UPI Study › Courses › Foundations of Leadership › Free lessons › Lesson 12.4 Free with a free account
Management Practices and Functions in International Companies
Foundations of Leadership · Chapter 12: Global Leadership ModuleSection 12.4 · lesson 84 of 90video coming soon
← Characteristics and Responsibilities of Effective Global LeadersNext lesson: Your Small Business, the Whole World: Going Global Without Losing Your Edge →
In this lesson
How planning, organising and staffing change once the firm crosses a border.
- Explain the integration-responsiveness tension
- Compare the four multinational structures
- Analyse the core challenges of international HRM
- Apply the SECI model to cross-border knowledge transfer
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,331 words). Read along, or search it.
Global Leadership Module
Management Practices and Functions in International Companies
A practice invented in the Brazilian subsidiary solves a problem the Polish subsidiary is still fighting. Nobody is hiding it. It simply never travels. That is a management-function failure, and it is the kind this section is about. The four fundamental management functions do not change when a company goes international. Planning, organising, leading and controlling. Every organisation does all four. What changes is the number of constraints each one has to satisfy. We will work through planning, structure, international human resources, and knowledge transfer. And one tension will keep reappearing in all of them.
The Premise
Same Four Functions, New Constraints
Start with why the functions get harder rather than merely bigger. Four sources of additional complexity are named. Cultural diversity. Institutional variation between jurisdictions. Geographic dispersion. And the need to balance global integration with local responsiveness. That fourth one is not really a fourth item on a list. It is the constraint the first three feed into. Almost every structural decision in this section turns out to be a different answer to it. So it is worth holding on to as we go.
Planning
The Tension That Will Not Resolve Itself
Strategic planning in a multinational has to do two things that pull against each other. Address global competitive dynamics, and address local market conditions. Prahalad and Doz theorised this in nineteen eighty-seven, as the integration-responsiveness tension. Integration means global efficiency, achieved through standardisation. Responsiveness means local market fit, achieved through adaptation. Standardise and you get scale, and you get products nobody local particularly wants. Adapt and you get fit, and you lose the efficiency that made the expansion worth doing. Bartlett and Ghoshal, in nineteen eighty-nine, proposed what they call the transnational solution. It seeks to achieve both simultaneously, through a differentiated network structure. Different subsidiaries develop specialised capabilities, which are then shared globally. The move there is subtle, and worth naming. Instead of trading integration against responsiveness, it turns local difference into the source of what gets integrated.
The Sequence
How Multinational Planning Actually Runs
The planning process in a multinational runs through five stages. It begins with an environmental scan. A global PESTEL analysis of the markets in play. Second comes the integration versus responsiveness judgement, using the Prahalad and Doz framework. That judgement is made before the structure is chosen, and that ordering matters. Third is the structure choice itself. Broadly, multi-domestic against global. Fourth is resource allocation. Where capital and talent actually flow. And fifth, performance targets. Key indicators set by market tier, rather than uniformly. Notice what the sequence rules out. You cannot pick the structure first and then work out your position on the tension. The structure is a consequence of that position, not an input to it.
Organising
Four Structures, Four Sacrifices
Four organisational structures are available, and each embodies a different resolution of the tension. The international division structure groups all foreign operations separately from domestic operations. It is simple to implement, and it is prone to siloing. The global product structure organises around worldwide product divisions. That enables global integration, often at the cost of geographic responsiveness. The geographic area structure inverts it. It maximises local responsiveness. And it fragments global product coordination in the process. The matrix structure attempts to capture both dimensions at once. It introduces significant complexity as the price. There is no option on that list that pays nothing. So the useful question is never which structure is best. It is which sacrifice this firm, in this market, can actually afford.
Expatriates
A Failure Rate Nobody Budgets For
International human resource management extends the core functions into the multinational context. And it starts with the challenge that generates the most visible waste. Expatriate management. The function covers selection, preparation, deployment, and repatriation. Research estimates expatriate failure rates at twenty-five to forty per cent. That is a very large number for a category of assignment that is expensive by design. And the primary cause is not what most people assume. It is not technical incompetence. It is cultural adjustment difficulty. Both of the employee, and of accompanying family members. Read that carefully, because it changes what a fix would look like. The family is not a peripheral welfare concern in that finding. It sits inside the main explanation for why assignments fail. And notice that repatriation appears in the definition of the function itself. The assignment does not end when the flight home lands.
Preparation
Training That Goes Past the Briefing
Cross-cultural training is the standard response, delivered both pre-departure and in-country. Its purpose is to accelerate cultural adjustment rather than leave it to chance. The methods span a wide range, and the range is the important part. At one end, factual briefings. Information about the country, its institutions, its norms. In the middle, behavioural simulation and role-play. That is practising the interaction, rather than reading about it. At the far end, immersive language instruction. That is the most demanding option, and the one that changes daily access to a place. The practical warning follows directly. A programme that stops at the factual briefing has covered the cheapest end of a spectrum. It has not covered the spectrum.
Pay And Appraisal
Two Problems With No Clean Answer
Two more international human resource problems deserve attention, because neither has a clean answer. International compensation is the first. Packages must be globally equitable, locally competitive, and fiscally efficient. Across multiple tax jurisdictions, simultaneously. Those three constraints pull apart. Equity across countries and competitiveness within one rarely coincide. Global performance management is the second. Appraisal processes have to account for cultural differences in feedback norms. In goal-setting preferences. And in individual versus collective performance metrics. Here is the failure mode, stated plainly. An unadapted appraisal form does not measure performance. It measures culture. Where feedback norms differ, the same scale returns systematically different numbers for identical work. And then the cross-market comparison built on those numbers is worthless.
Knowledge
What One Subsidiary Learns, Another Repeats
Knowledge management is the last function, and arguably the most strategically significant. The challenge is creating, transferring and applying knowledge across geographic and cultural boundaries. Nonaka and Takeuchi, in nineteen ninety-five, offer the SECI model. Socialisation, externalisation, combination, internalisation. It explains how tacit knowledge, held by individuals in one part of the organisation, becomes explicit. And how, once explicit, it can be transferred into other contexts. Three things impede that transfer across borders. Cultural distance. Language barriers. And NIH syndrome. The third is the most expensive of the three, because it is the only one that is a choice. Distance and language are conditions you inherit. Rejecting a practice because it came from somewhere else in your own company is a decision. And it is a decision organisations make over and over, usually without noticing.
Case
Nestle and the Transnational Model
Nestle is the standard illustration of the transnational model working. The company operates in one hundred and eighty-eight countries. With over two hundred and seventy thousand employees. Some functions are globally integrated. Research and development, procurement, and brand architecture. Others are deliberately devolved. Geographic business units hold significant operational autonomy. Local managers adapt product formulations to local consumer preferences. The concrete example is Maggi noodles. Region-specific flavours across Asia, Africa and Latin America, under one global brand. The human resource design is what makes that workable. Long-tenured local talent holds operational leadership. Supported by globally mobile managers who carry organisational knowledge and culture between markets. Those mobile managers are the transfer mechanism the SECI model describes, staffed as a role.
Consolidate
Every Choice Here Is the Same Choice
Step back and the section resolves into a single idea. Structure, staffing, compensation, appraisal and knowledge flow look like five separate design problems. They are five expressions of one question. Integration, against responsiveness. Which is why inconsistency between them is so expensive. Imagine a firm that chooses a geographic area structure, for local responsiveness. And then imposes one global appraisal form on everybody. It has answered the same tension two different ways. The friction does not stay abstract. It shows up as expatriate failure, and stalled knowledge transfer. One final caution about the transnational model. It is described as the most sophisticated response, not as the default one. It demands a differentiated network, and active management of knowledge transfer. Firms that adopt the vocabulary without building that machinery get the complexity, and none of the learning.
About Foundations of Leadership at UPI Study
Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) is a self-paced online course of 90 video lessons in 12 chapters, from the roots of leadership theory and the trait, situational and transformational approaches to power, decision-making, communication, teams, conflict, diversity and global leadership. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB
Why take it here
Why students take Foundations of Leadership with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Foundations of Leadership carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Management Practices and Functions in International Companies
What is the integration-responsiveness framework?
What is a transnational strategy?
What organizational structures do international companies use?
Why do expatriate assignments fail?
About the Foundations of Leadership course
How many college credits is Foundations of Leadership?
How much does Foundations of Leadership cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Foundations of Leadership take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Foundations of Leadership.
90 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →