Resolving Conflicts in International Business, Explained

UPI Study › Courses › Foundations of Leadership › Free lessons › Lesson 12.8 Free with a free account

Resolving Conflicts in International Business

Foundations of Leadership · Chapter 12: Global Leadership ModuleSection 12.8 · lesson 88 of 9011 min · free with a free account

← Diversity Training and Its Value in Global BusinessNext lesson: Doing the Right Thing Abroad: Navigating Ethical Minefields →

Earn 3 college credits for Foundations of LeadershipRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 205 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Foundations of Leadership · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Which conflicts to encourage, which to stop, and how negotiation norms differ.

  • Identify the three sources of international business conflict
  • Distinguish task, relationship and process conflict
  • Apply cultural dimensions to conflict behaviour
  • Compare arbitration with litigation for cross-border disputes

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,343 words). Read along, or search it.

Global Leadership Module

Resolving Conflicts in International Business

A joint venture stalls over profit distribution and both sides blame the other team's attitude. It is not an attitude problem. The interests were incompatible from the day the contract was signed. Conflict is an inevitable feature of complex organisations. In international business it gets amplified, and misdiagnosed, more often than anywhere else. This section covers where international conflict comes from. Which kinds of it a leader should actually want. How conflict behaviour varies systematically across cultures. And why arbitration is usually preferred to litigation when a dispute crosses a border.

Amplification

The Conflict Is Normal. The Amplifier Is Not.

Start with why the international setting is different, rather than simply harder. Three things amplify conflict here. First, cultural differences in how conflict is perceived, expressed and resolved. Second, institutional and legal diversity across jurisdictions. And third, the inherent tension between global integration and local autonomy. That third source deserves particular attention, because it is structural rather than behavioural. The integration-responsiveness tension guarantees a standing disagreement between centre and subsidiary. It is built into the design of the organisation. No amount of goodwill dissolves it. It can only be managed. Which means some conflict in a multinational is not a symptom of anything going wrong.

Three Sources

Where International Conflict Comes From

The sources of conflict sort into three families, and it is worth naming them before diagnosing anything. Structural conflict, arising from incompatible organisational interests. Headquarters against subsidiary, resource disputes, and gaps in governance. Cultural conflict, arising from differing values and norms. Clashes of communication style, and violations of norms one side did not know existed. And interpersonal conflict. Trust violations, personality clashes, and plain misunderstandings. Most real disputes contain some of all three. The diagnostic question is which one is doing the driving.

In Detail

The Same Dispute, Three Different Diagnoses

Take each source with its examples, because the examples are what make diagnosis possible. Structural conflicts come from incompatible organisational interests. Headquarters against subsidiaries over resource allocation. Joint venture partners over profit distribution. Multinational employers against host-country governments over taxation or employment practices. Notice that in none of those cases is anybody behaving badly. The interests genuinely diverge. Cultural conflicts come from differing values, norms and assumptions about appropriate behaviour. Communication style, hierarchy, decision-making, time orientation, and conceptions of fairness. Interpersonal conflicts come from personality clashes, trust violations, and perceived disrespect. Or communication misunderstandings across cultural boundaries. And here is the expensive error. A structural conflict treated as an interpersonal one gets a mediation session and a reassignment. While the incompatible interests that generated it remain exactly as incompatible as before.

Three Types

One of These You Should Want

Within global teams, research distinguishes three types of conflict, and they have very different value. Task conflict is disagreement about work content and goals. And it is often beneficial in moderate quantities, because it stimulates cognitive diversity. Relationship conflict is interpersonal incompatibility and negative emotion. It consistently impairs performance and trust. There is no moderate quantity that helps. Process conflict is disagreement about how the work should be organised. It is particularly prevalent in culturally diverse global teams. Because coordination norms differ significantly across members, and nobody stated theirs. That three-way split changes what a leader should be trying to do. The job is separation, not suppression. Encourage disagreement about the work. And prevent it from turning into disagreement about the people. A team with no task conflict at all is not harmonious. It is failing to use the diversity it was assembled to have.

Cultural Variation

The Same Move Reads Differently

Hofstede's dimensions explain why conflict behaviour varies systematically across cultures. Systematically is the key word. This is pattern, not personal idiosyncrasy. Members of high power-distance cultures avoid direct confrontation with superiors. They escalate conflict through indirect channels instead. Members of collectivist cultures prioritise group harmony. They may express disagreement through intermediaries, or in coded language. Members of cultures high in uncertainty avoidance prefer formal, rule-governed resolution mechanisms. An informal chat, for them, is not a lighter touch. It is an absence of due process. The consequence is stated plainly in the source. Strategies effective in one culture may be counterproductive in another. An open-floor airing of grievances is constructive in one setting and a humiliation in another. The technique did not change. The meaning of the technique changed.

Negotiation

What the Meeting Is For

Negotiation is the primary mechanism for resolving conflict in international business. And cultures differ first on what the meeting is even for. Task-focused cultures, such as the United States and Germany, approach negotiation as problem-solving. You arrive, you work the problem, you leave with a solution. Relationship-focused cultures, such as Japan, China and the Arab world, invest heavily beforehand. Pre-negotiation relationship-building is not preamble. It is a substantial part of the work. The same divide reappears in what the signed document is taken to be. Low-context cultures treat contracts as comprehensive legal documents. The agreement is what is written down, and nothing else. High-context cultures may view a contract as a framework for an ongoing relationship. With flexibility expected as circumstances evolve. Which sets up a very specific misunderstanding. One party asking to adjust terms believes it is honouring the relationship. The other experiences the identical request as a breach.

Tactics

Concessions, Silence and the Clock

Two more dimensions vary, and both are exploitable if only one side understands them. Concession patterns differ. Cultures vary in whether concessions are expected to be reciprocal and immediate. Or phased over extended timelines. Then there is the use of silence, which is the sharpest example in this section. Japanese negotiators use silence deliberately, as a negotiation tool. American counterparts frequently interpret silence as impasse. And make unnecessary concessions in order to break it. Nothing was said. The pause did the work, and it worked because it was misread. Deadlines carry the same asymmetry. Some cultures treat them as firm. Others treat them as flexible. A negotiator who simply assumes their own convention hands the other side leverage. Without ever noticing that they did.

Mechanisms

Why Arbitration Usually Wins

When negotiation does not resolve a dispute, formal mechanisms take over. They range from informal negotiation through to binding arbitration and litigation. International arbitration, under ICC or LCIA rules, is typically preferred. For three reasons, and they are worth taking in order. First, awards are enforceable across jurisdictions. Under the New York Convention of nineteen fifty-eight. Second, proceedings can be conducted in a neutral venue, and a neutral language. Which removes the home-court advantage that a national court would otherwise confer. Third, arbitrators with specialist expertise can be selected. Rather than being allocated by whatever court roster happens to apply. Of those three, enforceability is the decisive one. A judgment you cannot enforce in the other party's jurisdiction is a document, not a remedy.

Case

Google and the European Commission

The case is the decade-long dispute between Google, now Alphabet, and the European Commission. Over alleged abuse of a dominant market position in search and advertising. It is a clean illustration of structural conflict at scale. A United States headquartered multinational, against a regional supranational regulatory authority. The Commission issued antitrust fines totalling over eight billion euros. Across three decisions, in twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen and twenty nineteen. Requiring Google to modify its European business practices. Google's response is the instructive part. It appealed multiple decisions, while simultaneously negotiating remedies. That pattern of parallel negotiation and formal dispute proceedings is characteristic here. It is what high-stakes international regulatory conflict actually looks like. And the broader lesson is about arenas. Structural conflicts frequently run in several at once. Legal, regulatory, public communications, political lobbying. Treating any single one of them as the dispute misreads the situation.

Consolidate

Frameworks Describe Averages, Not the Person Opposite

Pull it together, and then add the caution the material deserves. Three sources of conflict. Three types within teams. And systematic cross-cultural variation in how negotiation is conducted. Each of those helps you form a hypothesis about what is going on. But cultural frameworks such as Hofstede's describe average national tendencies. Relying on them as a prediction about the specific individual across the table is risky. It produces a confident, culturally flavoured misread. Which is a worse position to be in than simply admitting you do not yet know. So use the framework for preparation, and observation for decisions. Prepare for the tendency the research describes. Then negotiate with the person who is actually in the room.

About Foundations of Leadership at UPI Study

Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) is a self-paced online course of 90 video lessons in 12 chapters, from the roots of leadership theory and the trait, situational and transformational approaches to power, decision-making, communication, teams, conflict, diversity and global leadership. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB

Why take it here

Why students take Foundations of Leadership with UPI Study

What makes people follow a leaderFoundations of Leadership covers the main theories of leadership and how leaders use power, make decisions, communicate, build teams and handle conflict. It is a common course in business, management and organizational leadership degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Foundations of Leadership carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Resolving Conflicts in International Business

What are the main sources of conflict in international business?
The main sources are structural, cultural, and interpersonal. Structural conflict comes from incompatible organizational interests, such as headquarters versus subsidiaries over resources or joint venture partners over profits. Cultural conflict comes from differing norms about communication, hierarchy, time, and fairness. Interpersonal conflict comes from personality clashes, trust violations, and misunderstandings. A common mistake is treating a structural conflict as an interpersonal one, which leaves the incompatible interests in place.
How do negotiation styles differ across cultures?
Negotiation styles differ in focus, view of contracts, concessions, and silence. Task-focused cultures such as the United States and Germany treat negotiation as problem-solving, while relationship-focused cultures such as Japan and China invest heavily in relationship-building first. Low-context cultures treat contracts as complete legal documents, while high-context cultures may see them as frameworks for an evolving relationship. Japanese negotiators may use silence deliberately, while Americans often read it as impasse.
Why is arbitration preferred over litigation in international business disputes?
International arbitration, often under ICC or LCIA rules, is usually preferred because awards are enforceable across borders under the 1958 New York Convention. It also allows a neutral venue and language, removing the home-court advantage a national court could give one side, and lets the parties choose arbitrators with specialist expertise. Enforceability is the decisive advantage, since a national court judgment can be hard to enforce in the other party's country.
Can Hofstede's cultural dimensions predict how a negotiator will behave?
No, cultural frameworks such as Hofstede's describe average national tendencies, not how any particular person will behave. Treating them as predictions about the individual across the table produces a confident but culturally flavored misreading. A better approach is to use the frameworks for preparation, for example anticipating that someone from a high power-distance culture may avoid confronting superiors directly, and then base decisions on observing the actual person in the room.

About the Foundations of Leadership course

How many college credits is Foundations of Leadership?
Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Foundations of Leadership cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 90 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Foundations of Leadership take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 90 lessons total about 16 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Foundations of Leadership.

90 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Foundations of Leadership →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Foundations of Leadership
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →