Referent and Expert Power, Explained

UPI Study › Courses › Foundations of Leadership › Free lessons › Lesson 6.7 Free with a free account

Referent and Expert Power

Foundations of Leadership · Chapter 6: Leadership Power, Styles & InfluenceSection 6.7 · lesson 33 of 9010 min · free with a free account

← Formal and Informal LeadershipNext lesson: Coercive Power: Leadership Through Pressure →

Earn 3 college credits for Foundations of LeadershipRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 205 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Foundations of Leadership · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

The two power bases nobody can grant you - and the one place they overlap.

  • Define referent power and the qualities that produce it
  • Define expert power and explain why it is domain-bound
  • Explain why the trusted expert produces the deepest influence
  • Evaluate the distinct risks of each power base in isolation

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,418 words). Read along, or search it.

Leadership Power, Styles & Influence

Referent and Expert Power

Of French and Raven's five bases of power, two cannot be given to you. An organisation can hand you legitimate power on your first morning. It can hand you a budget, and the ability to reward and to punish. It cannot hand you admiration, and it cannot hand you credibility. Those two, referent power and expert power, have to be earned. They are also the two that produce the deepest and most durable influence available to any leader. This section is about how each one is built, how each one is lost. And what happens in the rare case where the same person holds both.

Two Currencies

Personal Power Comes in Two Forms

Take the definitions carefully, because the two are often blurred. Referent power is the influence a leader exerts because followers admire them. Because they identify with them, or want to be like them. Followers comply in order to win the leader's approval, or to be associated with them. Expert power is different in kind. Followers comply because they believe the leader has knowledge or skill they themselves lack. On a question that actually matters to them. Both are personal in the literal sense. They travel with the individual, and they survive the loss of any title. Which is also why neither can be conferred by an organisation. Referent power in particular is granted, often quietly, by the people around the leader.

Referent

What Actually Produces Admiration

So what actually produces referent power? The research is unusually consistent on this, which is rare in leadership studies. Perceived integrity. Demonstrated courage in difficult moments. Consistency between what a leader says and what a leader does. Willingness to take personal risk on behalf of the team. And a manner that makes followers feel respected, rather than managed. Notice what is absent from that list. None of these qualities is performative. Followers turn out to be unusually good at detecting the difference between sincerity and stagecraft. Especially over any length of time. Which explains the shape of the curve. Referent power accumulates slowly, through a long pattern of consequential choices. And it erodes very quickly, when a single choice contradicts the pattern.

Expert

The Key Word Is Demonstrated

Expert power has its own logic, and one word carries most of it. Demonstrated. A claim of expertise supported only by credentials produces weak influence. Expertise supported by a track record of difficult decisions made well produces strong influence. Expert power is also necessarily bound to a domain. A surgeon's expert power evaporates in a marketing meeting. It does not transfer simply because the person walked into the room. And there is an asymmetry here that catches inexperienced leaders out. The threshold to acquire expert power is high and slow. The threshold to lose it is low and fast. One confidently stated claim that turns out to be wrong, on a high-stakes question, can dismantle years of accumulated credibility. Honest leaders manage this by drawing tight boundaries around what they actually know.

The Reframe

Why Saying I Do Not Know Builds Power

Which leads to a move that feels wrong and works. Saying, I do not know. It feels like a confession of weakness. In leadership it almost always builds power. The reason is that followers calibrate expert credibility by listening for the limits. They notice what a leader admits not knowing. A leader who can name the boundaries of their knowledge has demonstrated self-awareness. And that self-awareness is what makes their positive claims believable. Meanwhile the leader who has an answer for every question has revealed something else. That the answers cannot all be trusted. Said early, clearly, and without anxiety, this is one of the cheapest investments available. Almost nothing else buys that much expert credibility for so little.

Build and Lose

Two Different Ledgers

Each form of personal power is built and lost through a different ledger. Referent power is built by accumulating small acts, consistently. The leader who walks toward the difficult conversation rather than away from it. Who credits the team for successes and shoulders the blame for failures. Who keeps confidences without exception. It is lost through visible breaches. A single act of obvious self-interest. A public dishonesty. A withdrawal of support from a vulnerable colleague. Expert power runs on a different ledger. It is built by sustained engagement with hard problems. And by a public record of judgements that prove sound over time. It is lost by overreach into adjacent domains, and by confidence that exceeds knowledge. Or simply by the slow erosion of currency in a fast-moving field. The common feature is that neither is a possession. Both require continual renewal.

The Overlap

Where the Two Meet

It helps to hold the two on separate axes rather than as one scale. Put demonstrated expertise on one axis, and granted trust on the other. Low on both, and there is no personal power to draw on at all. High on expertise and low on trust gives you the pure expert. Frequently right. Frequently ignored. High on trust and low on expertise gives you pure charisma. Admired, and unchecked, which is a more dangerous combination than it sounds. And in the top corner sits the trusted expert. This is the only quadrant that reliably produces commitment rather than compliance. Which is worth pausing on, because it is not obvious. Being credible and being trusted are not the same achievement, and neither one gets you the other.

In Depth

Why Trusted Experts Are Hard to Replace

When referent and expert power overlap in the same person, something distinctive happens. Followers believe both that the leader knows what they are doing. And that the leader's intentions are sound. So they stop verifying every decision independently. They extend trust, because the leader has earned both kinds of credibility. This is expensive influence to build, and very easy to underestimate. Many organisations have a handful of trusted experts. People whose absence would be felt across several teams at once. Not because of their titles, but because decisions get routed through them informally. That kind of loss is rarely captured by exit interviews. Or by formal succession planning, which tracks roles rather than routing. Which is why organisations that take personal power seriously go to unusual lengths to retain them.

Case

Two Architects, Two Outcomes

A small case shows how quickly the two can come apart. Two senior software architects worked on the same platform team. Architect A had the deeper technical expertise. Engineers consistently rated his judgement as the gold standard. But he treated junior engineers with visible impatience. And his recommendations were increasingly bypassed, because no one wanted to approach him. Architect B was technically excellent, but not unique. What set her apart was unfailing patience, and respect for every colleague who asked her a question. Within two years, her informal authority on architecture decisions exceeded his. The difference was not expert power. On that they were close to even. It was referent power, which Architect A had spent down through small daily acts of impatience. Until his expertise could no longer carry the weight alone.

The Risks

Each One Alone Fails Differently

Each form of personal power carries a distinct risk when it operates without the other. Pure referent power is charisma uncoupled from demonstrated competence. It is the form of leadership most often associated with harmful outcomes. Followers who admire a leader they cannot evaluate are vulnerable to manipulation. To groupthink, which we return to later in this chapter. And to the slow conversion of an organisation into a personality cult. Pure expert power fails differently. It produces technical correctness without organisational legitimacy. The specialist whose decisions are intellectually right, but who has not built relational credibility. They find their recommendations rejected, watered down, or quietly ignored. The practical guidance is unambiguous. Leaders who hold expert power should invest deliberately in referent power. Leaders who hold referent power should invest deliberately in genuine competence. Being liked does not make you right. Being right does not make you followed.

Case

Anthony Fauci and the Limits of Expert Power

The last case is a caution about assuming that expertise is sufficient. Anthony Fauci's career at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases built expert power over decades. Through research on H I V and AIDS, on Ebola, and on pandemic preparedness. Inside the scientific community, his expert power was nearly unrivalled. His referent power among public-health professionals was equally strong. Then the COVID nineteen pandemic tested whether expert power alone could carry an entire society. As political polarisation grew, his expert credibility was unchanged. But his referent power fragmented along partisan lines. The case is instructive precisely because the two moved independently. Even the strongest expert power has limits. When the broader social conditions for trust have broken down, expertise cannot supply them. It is a sobering lesson for any leader who assumes that being right is enough.

About Foundations of Leadership at UPI Study

Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) is a self-paced online course of 90 video lessons in 12 chapters, from the roots of leadership theory and the trait, situational and transformational approaches to power, decision-making, communication, teams, conflict, diversity and global leadership. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB

Why take it here

Why students take Foundations of Leadership with UPI Study

What makes people follow a leaderFoundations of Leadership covers the main theories of leadership and how leaders use power, make decisions, communicate, build teams and handle conflict. It is a common course in business, management and organizational leadership degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Foundations of Leadership carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Referent and Expert Power

What is the difference between referent power and expert power?
Referent power comes from followers admiring or identifying with a leader, while expert power comes from followers believing the leader has knowledge or skill they lack. Followers respond to referent power to win approval or be associated with the leader, and to expert power because the leader knows something that matters to them. Both are personal forms of power in French and Raven's model: an organization cannot hand them out, and they survive the loss of a title.
How does a leader build referent power?
A leader builds referent power through perceived integrity, courage in difficult moments, consistency between words and actions, willingness to take personal risk for the team, and treating people with respect. Small, consistent acts add up, such as crediting the team for success, accepting blame for failure, and keeping confidences. Referent power accumulates slowly and can erode quickly, because one visible act of self-interest or dishonesty can contradict a long pattern.
Why can saying I do not know increase a leader's expert power?
Admitting the limits of your knowledge usually builds expert power because followers judge credibility partly by listening for those limits. A leader who names what they do not know shows self-awareness, which makes their positive claims more believable. A leader with an answer for everything signals that some answers cannot be trusted. Expert power is domain-bound and slow to build, and one confident but wrong claim on a high-stakes question can undo years of credibility.
What are the risks of having referent power without expert power, or the reverse?
Referent power without competence is admired but unchecked charisma, which can leave followers open to manipulation, groupthink, and a personality cult. Expert power without referent power produces technically correct recommendations that colleagues reject, water down, or ignore. The trusted expert, high on both, is the combination most likely to produce commitment rather than compliance. Experts should therefore invest in relationships, and admired leaders should invest in genuine competence.

About the Foundations of Leadership course

How many college credits is Foundations of Leadership?
Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Foundations of Leadership cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 90 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Foundations of Leadership take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 90 lessons total about 16 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Foundations of Leadership.

90 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Foundations of Leadership →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Foundations of Leadership
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →