Divergent Developmental Pathways, Autism Characteristics, and Learning Considerations

UPI Study › Courses › Abnormal Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 21.2 Free with a free account

Divergent Developmental Pathways, Autism Characteristics, and Learning Considerations

Abnormal Psychology · Chapter 21: Developmental Disorders Across the LifespanSection 21.2 · lesson 80 of 9719 min · free with a free account

← Overview of Developmental Psychopathology and Psychological Growth in Children and AdolescentsNext lesson: ADHD, Diagnostic Criteria, Behavioral Management, and Giftedness in Education →

Earn 3 college credits for Abnormal PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 180 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Abnormal Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Differences in style and processing - and environments that fit or don't.

  • Describe autism as classified, and why the categories were consolidated
  • Explain the double empathy problem, masking, and sensory differences
  • Compare the neurodiversity and clinical framings fairly
  • Describe assessment and support aimed at the person's own wellbeing

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (2,491 words). Read along, or search it.

Developmental Disorders Across the Lifespan

Autism and Divergent Developmental Pathways

This section covers divergent developmental pathways, with autism at its center. We look at how autism is classified and why the categories changed, at social communication and the double empathy problem, and at masking and sensory differences. We compare the neurodiversity and clinical framings fairly, and finish with assessment, support, and two composite cases.

Before You Begin

The Most Consequential Misinformation First

One statement belongs at the outset, because it is the most consequential piece of misinformation in this area. Vaccines do not cause autism. The study that claimed a link was fraudulent and was retracted, and its author was removed from the medical register. The claim has been examined repeatedly in very large studies, and it is not supported. The resulting harm, falling vaccination rates and outbreaks of preventable disease, was substantial, and is ongoing. On language. Many autistic people prefer identity-first language, autistic person rather than person with autism. Others prefer person-first. This section uses identity-first by default, but individual preference governs. And functioning labels are not used. High-functioning obscures real support needs, and low-functioning obscures capability. The current preference is to describe specific support needs, in specific areas. As always, this is educational, and not a basis for diagnosing yourself or anyone else, including a child.

Terminology and History

Several Categories Became One Spectrum

Earlier classifications separated several categories, including autistic disorder and Asperger disorder, distinguished largely by early language and cognitive level. The current American classification consolidated them into a single autism spectrum disorder, with severity described by support needs. The reasoning was that the separate categories were not reliably distinguished. Which label a person got depended substantially on who assessed them. And the evidence suggested a continuum. The strongest objection came from people who identified with a removed label. A community had formed around it, and its removal felt like an identity being taken away. Others worried that one diagnosis covering such a varied population conveys less information, and that services may allocate support by label rather than by need. Neither objection has been resolved.

As Classified

2 Domains, From Early Development

In paraphrase, the diagnosis requires persistent differences in social communication and interaction, across contexts. In reciprocity, in nonverbal communication, and in developing and understanding relationships. It also requires restricted and repetitive patterns. Repetitive movement or speech, insistence on sameness, highly focused interests, and differences in sensory processing. The characteristics must be present from early development. But they may only become fully apparent when social demands exceed capacity. That is why late diagnosis is common, and consistent with the criteria. They must cause functional impact, and not be better explained by intellectual disability alone. Severity is described as levels of support needed, in each domain separately. Those levels describe support required, not a person. And they change with environment, age, and what is being asked of the person.

Social Communication

Differences in Style - Not Absent Desire

Social communication characteristics are best described as differences in style and processing, not as an absence of desire for connection. That is the most important framing point here. Conversation may have a different rhythm, with more direct exchange of information, and less of the small talk whose function is social. Nonverbal communication may differ, in eye contact, gesture, and tone. Many autistic people say reduced eye contact makes concentration easier, which makes it a strategy, not a deficit. Relationships may be harder, and here the framing matters most. Many autistic people want friendship, and find the conventional route to it opaque or exhausting. That is very different from not wanting it. Three stereotypes need direct correction. Autistic people do not lack emotion. Their emotional experience is present, and often intense. They do not lack empathy. Recognizing another's state differs from caring about it, and many describe strong responses to others' distress. And they do not lack inner life.

The Double Empathy Problem

Misunderstanding Runs Both Ways

The double empathy problem was set out by Damian Milton in twenty-twelve. It proposes that misunderstanding between autistic and non-autistic people is mutual, not a one-sided deficit. Both find it hard to read someone whose communication style differs from their own. The conventional framing records this asymmetrically, simply because non-autistic people are the majority. This is a serious position with evidence. Information transfers as efficiently between autistic people as between non-autistic people, and less efficiently in mixed pairs. That is what a mutual-mismatch account predicts. Non-autistic observers also form less favorable impressions of autistic people from brief exposure, and the effect is smaller when they know about autism. So part of the social difficulty is generated by the perceiver. The clinical implication is substantial. If the difficulty is relational, interventions aimed only at changing the autistic person address half the problem at most.

Table 21.2.1

Characteristics Serve a Function

Almost every characteristic in this domain serves a purpose for the person. Repetitive movement, often called stimming, supports regulation. It reduces distress, manages sensory input, and helps focus. Suppressing it removes a regulation strategy without replacing it. Repetitive speech may serve communication, regulation, or processing. Insistence on sameness reduces a genuinely higher processing load, rather than being rigidity for its own sake. Focused interests bring enjoyment, expertise, and connection. The same depth of engagement in a non-autistic person is called dedication. And sensory differences are not a strategy at all. They are differences in processing, and they are systematically underestimated by others. Hypersensitivity means ordinary input, like fluorescent lighting or background noise, feels intense or painful. A person may be managing continuous discomfort in a supermarket or waiting room, while appearing merely quiet. Almost every conventional response aims at removing these characteristics, which takes away the function, and leaves the need behind.

Masking and Camouflaging

Coping on the Outside, Effort Inside

Masking, also called camouflaging, is the effortful suppression of autistic characteristics, and the deliberate performance of expected social behavior. It can mean rehearsing conversations, forcing eye contact at a cost, imitating others' expressions, suppressing repetitive movement, and concealing sensory distress. Everything an observer can see is the performance. The person appears to be coping, and the effort behind that appearance is invisible. Masking is exhausting, and associated with poorer mental health. It often produces a pattern of holding together through a school or work day, and being overwhelmed afterward. Families often read that as home being the problem, when home is simply where the mask comes off. And it delays diagnosis directly. The criteria describe observable behavior, and masking exists to alter observable behavior. An assessment in an unfamiliar clinic room, where masking is most active, can miss the person entirely.

In the Clinic

Why Girls and Women Are Diagnosed Later

Autistic girls and women are diagnosed later and less often, and none of the reasons is that girls are less often autistic. The criteria were derived largely from studies of boys. Masking is more common, and often more effective, in girls and women. Focused interests on conventional subjects attract no attention. Referral follows disruption, so a quiet, compliant, struggling child is not referred. And anxiety, depression, and eating disorders are often identified first. They are frequently genuinely present, which can close the question too early. More adults are now diagnosed later in life, often after a child's diagnosis prompts recognition. The requirement is that characteristics were present in early development, not that they were recognized then. Co-occurring conditions, like anxiety, depression, ADHD, epilepsy, and sleep difficulty, often drive presentation to services. Treating anxiety without addressing the sensory and environmental load behind it treats the symptom, and leaves the cause.

Table 21.2.2

2 Framings - More Agreement Than It Seems

Two framings of autism are held seriously, including by autistic people themselves. The neurodiversity perspective sees a natural variation in human neurology, a different way of processing, not a defective version of a standard one. The clinical framing sees a condition that can substantially impair functioning. On where difficulty comes from, the social model points to the interaction between a person and an environment built without them in mind. The medical model points to the condition itself. On what should change, one emphasizes environment and attitudes, and the other support, skills, and treatment. Each raises concerns. The clinical framing may pathologize difference, and has justified harmful interventions. The neurodiversity framing may understate very substantial support needs. Now read the last column. Both agree the characteristics are real, early, and not chosen, that environment matters, and that support is needed. And both note that people with the highest support needs are least represented in the debate. The disagreement concentrates on language, emphasis, and the aim of intervention.

Figure 21.2.3

The Same Characteristics in 2 Environments

Here is what the social model claims, in a form that can be checked. On both sides, the same autistic characteristics. On the left, an unadjusted environment, with noise, flickering light, and sudden change, produces substantial difficulty. On the right, an adjusted environment, predictable and sensory-accommodated, produces much less difficulty. Nothing about the person differs between the panels. The amount of difficulty does. A defensible position takes this seriously, without claiming all difficulty is environmental. Sensory pain is not created by attitudes, and some support needs persist in any environment.

Interventions Aimed at Elimination

A Debate Held by People With Experience

Autism is not a disease to be cured, and this course does not present it as one. Approaches whose aim is to make an autistic person indistinguishable from non-autistic peers, rather than to support their functioning and wellbeing, are contested, and have been criticized by autistic adults. The concerns are that such approaches teach masking, with its costs. That historical forms used aversive methods now widely rejected. That compliance training may reduce a person's capacity to refuse. And that some adults report lasting distress. The counter-position is also stated fairly. Proponents argue that contemporary practice differs substantially from those historical forms, and that some approaches have evidence for specific skills, including communication. Families of people with very substantial support needs often value them, and critics' experience may reflect older practice. Both positions are held by people with direct experience, and this course does not resolve the debate.

Causation

Strongly Heritable - and 2 Firm Negatives

The heritable contribution to autism is strong, among the strongest for any condition in this course. That is a population statement about variance, not a statement about mechanism in any individual. The architecture is polygenic. There is no single autism gene, and no genetic test. Prenatal factors, including advanced parental age, are named only as associations. No single cause is established. Two negatives matter as much. Parenting does not cause autism. The historical claim that it did caused enormous and entirely unwarranted harm to families, and no evidence supports it. And vaccines do not cause autism. The original study was fraudulent and retracted, and the public health consequences of the claim have been serious.

Assessment

Adults, and a Differential That's Rarely Either-Or

Assessment draws on developmental history, observation across settings, and several informants, treating disagreement as data. No instrument content appears in this course. Assessing adults is specifically difficult. Early history may be unobtainable, masking hides the presentation, and years of compensation obscure the characteristics. So self-report about internal experience, the effort involved, the sensory load, and what social interaction costs, carries more weight than observed behavior. Social anxiety can look similar. But in social anxiety, the person understands social expectations and fears evaluation. In autism, the difficulty concerns processing social information itself, from early development. Language disorder lacks the restricted and repetitive domain. Attachment-related difficulty changes with the caregiving environment. And with intellectual disability, the autism diagnosis requires differences beyond what the developmental level would explain. Every one of these can co-occur with autism. The differential here is rarely either-or.

Support

Wellbeing on the Person's Own Terms

The aim of support is functioning and wellbeing on the person's own terms, not the elimination of autistic characteristics. That sentence governs everything here. Communication support includes augmentative and alternative communication where speech is not the person's most effective means. It supplements speech, and does not impede its development. Environmental adjustment means predictability, advance notice of change, structure, and less unnecessary demand. Sensory accommodation is often the single most effective adjustment, and among the cheapest. Skills teaching is support where the person wants it. Teaching someone to appear less autistic because others prefer it is not the same thing. Clinical environments are among the least accommodating. So ask what would make the appointment easier before it starts, and send information in advance about what will happen. Do not require eye contact, or read its absence as evasion. Ask direct questions, allow processing time, and do not fill silence. And offer an alternative to the waiting room. It can decide whether some people attend at all.

Education and Adulthood

Outcomes Depend on Fit

In education, inclusive versus specialist provision is a genuine debate. For inclusion, participation is a rights matter, and segregation has a poor history. For specialist provision, there is expertise and an adapted environment, and inclusion without support is just placement in a setting that does not work. A defensible position is that the binary is badly framed. What matters is whether the setting is adequately resourced and adjusted for the individual. Transitions are consistently the hardest points, and need specific planning. In adulthood, employment rates among autistic people are low everywhere studied. The reasons are largely about process and environment, not capability. Recruitment relies on interviews, which assess social presentation rather than job capacity. Open-plan offices are sensorily demanding. And adult services are scarcer than children's, so support is often lost at eighteen. The finding to carry forward is that outcomes depend heavily on environmental fit and support, not on characteristics alone.

Case Vignette 1 (Composite)

Priya: Diagnosed Late After Years of Masking

Now two composite cases, constructed for instruction. Priya is thirty-four. She sought assessment after her son was diagnosed, and she recognized much of the description in herself. Her mother describes her as a quiet, precise child, happiest alone with books, with an intense interest in horses from six to fourteen that nobody thought unusual. She achieved well at school, and no concerns were raised. She has left a series of jobs after about two years each, exhausted. She needs hours alone after any social occasion, and has been treated for anxiety twice, and depression once. Every mechanism applies. She masked effectively. Her interest was conventional. She was compliant and successful, so no adult was inconvenienced. And her anxiety and depression, genuinely present, closed the question. Her mother's account supplied the early evidence. Priya's own account supplied what observation cannot, the effort each interaction costs, and the sensory load she has been managing. Her job history is sustained masking, invisible from outside, until it becomes unsustainable. She was not failing at the work.

Case Vignette 2 (Composite)

Ewan: Resolved Through Adjustment

Ewan is eight, and autistic, diagnosed at five. His school reported escalating distress and difficulty in class, and asked about additional support. Instead of describing the behavior, the assessment established when and where it happened. Distress clustered at transitions between lessons, in the dining hall, and in afternoon lessons in one particular room. The transitions were unannounced and rushed. The dining hall was loud, echoing, and crowded. And the afternoon room had fluorescent lighting that flickered audibly, which staff had not noticed, and Ewan could not put into words. The adjustments were a visual timetable with advance warning, leaving lessons a minute early through quieter corridors, an alternative to the dining hall, repaired lighting, and a low-stimulation space. None needed extra staff. His distress fell substantially, and his attendance recovered. Nothing about Ewan changed. The request was for support aimed at the child, and the effective intervention was aimed at the setting.

About Abnormal Psychology at UPI Study

Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) is a self-paced online course of 97 video lessons in 25 chapters, from the main theoretical perspectives and clinical assessment to anxiety, mood, psychotic and personality disorders, treatment and the law. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Why take it here

Why students take Abnormal Psychology with UPI Study

Understand mental health disordersAbnormal Psychology covers how psychological disorders are defined, assessed, explained and treated. It is a core course for psychology majors and useful for nursing, social work, counseling and criminal justice.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Abnormal Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Divergent Developmental Pathways, Autism Characteristics, and Learning Considerations

Why was Asperger's disorder merged into autism spectrum disorder?
The separate categories, such as autistic disorder and Asperger disorder, were merged because clinicians could not distinguish them reliably and the evidence pointed to a continuum. Which label a person received depended heavily on who assessed them. The current American classification uses one autism spectrum disorder diagnosis, with severity described by support needed. Critics note that people lost a label they identified with and that one broad diagnosis may convey less information.
What is the double empathy problem in autism?
The double empathy problem, set out by Damian Milton in 2012, proposes that misunderstanding between autistic and non-autistic people is mutual rather than a one-sided autistic deficit. Each group finds it hard to read someone whose communication style differs from their own. Research supports this: information passes as efficiently between two autistic people as between two non-autistic people, but less efficiently in mixed pairs.
What is autistic masking, and why can it delay a diagnosis?
Masking, or camouflaging, is the effortful suppression of autistic characteristics and the deliberate performance of expected social behavior, such as rehearsing conversations or forcing eye contact. It is exhausting and linked to poorer mental health. Because diagnostic criteria rely on observable behavior, and masking exists to change observable behavior, an assessment can miss the person. Masking is more common in girls and women, one reason they are diagnosed later.
Do vaccines or parenting cause autism?
No, neither vaccines nor parenting causes autism. The study that claimed a vaccine link was fraudulent and retracted, and very large studies have found no link. The old claim that cold parenting caused autism has no supporting evidence and harmed many families. Autism is strongly heritable with a polygenic architecture, meaning many genes contribute, and there is no single autism gene or genetic test.

About the Abnormal Psychology course

How many college credits is Abnormal Psychology?
Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Abnormal Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 97 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Abnormal Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 97 lessons total about 24 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Abnormal Psychology.

97 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Abnormal Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Abnormal Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →