UPI Study › Courses › Foundations of Leadership › Free lessons › Lesson 6.9 Free with a free account
Power, Authority, Influence, and Leadership Defined
Foundations of Leadership · Chapter 6: Leadership Power, Styles & InfluenceSection 6.9 · lesson 35 of 9010 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Foundations of Leadership.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Foundations of Leadership
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Independent Thinking: A Critical Leadership Skill →← Coercive Power: Leadership Through PressureNext lesson: Independent Thinking: A Critical Leadership Skill →
In this lesson
Four words used interchangeably in ordinary speech, and four different things.
- Define power, authority, influence and leadership precisely
- Describe how the four relate in a nested but non-identical structure
- Name the leadership pathology each confusion produces
- Use the vocabulary to diagnose why a team is not following
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,409 words). Read along, or search it.
Leadership Power, Styles & Influence
Power, Authority, Influence, Leadership
By this point in the chapter you have met four words many times over. Power. Authority. Influence. Leadership. You have also seen them used interchangeably, which they are not. That may sound like a pedantic complaint. It is not. Many of the worst leadership failures begin in vague language. A manager who believes their authority gives them power. An executive who confuses influence with leadership. A team that mistakes obedience for endorsement. This section tightens the vocabulary, so that each of those can be named.
The Stakes
Every Leadership Failure Is Also a Language Failure
Consider what each confusion actually does to a leader. Conflating power with authority makes a leader overconfident about their own capacity. They assume the right to direct is the same as the ability to direct. Conflating influence with leadership flattens something more important. It erases the moral distinction between affecting behaviour and pursuing a shared purpose. So crisp definitions are not academic hygiene. They are diagnostic instruments. They let a leader tell themselves the truth about what is and is not working. The leader who confuses authority with power is unprepared when the team does not follow. The leader who confuses influence with leadership is unprepared for a different discovery. That they moved people in directions which did not serve them.
Four Terms
The Definitions, Precisely
Here are the four definitions, stated precisely. Power is the capacity to affect the behaviour of others. Whether or not that capacity is ever exercised. Authority is the formally granted right to make decisions and issue commands. Within a defined scope. The scope is part of the definition. Influence is the actual change in another person's beliefs, attitudes, or behaviour. The change that results from a leader's action. And leadership is the process of intentional influence directed at a shared goal. Each of those definitions rules some things in and some things out, quite deliberately. It is worth walking through what each one excludes.
Read Backwards
What Each Definition Rules Out
Read the definitions backwards, and they become sharper. Power is a capacity, not an outcome. A person can hold power they never use. Nothing has to happen for the power to be real. Authority is a right, not a capacity. A person can hold the formal right to direct others without a single person actually following. Influence is an outcome, and it is not necessarily intentional. Colleagues influence one another constantly, without any of them trying to lead. And leadership is influence with a particular character. Intentional. Aimed at a shared goal. And exercised through voluntary response, rather than coerced response. That last clause is doing a lot of work, and it is easy to skip past.
The Structure
Overlapping, Not Nested
The four terms describe an overlapping structure, not a set of neat boxes. Power is the widest of the four. It takes in every form of capacity, formal or personal. Authority is one source of power, but it does not guarantee influence. An authority-holder with no follower trust can issue commands that are complied with and never internalised. Influence is the outcome that power may produce. And it can flow from any source of power, including sources entirely outside formal authority. Leadership lives in the intersection of influence and shared purpose. It is the deliberate use of power to produce influence, in service of something larger than the leader. Which means each of the other three can occur without leadership. A person can hold power without leading, if they never use it, or use it for private ends. A person can wield authority without leading, if the commands produce no followership. And a person can produce influence without leading, if the effect is unintentional or self-serving.
Three Confusions
What Each One Costs
Three confusions are especially common, and each produces its own pathology. The first is the confusion of authority with power. New managers discover this uncomfortably. The right to direct their team does not give them the actual capacity to do so. Their authority is real. Their power stays thin until they have built personal credibility. The pathology is the overconfident manager. The second confusion is of influence with leadership. This is the one carrying real moral weight. A manipulative colleague may produce considerable influence over decisions. They are not leading, because the purpose served is private. The pathology is the manipulative operator. The third confusion is of compliance with commitment. A team that complies has been influenced behaviourally, but may not have been led at all. Their beliefs and attitudes are unchanged. The pathology is the brittle organisation.
Case
The Authority That Wasn't Power
A case makes the first confusion concrete. A newly appointed head of department in a large university spent her first six months frustrated. Her decisions kept getting watered down in implementation. She had clear authority. The title, the budget signing rights, the formal decision rights. And yet every initiative lost momentum somewhere between her office and the corridors. A conversation with a colleague produced the diagnosis. She had authority, but she had not yet built power. Specifically referent and expert power inside the department. The faculty were complying with her instructions formally. Without endorsing her judgement personally. The intervention took another six months, and none of it was a directive. Deliberate listening. Public acknowledgement of faculty expertise. And one widely respected decision to defend a controversial colleague. That converted her authority into power, and her power into influence.
Diagnose
When the Team Is Not Following, Ask Which One Is Missing
The practical value of the tightened vocabulary is the discipline it imposes. A manager told that their team is not following can now ask a precise question. Is this a deficit of power? The capacity simply is not there yet. If so, the answer is investment in personal credibility. Is it a deficit of authority? The right has not actually been clarified. If so, the answer is an explicit conversation with the leader's own boss. Is it a deficit of influence? The capacity exists but is not being deployed well. That is a style problem, and the earlier sections of this chapter address it. Or is it a deficit of leadership? Influence exists, but it is not aimed at a goal the team actually shares. In which case the work is establishing what the shared goal is. Four diagnoses, four different interventions. Vague language conceals every one of those differences.
The Map
Where the Rest of the Chapter Sits
With the vocabulary in place, the architecture of the chapter becomes clearer. Section six point one introduced the three currents, and the leader, follower, situation triangle. Sections six point two and six point three examined style. Style is the channel between power and influence. Section six point four named the obstacles between followers and their goals. Those obstacles decide which style converts power into influence most efficiently. And sections six point five through six point eight examined where power itself comes from. Formal versus personal sources, and the five specific bases. Throughout, the unstated logic was that leadership is intentional influence directed at shared purpose. This section has simply made that logic explicit. Two sections remain. What leaders must think with, and how it all integrates in practice.
Case
Ratan Tata Across Four Decades
Ratan Tata's career shows all four terms operating at once. As chairman of the Tata Group from nineteen ninety-one to twenty twelve, he held formal authority over a vast conglomerate. His power extended well beyond that authority. It was anchored in family history, and in decades of personal credibility. And in a reputation for ethical decision-making that earned him deep referent power across Indian business. His influence extended further still. Even after stepping down, he shaped decisions in companies he no longer formally controlled. His interventions on industry ethics were attended to by people who did not report to him. His leadership was most visible where the purpose was larger than the group itself. In the response after the two thousand and eight Mumbai attacks on the Taj Hotel. His focus was on staff and guests, before commercial considerations. The four terms pick out different facets of the same career. None could substitute for the others.
Consolidate
The Vocabulary Is the Instrument
So hold the four apart, and keep them apart. Power is the capacity. Authority is the right. Influence is the change actually produced in another person. And leadership is influence aimed at a goal the followers share. Nothing in that list is interchangeable with anything else in it. Each confusion produces a failure you can name in advance. The overconfident manager. The manipulative operator. And the organisation that has compliance where it believed it had commitment. This is the cheapest insurance available to a leader. The definitions cost nothing to adopt. And they let you name exactly what is missing, on the day something stops working.
About Foundations of Leadership at UPI Study
Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) is a self-paced online course of 90 video lessons in 12 chapters, from the roots of leadership theory and the trait, situational and transformational approaches to power, decision-making, communication, teams, conflict, diversity and global leadership. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB
Why take it here
Why students take Foundations of Leadership with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Foundations of Leadership carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Power, Authority, Influence, and Leadership Defined
What is the difference between power and authority?
What is the difference between influence and leadership?
Why might a team not follow a manager who has formal authority?
What problems come from confusing power, authority, influence, and leadership?
About the Foundations of Leadership course
How many college credits is Foundations of Leadership?
How much does Foundations of Leadership cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Foundations of Leadership take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Foundations of Leadership.
90 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →