. This was more expensive in leadership time than a single email would have been. It was also substantially more effective. Voluntary turnover among retained staff ran below the industry average for comparable restructurings. And the leadership team's credibility was preserved, which is the asset that is hardest to rebuild.
Consolidate
Two Habits Worth Keeping
Two habits carry most of this section into daily practice. The first is the pre-mortem. If this message produces the opposite of the intended effect, what most likely caused it? Was the timing wrong? Was the message clear but emotionally tone-deaf? It takes a few minutes, and it surfaces exactly the failure modes that are cheap to fix in advance. And expensive to repair once the message has landed. The second habit is a personal communication strategy. It is not a document. It is a stance. With whom does your effectiveness depend on being well understood? On whom does your influence depend, and through which channels do they actually pay attention? Managers who adopt the stance find they communicate less in total, but to greater effect. And the audiences who matter most receive a notably better quality of attention.
About Foundations of Leadership at UPI Study
Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) is a self-paced online course of 90 video lessons in 12 chapters, from the roots of leadership theory and the trait, situational and transformational approaches to power, decision-making, communication, teams, conflict, diversity and global leadership. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB
Why take it here
Why students take Foundations of Leadership with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Foundations of Leadership carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Strategic and Managerial Communication
What is strategic communication in management?
What are the main communication tasks of a manager?
What are the key principles of crisis communication?
How should a company communicate a new strategy to employees?
About the Foundations of Leadership course
How many college credits is Foundations of Leadership?
How much does Foundations of Leadership cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Foundations of Leadership take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Foundations of Leadership.
90 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →