UPI Study › Courses › Foundations of Leadership › Free lessons › Lesson 10.6 Free with a free account
Emotional Intelligence as a Leadership Asset
Foundations of Leadership · Chapter 10: Teams ModuleSection 10.6 · lesson 70 of 9012 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Foundations of Leadership.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Foundations of Leadership
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Cultural Differences in Global Team Contexts →← Virtual TeamsNext lesson: Cultural Differences in Global Team Contexts →
In this lesson
Self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management.
- Define emotional intelligence and what it is not
- Identify the four domains and their competencies
- Apply self-awareness and self-management under pressure
- Outline how the capacity develops over a career
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,576 words). Read along, or search it.
Teams Module
Emotional Intelligence as a Leadership Asset
Most leadership failures at senior level are not failures of analysis. They happen in a meeting that tips into conflict, or a conversation about a role being cut. Or in the moment a colleague challenges the leader in public. In each of those, technical skill contributes almost nothing. Emotional intelligence has moved from a fringe idea in the nineteen nineties to the centre of leadership development. This section covers what it is, and importantly what it is not. The four domains, and the sequence in which they build. And how the capacity actually develops, which is slower and more mundane than the popular version suggests.
Origins
A Definition Older Than Its Popularity
The concept entered the academic literature before it entered the bookshops. Peter Salovey at Yale and John D. Mayer at New Hampshire proposed it in nineteen ninety. Their definition is worth stating precisely. The ability to monitor one's own and others' emotions. To discriminate among them. And to use that information to guide thinking and action. Notice that last clause. It is not about having feelings, or being attuned to them. It is about using the information they carry. Daniel Goleman's nineteen ninety-five book brought the concept to a wide audience. He argued emotional capacities matter as much as, or more than, cognitive ability for long-term success. Reuven Bar-On developed a parallel measurement framework, emphasising the skills somewhat differently. The frameworks differ in detail. They converge on one claim. These capacities are distinct from cognitive ability, measurable, developable, and consequential.
Four Confusions
What Emotional Intelligence Is Not
Before the framework, it is worth clearing away four common confusions. Emotional intelligence is not the same as personality. Agreeable people are not necessarily emotionally intelligent, and disagreeable people may well be. It is not the same as kindness. Emotionally intelligent leaders can be demanding, even harsh, when circumstances require it. What distinguishes them is that the harshness is chosen rather than leaked. It is not the same as cognitive ability. The two capacities are largely independent, and possessing one does not imply the other. And it is not innate, in the way some early popularisations suggested. The underlying research consistently finds it improves with deliberate practice, particularly in adulthood. It is one of the few leadership capacities that demonstrably develops with age and experience.
The Sequence
Each Domain Rests on the One Before It
Goleman's framework, refined with Richard Boyatzis and Annie McKee, has four domains. The first two concern the self. Self-awareness is accurate recognition of your own emotions, strengths and limitations. Including, crucially, the impact of your behaviour on other people. Self-management is the capacity to regulate your emotional reactions. Staying composed under pressure, acting on values rather than impulses. The second two concern relationships. Social awareness is accurate recognition of others' emotions and of group dynamics. Relationship management uses that awareness to influence, develop, inspire, and resolve conflict. And these form a sequence rather than a menu. Each rests on the one before it.
The Framework
Competencies and What They Look Like
Each domain contains several named competencies, and the vocabulary is useful for self-assessment. Self-awareness holds emotional self-awareness, accurate self-assessment, and self-confidence. In behaviour, that looks like naming your own state under pressure, and seeking feedback on your impact. Self-management holds self-control, integrity, adaptability, achievement orientation and initiative. It looks like pausing before reacting, and honouring commitments when under stress. Social awareness holds empathy, organisational awareness, and service orientation. It looks like reading the emotional state of a meeting, and noticing unstated concerns. Relationship management holds influence, developing others, conflict management and teamwork. It looks like resolving disagreement constructively, and developing your own successors. And integrated practice is using all four in combination, as the situation requires. Choosing appropriately among empathy, candour, and challenge.
The Claim
Twice the Variance, With a Caveat
How much does this actually matter? Goleman's research made a strong claim. Conducted across several hundred organisations, it suggested emotional intelligence accounted for roughly twice the variance. Twice the variance in leadership effectiveness that cognitive ability alone accounted for. Particularly at senior levels. That specific finding has been challenged on methodological grounds, and the challenges are reasonable. But the broad pattern has been widely replicated. Emotional capacities become disproportionately important as leadership responsibility grows. Which makes sense. At senior levels, emotional and political complexity dominates the work. The sequence of domains matters for a practical reason too. A leader who tries to manage others without self-management fails predictably. So does one who tries to influence without social awareness. Which means visible failures in the fourth domain often originate in the first.
Foundation
The Capacity Most Resistant to Self-Assessment
Self-awareness is the foundation, and it has an awkward property. It is among the capacities most resistant to self-assessment. A leader who does not accurately perceive their own emotional state is stuck. They cannot see their characteristic reactions under pressure, or their effect on others. And so they cannot reliably manage themselves, let alone anyone else. Here is the difficulty. People consistently rate their own self-awareness higher than colleagues rate it. Research by Tasha Eurich and colleagues finds that genuine self-awareness depends on external feedback. Feedback that is honestly given, and honestly received. And that feedback is hardest to obtain at the senior levels where it matters most. The more consequential your blind spots become, the fewer people are willing to describe them to you.
Distinct Capacity
Knowing You Are Angry Is Not Managing It
Self-management depends on self-awareness, but it is a genuinely distinct capacity. Consider the leader who knows perfectly well that they are angry. And cannot prevent that anger from determining their behaviour. That is self-awareness without self-management. Now consider the leader who suppresses emotional reactions entirely. That is neither, because suppression eventually fails. Usually at the worst available moment. Effective self-management is not the absence of emotion. It is the choice of response. Pausing before replying to a difficult message. Deferring a decision that would otherwise be made in the wrong state. Expressing frustration in ways that do not damage the relationship it passes through. These are practised behaviours rather than personality traits. Which is good news. They improve with deliberate attention, and they decay without it.
High Stakes
The Moments Where It Becomes Visible
Emotional intelligence is most visible in the moments that test leaders. A team has failed a critical deliverable, and morale is shaken. A long-serving member has been told their role is being eliminated. A senior colleague has publicly challenged the leader's judgement. A team meeting has tipped into open conflict between two people. In each of those, technical skill and cognitive analysis are insufficient. The leader who navigates them well is doing several things at once. Reading their own state, and reading the room. Managing their own reaction rather than expressing it. Attending to what is being felt as well as what is being said. And choosing a response that serves both the immediate moment and the longer relationships at stake.
Failure Modes
Four Predictable Substitutions
When emotional intelligence is weak, these moments fail in predictable ways. Failure becomes blame. The postmortem turns into an inquest. And the next problem gets reported later than it should be. Difficult news becomes a transactional announcement. Delivered efficiently, and remembered by everyone who watched it happen. Challenge becomes defensiveness, and the person who raised it learns what that cost them. Conflict becomes either avoidance or escalation, and both leave the disagreement in place. The cumulative effect over a career is substantial. A leader who handles a handful of these badly each year builds a particular environment. Careful behaviour. Withheld information. Quiet attrition. And the damage is rarely traceable to any single dramatic event. It is the pattern, accumulating quietly, that does the work.
Case
The CEO Who Could Not Hear
A technology company's chief executive illustrates the cost at senior level. He was widely regarded as brilliant, and on most measures was an effective leader. The company had grown sharply under his tenure. Strategy was sound. Execution was disciplined. Financial performance was strong. Over two years, the executive team began to erode. Two senior leaders left for competitors. A long-serving finance chief retired earlier than expected. And internal surveys showed engagement in the executive group falling sharply. An external coach engaged by the board identified the pattern. The chief executive, fluent in strategy and operations, was poor at receiving challenge. Executives who pushed back found themselves slowly marginalised. Not through any explicit action, but through a cooling that took six to nine months to become visible. He was unaware of the pattern, and that unawareness was the central problem. With coaching, he learned to recognise his reaction to challenge, name it, and choose differently. Within eighteen months the executive team had stabilised.
Consolidate
Built by Repetition, Not by Instruction
Development follows a recurring pattern, identified by Goleman, Boyatzis and others. It begins with honest feedback from people who can see what you cannot. Peers, subordinates, coaches. And specifically about emotional impact, not only technical performance. It continues with deliberate practice of new behaviours in real situations. Supported by reflection afterwards on what worked and what did not. And it is sustained by an environment where the new behaviours are reinforced rather than punished. That last condition is a genuine difficulty in some organisational cultures, and worth naming. One practical discipline is the weekly audit. Fifteen minutes, three questions. What were the emotionally weighted moments this week? How did I respond to each, and was that the response I intended? And what did I learn about my characteristic reactions that I would practise differently? It sounds trivial, and it outperforms far more elaborate development programmes. Because this capacity is built through small repeated reflection on real experience. It is built over years rather than weeks, and the gains are not always visible to the leader. One reward of leading well is finding that what you once found difficult has become routine.
About Foundations of Leadership at UPI Study
Foundations of Leadership (Business 205) is a self-paced online course of 90 video lessons in 12 chapters, from the roots of leadership theory and the trait, situational and transformational approaches to power, decision-making, communication, teams, conflict, diversity and global leadership. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB
Why take it here
Why students take Foundations of Leadership with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Foundations of Leadership carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Emotional Intelligence as a Leadership Asset
What is emotional intelligence in leadership?
What are the four domains of emotional intelligence?
Is emotional intelligence the same as being nice or having a good personality?
How can a leader improve their emotional intelligence?
About the Foundations of Leadership course
How many college credits is Foundations of Leadership?
How much does Foundations of Leadership cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Foundations of Leadership take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Foundations of Leadership.
90 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →