Interpersonal Skills in Professional Settings, Explained

UPI Study › Courses › Foundations of Leadership › Free lessons › Lesson 8.6 Free with a free account

Interpersonal Skills in Professional Settings

Foundations of Leadership · Chapter 8: Communication ModuleSection 8.6 · lesson 53 of 9011 min · free with a free account

← Communication Skills for Effective LeadershipNext lesson: Formal and Informal Communication in Organizations →

Earn 3 college credits for Foundations of LeadershipRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 205 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Foundations of Leadership · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

The relational disciplines that turn individual competence into shared accomplishment.

  • Separate interpersonal skills from communication skills
  • Treat self-awareness as the foundation of the rest
  • Build rapport and earn trust as distinct activities
  • Disagree productively without damaging the relationship

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,438 words). Read along, or search it.

Communication Module

Interpersonal Skills in Professional Settings

Technical competence is necessary for a professional career. It is not sufficient. Interpersonal skills are how individuals work effectively with other individuals. Building rapport, and managing disagreement. Maintaining productive relationships across difference. And drawing on those relationships when the work requires it. In their absence, no amount of technical competence produces sustained effectiveness. This section defines them, identifies self-awareness as their foundation. And looks at how interpersonal excellence is cultivated over a career, rather than acquired in a training event.

The Definition

Not the Same Thing as Being a Good Communicator

Interpersonal skills govern interaction with other people as individuals, not as roles. Recognising what another person needs in a particular situation. Adjusting your behaviour to fit the relationship, rather than only the task. And maintaining the connections that make sustained collaboration possible. A person can be articulate, persuasive, and a careful listener. And still be interpersonally weak. If they cannot read situations, modulate their style, or recover from missteps in relationships. The reverse happens too. Strong interpersonal instincts do not automatically become clear communication.

The Components

A Composite Capability, Not a Trait

The components that scholars consistently identify are recognisable enough. Self-awareness and empathy. Rapport-building and trust development. Conflict management. Networking. And the broader capacity to read social situations. Interpersonal effectiveness is a composite capability, not a single trait. And competence in one component does not guarantee competence in the others. Treated as a single trait, interpersonal skill is something you either have or you lack. Treated as components, each one can be developed deliberately.

The Foundation

The Gap Between How You See Yourself and How You Land

Everything else here rests on one thing, and it is the thing people are worst at. Self-awareness. An accurate sense of how your own behaviour lands on other people. The professional who believes themselves direct may be experienced as abrasive. The professional who believes themselves measured may be experienced as evasive. The gap between self-perception and others' experience is one of the most consistent findings. And the size of that gap is among the strongest predictors of derailment in leadership careers. Which makes closing it one of the highest-return investments available. It is also one of the least often attempted, for reasons the next slide makes obvious.

Practice

Three Uncomfortable Practices

Self-awareness develops through three reinforcing practices. The first is soliciting feedback explicitly. About specific behaviours, rather than general impressions. That surfaces what colleagues will almost never volunteer on their own. The second is reflecting after important interactions. Asking what worked and what did not. Over time that builds the habit of observing your own behaviour in real time. The third is working with a coach or a trusted mentor. That provides a structured channel for feedback colleagues are unable to offer you. Each of them is uncomfortable. And why those who do develop faster than peers of similar starting competence.

The Model

The Trust Equation

There is a useful simplification of the trust literature worth knowing. It comes from Charles Green and David Maister, and it is called the trust equation. Trust is a function of credibility, reliability and intimacy. All of that divided by self-orientation. Credibility is what others believe about your competence and honesty. Reliability is the track record of doing what you said you would do. Intimacy is the safety others feel in sharing concerns with you. And self-orientation is how focused you appear on your own interests rather than theirs. The first three factors add up. They accumulate. But the denominator can collapse the whole thing. Perceived self-orientation destroys trust regardless of how strong the other three are. So building trust is partly adding to the numerator. And partly removing from the denominator, which most people never think to do.

The Distinction

Rapport Is Not Trust

Rapport is the comfortable working connection that makes substantive exchange easier. It is built through small consistent behaviours. Remembered names and details. Genuine interest in the other person's situation. Reliable follow-through on small commitments. Rapport is necessary and not sufficient. It eases collaboration without guaranteeing it. Trust runs deeper and takes considerably longer. Roger Mayer and James Davis identified three components. Ability. The trusted party is competent in the domain at issue. Benevolence. They care about your interests, not only their own. Integrity. Their actions are consistent with the values they profess. Trust is built through accumulated evidence of all three. And lost rapidly through evidence of failure in any one. Slow to build, fast to lose. That asymmetry is worth internalising early.

Disagreement

The Behaviours That Separate the Two Kinds

Productive disagreement focuses on the substance of the issue. Unproductive disagreement focuses on the person holding the view. Productive disagreement involves genuine effort to understand the other position. Unproductive disagreement is the defence of your own position and nothing else. The tone is direct but measured, and never personal. Against sharp, sarcastic, or contemptuous. Productive disagreement surfaces evidence and reasoning. Unproductive disagreement repeats the same assertion with rising intensity. And the outcomes differ completely. In one, the best argument shapes the decision. In the other, the loudest or most senior voice prevails, and resentment persists. That is straightforward to describe and difficult to maintain under pressure. Particularly when the issue is one you actually care about. Which is why practising in lower-stakes settings is the reliable route.

Networks

Two Ways to Build One

Professional networks are the web of working relationships that sustain a career. They provide access to information, opportunities, advice and reference. Research on career advancement consistently finds they account for a meaningful share of outcomes. However much the language of networking may grate on people who associate it with self-promotion. But there are two ways to do it, and orientation is what separates them. The ethical networker invests in relationships for the long term. Contributes value to others before seeking it. And maintains connections through periods when no transaction is in prospect. The opportunistic networker contacts people mainly when they need something. Then disappears between requests. Those two feel entirely different on the receiving end. And they produce very different career outcomes over time. The mark of a well-cultivated network is that your calls get returned. Not because of a specific past favour, but because the relationship has become valuable in itself.

Case

The Engineer Who Could Not Disagree

Here is how a missing interpersonal skill caps a strong technical career. A highly capable engineer in a software company outperformed her peers on individual work. And stalled in career progression, for reasons nobody could initially name. Investigation revealed a specific pattern. When she disagreed with a colleague's approach in a design discussion, she withdrew. Then implemented her own approach quietly in the code. The pattern produced excellent code. It corroded relationships. Colleagues felt unheard when their ideas were tacitly overruled after the fact. And senior managers came to see her as politically naive. Strong on substance, weak on the collective work of making decisions. With coaching, she developed one specific discipline. Disagreeing openly during the discussion, rather than enacting the disagreement afterwards. The technical quality of her work did not change at all. Her relationships, her reputation, and within two years her trajectory, visibly did.

Practice

The Relationship Inventory

There is an exercise many senior professionals find clarifying, and mildly painful. It is called a relationship inventory, and it asks two questions. Who are the people whose trust and goodwill genuinely matter for your work? And when did you last invest in each of those relationships in a meaningful way? It is uncomfortable because it usually reveals neglect. Relationships that were close once and have not been tended since. Contacts whose value has been drawn on without reciprocation. Colleagues whose support has been assumed rather than earned. But it leads naturally to specific repairs. A long-overdue note. A coffee scheduled. An introduction offered. A piece of help volunteered without any expectation attached. Over a few months those repairs accumulate. Into the kind of network that defends a career when difficulty eventually arrives.

Consolidate

A Practice, Not a Project

Interpersonal excellence is not a state to be achieved. It is a practice to be sustained. The professional who treats it as a project sees a familiar pattern. A brief improvement that fades within months. The professional who treats it as a continuing discipline sees something else. Paying attention to the quality of their relationships. Repairing damage promptly. Investing in connections beyond immediate need. Soliciting and acting on feedback over the long term. The cumulative effect is invisible in any single year, and striking across decades. Those who invested arrive in their senior years with a wide network of trusted relationships. A reputation for being someone others want to work with. And accumulated goodwill that smooths every subsequent endeavour. Those who neglected it arrive with technical accomplishment and a thinner social fabric. They find that the moves which came naturally in their thirties have become harder in their fifties. That asymmetry is the strongest argument for treating interpersonal skill as a discipline. Rather than as a personality trait you were either issued or not.

About Foundations of Leadership at UPI Study

Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) is a self-paced online course of 90 video lessons in 12 chapters, from the roots of leadership theory and the trait, situational and transformational approaches to power, decision-making, communication, teams, conflict, diversity and global leadership. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB

Why take it here

Why students take Foundations of Leadership with UPI Study

What makes people follow a leaderFoundations of Leadership covers the main theories of leadership and how leaders use power, make decisions, communicate, build teams and handle conflict. It is a common course in business, management and organizational leadership degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Foundations of Leadership carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Interpersonal Skills in Professional Settings

What are interpersonal skills in the workplace?
Interpersonal skills are the abilities that let you work effectively with other people as individuals, not just as roles. They include self-awareness, empathy, building rapport and trust, managing conflict, networking and reading social situations. They are a set of separate components rather than one trait, so strength in one does not guarantee strength in another. A person can be articulate and persuasive yet still struggle to read a situation or repair a damaged relationship.
What is the trust equation?
The trust equation, from Charles Green and David Maister, says trust equals credibility plus reliability plus intimacy, divided by self-orientation. Credibility is others' belief in your competence and honesty, reliability is your record of doing what you promised, and intimacy is how safe people feel sharing concerns with you. Self-orientation, the sense that you care mainly about your own interests, sits in the denominator, so a high level of it can undermine strong scores on the other three.
How can you improve self-awareness at work?
Self-awareness, an accurate sense of how your behavior lands on others, improves through feedback, reflection and coaching. Ask colleagues about specific behaviors rather than general impressions, reflect after important interactions on what worked and what did not, and use a coach or trusted mentor for feedback peers rarely volunteer. The gap between self-perception and how others experience you, such as seeing yourself as direct while others find you abrasive, is a strong predictor of leadership derailment.
How do you disagree productively with a colleague?
Productive disagreement focuses on the issue, not the person. It involves a genuine effort to understand the other view, a direct but measured tone, and evidence and reasoning rather than the same claim repeated more loudly. Done well, the best argument shapes the decision; done badly, the loudest or most senior voice wins and resentment lingers. Disagreeing openly during the discussion works better than quietly acting on your own view afterward.

About the Foundations of Leadership course

How many college credits is Foundations of Leadership?
Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Foundations of Leadership cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 90 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Foundations of Leadership take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 90 lessons total about 16 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Foundations of Leadership.

90 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Foundations of Leadership →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Foundations of Leadership
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →